138,726
edits
m (→Verbs) |
m (→Verbs) |
||
Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
Verbs inherited the following forms from Biblical Hebrew: | Verbs inherited the following forms from Biblical Hebrew: | ||
* | *preterite independent (from the BH waw-consecutive preterite), distinguished from the imperfect by stress | ||
*imperfect independent (from the BH waw-consecutive imperfect) | *imperfect independent (from the BH waw-consecutive imperfect) | ||
* | *preterite dependent (from the BH perfect) | ||
*imperfect dependent (from the BH imperfect) | *imperfect dependent (from the BH imperfect) | ||
*imperative | *imperative | ||
Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
*jussive (only survives in ''hajā'' 'to be') | *jussive (only survives in ''hajā'' 'to be') | ||
*infinitive absolute | *infinitive absolute | ||
The Biblical Hebrew distinction between waw-preterite and perfect, and waw-stative and future, became a purely syntactic one: The waw-consecutive is used as the default form, and the non-waw forms are used when pre-verbal particle is attached (such as ''lō'' 'not', ''him'' 'if', ''ha-'' 'question particle', ''hinni'' 'but'). This is similar to Old Irish verbal allomorphy between independent and dependent forms. | The Biblical Hebrew distinction between waw-preterite and perfect, and waw-stative and future, became a purely syntactic one: The waw-consecutive is used as the default form, and the non-waw forms are used when pre-verbal particle is attached (such as ''lō'' 'not', ''him'' 'if', ''ha-'' 'question particle', ''hinni'' 'but'). This is similar to Old Irish verbal allomorphy between independent and dependent forms. | ||
Line 218: | Line 217: | ||
! || independent || dependent | ! || independent || dependent | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! preterite | ||
| ''wajjṓγal''<br/>'he ate' || ''lō haγál''<br/>'he did not eat' | | ''wajjṓγal''<br/>'he ate' || ''lō haγál''<br/>'he did not eat' | ||
|- | |- |
edits