138,726
edits
User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Ancient: Difference between revisions
User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Ancient (view source)
Revision as of 12:38, 17 February 2020
, 17 February 2020no edit summary
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 686: | Line 686: | ||
===Uses of the infinitive construct=== | ===Uses of the infinitive construct=== | ||
Many of the Biblical or quasi-Biblical uses of the infinitive construct were retained: | Many of the Biblical or quasi-Biblical uses of the infinitive construct were retained: | ||
#la + IC may be used to indicate purpose | #la + IC may be used to indicate purpose | ||
#there were many verbs after which either la + IC or bare IC were commonly used | #there were many verbs after which either la + IC or bare IC were commonly used | ||
#ba- or xa- + IC + NOUN = "when possessor VERBs/VERBed..." | #ba- or xa- + IC + NOUN = "when possessor VERBs/VERBed..." | ||
#*more generally IC + NOUN serves to point to an action in a tenseless way, like "for NOUN to VERB" or subordinate clauses where English would use a tensed verb form. | #*more generally IC + NOUN serves to point to an action in a tenseless way, like "for NOUN to VERB", or subordinate clauses where English would use a tensed verb form. | ||
#IC was often used to give further descriptions of what someone did in addition to the main verb, could often be translated as "X-ing" in sentences | #IC was often used to give further descriptions of what someone did in addition to the main verb, could often be translated as "X-ing" in sentences | ||