Contionary:in: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Oberionsynth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Oberionsynth (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==== Derived terms ==== | ==== Derived terms ==== | ||
When followed by a definite article, in is combined with the article to give the following combined forms: | When followed by a definite article, ''in'' is combined with the article to give the following combined forms: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
[[Category:Contionary]] [[Category:Reneissan prepositions]][[Category:Reneissan words]] | [[Category:Contionary]] [[Category:Reneissan prepositions]][[Category:Reneissan words]] | ||
==Skundavisk== | ==Skundavisk== |
Revision as of 15:49, 29 November 2019
Reneissan
Alternative forms
Etymology
Pronunciation
(Reneissan) IPA: /ɛ̃/
Preposition
in
- in, at
Derived terms
When followed by a definite article, in is combined with the article to give the following combined forms:
in + article | combined form |
---|---|
in + il | nel |
in + i | nei |
in + la | nella |
in + lai | nellai |
in + l' | nell' |
in + lais | nellais |
Skundavisk
Etymology
From Middle Skundavisk in, from Old Skundavisk in, from Halmisk ᛁᚾ (in), from Proto-Germanic *in.
Pronunciation
- IPA: /ɪn/
Preposition
in
- in
- Hwat doost thou in the kykne ?
- What are you doing in the kitchen ?
- Hwat doost thou in the kykne ?