User talk:Chrysophylax/Golden Afroasiatic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Nice to see you thinking about Afro-Asiatic! בָּרוּך הַבָּא! Unfortunately there exist less comparative data for Afro-Asiatic than for Indo-European. So for conla...") |
(→Re: voicing distinction: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nice to see you thinking about Afro-Asiatic! בָּרוּך הַבָּא! Unfortunately there exist less comparative data for Afro-Asiatic than for Indo-European. So for conlanging purposes you kinda have to make things up somewhat. [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 04:31, 16 July 2015 (CEST) | Nice to see you thinking about Afro-Asiatic! בָּרוּך הַבָּא! Unfortunately there exist less comparative data for Afro-Asiatic than for Indo-European. So for conlanging purposes you kinda have to make things up somewhat. [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 04:31, 16 July 2015 (CEST) | ||
== Re: voicing distinction == | |||
*If Egyption voiced stops were actually ejectives that would explain the apparent mix-up? | |||
*I have heard that Semitic was the branch that regularized its root system to mainly triliterals and some quadriliterals (Evidence: Semitic has families of semantically related triliteral roots sharing two consonants, and also hollow roots with a semivowel in the middle.) In general there seems to be little agreement on PAA beyond the basics of morphology. Hopefully I'm just not that well-read on it. | |||
[[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 04:49, 16 July 2015 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 02:49, 16 July 2015
Nice to see you thinking about Afro-Asiatic! בָּרוּך הַבָּא! Unfortunately there exist less comparative data for Afro-Asiatic than for Indo-European. So for conlanging purposes you kinda have to make things up somewhat. IlL (talk) 04:31, 16 July 2015 (CEST)
Re: voicing distinction
- If Egyption voiced stops were actually ejectives that would explain the apparent mix-up?
- I have heard that Semitic was the branch that regularized its root system to mainly triliterals and some quadriliterals (Evidence: Semitic has families of semantically related triliteral roots sharing two consonants, and also hollow roots with a semivowel in the middle.) In general there seems to be little agreement on PAA beyond the basics of morphology. Hopefully I'm just not that well-read on it.