Peshpeg: Difference between revisions

65 bytes added ,  5 November 2021
m
Line 203: Line 203:
The nominal system is divided into a three-way declension system based on natural gender, animacy, and countability and concreteness.  The declension system underlies Peshpeg's unusual split-ergative alignment system.  Unlike other split systems, which either display tense-aspect based ergative marking (e.g. Hindi and most Indic languages), or pronominal-based splits (e.g. Minhast and Dyirbal), Peshpeg applies nominative-accusative and ergative-absolutive marking based on noun class.  This noun class system is based on an animacy hierarchy.  Class I nouns, ranked as the most animate in the animacy hierarchy, takes nominative-accusative marking, whilst Class II nouns, which lie lower in the animacy hierarchy, take ergative-absolutive marking.  The final group of nouns, falling under Class III, receive no overt marking and therefore show direct alignment as these nouns fall lowest in the animacy hierarchical spectrum.
The nominal system is divided into a three-way declension system based on natural gender, animacy, and countability and concreteness.  The declension system underlies Peshpeg's unusual split-ergative alignment system.  Unlike other split systems, which either display tense-aspect based ergative marking (e.g. Hindi and most Indic languages), or pronominal-based splits (e.g. Minhast and Dyirbal), Peshpeg applies nominative-accusative and ergative-absolutive marking based on noun class.  This noun class system is based on an animacy hierarchy.  Class I nouns, ranked as the most animate in the animacy hierarchy, takes nominative-accusative marking, whilst Class II nouns, which lie lower in the animacy hierarchy, take ergative-absolutive marking.  The final group of nouns, falling under Class III, receive no overt marking and therefore show direct alignment as these nouns fall lowest in the animacy hierarchical spectrum.


Verbs fall under two broad classes.  One class, which is partially or fully synthetic, derives from an older system.  These verbs are usually high-frequency words, such as ''ru'' ("to go").  The other verb class involves a construction based on an unmarked verbal noun and an auxiliary which takes person, tense, and aspect marking.
Verbs fall under two broad classes.  One class, which is partially or fully synthetic, derives from an older system.  These verbs are usually high-frequency words, such as ''ru'' ("to go").  The other verb class involves a periphrastic construction based on an unmarked verbal noun followed by an auxiliary verb which takes person, tense, and aspect marking.


Adjectives typically do not take case or number marking, but derive them from their noun head.  They typically follow the noun head and are take the suffix ''-em'' if followed by another noun phraseIf followed by a verb-auxiliary construct, however, the adjective precedes their head, joined to it by the particle ''mon'', argued by some linguists to be etymologically related to the Minhast connective ''min''.
Adjectives take minimal inflection, based on its position relative to its noun head.  A suffix ''-em'' simply indicates the adjective is dependent on another element, and appears when the adjective follows its headInterestingly, if a periphrastic verb construction appears immediately after the adjective, the adjective is displaced and must appear before its noun head.  A connective ''mon'' surfaces between the pre-nominal adjective and its noun.


Particles are uninflected words, a lexically broad collection which include adverbs, negators, discourse markers, and various syntactic operators.
Particles are uninflected words, a lexically broad collection which include adverbs, negators, discourse markers, and various syntactic operators.
5,467

edits