User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Ancient: Difference between revisions

User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Ancient (view source)

1 byte removed , 2 April 2022

m

138,726

edits

@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 The definite article was ''ʔaC-'' (~ Biblical Hebrew ''*haC-''). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ''ʔō-''.
-Unstressed ''-ō'' corresponds to the Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ṓ''. Other possible feminine endings are ''-t'', ''-θ'' or ''-δ''. Eventually stress shifted away from gender/number suffixes across the board: The regular masculine and feminine plural endings were unstressed ''-īm'' and unstressed ''-ūδ'', ~ Biblical Hebrew ''*-ī́m'' and ''*-ṓt''.
+Unstressed ''-ō'' corresponds to the Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā''. Other possible feminine endings are ''-t'', ''-θ'' or ''-δ''. Eventually stress shifted away from gender/number suffixes across the board: The regular masculine and feminine plural endings were unstressed ''-īm'' and unstressed ''-ūδ'', ~ Biblical Hebrew ''*-ī́m'' and ''*-ṓt''.
 Often ''-ō'' is found where Hebrew has ''-t''.