Aryan: Difference between revisions

3,608 bytes added ,  31 January
(40 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
{{Construction}}
{{Construction}}


'''Aryan''' (''*Airás'', [[w:Help:IPA|[əi̯ˈrəs]]]), also referred to as '''Pre-Proto-Indo-European,''' is an [[ab interiori language]] depicting the transition from [[Paleolithic Codes]] to [[w:Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] (PIE). There are no historical records of its existence, or comparative data to support it; rather, it is an abductive experiment based on the hypothesis of [[Transitional Dialects]].
'''Aryan''' (''*Ai̯ri̯áh<sub>0</sub>'', [[w:Help:IPA|[əi̯ˈri̯əʔ]]]), also referred to as '''Pre-Proto-Indo-European,''' is an [[ab interiori language]] depicting the transition from [[Paleolithic Codes]] to [[w:Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] (PIE). There are no historical records of its existence, or comparative data to support it; rather, it is an abductive experiment based on the hypothesis of [[Transitional Dialects]].


In most of known [[w:History|History]], indo-european speaking populations have been widespread in [[w:Eurasia|Eurasia]], bearing fruits from civilizations such as those of the [[w:Roman empire|Roman Empire]], the [[w:Ancient Greece|Hellenistic City-States]], and the [[w:List of ancient Indo-Aryan peoples and tribes|Rigvedic Tribes]]. Memorable personalities who spoke natively dialects from those areas include the roman general [[w:Gaius Julius Caesar|Julius Caesar]] (speaker of [[w:Latin|Latin]]), the macedonian king [[w:Alexander the Great|Alexander the Great]] (speaker of [[w:Ancient Greek|Ancient Greek]]), the nazi chancellor [[w:Adolf Hitler|Adolf Hitler]] (speaker of [[w:German language|German]]), the french emperor [[w:Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon Bonaparte]] (speaker of [[w:Corsican langugae|Corsican]]), the british physicist [[w:Isaac Newton|Isaac Newton]] (speaker of [[w:English language|English]]), the italian renascentist [[w:Leonardo da Vinci|Leoanardo da Vinci]] (speaker of [[w:Tuscan dialect|Tuscan Italian]]), the indian ascetic [[w:Gautama Buddha|Gautama Buddha]] (speaker of [[w:Prakrit language|Prakrit]]), et cetera. Also, due the trajectory of the linguistic stock along the millenia, some of the most culturally influential works of Literature have been yielded, such as the [[w:Vulgate|Vulgate]], the [[w:Iliad|Iliad]], and the [[w:Vedas|Vedas]]. As of the [[w:21st Century|21<sup>st</sup> Century]], half of the world's population speaks 454 indo-european languages<ref>https://www.ethnologue.com/</ref>, with the [[w:Americas|Americas]], [[w:Europe|Europe]], [[w:Iran|Iran]], [[w:Pakistan|Pakistan]], and [[w:India|India]] being today the centers of native speakers due the [[w:Indo-European migrations|Indo-European Migrations]] and [[w:Colonial empires|European Colonialism]].
In most of known [[w:History|History]], indo-european speaking populations have been widespread in [[w:Eurasia|Eurasia]], bearing fruits from civilizations such as those of the [[w:Roman empire|Roman Empire]], the [[w:Ancient Greece|Hellenistic City-States]], and the [[w:List of ancient Indo-Aryan peoples and tribes|Rigvedic Tribes]]. Memorable personalities who spoke natively dialects from those areas include the roman general [[w:Gaius Julius Caesar|Julius Caesar]] (speaker of [[w:Latin|Latin]]), the macedonian king [[w:Alexander the Great|Alexander the Great]] (speaker of [[w:Ancient Greek|Ancient Greek]]), the nazi chancellor [[w:Adolf Hitler|Adolf Hitler]] (speaker of [[w:German language|German]]), the french emperor [[w:Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon Bonaparte]] (speaker of [[w:Corsican langugae|Corsican]]), the british physicist [[w:Isaac Newton|Isaac Newton]] (speaker of [[w:English language|English]]), the italian renascentist [[w:Leonardo da Vinci|Leoanardo da Vinci]] (speaker of [[w:Tuscan dialect|Tuscan Italian]]), the indian ascetic [[w:Gautama Buddha|Gautama Buddha]] (speaker of [[w:Prakrit language|Prakrit]]), et cetera. Also, due the trajectory of the linguistic stock along the millenia, some of the most culturally influential works of Literature have been yielded, such as the [[w:Vulgate|Vulgate]], the [[w:Iliad|Iliad]], and the [[w:Vedas|Vedas]]. As of the [[w:21st Century|21<sup>st</sup> Century]], half of the world's population speaks 454 indo-european languages<ref>https://www.ethnologue.com/</ref>, with the [[w:Americas|Americas]], [[w:Europe|Europe]], [[w:Iran|Iran]], [[w:Pakistan|Pakistan]], and [[w:India|India]] being today the centers of native speakers due the [[w:Indo-European migrations|Indo-European Migrations]] and [[w:Colonial empires|European Colonialism]].
Line 27: Line 27:


In the hybrid model, Aryan must have been spoken somewhere near the Caucasus Mountains in compliance with the [[w:Armenian hypothesis|Armenian Hypothesis]], which in its current form holds that the speakers of "Pre-Proto-Indo-European" pertained to the genepool of the [[w:Caucasus hunter-gatherer|Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers]] (CHG)<ref name=Lazaridis>Lazaridis et alii (2022); ''The genetic history of the Southern Arc: a bridge between West Asia and Europe''</ref>, who would eventually contribute to the formation of the [[w:Yamnaya culture|Yamnaya Culture]] and the dispersion of "Core Proto-Indo-European" as detailed in the [[w:Kurgan hypothesis|Kurgan Hypothesis]]. The age of the language is more controversial, being set between 12,000 and 10,000 years Before Present (BP), or the double of its daughter-language's, to coincide with the notion of [[Linguistic Modernity]].
In the hybrid model, Aryan must have been spoken somewhere near the Caucasus Mountains in compliance with the [[w:Armenian hypothesis|Armenian Hypothesis]], which in its current form holds that the speakers of "Pre-Proto-Indo-European" pertained to the genepool of the [[w:Caucasus hunter-gatherer|Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers]] (CHG)<ref name=Lazaridis>Lazaridis et alii (2022); ''The genetic history of the Southern Arc: a bridge between West Asia and Europe''</ref>, who would eventually contribute to the formation of the [[w:Yamnaya culture|Yamnaya Culture]] and the dispersion of "Core Proto-Indo-European" as detailed in the [[w:Kurgan hypothesis|Kurgan Hypothesis]]. The age of the language is more controversial, being set between 12,000 and 10,000 years Before Present (BP), or the double of its daughter-language's, to coincide with the notion of [[Linguistic Modernity]].
==Etymology==
The word ''*Ai̯ri̯áh<sub>0</sub>'' is influenced but not based on the Indo-Iranian ethnonym ''*Áryas'' "Aryan", as the root ''*h<sub>5</sub>ir'' "member/comrade" comes from Pangaean ''ʕihr'' "racial person".


==History==
==History==
===Development from Paleolithic Codes===
===Development from Paleolithic Codes===


The history of Aryan taken into account starts with the transition from Atomism to Double Articulation by the dialects of the Upper Paleolithic, mostly regarding the [[Pangaean Code]] as its ultimate source, next to the influence of the [[Diluvian Code|Diluvian]] and [[Hyperborean Code|Hyperborean]] Codes. Although the actor responsible for this transition is a matter of debate even within the experiment, the loss of archaic features is assumed to coincide with the [[w:Last Glacial Period|End of the Last Ice Age]]. At that time (12,000 BP), the loss of strict adherence to the primordial grammar might have allowed sound changes to take place, as seen below.<br>
The story of Aryan starts with the transition from Atomism to Double Articulation, or from the [[Pangaean Code]] to Neolithic dialects (circa 12,000 BP). Noticeable is the influence of the [[Diluvian Code|Diluvian]] and [[Hyperborean Code|Hyperborean]] Codes, which triggered several sound changes:


*Weak (plosive) stops become aspirated/murmured preceding a laryngeal consonant, as strong (ejective/implosive) stops gain plosive qualities in the same position.<br>
*Weak (plosive) stops become aspirated/murmured preceding a laryngeal consonant, as strong (ejective/implosive) stops gain plosive qualities in the same position.<br>
Line 324: Line 327:
|''*wid-rás'' "aquatic"
|''*wid-rás'' "aquatic"
|''*ud-rós'' "aquatic"  
|''*ud-rós'' "aquatic"  
|-
| ''ˈɗ̟ɦɨho-ə'' "foot"
| ''*díop<sup>h</sup>-as'' "foot"
| ''*pód-s'' "foot"
|-
| ''ˈɗ̟ɦɨho ˈə'' "foot-like"
| ''*p<sup>h</sup>d-yás'' "pedestrian"
| ''*ped-yós'' "on foot"
|-
|-
|''ˈkhuħ-ə'' "sound"
|''ˈkhuħ-ə'' "sound"
Line 342: Line 337:
|}
|}


===Development into Indo-European Languages===
===Development into Indo-European Languages [...]===
 
Some tendences include the aspirated velars of Aryan becoming the PIE palatal series (*Kʰ ⇒ *Ḱ); ....
 
https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Proto-Indo-European_roots&from=A


Some correspondences include the aspirated velars of Aryan becoming the PIE palatal series (*Kʰ→*Ḱ); ....
*bʰeyh₂-


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
!Codex
!Codex
!Aryan
!Aryan
Line 354: Line 353:
| k̠-
| k̠-
| *kʰpʰ-
| *kʰpʰ-
| *ǵʰ/d ~ *ḱh<sub>2</sub>d- ~ *ǵʰ/s ~ *ǵʰ/∅
| *ǵʰ-d
| ''*kʰpʰuh<sub>1</sub>-'' ⇒ [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰewd-|''*ǵʰewd-'']] "pour", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰed-|''*ǵʰed-'']] "to defecate", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰes-|''*ǵʰes-'']] "hand", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰey-|''*ǵʰey-'']] "winter" (earlier lexical transition from "autumn", with similar use of English "fall"), [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱh₂d-|''*ḱh<sub>2</sub>d-'']] "fall" [sense of "detaching" turned into "falling"]
| 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰewd-|''*ǵʰewd-'']] "to pour", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰed-|''*ǵʰed-'']] "to defecate", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱh₂d-|''*ḱh₂d-'']] "to fall"
|-
|-
| -k̠
| -k̠
| *-kp
| *-kp
| (...)
| *-k<sup>w</sup>
|
| 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leykʷ-|''*leykʷ-'']] "to leave"
|-
|-
| k-
| k-
| *kʰ-
| *kʰ-
| *ḱ
| *ḱ
| ''*ki'' ⇒ ''*kʰi'' ⇒ [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱe|''ḱe'']] "this"
| 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱe|''*ḱe'']] "this"
|-
|-
| -k
| -k
Line 374: Line 373:
| k̟-
| k̟-
| *kʰtʰ-  
| *kʰtʰ-  
| *ḱ/s ~ *k/s  ~ *k/d ~ *gʰ/s ~ *g/∅
| *ḱ-s
| ''k̟hĩ̤ho'' ⇒ ''*kʰtʰīh<sub>1</sub>o'' ⇒ ''*(s)ker-'', ''*(s)kelH-'', ''*sek-'', ''*ḱes-'', ''*kh₂eyd-'' "to cut"; ''k̟ʕii̯h'' ⇒ ''*kʰtʰeyh<sub>1</sub>-'' ⇒ ''*gʰays-'' ~ ''*gleyH-'' "to stick"
| 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)ker-|''*(s)ker-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)kelH-|''*(s)kelH'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/sek-|''*sek-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱes-|''*ḱes-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kh₂eyd-|''*kh₂eyd-'']] "to cut"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gleyH-|''*gleyH-'']] "to stick"
|-
|-
| -k̟
| -k̟
| -kt
| *-kt
| *ḱ/∅ ~ *ǵ/∅
| *p-
| (...) ''*peh₂ḱ-'' "to join", ''*peh₂ǵ-'' "to attach"
| 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/peh₂ḱ-|''*peh₂ḱ-'']] "to join", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/peh₂ǵ-|''*peh₂ǵ-'']] "to attach"; 2. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leyp-|''*leyp-'']] "to stick", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leyǵ-|''*leyǵ-'']] "to bind"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰendʰ-|''*bʰendʰ-'']] "to bind"
|-
|-
| g̠-
| g̠-
| *gʰbʰ-
| *gʰbʰ-
| *gʰ/p ~ *gʰ/w
| *gʰ-bʰ
| ''g̠ʕih'' > ''*gʰbʰih<sub>1</sub>-'' ⇒ ''*(s)pregʰ-'' "to sprinkle"; ''g̠ho̰hr'' "scattering glow" ''*gʰbʰōr-'' "glow" ''*gʷʰer-'' "to be warm"
| 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)pregʰ-|''*(s)pregʰ-'']] "sprinkle", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/glewbʰ-|''*glewbʰ-'']] "split", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeh₂g-|''*bʰeh₂g-'']] "to divide"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeyd-|''*bʰeyd-'']] "to split"
|-
|-
| -g̠
| -g̠
| -gb
|  
|  
|  
| *h₁éǵʰ "out"
|
|-
|-
| g-
| g-
Line 404: Line 403:
| g̟-
| g̟-
| *gʰdʰ-
| *gʰdʰ-
| *gʰ/
| *gʰ-
| ''g̟ʕih'' ⇒ ''*gʰdʰih<sub>1</sub>-'' ⇒ ''*gʰedʰ-'' "to join"
|  [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gʰedʰ-|''*gʰedʰ-'']] "to join", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰendʰ-|''*bʰendʰ-'']] "to bind"
|-
|-
| -g̟
| -g̟
Line 414: Line 413:
| k̠ʼ-
| k̠ʼ-
| *kp-
| *kp-
| *g/bʰ ~ *k/p
| *bʰ-g, *k-p
| ''k̠ʼʕih'' ⇒ ''*kpih<sub>1</sub>-'' > ''*bʰeg-'' ~ ''*bʰreg-'' ~ ''*bʰrew-'' ~ ''*bʰrews-'' ~ ''*kelh₂-'' ~ ''*(s)kep-'' "to break"
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeg-|''*bʰeg-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰreg-|''*bʰreg-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrew-|''*bʰrew-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrews-|''*bʰrews-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kelh₂-|''*kelh₂-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)kep-|''*(s)kep-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/Hrewp-|''*Hrewp-'']] "break" [may be from [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/Hrew-|''*Hrew-'']] "tear out"]
|-
|-
| -k̠ʼ
| -k̠ʼ
| *-kʰpʰ
| *-kʰpʰ
| *ǵ/w
| *w-ǵ
| ''ʕihk̠ʼ'' ⇒ ''*h<sub>5</sub>ikʰpʰ-'' ⇒ ''*lewǵ-'' ~ ''*weh₂ǵ-'' ~ ''*wreh₁ǵ-'' "to break"
| ''*lewǵ-'' ~ ''*weh₂ǵ-'' ~ ''*wreh₁ǵ-'' "to break"
|-
|-
| kʼ-
| kʼ-
Line 473: Line 472:
|-
|-
| p̠-
| p̠-
|  
| *pʰtʰ-
|
| *bʰ/gʷ
|  
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰegʷ-|''*bʰegʷ-'']] "flee", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰewg-|''*bʰewg-'']] "flee"
|-
|-
| -p̠
| -p̠
Line 483: Line 482:
|-
|-
| p-
| p-
| *pʰ
| *pʰ-
| *bʰ
| *bʰ-
| ''pʕihr'' ⇒ ''*pʰair-'' ⇒ ''*bʰer-'' "to bear"  
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰer-|''*bʰer-'']] "bear"
|-
|-
| -p
| -p
Line 535: Line 534:
|-
|-
| p̠ʼ-
| p̠ʼ-
| *pt-
|  
|  
|
|  
|  
|-
|-
| -p̠ʼ
| -p̠ʼ  
|  
| *-pʰtʰ
|  
| *bʰ-dʰ
|
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰedʰ-|''*bʰedʰ-'']] "dig"
|-
|-
| pʼ-
| pʼ-
| *p-
| *p-
| *p
| *p
| ''pʼʕih'' > ''*pair-'' ⇒ ''*per-'' "to go through", ''*pel-'' "to drive", ''*pent-'' "to pass", ''*pes-'' "penis"
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/per-|''*per-'']] "go through", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pel-|''*pel-'']] "drive", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pent-|''*pent-'']] "pass", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pes-|''*pes-'']] "penis"
|-
|-
| -pʼ
| -pʼ
|  
| *-pʰ
|  
| *bʰ
|
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰerH-|''*bʰerH-'']] "pierce"
|-
|-
|-
|-
Line 587: Line 586:
|-
|-
| ɓ̟-
| ɓ̟-
|  
| *bʰ-
|
| *bʰ
|  
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰed-|''*bʰed-'']] "improve"
|-
|-
| -ɓ̟
| -ɓ̟
Line 717: Line 716:
|  
|  
|
|
|}
|-
 
| ʘ̠-
 
|
 
|
 
|
: *bʰegʷ- "to flee" < *-pʰtʰ "to escape" < …
|-
| -ʘ̠
|
|
|
|-
| ʘ-
| *dʷ-
| *bʰ-
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰed-|''*bʰed-'']] "improve", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰil-|''*bʰil-'']] "lovely"
|-
| -ʘ
|
|
|
|-
| ʘ̟-
|
|
|
|-
| -ʘ̟
|
|
|
|-
| ǀ̠-
|
|
|
|-
| -ǀ̠
|
|
|
|-
| ǀ-
|
|
|
|-
| -ǀ
|
|
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeyh₂-|''*bʰeyh₂-'']] "to shake"
|-
| ǀ̟-
|
|
|
|-
| -ǀ̟
|
|
|
|}
 
 
[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰerǵʰ-|''*bʰerǵʰ-'']] "ascend"
 
: *bʰegʷ- "to flee" < *-pʰtʰ "to escape" < …


: *bʰerǵʰ- "to rise up " < *pk- "to eject" (?)
: *bʰerǵʰ- "to rise up " < *pk- "to eject" (?)


: *bʰil "good" < *dʷih<sub>1</sub> < ʘ̪-
: *bʰil "good" < *dʷih<sub>1</sub>
 
[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰes-|''*ǵʰes-'']] "hand", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰey-|''*ǵʰey-'']] "winter" (earlier lexical transition from "autumn", with similar use of English "fall"),


[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gʷʰer-|''*gʷʰer-'']] "warm" [from ''*gʰbʰōr-'' "glow"], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeh₃g-|''*bʰeh₃g-'']] "bake/roast" [from ''*gʰbʰor-'' "kindle"]


*temh<sub>1</sub>
*temh<sub>1</sub>
Line 2,740: Line 2,802:
===Pitch Accent===
===Pitch Accent===


==Morphology==
==Morphology== [...]


[...]
[...]
Line 2,763: Line 2,825:
*gʷaināsay, *gʷaināmas
*gʷaināsay, *gʷaināmas


Aryan has only zero-grade () and full grade (_)
Aryan morphology deals with full-grade (_) and null-grade (∅). 
.
 
Aryan ''*(á)-s'' [PIE ''*(ó)-s''] forms nouns, as in ''*p<sup>h</sup>árs'' "thief" [PIE ''*b<sup>h</sup>ṓr'' "thief"] from ''*p<sup>h</sup>air'' "bearing".
 
Aryan ''*(_)-as'' [PIE ''*(é)-os''] forms active animate nouns, as in ''kʰúh<sub>2</sub>as'' "living sound" [PIE ''*ḱlewos'' "fame"]. If the meaning intended is "racial", furthermore, the affix becomes ''*(_)-(a)ras'' [PIE ''*(∅)-(u)ros''], as in ''h<sub>5</sub>ímsaras'' "engenderer" [PIE ''*h<sub>2</sub>ḿ̥suros'' "deity"].
 
Aryan ''*(∅)-ás'' [PIE ''*(e)-ós''] forms active animate adjectives, as in ...
 
Aryan ''*(á)-as'' [PIE ''*(ó)-os''] forms passive animate nouns, as in ''*p<sup>h</sup>áras'' "what is born" [PIE ''*b<sup>h</sup>óros'' "what is brought"]
 
Aryan ''*(a)-ás'' [PIE ''*(o)-ós''] forms passive animate adjectives, as in ... became agentive instead of passive in PIE, but some archaic forms remain, such as *gʰoysós "spear"
 
Aryan ''*(_)-ar'' [PIE *([é/ó)-r̥] forms active inanimate nouns, as in ''*húdar'' "water" [PIE  ''*wódr̥'' "water"]
 
Aryan ''*(∅)-ár'' forms active inanimate adjectives.
 
Aryan ''*(á)-ar'' forms passive inanimate nouns.
 
Aryan ''*(a)-ár'' forms passive inanimate adjectives.
 
-


  *(_)-as [forms active animate nouns] EX: kʰúh<sub>2</sub>as "sound" = PIE *(é)-os in *ḱlewos
Aryan ''*(_)-tár'' forms agent nouns.
*(∅)-ás [forms active animate adjectives] EX: *pdás "capable to step" = PIE *(e)-ós in *pṓds
*(á)-as [forms passive animate nouns] EX: ... = PIE *(ó)-os in ...
*(a)-ás [forms passive animate adjectives] EX: = PIE *(o)-ós, *the construction became agentive instead of passive in PIE, but some archaic forms remain, such as *gʰoysós "spear"
*(_)-ar [forms active inanimate nouns] EX: *húdar "water" = PIE *-r̥ in *wódr̥
*(∅)-ár [forms active inanimate adjectives]
*(á)-ar [forms passive inanimate nouns]
*(a)-ár [forms passive inanimate adjectives]


mas
Aryan  ''*(_)-tram'' forms instrument nouns. It is a fusion of ''*(_)-tár'' [agent particle] and ''*-am'' [neuter particle]


*(_)-tár [forms agent nouns]
Aryan ''*()-C-ás'' [PIE ''*()-mós''] [forms derived nouns through mobile roots] EX: ''*pʰtʰūymás'' PIE =
*(_)-tram [forms instrument nouns] *fusion of *(_)-tár [agent particle] and *-am [neuter particle]
*(∅)-C-ás [forms derived nouns through mobile roots] EX: *pʰtʰūymás PIE = PIE *(∅)-mós


===Root===
===Root===
Line 3,069: Line 3,141:


====Personal Pronouns [...]====
====Personal Pronouns [...]====
[...]
English, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Persian, Latin, Greek, Sanskrit...
Brugmann; Grundriss [...] ⇒ Schmidt, Stammbildung und Flexion (argues in favor of eǵ as older tham eǵom) ⇒ P. Forchheimer, The category of person in language, Berlin 1953
⇒ Benveniste, La nature des pronoms > https://www.academia.edu/1478874/Die_komplexe_Morphologie_der_urindogermanischen_Personalpronomina_draft_
Stop Borrowing! Anatolian/Indo-European Stops, Voice, and Northwest Semitic Loans – With Notes on Ugaritic grdš, ztr, dġṯ and Other Words


[...]
[...]
Line 3,112: Line 3,193:


*The first-person singular ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' (PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'') seems to be a descendent of the primordial form ''ˈʕih-ɔː'' "I" , which would regularly yield stress on the first syllable, yet it is observed that in PIE the consonant <''*ǵ''> appears (probably a consequence from the sound change '''*h<sub>1</sub> ⇒ *ǵ / V_V'''), plus the affixation of <''*n''>, a borrowing from Diluvian ''nao'' "this person".
*The first-person singular ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' (PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'') seems to be a descendent of the primordial form ''ˈʕih-ɔː'' "I" , which would regularly yield stress on the first syllable, yet it is observed that in PIE the consonant <''*ǵ''> appears (probably a consequence from the sound change '''*h<sub>1</sub> ⇒ *ǵ / V_V'''), plus the affixation of <''*n''>, a borrowing from Diluvian ''nao'' "this person".
**In PIE, the emphatic''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'' could be interpreted as more archaic than ''*h₁eǵH'', as Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'' and Sanskrit ''अहम्'' suggest. The emphatic particle ''*-om'' (PIE) likely arose due the contaminator <''*m''>.
**In PIE, the emphatic ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'' could be interpreted as more archaic than ''*h₁eǵH'', as Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'' and Sanskrit ''अहम्'' suggest. The emphatic particle ''*-om'' (PIE) likely arose due the contaminator <''*m''>.
**The nasal in ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' "I" became <''*m''> primarily due two distinct processes; one phonetic and other phonological. It was either subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /oːn/ ⇒ /own/ ⇒ /om/), and/or swapped by the contaminator ''*m'' based on its inflected forms.
**The nasal in ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' "I" became <''*m''> primarily due two distinct processes; one phonetic and other phonological. It was either subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /oːn/ ⇒ /own/ ⇒ /om/), and/or swapped by the contaminator ''*m'' based on its inflected forms.
***This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular (e.g. ''*nh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' "me" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*mh<sub>0</sub>'' ~ ''*h<sub>0</sub>m'' "me" (?) ⇒ ''*me'' ~ ''*h<sub>1</sub>me'' "me" (PIE)).
***This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular (e.g. ''*nh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' "me" (A) ⇒ ''*mh<sub>0</sub>'' ~ ''*h<sub>0</sub>m'' "me" (?) ⇒ ''*me'' ~ ''*h<sub>1</sub>me'' "me" (PIE)).
*The second-person singular ''*tū́'' (PIE ''*túH'') seems to be a descendent of Diluvian ''taocar'' "the person one refers to", with an unusual vocalic paradigm. If this is correct, a more conservative alternative might have been ''*táu''.
*The second-person singular ''*tū́'' (PIE ''*túH'') seems to be a descendent of Diluvian ''taocar'' "the person one refers to", with an unusual vocalic paradigm. If this is correct, a more conservative alternative might have been ''*táu''.
**In PIE, the pronoun ''*túH'' is extremely conservative, found as ''tu'' in Latin, ''σύ'' in Greek, and ''त्वम्'' in Sanskrit, for example. In PIA, though, Hittite ''zīg'' and Palaic ''ti'' suggest Indo-Anatolian ''*tī́''<ref name=Kloekorst>Alwin Kloekorst (2007); [https://archive.org/details/etymological-dictionary-of-the-hittite-inherited-lexicon/mode/1up ''Etymological Dictionary Of The Hittite Inherited Lexicon'']</ref>; although it could also be pointed out that the Anatolitan counterparts might be mere rearrangements from the non-emphatic PIE 1.SG.NOM. ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵ(ō)'' plus an accusative enclitic of the second-person singular (i.e. ''*te-eǵ'' ⇒ ''*tī́ǵ'' (PA))<ref name=Szemerényi>Oswald Szemerényi (1990); [https://archive.org/details/szemerenyieinfuhrungindievergleichendesprachwissenschaft4thedition1990/mode/2up ''Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft'']</ref><ref name=Petersen>Walter Petersen (1930); [https://www.jstor.org/stable/409118?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ''The Inflection of Indo-European Personal Pronouns'']</ref>, or even the result of the palatalization of apical consonants due phonetic height (i.e. ''*tū'' (PIA) ⇒ ''*tyū'' (?) ⇒ ''*tī'' (PA))<ref name=Melchert>Craig Melchert (1983); [https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/Melchert/2ndsingularpronoun.pdf ''The Second Singular Personal Pronoun in Anatolian'']</ref>.
**In PIE, the pronoun ''*túH'' is extremely conservative, found as ''tu'' in Latin, ''σύ'' in Greek, and ''त्वम्'' in Sanskrit, for example. In PIA, though, Hittite ''zīg'' and Palaic ''ti'' suggest Indo-Anatolian ''*tī́''<ref name=Kloekorst>Alwin Kloekorst (2007); [https://archive.org/details/etymological-dictionary-of-the-hittite-inherited-lexicon/mode/1up ''Etymological Dictionary Of The Hittite Inherited Lexicon'']</ref>; although it could also be pointed out that the Anatolitan counterparts might be mere rearrangements from the non-emphatic PIE 1.SG.NOM. ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵ(ō)'' plus an accusative enclitic of the second-person singular (i.e. ''*te-eǵ'' ⇒ ''*tī́ǵ'' (PA))<ref name=Szemerényi>Oswald Szemerényi (1990); [https://archive.org/details/szemerenyieinfuhrungindievergleichendesprachwissenschaft4thedition1990/mode/2up ''Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft'']</ref><ref name=Petersen>Walter Petersen (1930); [https://www.jstor.org/stable/409118?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ''The Inflection of Indo-European Personal Pronouns'']</ref>, or even the result of the palatalization of apical consonants due phonetic height (i.e. ''*tū'' (PIA) ⇒ ''*tyū'' (?) ⇒ ''*tī'' (PA))<ref name=Melchert>Craig Melchert (1983); [https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/Melchert/2ndsingularpronoun.pdf ''The Second Singular Personal Pronoun in Anatolian'']</ref>.
*The third-person singulars ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'', ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>'', and ''*aī́ts'' possess a shorter form when complemented by a noun (e.g. ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>0</sub>naír h<sub>0</sub>í'' "he, the man"). The reason for this is that in the Codex, pronouns used to be morphologically treated as affixes, and therefore couldn't stand by themselves except when linked to a root (e.g. ''ˈə-e̞ː'' "he/she/it", but not ''**e̞ː'').
*The third-person singulars ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'', ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>'', and ''*aī́ts'' possess a shorter form when complemented by a noun (e.g. ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>0</sub>naī́r h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he, the man"). The reason for this is that in the Codex, pronouns used to be morphologically treated as affixes, and therefore couldn't stand by themselves except when linked to a root (e.g. ''ˈə-e̞ː'' "he/she/it", but not ''**e̞ː'').
**As a result, the clitic counterparts gained a sense as proximal demonstratives in PIE, being evident in forms such as Latin ''is'' "he", ''ea'' "she", and ''id'' "it", whose anaphoric use prohibts them to stand by themselves.
**As a result, the clitic counterparts gained a sense as proximal demonstratives in PIE, being evident in forms such as Latin ''is'' "he", ''ea'' "she", and ''id'' "it", whose anaphoric use prohibts them to stand by themselves.
***e.g. ''*h<sub>0</sub>í'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>í'' "this/he"; ''*íh<sub>0</sub>'' "she" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íh<sub>2</sub>'' "this/she"; ''*íts'' "it" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íd'' "this/it".
***e.g. ''*h<sub>0</sub>í'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>í'' "this/he"; ''*íh<sub>0</sub>'' "she" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íh<sub>2</sub>'' "this/she"; ''*íts'' "it" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íd'' "this/it".
*Overall, the dual is formed by erasing sounds of the singular, then reduplicating it (e.g. ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ōi̯ṓn''; ''*tū́'' ⇒ ''*ūi̯ū́''; ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' ⇒ ''*aīaī́''), while the plural is formed by erasing the reduplication of the dual, then adding the serial particle ''*-s-'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓns''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́s''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́s''), and the collective simply does the latter but with the suffix ''*-a'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓna''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́a''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́a''''). Medial ''*i̯'' ~ ''*u̯'' is inserted to avoid diphthongs between reduplicated vowels, and ''*ts'' is applied in other cases when two bordering vowels are similar (except those involving schwas).
*Overall, the dual is formed by erasing sounds of the singular, then reduplicating it (e.g. ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ōi̯ṓn''; ''*tū́'' ⇒ ''*ūi̯ū́''; ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' ⇒ ''*aīaī́''), while the plural is formed by erasing the reduplication of the dual, then adding the serial particle ''*-s-'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓns''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́s''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́s''), and the collective simply does the latter but with the suffix ''*-a'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓna''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́a''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́a''''). Medial ''*i̯'' ~ ''*u̯'' is inserted to avoid diphthongs between reduplicated vowels, and ''*ts'' is applied in other cases when two bordering vowels are similar (except those involving schwas).
**The dual products of this process would eventually substitute the plural forms of the first and second-person in their nominative equivalents (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōi̯ṓn'' "we (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūi̯ū́'' "you (dual)" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)), while their oblique inflections for example would assume the same spot in the dual of the Indo-European languages (i.e. ''*noh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 1.DU.ACC. (Aryan) ⇒ ''*n̥h<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*nōh<sub>1</sub>'' 1.DU.ACC. (PIE); ''*i̯uh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 2.DU.ACC. (Aryan) ⇒ ''*uh<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*wōh<sub>1</sub>'' 2.DU.ACC. (PIE)).
**Rather than the nominative of the first and second-person dual/plural in PIE being prehistorical combinations (i.e. ''*u'' 2.SG + ''*e'' 1.SG. +  = ''we'' 1.DU./PL.; ''*i'' 3.SG. + ''*u'' 2.SG = ''*yu'' 2.DU./PL.)<ref name=Seebold>Elmar Seebold (1984); [https://annas-archive.org/md5/e8ece7cab77fe9adeae0052312aa3d89 ''Das System der Personalpronomina in den frühgermanischen Sprachen: Sein Aufbau und seine Herkunft'']</ref>, the dual products of the Aryan patterns would eventually substitute the plural forms of the first and second-person in their nominative equivalents (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōi̯ṓn'' "we (dual)" (A) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūi̯ū́'' "you (dual)" (A) ⇒ ''*yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)), while their oblique inflections for example would assume other spots in the ancestor of Indo-European languages (i.e. ''*noh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 1.DU.ACC. (A) ⇒ ''*n̥h<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*nōh<sub>1</sub>'' 1.DU.ACC. (PIE); ''*i̯uh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 2.DU.ACC. (A) ⇒ ''*uh<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*wōh<sub>1</sub>'' 2.DU.ACC. (PIE)).
**The particle <''*m''> gains the property of the serial particle <''*s''> when the latter conflates with the particle ''*ts'' (e.g. third-person plural locative ''*itsim'' instead of ''*itsis''). This contamination was likely encouraged due the abundant presence of ''*m'' in the accusative, and produces an alternative explanation to the hypothesis that the oblique of the first-person plural was''*ms-'' before becoming ''*ns-''<ref name=Sihler>Andrew Sihler (1995); [https://archive.org/details/sihler-andrew-new-comparative-grammar-of-greek-and-latin/mode/2up ''New Comparative Grammar Of Greek And Latin'']</ref>. Later in PIE, not only plural forms (e.g. ''*nsai̯(m)'' 1.PL.DAT. (Aryan) ⇒ ''*n̥sméy'' 1.PL.DAT. (PIE))  would become contaminated, but also singular ones (e.g. ''*iai̯'' "to him" (Aryan) ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>esmōy'' "to him" (PIE)); including verbal affixes (e.g.''*-nas'' 1.PL.VB. (Aryan) ⇒ ''*-mos'' 1.PL.VB. (PIE)).
**The particle <''*m''> gains the property of the serial particle <''*s''> when the latter conflates with the particle ''*ts'' (e.g. third-person plural locative ''*itsim'' instead of ''*itsis''). This contamination was likely encouraged due the abundant presence of ''*m'' in the accusative, and produces an alternative explanation to the hypothesis that the oblique of the first-person plural was''*ms-'' before becoming ''*ns-''<ref name=Sihler>Andrew Sihler (1995); [https://archive.org/details/sihler-andrew-new-comparative-grammar-of-greek-and-latin/mode/2up ''New Comparative Grammar Of Greek And Latin'']</ref>. Later in PIE, not only plural forms (e.g. ''*nsai̯(m)'' 1.PL.DAT. (A) ⇒ ''*n̥sméy'' 1.PL.DAT. (PIE))  would become contaminated, but also singular ones (e.g. ''*iai̯'' "to him" (A) ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>esmōy'' "to him" (PIE)); including verbal affixes (e.g.''*-nas'' 1.PL.VB. (A) ⇒ ''*-mos'' 1.PL.VB. (PIE)).


====Possessive Pronouns====


nás, tu̯ás, h0iás/ih0ás/i ... tsu̯á


in Aryan possessive pronouns could be produced through the pure oblique or any inflected form, as long as it received the affix -ás.


<ref name=Petersen>Walter Petersen (1930); ''The Inflection of Indo-European Personal Pronouns''</ref>
nás ~ nai̯ás ~ ni̯aás ~ niás


nás h0naír


du
compare the translation for "my man"


''*nh0(m)ás h0naī́r'' (A) > ''*h1mós h2nḗr'' (PIE) > ''ἐμός ἀνήρ'' (G)


ki > si
ku > hu


ti > tsi
tu > lu


-as -ah0 -am | -aī -ah0ī -aī
-ias -i | -īas īs
-h0i -ih0 -its | -h0ias -ih0as -itsas




====Reflexive Pronouns====


dau
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
 
! rowspan="2" |
J.Schmidt, KZ 36.405ff argues in favor of eǵ as older tham eǵom
! colspan="4" | REFLEXIVE PRONOUN DECLENSION
 
|-
 
! Singular
Melchert,MSS42,1983,151-165
! Dual
Eichner, KZ 96, 1983,
! Plural
Seebold. Das System der Personalpronomina in den frühgerm
! Collective
Brugmann; Grundriss
|-
Schmidt, Stammbildung und Flexion der
! Nominative
Seebold. Das System der Personalpronomina in den frühgerm
| *tsū́r ~ *tsáur || *ūi̯ū́r || ū́rs || *ū́ra
P. Forchheimer, The category of person in language, Berlin 1953
|-
Benveniste, La nature des pronoms
! Accusative
| *su̯h<sub>0</sub> || *ruh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rsh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rah<sub>0</sub>
|-
! Genitive
| *su̯i̯a || *rui̯a || *u̯rsi̯a || *u̯rai̯a
|-
! Locative
| *su̯i || *rui || *u̯rsi || *u̯rai
|-
! Dative
| *su̯ai̯ || *ruai̯ || *u̯rsai̯ || *u̯raai̯
|-
|}
 
*The reflexive pronoun ''*tsū́r'' derives from an older ''*ū́tsar'' (equivalent to Aryan ''*aítsar'' "this/that one", PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other"), itself a borrowing from Diluvian ''aocar'', whose <''*ū́''> portion is still visible in another borrowing into Aryan (i.e. the second-person singular ''*tū́'').
**In PIE, it was reanalyzed as its accusative form (i.e.''*su̯h<sub>0</sub>'' "themselves" ⇒ ''*swé'' "themselves"), thus degrading the dual, plural, and collective inflections.
 
====Demonstrative Pronouns====


[..]


Boisacq : É. Boisacq, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Heidelberg, 1916.
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
Brugmann, Griech. Gram?: Griechische Grammatik,
! rowspan="3" |
Chantraine, GH: Grammaire homérique.
! colspan="12" | PRONOUN DECLENSION
Chantraine, Morphologie : Morphologie historique du grec. 1947. 2nd ed. 1961.
|-
Chantraine, Formation ` La formation des noms en grec ancien
! colspan="3" | Singular
CIL : Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum.
! colspan="3" | Dual
Collitz-Bechtel, D: Sammlung griechischer Dialektinschriften. 1884— 1915
! colspan="3" | Plural
Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen: J. Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fälle von Gelenkheteroklisie. Dissert. Zürich
! colspan="3" | Collective
Ehrlich, Betonung ` Untersuchungen über die Natur der griechischen Betonung. 1912
|-
Ernout-Meillet, Dictionnaire étym.: Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine
! Masculine
Evidence for Laryngeals : Evidence for Laryngeals — Work papers of a conference in Indo—European linguistics on May 7 and 8, 1959. Edited by Werner Winter. Austin, Texas, 1960
! Feminine
Frisk, GEW ` Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg 1954
! Neuter
Kuryłowicz, A pophonie ` L'apophonie en indo-européen. 1956.
! Masculine
Kuryłowicz, Accentuation *: L'accentuation des langues indo—européennes. 2nd ed. 1958.
! Feminine
Leumann-Hofmann :M. Leumann-]. B. Hofmann, Lateinische Grammatik, 5th ed. 1926-8
! Neuter
Meillet, Zz£roduction 9: Introduction a l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. 8th ed. 1937
! Masculine
Pokorny : Pokorny, /wdogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. 1948-
! Feminine
Wackernagel (-Debrunner), AzGr. : Altindische Grammatik
! Neuter
 
! Masculine
====Possessive Pronouns====
! Feminine
 
! Neuter
nás, tu̯ás, h0iás/ih0ás/i ... tsu̯á
|-
 
! Nominative
in Aryan possessive pronouns could be produced through the pure oblique or any inflected form, as long as it received the affix -ás.
| *h<sub>0</sub>tsar|| *tsah<sub>0</sub>r || *tsar || *h<sub>0</sub>tātā  || *tātāh<sub>0</sub> || *tātā || *h<sub>0</sub>tās || *tāh<sub>0</sub>s || *tās || *h<sub>0</sub>tāa || *tāh<sub>0</sub>a || *tāa
 
nás ~ nai̯ás ~ ni̯aás ~ niás
 
nás h0naír
 
compare the translation for "my man"
 
''*nh0(m)ás h0naī́r'' (A) > ''*h1mós h2nḗr'' (PIE) > ''ἐμός ἀνήρ'' (G)
 
 
 
-as -ah0 -am | -aī -ah0ī -aī
-ias -i | -īas īs
-h0i -ih0 -its | -h0ias -ih0as -itsas
 
 
====Reflexive Pronouns====
 
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
! rowspan="2" |
! colspan="4" | REFLEXIVE PRONOUN DECLENSION
|-
! Singular
! Dual
! Plural
! Collective
|-
! Nominative
| *tsū́r ~ *tsáur || *ūi̯ū́r || ū́rs || *ū́ra
|-
|-
! Accusative
! Accusative
| *su̯h<sub>0</sub> || *ruh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rsh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rah<sub>0</sub>
| *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>m || *tats || *atam || *atah<sub>0</sub>m || *atats || *tasm || *tah<sub>0</sub>sm || *tas || *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>am || *taa
|-
|-
! Genitive
! Genitive
| *su̯i̯a || *rui̯a || *u̯rsi̯a || *u̯rai̯a
| *tai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *tai̯a || *atai̯a || *atah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *atai̯a || *tasi̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>si̯a || *tasi̯a || *taai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯a || *taai̯a
|-
|-
! Locative
! Locative
| *su̯i || *rui || *u̯rsi || *u̯rai
| *tai || *tah<sub>0</sub>i || *tai || *atai || *atah<sub>0</sub>i || *atai || *tasi || *tah<sub>0</sub>si || *tasi || *taai || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai || *taai
|-
|-
! Dative
! Dative
| *su̯ai̯ || *ruai̯ || *u̯rsai̯ || *u̯raai̯
| *taai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *taai̯ || *ataai̯ || *atah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *ataai̯ || *tasai̯  || *tah<sub>0</sub>sai̯ || *tasai̯ || *taaai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>aai̯ || *taaai̯
|-
|-
|}
|}


*The reflexive pronoun ''*tsū́r'' derives from an older ''*ū́tsar'' (equivalent to Aryan ''*aítsar'' "this/that one", PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other"), itself a borrowing from Diluvian ''aocar'', whose <''*ū́''> portion is still visible in another borrowing into Aryan (i.e. the second-person singular ''*tū́'').
''*-tsaras'' (emphatic affix) ⇒ ''*-teros'' (emphatic affix), with the demonstrative sense shown in ''*aítsaras'' "one there" ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other"
**In PIE, it was reanalyzed as its accusative form (i.e.''*su̯h<sub>0</sub>'' "themselves" ⇒ ''*swé'' "themselves"), thus degrading the dual, plural, and collective inflections.
 
tsar > *só "that"
-om (emphatic)
 
-tar (loc.)
*íta "there/then/thus"
*h1itH "thus" EX: ita
*h1idH "here" EX: ibi
*tor "there"
tso
-r "locative"
 
ítar > h1itH
tsatar "that > tor
 
 


====Demonstrative Pronouns====
 
h0tā́a > h1etṓa > tóy
táa > téa > teh2
 
 
h0 may become h1 as <e> or h2 as <a>
 
*aī́h0i, *aī́h0, *aíts > *h0i, *ih0, *its
*h5ílias, *h5íli > *lis, li
 
specialized/not
 
as this segment results in 6 possibilities
ʕih > ~  h5ī ~ aī ~ aih1 ~  h5ih1 ~ ai ~ i
 
*All demonstratives of the ''*-ias'' paradigm transitioned from animate/inanimate to masculine/feminine/neuter declension.
**Either through the tonic form (e.g. "other" ''*h<sub>5</sub>ílias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íli'' (Aryan) ⇒  ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyos'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyeh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyod'' (PIE)), or the clitic form (e.g. "this" ''*kis'', ''*ki'' (from Aryan ''*h<sub>5</sub>íkias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íki'') > ''*ḱís'', ''*ḱíh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*ḱíd'' (PIE)).
 
====Interrogative Pronouns====


[..]
[..]


{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
====Indefinite Pronouns====
! rowspan="3" |
 
! colspan="12" | PRONOUN DECLENSION
[..]
|-
! colspan="3" | Singular
! colspan="3" | Dual
! colspan="3" | Plural
! colspan="3" | Collective
|-
! Masculine
! Feminine
! Neuter
! Masculine
! Feminine
! Neuter
! Masculine
! Feminine
! Neuter
! Masculine
! Feminine
! Neuter
|-
! Nominative
| *h<sub>0</sub>tsar|| *tsah<sub>0</sub>r || *tsar || *h<sub>0</sub>tātā  || *tātāh<sub>0</sub> || *tātā || *h<sub>0</sub>tās || *tāh<sub>0</sub>s || *tās || *h<sub>0</sub>tāa || *tāh<sub>0</sub>a || *tāa
|-
! Accusative
| *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>m || *tats || *atam || *atah<sub>0</sub>m || *atats || *tasm || *tah<sub>0</sub>sm || *tas || *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>am || *taa
|-
! Genitive
| *tai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *tai̯a || *atai̯a || *atah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *atai̯a || *tasi̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>si̯a || *tasi̯a || *taai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯a || *taai̯a
|-
! Locative
| *tai || *tah<sub>0</sub>i || *tai || *atai || *atah<sub>0</sub>i || *atai || *tasi || *tah<sub>0</sub>si || *tasi || *taai || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai || *taai
|-
! Dative
| *taai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *taai̯ || *ataai̯ || *atah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *ataai̯ || *tasai̯  || *tah<sub>0</sub>sai̯ || *tasai̯ || *taaai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>aai̯ || *taaai̯
|-
|}


''*-tsaras'' (emphatic affix) ⇒ ''*-teros'' (emphatic affix), with the demonstrative sense shown in ''*aítsaras'' "one there" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other"
====Relative Pronouns====


tsar > *só "that"
[..]
-om (emphatic)


-tar (loc.)
===Verb===
*íta "there/then/thus"
*h1itH "thus" EX: ita
*h1idH "here" EX: ibi
*tor "there"
tso
-r "locative"


ítar > h1itH
[...]
tsatar "that > tor


====Aspect====


The Origin of Aspect in the Indo-European Languages  Oswald Szemerényi




h0tā́a > h1etṓa > tóy
====?====
táa > téa > teh2


''*gaínōm'', ''*gígnmi'' "I generate"
''*pūhāṓm'', ''*píbmi'' "I drink"
''*wehdḗyōm'', ''*wḗydmi'' "I see"


h0 may become h1 as <e> or h2 as <a>
*gánas > γόνος  "offspring"


*aī́h0i, *aī́h0, *aíts > *h0i, *ih0, *its
Initial clusters in the Nominative will give way to /ə/<br>
*h5ílias, *h5íli > *lis, li
*ptā́r (A)> *patḗr (PIE)<br>
*páh5man > *póh5mn̥ > πῶμα "slid"<br>
[*peh5] "feed, protect"


specialized/not


as this segment results in 6 possibilities
ʕih > ~  h5ī ~ aī ~ aih1 ~  h5ih1 ~ ai ~ i


*All demonstratives of the ''*-ias'' paradigm transitioned from animate/inanimate to masculine/feminine/neuter declension.
**Either through the tonic form (e.g. "other" ''*h<sub>5</sub>ílias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íli'' (Aryan) ⇒  ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyos'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyeh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyod'' (PIE)), or the clitic form (e.g. "this" ''*kis'', ''*ki'' (from Aryan ''*h<sub>5</sub>íkias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íki'') > ''*ḱís'', ''*ḱíh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*ḱíd'' (PIE)).


====Interrogative Pronouns====
''*pʰair-'' "bearing" [n/v] (Latin ferō, Greek φέρω < ''*pʰaírōm'', ''*pʰíprmi'') > ''*pʰaíras'' [bare noun], ''*pʰ∅rás'' "bearer" [adjective-noun] (Latin fūr, Greek φώρ "thief"), ''*pʰáras'' [result-noun] (Greek φόρος "tribute")


[..]
''*daim-'' "building" [n/v] (Greek δέμω < ''*daímōm'', ''*dídmmi'') > ''*daímas'' [bare noun], ''*d∅más'' "building" [adjective-noun] (Greek δῶ "house"), ''*dámas'' "house" [result-noun] (Latin domus, Greek δόμος "house")
 
====Indefinite Pronouns====
 
[..]
 
====Relative Pronouns====
 
[..]
 
===Verb===
 
[...]
 
====Aspect====
 
The Origin of Aspect in the Indo-European Languages  Oswald Szemerényi


 
''*paid-'' "stepping" [n/v] (''*paídōm'', ''*pípdmi'') > ''*paídas'' [bare noun], ''*p∅dás'' "foot" [adjective-noun] (Latin pes, Greek  πούς "foot"), ''*pádas'' "step" [result-noun]
====?====
 
''*gaínōm'', ''*gígnmi'' "I generate"
''*pūhāṓm'', ''*píbmi'' "I drink"
''*wehdḗyōm'', ''*wḗydmi'' "I see"
 
*gánas > γόνος  "offspring"
 
Initial clusters in the Nominative will give way to /ə/<br>
*ptā́r (A)> *patḗr (PIE)<br>
*páh5man > *póh5mn̥ > πῶμα "slid"<br>
[*peh5] "feed, protect"
 
 
 
 
''*pʰair-'' "bearing" [n/v] (Latin ferō, Greek φέρω < ''*pʰaírōm'', ''*pʰíprmi'') > ''*pʰaíras'' [bare noun], ''*pʰ∅rás'' "bearer" [adjective-noun] (Latin fūr, Greek φώρ "thief"), ''*pʰáras'' [result-noun] (Greek φόρος "tribute")
 
''*daim-'' "building" [n/v] (Greek δέμω < ''*daímōm'', ''*dídmmi'') > ''*daímas'' [bare noun], ''*d∅más'' "building" [adjective-noun] (Greek δῶ "house"), ''*dámas'' "house" [result-noun] (Latin domus, Greek δόμος "house")
 
''*paid-'' "stepping" [n/v] (''*paídōm'', ''*pípdmi'') > ''*paídas'' [bare noun], ''*p∅dás'' "foot" [adjective-noun] (Latin pes, Greek  πούς "foot"), ''*pádas'' "step" [result-noun]


''*kpain-'' "killing" [n/v] (Proto-Indo-European *kʷʰen, Latin de-fendo "I expell from") > ''*kpaínas'' [bare noun], ''*kp∅nás'' "murderer" [adjective-noun], ''*kpánas'' "murder" [result-noun] (Greek φόνος "murder")
''*kpain-'' "killing" [n/v] (Proto-Indo-European *kʷʰen, Latin de-fendo "I expell from") > ''*kpaínas'' [bare noun], ''*kp∅nás'' "murderer" [adjective-noun], ''*kpánas'' "murder" [result-noun] (Greek φόνος "murder")
Line 3,561: Line 3,590:




perfect: I have run [action started and halted, not necessarily completed]
perfect: I have run [action started and halted, not necessarily completed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
perfective: I have run [action started and completed]
perfective: I have run [action started and completed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
*the syntax of a language is marked by its idiosyncratic constructions
*the syntax of a language is marked by its idiosyncratic constructions
 
 
il semblerait qu'ils se soient intensifiés
il semblerait qu'ils se soient intensifiés
 
 
parece (por hypóthese) que eles se intensificaram
parece (por hypóthese) que eles se intensificaram
 
 
movement verbs and cases: cubitum ire *as French and German treat it in the european sprachbund
movement verbs and cases: cubitum ire *as French and German treat it in the european sprachbund
eo domum
eo domum
end goal: accusative
end goal: accusative
*h2iyṓm dámam
*h2iyṓm dámam
 
 
 
 
[[w:Standard average european||europoid]]
[[w:Standard average european||europoid]]
 
 
 
 
какой-то сказал
какой-то сказал
 
 
Ja vot tut ...
in dem Anfang, hat Gott die Erde und den Himmel geschaffen
 
Männer, deren Kinder gestorben haben,
==Sample text==
der Schicksal dessen, der gelitten habt
 
der Schicksal derer, die gelitten haben
==References==
 
 
Ja vot tut ...
 
 
Bergaige, Abel; Du Rôle de la dérivation dans la déclinaison indo-européenne: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57721099.texteImage#
==Sample text==
 
 
Bergaige, Abel; Essai sur la construction grammaticale considérée dans son développement historique, en sanscrit, en grec, en latin, dans les langues romanes et dans les langues germaniques: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5803410m/f6
==References==
 
 
>
Einleitung in die Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (Pott)
 
 
Einleitung in die Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (Pott)
hermann hirt Indogermanische Grammatik
 
Franz Bopp
 
Schleicher
 
Calvert Watkins
 
Jochem Schindler
 
Helmut Rix
 
Kuryłowicz
 
 
 
Boisacq : É. Boisacq, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Heidelberg, 1916.
Brugmann, Griech. Gram?: Griechische Grammatik,
Chantraine, GH: Grammaire homérique.
Chantraine, Morphologie : Morphologie historique du grec. 1947. 2nd ed. 1961.
Chantraine, Formation ` La formation des noms en grec ancien
CIL : Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum.
Collitz-Bechtel, D: Sammlung griechischer Dialektinschriften. 1884— 1915
Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen: J. Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fälle von Gelenkheteroklisie. Dissert. Zürich
Ehrlich, Betonung ` Untersuchungen über die Natur der griechischen Betonung. 1912
Ernout-Meillet, Dictionnaire étym.: Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine
Evidence for Laryngeals : Evidence for Laryngeals — Work papers of a conference in Indo—European linguistics on May 7 and 8, 1959. Edited by Werner Winter. Austin, Texas, 1960
Frisk, GEW ` Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg 1954
Kuryłowicz, A pophonie ` L'apophonie en indo-européen. 1956.
Kuryłowicz, Accentuation *: L'accentuation des langues indo—européennes. 2nd ed. 1958.
Leumann-Hofmann :M. Leumann-]. B. Hofmann, Lateinische Grammatik, 5th ed. 1926-8
Meillet, Zz£roduction 9: Introduction a l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. 8th ed. 1937
Pokorny : Pokorny, /wdogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. 1948-
Wackernagel (-Debrunner), AzGr. : Altindische Grammatik
 
 
Bergaige, Abel; Du Rôle de la dérivation dans la déclinaison indo-européenne: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57721099.texteImage#
 
Bergaige, Abel; Essai sur la construction grammaticale considérée dans son développement historique, en sanscrit, en grec, en latin, dans les langues romanes et dans les langues germaniques: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5803410m/f6
 
>
 
 




2,719

edits