5,467
edits
(→Gender) |
|||
Line 358: | Line 358: | ||
====Gender==== | ====Gender==== | ||
Vadi | The issue of gender marking in Vadi is a topic of heated debate between the schools. The Traditionalists believe that Vadi lacks gender as there is no apparent gender-marking morphology. The Šibbūru argue that the mutation system (a feature the Traditionalists deny existing) does indeed indicate gender. | ||
At least in the case of body parts, there does appear to be some sort of gender marking on special [[Vadi#Number| singulative ]] forms, which also demonstrate an interesting split on the [[Vadi#Number| number system]]. The Šibbūru believes these divergent forms suggest that Vadi at one time had a more extensive noun class system, whereas the Traditionalists believe these differentiated forms are simply fossil remnants of a long defunct gender marking. | |||
{| class="bluetable lightbluebg" | {| class="bluetable lightbluebg" |
edits