User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Ancient: Difference between revisions

m
Line 463: Line 463:
*Emphatic future: ''wājā́'' + imperfect (remnant of BH ''*wahayā'', waw-consecutive + suffix conjugation)
*Emphatic future: ''wājā́'' + imperfect (remnant of BH ''*wahayā'', waw-consecutive + suffix conjugation)
*Jussive: ''jế'' 'let it be' + imperfect
*Jussive: ''jế'' 'let it be' + imperfect
===Waw-consecutive===
The Biblical Hebrew distinction between waw-preterite and perfect, and waw-stative and future, became a purely syntactic one: The waw-preterite is used as the default past tense form, and the perfect is used when pre-verbal particle is attached (such as ''lō'' 'not', ''him'' 'if', ''ha-'' 'question particle', ''hinni'' 'but'). This is similar to Old Irish verbal allomorphy between independent and dependent forms.
*''wajjṓγal'' = he ate
*''lō haγal'' = he did not eat
===Uses of the infinitive construct===
===Uses of the infinitive construct===
Many of the Biblical or quasi-Biblical uses of the infinitive construct were retained:
Many of the Biblical or quasi-Biblical uses of the infinitive construct were retained:
138,726

edits