615
edits
Luthic: Difference between revisions
m
→Bolognese Standard Luthic
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) |
Lëtzelúcia (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4,620: | Line 4,620: | ||
===Bolognese Standard Luthic=== | ===Bolognese Standard Luthic=== | ||
Although very similar to Ravennese Standard Luthic, there is noticeable influence from the regional [[w:Bolognese dialect|Bolognese dialects]]: | <div style="float:right; width:35%; padding:15px; background: #f5f8ff; border: 1px solid blue; margin-left:8px; margin-right:8px;margin-bottom:15px; text-align:center; font-size: small"> | ||
:''"… I say, then, that perhaps those are not wrong who claim that the Bolognese speak a more beautiful language than most, especially since they take many features of their own speech from that of the people who live around them, in Imola, Ferrara and Modena I believe that everybody does this with respect to his own neighbours.... So the above-mentioned citizens of Bologna take a soft, yielding quality from those of Imola, and from the people of Ferrara and Modena, on the other hand, a certain abruptness which is more typical of the Lombards.... If, then, the Bolognese take from all sides, as I have said, it seems reasonable to suggest that their language, tempered by the combination of opposites mentioned above, should achieve a praiseworthy degree of elegance; and this, in my opinion, is beyond doubt true."''<br/> ([[w:Dante Alighieri|Dante Alighieri]], [[w:De vulgari eloquentia|''De vulgari eloquentia'']] - ''Liber I'', xv, 2-5) | |||
</div> | |||
Although very similar to Ravennese Standard Luthic, there is noticeable influence from the regional [[w:Bolognese dialect|Bolognese dialects]], dialects of [[w:Emilian dialects|Emilian]], one of the [[w:Gallo-Italic|Gallo-Italic]] languages of the [[w:Romance languages|Romance]] family: | |||
* /h ç/ are fully lost, however spelling remains the same; | * /h ç/ are fully lost, however spelling remains the same; | ||