User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 236: Line 236:
Their forms have become more similar to each other due to analogy.  
Their forms have become more similar to each other due to analogy.  


Knench maintains a distinction between independent and dependent forms for finite verbs, like Old Irish. The independent forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' 'not', ''xi'' 'that', or ''śə'' '(emphatic preverb, from the infinitive absolute *3aśū of *3aśō 'to do')' requires the dependent form. Dependent past forms and future forms look similar to independent future forms and past forms, but can be a little different since they may lack ''w-'' or ''u-''.
Knench maintains a distinction between independent and dependent forms for finite verbs, like Old Irish. The independent forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' 'not', ''xi'' 'that', or ''śə'' '(emphatic preverb, from the infinitive absolute *3aśū of *3aśō 'to do')' requires the dependent form. Dependent past forms and future forms are formally identical to independent future forms and past forms, respectively, except forms of ''juð'' 'to be' which are a little different from the independent forms.


Even verbs with finite forms are defective verbs, since finite forms are always perfective (except forms of ''juð''). To express the imperfective with these verbs, you still have to use the copula + bə + VN construction. The negator ''lu'' only negates finite verbs.
Even verbs with finite forms are defective verbs, since finite forms are always perfective (except forms of ''juð''). To express the imperfective with these verbs, you still have to use the copula + bə + VN construction. The negator ''lu'' only negates finite verbs.
Line 295: Line 295:
! past
! past
| ''wé i''
| ''wé i''
| ''uþé tə''
| ''þé tə''
| ''uþí ti''
| ''þí ti''
| ''ujé u''
| ''u''
| ''uþé oj''
| ''þé oj''
| ''uné nu''
| ''nu''
| ''uþú tim''
| ''þú tim''
| ''ujú'm''
| '''m''
|-
|-
!rowspan=2| ''fluð''  
!rowspan=2| ''fluð''  
Line 357: Line 357:
|-
|-
! past pfv.
! past pfv.
| ''la i''
| ''lax i''
| ''tla tə''
| ''tlax tə''
| ''tli ti''
| ''tlej ti''
| ''ula u''
| ''lax u''
| ''tla oj''
| ''tlax oj''
| ''unla nu''
| ''lax nu''
| ''tlaw tim''
| ''tlaw tim''
| ''law'm''
| ''law'm''
Line 378: Line 378:
|-
|-
! past pfv.
! past pfv.
| ''ka i''
| ''kax i''
| ''tka tə''
| ''tkax tə''
| ''tki ti''
| ''tkaj ti''
| ''uka u''
| ''kax u''
| ''tka oj''
| ''tkax oj''
| ''unka nu''
| ''kax nu''
| ''tkaw tim''
| ''tkaw tim''
| ''ukaw'm''
| ''kaw'm''
|-
|-
!rowspan=2| ''ðeht''
!rowspan=2| ''ðeht''
Line 399: Line 399:
|-  
|-  
! past pfv.
! past pfv.
| ''na i''
| ''nax i''
| ''tna tə''
| ''tnax tə''
| ''tna ti''
| ''tnaj ti''
| ''una u''
| ''nax u''
| ''tna oj''
| ''tnax oj''
| ''na nu''
| ''nax nu''
| ''tnaw tim''
| ''tnaw tim''
| ''unaw'm''
| ''naw'm''
|}
|}
(Todo: Justify forms)
(Todo: Justify forms)
138,726

edits