5,466
edits
Minhast/Noun Incorporation: Difference between revisions
m
Create subtopic, minor rewording
m (Rewording) |
m (Create subtopic, minor rewording) |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
== Noun Incorporation in Intransitive Verbs == | == Noun Incorporation in Intransitive Verbs == | ||
Although noun incorporation in Minhast is prototypically associated with transitive verbs, intransitive verbs may incorporate nouns. Verbs that take as their core NP with the Experiencer | Although noun incorporation in Minhast is prototypically associated with transitive verbs, intransitive verbs may also incorporate nouns. | ||
=== Incorporation of Experiencers === | |||
Verbs that take as their core NP with the Experiencer thematic relation often incorporate oblique nominals, whose theta role of Source or Cause, to background them, thereby focusing on Experiencer. The following two examples, the first with no incorporation, and the second with incorporation of the oblique nominal ''tipr'' ("meat") are semantically equivalent. The difference between the non-incorporated and incorporated versions is one of discourse purpose. | |||
In the first example, the speaker is explicitly adding information about the cause of his sickness, the meat ''(tipr)'', with the Ablative clitic ''=yār''. Additionally, by explicitly mentioning the meat he is introducing new information, as it had not yet been introduced into the discourse: | In the first example, the speaker is explicitly adding information about the cause of his sickness, the meat ''(tipr)'', with the Ablative clitic ''=yār''. Additionally, by explicitly mentioning the meat he is introducing new information, as it had not yet been introduced into the discourse: | ||