7,011
edits
Kola: Difference between revisions
→Latin alphabet
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 512: | Line 512: | ||
====Latin alphabet==== | ====Latin alphabet==== | ||
There are two standardized Latin alphabets: a more common one based on the Semitic and Cushitic languages of Ethiopia (" | There are two standardized Latin alphabets: a more common one based on the Semitic and Cushitic languages of Ethiopia ("Ethiopicist"), and a less common one based on other Bantu languages ("Bantuist"). The biggest difference between them is in the treatment of voiceless stops and affricates. In the Ethiopicist alphabet, the aspirated versions are treated as the unmarked forms and the ejective versions are treated as marked (as they are in Semitic and Cushitic languages). In the Bantuist alphabet, however, the ejectives are treated as unmarked and the aspirates as marked (as they are in Bantu languages). Since Kola is Bantu, the Bantuist alphabet more accurately represents the phonemes' status in the language; however, this article uses the more common Ethiopicist alphabet. | ||
In both alphabets, clusters that can be confused with digraphs are separated with an apostrophe - e.g. ''s'h'' /sh/ vs ''sh'' /ʃ/. Labialization is indicated with a following ''w''. Stress is not normally indicated in writing, but this article uses an acute accent. | In both alphabets, clusters that can be confused with digraphs are separated with an apostrophe - e.g. ''s'h'' /sh/ vs ''sh'' /ʃ/. Labialization is indicated with a following ''w''. Stress is not normally indicated in writing, but this article uses an acute accent. | ||
| Line 520: | Line 520: | ||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Ethiopicist !! Bantuist | ||
! IPA | ! IPA | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 566: | Line 566: | ||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Ethiopicist !! Bantuist | ||
! IPA | ! IPA | ||
|- | |- | ||