Chlouvānem/Morphology: Difference between revisions

m
Line 636: Line 636:
The ''h-paradigm'' used by nouns in ''-ah'' and ''-āh'' is substantially identical to the regular 1-h one, except for the exessive, dative, ablative, locative, and instrumental plural which have ''-a-'' instead of ''-e-'' as a linking vowel and, for some nouns, the genitive singular ''(see table note 1)''.
The ''h-paradigm'' used by nouns in ''-ah'' and ''-āh'' is substantially identical to the regular 1-h one, except for the exessive, dative, ablative, locative, and instrumental plural which have ''-a-'' instead of ''-e-'' as a linking vowel and, for some nouns, the genitive singular ''(see table note 1)''.
{{col-end}}
{{col-end}}
Notes:
Table notes:
# ''-ьa'', ''-ьā'', ''-ya'', and ''-yā'' nouns form the genitive singular in ''-ei'' (e.g. ''laliā'' "night" → ''lalei''). Nouns in ''-ьah'', ''-ьāh'', ''-yah'', and ''-yāh'', however, have the regular ending (e.g. ''yamyah'' "fog" → ''yamyi'').
# ''-ьa'', ''-ьā'', ''-ya'', and ''-yā'' nouns form the genitive singular in ''-ei'' (e.g. ''laliā'' "night" → ''lalei''). Nouns in ''-ьah'', ''-ьāh'', ''-yah'', and ''-yāh'', however, have the regular ending (e.g. ''yamyah'' "fog" → ''yamyi'').
# In older texts ''-eiva'' (e.g. ''javileiva''), today only used in literature for an archaïzing effect or to mark a character speaking with a Northern Plain pronunciation (where this form survives in the spoken language).
# In older texts ''-eiva'' (e.g. ''javileiva''), today only used in literature for an archaïzing effect or to mark a character speaking with a Northern Plain pronunciation (where this form survives in the spoken language).
8,572

edits