Linguifex

Eska: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Eska (view source)

Revision as of 22:34, 3 January 2021

2,753 bytes added ,  3 January 2021
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
Eska is a conlang based on Case Grammar; more specifically, it is based on Extended Case Grammar which is my particular view of Case Grammar.  Extended Case Grammar follows the Matrix Model applied by Walter Cook with a few exceptions.  In Cook's Matrix Model there are four mutually exclusive cases: Experiencer, Benefactor, Location, and Time.  To this list I add Range.  It must be noted here that both the Matrix Model and Extended Case Grammar use semantic case rather than syntactic case.  I know of no natural language that marks semantic case.
Eska is a conlang based on Case Grammar; more specifically, it is based on Extended Case Grammar which is my particular view of Case Grammar.  Extended Case Grammar follows the Matrix Model applied by Walter Cook with a few exceptions.  In Cook's Matrix Model there are four mutually exclusive cases: Experiencer, Benefactor, Location, and Time.  To this list I add Range.  It must be noted here that both the Matrix Model and Extended Case Grammar use semantic case rather than syntactic case.  I know of no natural language that marks semantic case.


In the Matrix Model and in Extended Case Grammar predicates each belong to a particular domain.  Predicates are divided into a number of domains.  A predicate that only uses Object and possibly Agent cases is said to be in the Basic Domain.  A predicate requiring the Experiencer case is said to be in the Experiential Domain.  A predicate requiring the Benefactor case is said to be in the Benefactive Domain.  A predicate requiring the Location case is said to be in the Locative Domain.  A predicate requiring the Time case is said to be in the Temporal Domain.  And a predicate requiring the Range case is said to be in the Range Domain. (The Range Domain is not used in the Matrix Model, because Cook examines a single novel for his input.  Extended Case Grammar uses dictionaries for their input, which yielded the Range Domain as well as all of the other domains.)
In the Matrix Model and in Extended Case Grammar predicates each belong to a particular domain.  Predicates are divided into a number of domains.  A predicate that only uses Object and possibly Agent cases is said to be in the Basic Domain.  A predicate requiring the Experiencer case is said to be in the Experiential Domain.  A predicate requiring the Benefactor case is said to be in the Benefactive Domain.  A predicate requiring the Location case is said to be in the Locative Domain.  A predicate requiring the Time case is said to be in the Temporal Domain.  A predicate requiring the Range case is said to be in the Range Domain.  And a predicate requiring the Comparison case is said to be in the Comparative Domain. (The Range and Comparative Domains are not used in the Matrix Model, because Cook examines a single novel for his input.  Extended Case Grammar uses dictionaries for their input, which yielded the Range Domain as well as all of the other domains.)


Predicates are also divided into three classes:  State verbs, Inchoative verbs, and Causative verbs.  (The Matrix Model calls these:  State verbs, Process verbs, and Action Verbs, respectively.)  State verbs denote an unchanging state or condition.  Examples are: be good, be tall, be old, be happy, be hungry, be sad, see, hear, have, lack, be at, be inside, be outside, be ready to walk, be on (day), weigh, and measure.  Inchoative verbs include:  get better, get taller,  become happier, get hungrier, become sadder, spy, start to hear, get, lose, arrive, enter, exit, walk, last (for time), allocate, and appropriate.  Causative verbs include:  make good, make tall, make old, make hungry, make sad, show, make hear, give, discard, take away, bring, insert, remove, walk (a dog), spend (time), add, and subtract.  State verbs are taken to be the basic form of verbs with the Inchoative and Causative verbs being derived from State verbs.  An Inchoative verb is derived from a State verb by adding the inchoative notion of becoming or changing.  A Causative verb is derived from an Inchoative verb by adding the notion of causation.  A simple example would be the verbs be hungry, become hungry, and make hungry.  '''Be hungry''' is a state verb; it denotes an unchanging state.  '''Become hungry''' is derived from '''be hungry''' by adding the notion of becoming; therefore, '''become hungry''' is an Inchoative verb.  '''Make hungry''' is derived from become by adding the notion of causing; therefore, '''make hungry''' is a Causative verb.
Predicates are also divided into three classes:  State verbs, Inchoative verbs, and Causative verbs.  (The Matrix Model calls these:  State verbs, Process verbs, and Action Verbs, respectively.)  State verbs denote an unchanging state or condition.  Examples are: be good, be tall, be old, be happy, be hungry, be sad, see, hear, have, lack, be at, be inside, be outside, be ready to walk, be on (day), weigh, and measure.  Inchoative verbs include:  get better, get taller,  become happier, get hungrier, become sadder, spy, start to hear, get, lose, arrive, enter, exit, walk, last (for time), allocate, and appropriate.  Causative verbs include:  make good, make tall, make old, make hungry, make sad, show, make hear, give, discard, take away, bring, insert, remove, walk (a dog), spend (time), add, and subtract.  State verbs are taken to be the basic form of verbs with the Inchoative and Causative verbs being derived from State verbs.  An Inchoative verb is derived from a State verb by adding the inchoative notion of becoming or changing.  A Causative verb is derived from an Inchoative verb by adding the notion of causation.  A simple example would be the verbs be hungry, become hungry, and make hungry.  '''Be hungry''' is a State verb; it denotes an unchanging state.  '''Become hungry''' is derived from '''be hungry''' by adding the notion of becoming; therefore, '''become hungry''' is an Inchoative verb.  '''Make hungry''' is derived from become by adding the notion of causing; therefore, '''make hungry''' is a Causative verb.


In the Matrix Model, Walter Cook designates '''be''' as a verb in its own right.  I disagree with him.  I view '''be''' as a predicative particle that attaches to syntactic nouns and adjectives to yield State verbs.  In Eska state predicates include '''be + complement'''. '''Become + compliment''' yields an Inchoative verb. '''Make + compliment''' yields a Causative verb.
In the Matrix Model, Walter Cook designates '''be''' as a verb in its own right.  I disagree with him.  I view '''be''' as a predicative particle that attaches to syntactic nouns and adjectives to yield State verbs.  In Eska state predicates include '''be + complement'''. '''Become + compliment''' yields an Inchoative verb. '''Make + compliment''' yields a Causative verb.
Line 24: Line 24:


Each predicate requires a number of cases.  The number of cases required by a particular predicate is called the predicates valency.  Predicates may require one, two, or three cases.  Valency is directly related to the meaning of the predicate.
Each predicate requires a number of cases.  The number of cases required by a particular predicate is called the predicates valency.  Predicates may require one, two, or three cases.  Valency is directly related to the meaning of the predicate.


''Object Case''
''Object Case''
Line 49: Line 51:


The '''dog''' weighs 70 pounds.
The '''dog''' weighs 70 pounds.


''Agent Case''
''Agent Case''
Line 69: Line 73:


The '''man''' talked to the woman.
The '''man''' talked to the woman.


''Experiencer Case''
''Experiencer Case''
Line 97: Line 103:


The '''man''' thinks about rock climbing.
The '''man''' thinks about rock climbing.


''Benefactor Case''
''Benefactor Case''
Line 119: Line 127:


The thief stole money from the '''bank'''.
The thief stole money from the '''bank'''.


''Location Case''
''Location Case''
Line 139: Line 149:


The child walks the dog '''to the park'''.
The child walks the dog '''to the park'''.


''Time Case''
''Time Case''
Line 149: Line 161:


The man spends the '''day''' with the woman.
The man spends the '''day''' with the woman.


''Range Case''
''Range Case''
Line 161: Line 175:


The man bid '''$100'''.
The man bid '''$100'''.
''Comparison Case''
The Comparison case is required by Comparative verbs.  Comparison is used by verbs such as:  '''compare''', '''contrast''', '''be the same''', '''be different''', '''be more''', and '''be less'''.
examples:
The man compares the '''apples''' to each other.
The woman contrasts the '''lemons''' with the limes.
The '''book''' is more than 400 pages.
The '''toy''' is less than the candy.




Line 199: Line 229:


The dog '''weighs''' 70 pounds.
The dog '''weighs''' 70 pounds.


''Inchoative Verbs''
''Inchoative Verbs''
Line 229: Line 261:


The woman '''allocates''' a place for the book.
The woman '''allocates''' a place for the book.


''Causative Verbs''
''Causative Verbs''
Line 277: Line 311:


Covert case roles "are sometimes or always absent from the surface structure. Covert roles may be partially covert or totally covert.  Partially covert roles are sometimes present and sometimes absent and are called deletable roles.  Totally covert roles are roles that are never present in the surface structure despite the fact that they are part of the verb's valence.  Totally covert roles include both coreferential roles and lexicalized roles" (Cook 1989:201).
Covert case roles "are sometimes or always absent from the surface structure. Covert roles may be partially covert or totally covert.  Partially covert roles are sometimes present and sometimes absent and are called deletable roles.  Totally covert roles are roles that are never present in the surface structure despite the fact that they are part of the verb's valence.  Totally covert roles include both coreferential roles and lexicalized roles" (Cook 1989:201).


''Deletable Case Roles''
''Deletable Case Roles''
Line 297: Line 333:


She told me ('''that she was sick''').
She told me ('''that she was sick''').


''Coreferential Case Roles''
''Coreferential Case Roles''
Line 317: Line 355:


Sue = Agent + moving object  Agent = Object
Sue = Agent + moving object  Agent = Object


''Lexicalized Case Roles''
''Lexicalized Case Roles''
Line 327: Line 367:




''consonants''
 
''Consonants''


p t k b d f v s z m n l r y w j as in English
p t k b d f v s z m n l r y w j as in English
Line 339: Line 380:
h pronounce like th in '''th'''in
h pronounce like th in '''th'''in


''vowels''
 
 
''Vowels''


a e i o u as in Spanish
a e i o u as in Spanish


ay 


oy
''Diphthongs''
 
ay  l'''i'''ke  m'''y'''
 
oy t'''oy'''  s'''oi'''l
 
au  '''ow'''  c'''ou'''ch
 


au


Stress
''Stress''


Penultimate stress when word ends in a vowel.
Penultimate stress when word ends in a vowel.
Line 360: Line 408:


Nominals are marked for case in Eska.  Object case takes the suffix -a.  Dative case takes the suffix -i  Agent case takes the suffix -o.
Nominals are marked for case in Eska.  Object case takes the suffix -a.  Dative case takes the suffix -i  Agent case takes the suffix -o.


''Object Case''
''Object Case''
Line 382: Line 432:


Sac az talane ap '''mana'''.  The man is tall.
Sac az talane ap '''mana'''.  The man is tall.


''Agent Case''
''Agent Case''
Line 404: Line 456:


The Dative case is a hypercase of mutually exclusive cases including: Experiencer, Benefactor, Location, Time, and Range.  The Experiencer case occurs with the Experiential Domain.  The Benefactor case occurs with the Benefactive Domain. The Location case occurs with the Locative Domain.  The Time case occurs with the Temporal Domain.  And the Range case occurs with the Range Domain.
The Dative case is a hypercase of mutually exclusive cases including: Experiencer, Benefactor, Location, Time, and Range.  The Experiencer case occurs with the Experiential Domain.  The Benefactor case occurs with the Benefactive Domain. The Location case occurs with the Locative Domain.  The Time case occurs with the Temporal Domain.  And the Range case occurs with the Range Domain.


''Experiencer Case''
''Experiencer Case''
Line 424: Line 478:


Sac az bilivine ip '''mani''' Goda.  The man believes in God.
Sac az bilivine ip '''mani''' Goda.  The man believes in God.




Line 430: Line 485:
examples:
examples:


Sac iz baytile op mano kara '''dileri'''.  The man bought a car from a dealer.
Sac iz bayzile op mano kara '''dileri'''.  The man bought a car from a dealer.


Sac iz seline op selmiso ap dresa ip '''misi'''.  The saleswoman sold the dress to a woman.
Sac iz seline op selmiso ap dresa ip '''misi'''.  The saleswoman sold the dress to a woman.
Line 443: Line 498:


Sac az azine ip '''mani''' buka.  The man has a book.
Sac az azine ip '''mani''' buka.  The man has a book.


''Location Case''
''Location Case''
Line 457: Line 514:


Sac iz wakise ap kida '''froparki'''.  The child walked from the park.
Sac iz wakise ap kida '''froparki'''.  The child walked from the park.


''Time Case''
''Time Case''
Line 465: Line 524:


Sac iz okurise festiva '''yesti'''.  The party happened yesterday.
Sac iz okurise festiva '''yesti'''.  The party happened yesterday.


''Range Case''
''Range Case''
Line 473: Line 534:


Sac az kostine ap buka dekip '''dolari'''.  The book costs ten dollars.
Sac az kostine ap buka dekip '''dolari'''.  The book costs ten dollars.
''Comparative Case''
examples:
Sac iz kamperine op mano ip '''apli''' bala.  The man compared the apple to a ball.
Sac iz kotrine op miso ip '''dogi''' kata.  The woman contrasted the dog to a cat.




Line 487: Line 558:


Sac iz bitane oap '''manoa''' hamaror.  The man hit himself with a hammer.
Sac iz bitane oap '''manoa''' hamaror.  The man hit himself with a hammer.




Line 526: Line 598:


Predicate suffixes appear in this order:  Dative Status + Class + (Main or Subordinate Predicate) + (Case).  Reduced Predicates take these suffixes:  Case + Class.
Predicate suffixes appear in this order:  Dative Status + Class + (Main or Subordinate Predicate) + (Case).  Reduced Predicates take these suffixes:  Case + Class.




Line 539: Line 612:


Sac iz '''smelise''' ip misi flora.  The woman smelled a flower.
Sac iz '''smelise''' ip misi flora.  The woman smelled a flower.


''Subordinate Predicates''
''Subordinate Predicates''
Line 548: Line 623:
Sac iz noj vidise ip mani nobada, '''wakisu''' ha awi.  The man didn't see anybody, (so) he walked away.
Sac iz noj vidise ip mani nobada, '''wakisu''' ha awi.  The man didn't see anybody, (so) he walked away.


Embedded Predicates
 
 
''Embedded Predicates''


examples:
examples:
Line 556: Line 633:
Sac iz  
Sac iz  


Reduced Predicates
 
 
''Reduced Predicates''


Reduced Predicates translate as a relative clause.  They function similar to an adjective in English.
Reduced Predicates translate as a relative clause.  They function similar to an adjective in English.
Line 619: Line 698:


A clause is divided into a Proposition and a Modality.  The above sections have dealt exclusively with the Proposition.  Now we will focus on the Modality.  The Modality includes:  Modal nominals, Negative, Tense, Mood, Aspect, Voice, Performatives, Manner, Temporals, and Frequency.
A clause is divided into a Proposition and a Modality.  The above sections have dealt exclusively with the Proposition.  Now we will focus on the Modality.  The Modality includes:  Modal nominals, Negative, Tense, Mood, Aspect, Voice, Performatives, Manner, Temporals, and Frequency.


'''Modal Nominals'''
'''Modal Nominals'''


Modal Nominals are nominals that are not necessary for a clause to be grammatical.  They include: Instrument, Topic, Commitative and Modal Dative cases.
Modal Nominals are nominals that are not necessary for a clause to be grammatical.  They include: Genitive, Instrument, Topic, Commitative and Modal Dative cases.
 
 
 
''Genitive''
 
The Genitive case is called the possessive in English.  In Eska a nominal in the Genitive is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''azinu''' (to have).  The possessed nominal is marked by the suffix -v to show that it is a fronted argument.
 
examples:
 
Sac iz tekile iop misio bukav '''azinu mini'''.  The woman took my book.
 
Sac iz bayzile op mano karav '''azinu misi'''.  The man bought the woman's car.
 
 


''Instrument''
''Instrument''


The Instrument case takes the suffix -or.  It denotes an instrument or means of completing an action.  It can be a tool such as a hammer that is used to pound in a nail.  It can be a weapon used to hurt or kill someone.  It can be the method of completing an action.
The Instrument case is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''uzanu''' (to use).  It denotes an instrument or means of completing an action.  It can be a tool such as a hammer that is used to pound in a nail.  It can be a weapon used to hurt or kill someone.  It can be the method of completing an action.


examples:
examples:


Sac iz bitane op mano ap misa '''clubor'''.  The man clubbed the woman.  (The man hit the woman with a club.)
Sac iz bitane op mano ap misa '''uzanu cluba'''.  The man clubbed the woman.  (The man hit the woman using a club.)
 
Sac iz bitane op mano ap mana '''uzanu fista'''.  The man punched another man.  (The man hit the other man using (his) fist.)
 
Sac iz bitane op mano ap nela '''uzanu hamara'''.  The man hammered in the nail.  (The man hit the nail using a hammer.)


Sac iz bitane op mano ap mana '''fistor'''.  The man punched another man.  (The man hit the other man with (his) fist.)
Sac iz beldane op mano ap veg bigan husi '''uzanu brika'''.  The man built the very big house using bricks.


Sac iz bitane op mano ap nela '''hamaror'''.  The man hammered in the nail.  (The man hit the nail with a hammer.)


Sac iz beldane op mano ap veg bigan husi '''brikor'''.  The man built the very big house using bricks.


''Topic''
''Topic''


Topic can be used to indicate the "topic" of discussion.  It is marked by the suffix -ay.
Topic can be used to indicate the "topic" of discussion.  It is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''rigardinu''' (to regard, concern).


examples:
examples:


'''Fixay''', sac az naj plizine ta mi.  Speaking of fish, I don't like it.  (Speaking of fish, it doesn't please me.)
'''Rigardinu fixa''', sac az naj plizine ta mi.  Speaking of fish, I don't like it.  (Speaking of fish, it doesn't please me.)
 
 


''Commitative''
''Commitative''


Commitative case denotes accompaniment.  It is marked by the suffix -ar.
Commitative case denotes accompaniment.  It is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''akompaninu''' (to accompany).


examples:
examples:


Sac iz atise xa husi '''minar'''.  She came home with me.
Sac iz atise xa husi '''akompaninu mini'''.  She came home with me.
 
 


''Modal Dative''
''Modal Dative''


Modal Dative case denotes a dative use that is not an argument of the verb.  It is marked by the suffix -ir.
Modal Dative case denotes a dative use that is not an argument of the verb.  The Modal Experiencer case is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''expirinu''' (to experience). The Modal Benefactor case is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''azilu''' (to give).  The Modal Location case is marked my the Subordinate predicate '''atinu''' (to be at).  The Modal Time case is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''okurinu''' (to occur, happen).  The Modal Range case is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''mezurinu''' (to measure).  The Modal Comparison case is marked by the Subordinate predicate '''komperinu''' (to compare)


examples:
examples:


Sac iz vidise ip mani ap misa '''parkir'''.  The man spied the woman at the park.  (Vidise is in the Experiential Domain and does not require a location.)
Sac iz vidise ip mani ap misa '''atinu parki'''.  The man spied the woman at the park.  (Vidise is in the Experiential Domain and does not require a location.)


Sac iz baytale op mano buka '''minir'''.  The man bought a book for me.  (Baytale is in the Benefactive Domain and does not require 'for me'.  If '''minir''' is replaced by '''mini''' then the sentence would mean:  the man bought a book from me.)
Sac iz bayzale op mano buka '''azilu mini'''.  The man bought a book for me.  (Bayzale is in the Benefactive Domain and does not require 'for me'.  If '''azilu mini''' is replaced by '''mini''' then the sentence would mean:  the man bought a book from me.)




Line 675: Line 776:


Sac iz runine ap misa froparki '''kwikeh'''.  The woman ran quickly from the park.
Sac iz runine ap misa froparki '''kwikeh'''.  The woman ran quickly from the park.
'''Frequency'''
Frequency is marked by -oh.
examples:
'''nevoh'''  never
'''alvoh'''  always
'''oftoh'''  often
'''seldoh'''  seldom
'''regoh'''  regularly, periodically
'''negoh'''  irregularly
'''okoh'''  occaisionally
'''Temporal'''
Temporal is marked by -ah.
'''forah'''  forever
'''nah'''  now
'''henah'''  then
'''befah'''  before
'''aftah'''  after
'''arlah'''  earlier
'''letah'''  later
'''todah'''  today
'''yestah'''  yesterday
'''tumah'''  tomorrow
'''yeswikah'''  last week
'''nekwikah'''  next week
'''yiragah'''  a year ago
'''yirkamah'''  in a year
'''penakah'''  at 5:00
'''orakamah'''  in an hour
'''momenagah'''  a moment ago
'''dekap dezagah'''  ten days ago
'''kwah?'''  when?




Xagena
20

edits

Retrieved from "https://linguifex.com/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/192288...215097"