Lemizh: Difference between revisions
Anypodetos (talk | contribs) m (Move example text) |
Anypodetos (talk | contribs) (Case endings etc.) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Lemizh is an Indo-European language and, together with Volgan, constitutes one of the ten recognised branches of the Indo-European language family. This branch is also called Lemizh, to the disgruntlement of Volgan linguists. | Lemizh is an Indo-European language and, together with Volgan, constitutes one of the ten recognised branches of the Indo-European language family. This branch is also called Lemizh, to the disgruntlement of Volgan linguists. | ||
''Proto-Lemizh'', the ancestor of Lemizh and Volgan, is very poorly attested in form of some papyri found near the northwestern shore of the Black Sea, to the north of the Dniester Liman, dated about 2700 BC. ''Old Lemizh'', by contrast, is fairly well attested. It had predominantly [[w:Subject–verb–object|subject–verb–object]] (SVO) word order and was a quite typical old Indo-European language, but with a couple of interesting quirks: | '''Proto-Lemizh''', the ancestor of Lemizh and Volgan, is very poorly attested in form of some papyri found near the northwestern shore of the Black Sea, to the north of the Dniester Liman, dated about 2700 BC. '''Old Lemizh''', by contrast, is fairly well attested. It had predominantly [[w:Subject–verb–object|subject–verb–object]] (SVO) word order and was a quite typical old Indo-European language, but with a couple of interesting quirks: | ||
* Adjectives were lost as a separate part of speech, being replaced with participles ("white" > "being white"). | * Adjectives were lost as a separate part of speech, being replaced with participles ("white" > "being white"). | ||
* Finite subordinate clauses had their subject in the case of the clause: the subject of a local clause was in the locative case without having a local meaning in itself. | * Finite subordinate clauses had their subject in the case of the clause: the subject of a local clause was in the locative case without having a local meaning in itself. | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
===Ghean and Middle Lemizh=== | ===Ghean and Middle Lemizh=== | ||
''Ghean'' (<span style="font-family:Gentium,'DejaVu Sans','Segoe UI',sans-serif">[[Help:IPA|[ˈɣɛən]]]</span>) is a language with no known genetic relationships. It was spoken by a people of unknown origin, who subdued the Lemizh tribes in around 1000 BC and ruled for infamous three generations. Ghean was an [[w:Inflected|inflected]] register [[w:Tonal language|tonal]] language with strict [[w:Verb–subject–object|verb–subject–object]] (VSO) word order and head-first phrases. It had verbs, [[w:Nominal (linguistics)|nominals]] (a combined noun/adjective/participle [[w:Part of speech|part of speech]]), pronouns and particles. | '''Ghean''' (<span style="font-family:Gentium,'DejaVu Sans','Segoe UI',sans-serif">[[Help:IPA|[ˈɣɛən]]]</span>) is a language with no known genetic relationships. It was spoken by a people of unknown origin, who subdued the Lemizh tribes in around 1000 BC and ruled for infamous three generations. Ghean was an [[w:Inflected|inflected]] register [[w:Tonal language|tonal]] language with strict [[w:Verb–subject–object|verb–subject–object]] (VSO) word order and head-first phrases. It had verbs, [[w:Nominal (linguistics)|nominals]] (a combined noun/adjective/participle [[w:Part of speech|part of speech]]), pronouns and particles. | ||
The Gheans discouraged the use of the natives' language, but obviously tolerated Lemizh words (or rather word stems) to stand in for unfamiliar Ghean ones. The grammar of simple sentences was easy enough to learn for the Lemizh, as they were used to inflection and head-first phrases, and likely still knew VSO sentences from poetry. After two or three generations, the natives must have spoken a [[w:Creole language|creole]] with a more or less Ghean grammar but an abundance of Lemizh words, especially outside the core vocabulary. This is a quite unusual development as most creoles draw their lexicon mainly from the dominant group, and tend to be grammatically more innovative. (The Tanzanian language [[w:Mbugu|Mbugu]] might have had a somewhat similar development with more or less analogous outcomes.) After the disappearance of the Gheans, Lemizh patriots tried to revive their old language, which failed spectacularly for the grammar but reintroduced many Lemizh words of the core vocabulary. | The Gheans discouraged the use of the natives' language, but obviously tolerated Lemizh words (or rather word stems) to stand in for unfamiliar Ghean ones. The grammar of simple sentences was easy enough to learn for the Lemizh, as they were used to inflection and head-first phrases, and likely still knew VSO sentences from poetry. After two or three generations, the natives must have spoken a [[w:Creole language|creole]] with a more or less Ghean grammar but an abundance of Lemizh words, especially outside the core vocabulary. This is a quite unusual development as most creoles draw their lexicon mainly from the dominant group, and tend to be grammatically more innovative. (The Tanzanian language [[w:Mbugu|Mbugu]] might have had a somewhat similar development with more or less analogous outcomes.) After the disappearance of the Gheans, Lemizh patriots tried to revive their old language, which failed spectacularly for the grammar but reintroduced many Lemizh words of the core vocabulary. | ||
===The last three millennia=== | ===The last three millennia=== | ||
While ''Middle Lemizh'' as spoken after the Ghean occupation already had a non-Indo-European and unusually regular grammar, this trend was to continue over the following millennia. The factive case was innovated to express verbal nouns, which eventually supplanted verbs altogether. (At least part of the blame goes to the Tlöngö̀l, an epic novel published in 1351, which popularized the use of verbal nouns.) Pronouns lost their status as a separate part of speech. The last particles died out a few hundred years ago, leaving the language with a single part of speech which is often called a "verb" but, historically speaking, is really a nominal. This means that the concept of ''parts of speech'' does not make sense in Lemizh | While '''Middle Lemizh''' as spoken after the Ghean occupation already had a non-Indo-European and unusually regular grammar, this trend was to continue over the following millennia. The factive case was innovated to express verbal nouns, which eventually supplanted verbs altogether. (At least part of the blame goes to the Tlöngö̀l, an epic novel published in 1351, which popularized the use of verbal nouns.) Pronouns lost their status as a separate part of speech. The last particles died out a few hundred years ago, leaving the language with a single part of speech which is often called a "verb" but, historically speaking, is really a nominal. This means that the concept of ''parts of speech'' does not make sense in '''Modern Lemizh'''. | ||
==Orthography and phonology== | ==Orthography and phonology== | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
===Consonants=== | ===Consonants=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 89: | Line 90: | ||
===Accent=== | ===Accent=== | ||
Lemizh has got a two-way [[w:Pitch-accent language|pitch-accent]] system, in that accented moræ are not only spoken louder (as in English), but also have either a lower or a higher pitch than the surrounding unaccented ones. The vowel at the centre of a low-pitch accented mora is transcribed with a grave accent, the vowel at the centre of a high-pitch accented mora with an acute accent. | Lemizh has got a two-way [[w:Pitch-accent language|pitch-accent]] system, in that accented moræ are not only spoken louder (as in English), but also have either a lower or a higher pitch than the surrounding unaccented ones. The accented mora is always the ultimate or penultimate of a word. The vowel at the centre of a low-pitch accented mora is transcribed with a grave accent, the vowel at the centre of a high-pitch accented mora with an acute accent. | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 220px; table-layout: fixed; text-align: center" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 220px; table-layout: fixed; text-align: center" | ||
! colspan="8" | Accented vowel letters | ! colspan="8" | Accented vowel letters | ||
Line 108: | Line 109: | ||
==Morphology== | ==Morphology== | ||
< | All words are composed of the following parts: | ||
* Prestem + inner case + poststem + outer case | |||
Prestem and poststem form the stem, or the lexical part, of the word. The division of the stem into two portions is similar to English verbs such as ''sing/sang/sung'', where the lexical part is ''s–ng'' while the vowels ''i/a/u'' convey grammatical information. The stem always denotes an action (but never a state, a person, a thing, a property, etc.) and thus resembles our verbs. | |||
The inner case is represented by one of the eight vowels, optionally followed by a liquid (the primary case suffix) and/or a nasal (the secondary case suffix). The outer case has the same structure. For the first word in each sentence, the main predicate, the outer case is missing. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ Case morphemes | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="3" | № !! rowspan="3" | Case vowel !! colspan="4" | Primary case suffix | |||
|- | |||
| none || l || rh || r | |||
|- | |||
! Plot cases !! Causal cases !! Temporal cases !! Spatial cases | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || a || ''factive'':<br>action || ''affirmative'':<br>fact (point in causal chain) || ''temporal'':<br>time || ''locative'':<br>place/region | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || e || ''nominative'':<br>source, sender || ''causative'':<br>direct cause || ''ingressive'':<br>starting time || ''elative'':<br>starting point/region | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || y || ''accusative'':<br>content || ''contextual'':<br>causal context || ''durative'':<br>duration || ''extensive'':<br>spatial extent | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || i || ''dative'':<br>sink, recipient || ''consecutive'':<br>direct consequence, effect || ''egressive'':<br>closing time || ''illative'':<br>end point / ending region | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || o || ''tentive'':<br>intention || ''intentive'':<br>intention (intended point in causal chain) || ''episodic'':<br>episode, "act" || ''scenic'':<br>scene, "stage" | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || ö || ''comitative'':<br>company || ''persuasive'':<br>reason || ''digressive'':<br>time away from which || ''ablative'':<br>place/region away from which | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || u || ''instrumental'':<br>means, tool || ''motivational'':<br>motivational context || ''progressive'':<br>time that is passed || ''prolative'':<br>crossing point/region | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || ü || ''benefactive'':<br>beneficiary || ''final'':<br>purpose, aim || ''aggressive'':<br>time towards which, temporal aim || ''allative'':<br>place/region towards which, spatial aim | |||
|} | |||
<!-- Here are some example subcategories: | <!-- Here are some example subcategories: | ||
===Nouns=== | ===Nouns=== |
Revision as of 16:27, 2 May 2022
Lemizh | |
---|---|
lemỳzh. | |
Pronunciation | [lɛmˈɯ̀ʒ] |
Created by | Anypodetos |
Date | 1985 |
Setting | Alt-history Europe |
Native to | Lemaria |
Indo-European
| |
Early form | Proto-Lemizh
|
Lemizh alphabet | |
Sources | Proto-Indo-European |
Official status | |
Official language in | Lemaria |
Lemizh ([lεmˈiʒ], native pronunciation: [lɛmˈɯ̀ʒ]) is a language I invented with the aim of creating a grammar as regular and simple as possible. It was originally intended as an international auxiliary language. However, it turned out that a simple grammar is not necessarily a grammar that is easy to learn: the more ways of simplification I discovered, the further away it moved from Indo-European and probably all other familiar language structures. Expecting anyone to learn Lemizh, at this point, would be completely unrealistic.
So I needed a new justification for the language: enter the Lemizh, a people living to the west and north of the Black Sea in an alternate history that slowly drifted away from ours between two and eight millennia ago. Of course, it is extremely unlikely that they would speak a language that was completely without exceptions. To be precise, the chances are two to the power of two hundred and seventy-six thousand seven hundred and nine to one against. But they say that everything has to happen somewhere in the Multiverse. And everything happens only once.
History
Early stages
Lemizh is an Indo-European language and, together with Volgan, constitutes one of the ten recognised branches of the Indo-European language family. This branch is also called Lemizh, to the disgruntlement of Volgan linguists.
Proto-Lemizh, the ancestor of Lemizh and Volgan, is very poorly attested in form of some papyri found near the northwestern shore of the Black Sea, to the north of the Dniester Liman, dated about 2700 BC. Old Lemizh, by contrast, is fairly well attested. It had predominantly subject–verb–object (SVO) word order and was a quite typical old Indo-European language, but with a couple of interesting quirks:
- Adjectives were lost as a separate part of speech, being replaced with participles ("white" > "being white").
- Finite subordinate clauses had their subject in the case of the clause: the subject of a local clause was in the locative case without having a local meaning in itself.
The earliest known documents from this stage of Lemizh were probably written around 2100 BC along the northern and western shores of the Back Sea.
Ghean and Middle Lemizh
Ghean ([ˈɣɛən]) is a language with no known genetic relationships. It was spoken by a people of unknown origin, who subdued the Lemizh tribes in around 1000 BC and ruled for infamous three generations. Ghean was an inflected register tonal language with strict verb–subject–object (VSO) word order and head-first phrases. It had verbs, nominals (a combined noun/adjective/participle part of speech), pronouns and particles.
The Gheans discouraged the use of the natives' language, but obviously tolerated Lemizh words (or rather word stems) to stand in for unfamiliar Ghean ones. The grammar of simple sentences was easy enough to learn for the Lemizh, as they were used to inflection and head-first phrases, and likely still knew VSO sentences from poetry. After two or three generations, the natives must have spoken a creole with a more or less Ghean grammar but an abundance of Lemizh words, especially outside the core vocabulary. This is a quite unusual development as most creoles draw their lexicon mainly from the dominant group, and tend to be grammatically more innovative. (The Tanzanian language Mbugu might have had a somewhat similar development with more or less analogous outcomes.) After the disappearance of the Gheans, Lemizh patriots tried to revive their old language, which failed spectacularly for the grammar but reintroduced many Lemizh words of the core vocabulary.
The last three millennia
While Middle Lemizh as spoken after the Ghean occupation already had a non-Indo-European and unusually regular grammar, this trend was to continue over the following millennia. The factive case was innovated to express verbal nouns, which eventually supplanted verbs altogether. (At least part of the blame goes to the Tlöngö̀l, an epic novel published in 1351, which popularized the use of verbal nouns.) Pronouns lost their status as a separate part of speech. The last particles died out a few hundred years ago, leaving the language with a single part of speech which is often called a "verb" but, historically speaking, is really a nominal. This means that the concept of parts of speech does not make sense in Modern Lemizh.
Orthography and phonology
The alphabet is phonetic: each letter corresponds to a certain sound, and each sound is represented by a single letter. The direction of writing is left to right. This article uses the standard transcription of the native Lemizh alphabet.
Letters of the Lemizh alphabet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | e | y | i | o | ö | u | ü | l | rh | r | ng | m | g | d | b | k | t | p | gh | zh | z | dh | w | x | sh | s | th | f |
Consonants
bilabial | dental | alveolar | postalveolar | velar | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nasals | m [m] | ng [ŋ] | ||||
plosives | p [p] • b [b] | t [t] • d [d] | k [k] • g [g] | |||
fricatives | f [ɸ] • w [β] | th [θ] • dh [ð] | s [s] • z [z] | sh [ʃ] • zh [ʒ] | x [x] • gh [ɣ] | |
liquids | lateral approximant | l [l] | ||||
approximant | rh [ɹ] | |||||
trill | r [r] |
Vowels
front | back | |
---|---|---|
close | i [i] • ü [y] | y [ɯ] • u [u] |
open-mid | e [ɛ] • ö [œ] | a [ʌ] • o [ɔ] |
Two consecutive different vowels are pronounced as a diphthong; two consecutive identical vowels as a long one. Single vowels are always short.
Lemizh uses moræ for structuring words: a short syllable equals one mora, and a long syllable equals two. In Lemizh, every vowel is the centre of a mora; consequently, two consecutive vowels result in two moræ or one long syllable.
Accent
Lemizh has got a two-way pitch-accent system, in that accented moræ are not only spoken louder (as in English), but also have either a lower or a higher pitch than the surrounding unaccented ones. The accented mora is always the ultimate or penultimate of a word. The vowel at the centre of a low-pitch accented mora is transcribed with a grave accent, the vowel at the centre of a high-pitch accented mora with an acute accent.
Accented vowel letters | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
à | è | ỳ | ì | ò | ö̀ | ù | ǜ |
á | é | ý | í | ó | ö́ | ú | ǘ |
Phonotactics
Phonotactics is rather permissive in Lemizh. A mora has the following structure, where the bracketed parts are optional:
- (O)(N)(L)V(L)(N)(O)
V is the mora's vowel, L a liquid, N a nasal, and O an obstruent that can be either a P(losive), a F(ricative), FP, PF, FF, FFP, FPF, or PFF. Word-initial consonant clusters cannot contain more than three sounds. No geminate consonants (*ff etc.) occur within a mora. Consecutive plosive-fricative or fricative-plosive combinations within the same mora must have the same sonority – either both are voiced, or both are voiceless. A plosive cannot have the same place of articulation as a following consonant with the exception of rh and r. *dzh, *ddh and their voiceless counterparts are also prohibited within a mora.
Word boundaries, including those within compound words, are always mora boundaries. Where mora boundaries would still be ambiguous, liquids and nasals are assigned to the earliest possible mora, and obstruents to the latest possible mora.
Morphology
All words are composed of the following parts:
- Prestem + inner case + poststem + outer case
Prestem and poststem form the stem, or the lexical part, of the word. The division of the stem into two portions is similar to English verbs such as sing/sang/sung, where the lexical part is s–ng while the vowels i/a/u convey grammatical information. The stem always denotes an action (but never a state, a person, a thing, a property, etc.) and thus resembles our verbs.
The inner case is represented by one of the eight vowels, optionally followed by a liquid (the primary case suffix) and/or a nasal (the secondary case suffix). The outer case has the same structure. For the first word in each sentence, the main predicate, the outer case is missing.
№ | Case vowel | Primary case suffix | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
none | l | rh | r | ||
Plot cases | Causal cases | Temporal cases | Spatial cases | ||
1 | a | factive: action |
affirmative: fact (point in causal chain) |
temporal: time |
locative: place/region |
2 | e | nominative: source, sender |
causative: direct cause |
ingressive: starting time |
elative: starting point/region |
3 | y | accusative: content |
contextual: causal context |
durative: duration |
extensive: spatial extent |
4 | i | dative: sink, recipient |
consecutive: direct consequence, effect |
egressive: closing time |
illative: end point / ending region |
5 | o | tentive: intention |
intentive: intention (intended point in causal chain) |
episodic: episode, "act" |
scenic: scene, "stage" |
6 | ö | comitative: company |
persuasive: reason |
digressive: time away from which |
ablative: place/region away from which |
7 | u | instrumental: means, tool |
motivational: motivational context |
progressive: time that is passed |
prolative: crossing point/region |
8 | ü | benefactive: beneficiary |
final: purpose, aim |
aggressive: time towards which, temporal aim |
allative: place/region towards which, spatial aim |
Syntax
Constituent order
Noun phrases
Verb phrases
Sentence phrases
Dependent clauses
Example texts
The Legend of the Seventh Planet
A long time ago there was a tribe of nomads. They possessed neither writing nor houses nor horses. But they were truly human. They were curious; this means, above all, that they took interest in the useless, for the celestial objects were of no use to them yet. They looked at the Sun and the Moon. They had named the constellations and the six planets moving across the sky like the humans across the earth. They knew dim Mercury, who liked to hide in the glare of the Sun; Venus, the brightest of all; reddish and angry Mars; majestic father Jupiter; Saturn, who seemed to stand still for weeks; and even Uranus had been caught by their keen eyes. Six planets, and the legend of a seventh. Maybe it had been the minor planet Vesta, or a comet centuries or millennia earlier. Maybe it was the attraction of the number seven. For Neptune is invisible to the naked eye.
One youngster thought to himself that he could not live without seeing the seventh planet. He lay awake searching the sky for many nights, neglected his duties, and became thinner and thinner. And one night, lying with the Earth behind his back, and with the looping planets and the stars above him, he saw the depth of the sky and the planets circling the Sun, and among them the Earth.
External links
This article includes material from the Lemizh homepage, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.