2,719
edits
| (40 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{Construction}} | {{Construction}} | ||
'''Aryan''' (''* | '''Aryan''' (''*Ai̯ri̯áh<sub>0</sub>'', [[w:Help:IPA|[əi̯ˈri̯əʔ]]]), also referred to as '''Pre-Proto-Indo-European,''' is an [[ab interiori language]] depicting the transition from [[Paleolithic Codes]] to [[w:Proto-Indo-European language|Proto-Indo-European]] (PIE). There are no historical records of its existence, or comparative data to support it; rather, it is an abductive experiment based on the hypothesis of [[Transitional Dialects]]. | ||
In most of known [[w:History|History]], indo-european speaking populations have been widespread in [[w:Eurasia|Eurasia]], bearing fruits from civilizations such as those of the [[w:Roman empire|Roman Empire]], the [[w:Ancient Greece|Hellenistic City-States]], and the [[w:List of ancient Indo-Aryan peoples and tribes|Rigvedic Tribes]]. Memorable personalities who spoke natively dialects from those areas include the roman general [[w:Gaius Julius Caesar|Julius Caesar]] (speaker of [[w:Latin|Latin]]), the macedonian king [[w:Alexander the Great|Alexander the Great]] (speaker of [[w:Ancient Greek|Ancient Greek]]), the nazi chancellor [[w:Adolf Hitler|Adolf Hitler]] (speaker of [[w:German language|German]]), the french emperor [[w:Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon Bonaparte]] (speaker of [[w:Corsican langugae|Corsican]]), the british physicist [[w:Isaac Newton|Isaac Newton]] (speaker of [[w:English language|English]]), the italian renascentist [[w:Leonardo da Vinci|Leoanardo da Vinci]] (speaker of [[w:Tuscan dialect|Tuscan Italian]]), the indian ascetic [[w:Gautama Buddha|Gautama Buddha]] (speaker of [[w:Prakrit language|Prakrit]]), et cetera. Also, due the trajectory of the linguistic stock along the millenia, some of the most culturally influential works of Literature have been yielded, such as the [[w:Vulgate|Vulgate]], the [[w:Iliad|Iliad]], and the [[w:Vedas|Vedas]]. As of the [[w:21st Century|21<sup>st</sup> Century]], half of the world's population speaks 454 indo-european languages<ref>https://www.ethnologue.com/</ref>, with the [[w:Americas|Americas]], [[w:Europe|Europe]], [[w:Iran|Iran]], [[w:Pakistan|Pakistan]], and [[w:India|India]] being today the centers of native speakers due the [[w:Indo-European migrations|Indo-European Migrations]] and [[w:Colonial empires|European Colonialism]]. | In most of known [[w:History|History]], indo-european speaking populations have been widespread in [[w:Eurasia|Eurasia]], bearing fruits from civilizations such as those of the [[w:Roman empire|Roman Empire]], the [[w:Ancient Greece|Hellenistic City-States]], and the [[w:List of ancient Indo-Aryan peoples and tribes|Rigvedic Tribes]]. Memorable personalities who spoke natively dialects from those areas include the roman general [[w:Gaius Julius Caesar|Julius Caesar]] (speaker of [[w:Latin|Latin]]), the macedonian king [[w:Alexander the Great|Alexander the Great]] (speaker of [[w:Ancient Greek|Ancient Greek]]), the nazi chancellor [[w:Adolf Hitler|Adolf Hitler]] (speaker of [[w:German language|German]]), the french emperor [[w:Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon Bonaparte]] (speaker of [[w:Corsican langugae|Corsican]]), the british physicist [[w:Isaac Newton|Isaac Newton]] (speaker of [[w:English language|English]]), the italian renascentist [[w:Leonardo da Vinci|Leoanardo da Vinci]] (speaker of [[w:Tuscan dialect|Tuscan Italian]]), the indian ascetic [[w:Gautama Buddha|Gautama Buddha]] (speaker of [[w:Prakrit language|Prakrit]]), et cetera. Also, due the trajectory of the linguistic stock along the millenia, some of the most culturally influential works of Literature have been yielded, such as the [[w:Vulgate|Vulgate]], the [[w:Iliad|Iliad]], and the [[w:Vedas|Vedas]]. As of the [[w:21st Century|21<sup>st</sup> Century]], half of the world's population speaks 454 indo-european languages<ref>https://www.ethnologue.com/</ref>, with the [[w:Americas|Americas]], [[w:Europe|Europe]], [[w:Iran|Iran]], [[w:Pakistan|Pakistan]], and [[w:India|India]] being today the centers of native speakers due the [[w:Indo-European migrations|Indo-European Migrations]] and [[w:Colonial empires|European Colonialism]]. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
In the hybrid model, Aryan must have been spoken somewhere near the Caucasus Mountains in compliance with the [[w:Armenian hypothesis|Armenian Hypothesis]], which in its current form holds that the speakers of "Pre-Proto-Indo-European" pertained to the genepool of the [[w:Caucasus hunter-gatherer|Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers]] (CHG)<ref name=Lazaridis>Lazaridis et alii (2022); ''The genetic history of the Southern Arc: a bridge between West Asia and Europe''</ref>, who would eventually contribute to the formation of the [[w:Yamnaya culture|Yamnaya Culture]] and the dispersion of "Core Proto-Indo-European" as detailed in the [[w:Kurgan hypothesis|Kurgan Hypothesis]]. The age of the language is more controversial, being set between 12,000 and 10,000 years Before Present (BP), or the double of its daughter-language's, to coincide with the notion of [[Linguistic Modernity]]. | In the hybrid model, Aryan must have been spoken somewhere near the Caucasus Mountains in compliance with the [[w:Armenian hypothesis|Armenian Hypothesis]], which in its current form holds that the speakers of "Pre-Proto-Indo-European" pertained to the genepool of the [[w:Caucasus hunter-gatherer|Caucasian Hunter-Gatherers]] (CHG)<ref name=Lazaridis>Lazaridis et alii (2022); ''The genetic history of the Southern Arc: a bridge between West Asia and Europe''</ref>, who would eventually contribute to the formation of the [[w:Yamnaya culture|Yamnaya Culture]] and the dispersion of "Core Proto-Indo-European" as detailed in the [[w:Kurgan hypothesis|Kurgan Hypothesis]]. The age of the language is more controversial, being set between 12,000 and 10,000 years Before Present (BP), or the double of its daughter-language's, to coincide with the notion of [[Linguistic Modernity]]. | ||
==Etymology== | |||
The word ''*Ai̯ri̯áh<sub>0</sub>'' is influenced but not based on the Indo-Iranian ethnonym ''*Áryas'' "Aryan", as the root ''*h<sub>5</sub>ir'' "member/comrade" comes from Pangaean ''ʕihr'' "racial person". | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
===Development from Paleolithic Codes=== | ===Development from Paleolithic Codes=== | ||
The | The story of Aryan starts with the transition from Atomism to Double Articulation, or from the [[Pangaean Code]] to Neolithic dialects (circa 12,000 BP). Noticeable is the influence of the [[Diluvian Code|Diluvian]] and [[Hyperborean Code|Hyperborean]] Codes, which triggered several sound changes: | ||
*Weak (plosive) stops become aspirated/murmured preceding a laryngeal consonant, as strong (ejective/implosive) stops gain plosive qualities in the same position.<br> | *Weak (plosive) stops become aspirated/murmured preceding a laryngeal consonant, as strong (ejective/implosive) stops gain plosive qualities in the same position.<br> | ||
| Line 324: | Line 327: | ||
|''*wid-rás'' "aquatic" | |''*wid-rás'' "aquatic" | ||
|''*ud-rós'' "aquatic" | |''*ud-rós'' "aquatic" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''ˈkhuħ-ə'' "sound" | |''ˈkhuħ-ə'' "sound" | ||
| Line 342: | Line 337: | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Development into Indo-European Languages=== | ===Development into Indo-European Languages [...]=== | ||
Some tendences include the aspirated velars of Aryan becoming the PIE palatal series (*Kʰ ⇒ *Ḱ); .... | |||
https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Proto-Indo-European_roots&from=A | |||
*bʰeyh₂- | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | ||
!Codex | !Codex | ||
!Aryan | !Aryan | ||
| Line 354: | Line 353: | ||
| k̠- | | k̠- | ||
| *kʰpʰ- | | *kʰpʰ- | ||
| *ǵʰ | | *ǵʰ-d | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰewd-|''*ǵʰewd-'']] "to pour", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰed-|''*ǵʰed-'']] "to defecate", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱh₂d-|''*ḱh₂d-'']] "to fall" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k̠ | | -k̠ | ||
| *-kp | | *-kp | ||
| | | *-k<sup>w</sup> | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leykʷ-|''*leykʷ-'']] "to leave" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| k- | | k- | ||
| *kʰ- | | *kʰ- | ||
| *ḱ | | *ḱ | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱe|''*ḱe'']] "this" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k | | -k | ||
| Line 374: | Line 373: | ||
| k̟- | | k̟- | ||
| *kʰtʰ- | | *kʰtʰ- | ||
| *ḱ | | *ḱ-s | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)ker-|''*(s)ker-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)kelH-|''*(s)kelH'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/sek-|''*sek-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ḱes-|''*ḱes-'']], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kh₂eyd-|''*kh₂eyd-'']] "to cut"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gleyH-|''*gleyH-'']] "to stick" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k̟ | | -k̟ | ||
| -kt | | *-kt | ||
| *ḱ | | *p-ḱ | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/peh₂ḱ-|''*peh₂ḱ-'']] "to join", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/peh₂ǵ-|''*peh₂ǵ-'']] "to attach"; 2. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leyp-|''*leyp-'']] "to stick", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/leyǵ-|''*leyǵ-'']] "to bind"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰendʰ-|''*bʰendʰ-'']] "to bind" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| g̠- | | g̠- | ||
| *gʰbʰ- | | *gʰbʰ- | ||
| *gʰ | | *gʰ-bʰ | ||
| | | 1. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)pregʰ-|''*(s)pregʰ-'']] "sprinkle", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/glewbʰ-|''*glewbʰ-'']] "split", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeh₂g-|''*bʰeh₂g-'']] "to divide"; 3. [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeyd-|''*bʰeyd-'']] "to split" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -g̠ | | -g̠ | ||
| -gb | |||
| | | | ||
| | | *h₁éǵʰ "out" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| g- | | g- | ||
| Line 404: | Line 403: | ||
| g̟- | | g̟- | ||
| *gʰdʰ- | | *gʰdʰ- | ||
| *gʰ | | *gʰ-dʰ | ||
| '' | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gʰedʰ-|''*gʰedʰ-'']] "to join", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰendʰ-|''*bʰendʰ-'']] "to bind" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -g̟ | | -g̟ | ||
| Line 414: | Line 413: | ||
| k̠ʼ- | | k̠ʼ- | ||
| *kp- | | *kp- | ||
| *g | | *bʰ-g, *k-p | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeg-|''*bʰeg-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰreg-|''*bʰreg-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrew-|''*bʰrew-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰrews-|''*bʰrews-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kelh₂-|''*kelh₂-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/(s)kep-|''*(s)kep-'']] "break", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/Hrewp-|''*Hrewp-'']] "break" [may be from [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/Hrew-|''*Hrew-'']] "tear out"] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -k̠ʼ | | -k̠ʼ | ||
| *-kʰpʰ | | *-kʰpʰ | ||
| *ǵ | | *w-ǵ | ||
| | | ''*lewǵ-'' ~ ''*weh₂ǵ-'' ~ ''*wreh₁ǵ-'' "to break" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| kʼ- | | kʼ- | ||
| Line 473: | Line 472: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| p̠- | | p̠- | ||
| | | *pʰtʰ- | ||
| | | *bʰ/gʷ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰegʷ-|''*bʰegʷ-'']] "flee", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰewg-|''*bʰewg-'']] "flee" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -p̠ | | -p̠ | ||
| Line 483: | Line 482: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| p- | | p- | ||
| *pʰ | | *pʰ- | ||
| *bʰ | | *bʰ- | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰer-|''*bʰer-'']] "bear" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -p | | -p | ||
| Line 535: | Line 534: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| p̠ʼ- | | p̠ʼ- | ||
| *pt- | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -p̠ʼ | | -p̠ʼ | ||
| | | *-pʰtʰ | ||
| | | *bʰ-dʰ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰedʰ-|''*bʰedʰ-'']] "dig" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| pʼ- | | pʼ- | ||
| *p- | | *p- | ||
| *p | | *p | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/per-|''*per-'']] "go through", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pel-|''*pel-'']] "drive", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pent-|''*pent-'']] "pass", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/pes-|''*pes-'']] "penis" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -pʼ | | -pʼ | ||
| | | *-pʰ | ||
| | | *bʰ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰerH-|''*bʰerH-'']] "pierce" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 587: | Line 586: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ɓ̟- | | ɓ̟- | ||
| | | *bʰ- | ||
| | | *bʰ | ||
| | | [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰed-|''*bʰed-'']] "improve" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| -ɓ̟ | | -ɓ̟ | ||
| Line 717: | Line 716: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |- | ||
| ʘ̠- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
: *bʰegʷ- "to flee" < *-pʰtʰ "to escape" < … | |- | ||
| -ʘ̠ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| ʘ- | |||
| *dʷ- | |||
| *bʰ- | |||
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰed-|''*bʰed-'']] "improve", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰil-|''*bʰil-'']] "lovely" | |||
|- | |||
| -ʘ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| ʘ̟- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ʘ̟ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| ǀ̠- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ǀ̠ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| ǀ- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ǀ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeyh₂-|''*bʰeyh₂-'']] "to shake" | |||
|- | |||
| ǀ̟- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| -ǀ̟ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰerǵʰ-|''*bʰerǵʰ-'']] "ascend" | |||
: *bʰegʷ- "to flee" < *-pʰtʰ "to escape" < … | |||
: *bʰerǵʰ- "to rise up " < *pk- "to eject" (?) | : *bʰerǵʰ- "to rise up " < *pk- "to eject" (?) | ||
: *bʰil "good" < *dʷih<sub>1</sub> | : *bʰil "good" < *dʷih<sub>1</sub> | ||
[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰes-|''*ǵʰes-'']] "hand", [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰey-|''*ǵʰey-'']] "winter" (earlier lexical transition from "autumn", with similar use of English "fall"), | |||
[[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gʷʰer-|''*gʷʰer-'']] "warm" [from ''*gʰbʰōr-'' "glow"], [[wikt:Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeh₃g-|''*bʰeh₃g-'']] "bake/roast" [from ''*gʰbʰor-'' "kindle"] | |||
*temh<sub>1</sub> | *temh<sub>1</sub> | ||
| Line 2,740: | Line 2,802: | ||
===Pitch Accent=== | ===Pitch Accent=== | ||
==Morphology== | ==Morphology== [...] | ||
[...] | [...] | ||
| Line 2,763: | Line 2,825: | ||
*gʷaināsay, *gʷaināmas | *gʷaināsay, *gʷaināmas | ||
Aryan | Aryan morphology deals with full-grade (_) and null-grade (∅). | ||
. | |||
Aryan ''*(á)-s'' [PIE ''*(ó)-s''] forms nouns, as in ''*p<sup>h</sup>árs'' "thief" [PIE ''*b<sup>h</sup>ṓr'' "thief"] from ''*p<sup>h</sup>air'' "bearing". | |||
Aryan ''*(_)-as'' [PIE ''*(é)-os''] forms active animate nouns, as in ''kʰúh<sub>2</sub>as'' "living sound" [PIE ''*ḱlewos'' "fame"]. If the meaning intended is "racial", furthermore, the affix becomes ''*(_)-(a)ras'' [PIE ''*(∅)-(u)ros''], as in ''h<sub>5</sub>ímsaras'' "engenderer" [PIE ''*h<sub>2</sub>ḿ̥suros'' "deity"]. | |||
Aryan ''*(∅)-ás'' [PIE ''*(e)-ós''] forms active animate adjectives, as in ... | |||
Aryan ''*(á)-as'' [PIE ''*(ó)-os''] forms passive animate nouns, as in ''*p<sup>h</sup>áras'' "what is born" [PIE ''*b<sup>h</sup>óros'' "what is brought"] | |||
Aryan ''*(a)-ás'' [PIE ''*(o)-ós''] forms passive animate adjectives, as in ... became agentive instead of passive in PIE, but some archaic forms remain, such as *gʰoysós "spear" | |||
Aryan ''*(_)-ar'' [PIE *([é/ó)-r̥] forms active inanimate nouns, as in ''*húdar'' "water" [PIE ''*wódr̥'' "water"] | |||
Aryan ''*(∅)-ár'' forms active inanimate adjectives. | |||
Aryan ''*(á)-ar'' forms passive inanimate nouns. | |||
Aryan ''*(a)-ár'' forms passive inanimate adjectives. | |||
- | |||
*(_)- | Aryan ''*(_)-tár'' forms agent nouns. | ||
Aryan ''*(_)-tram'' forms instrument nouns. It is a fusion of ''*(_)-tár'' [agent particle] and ''*-am'' [neuter particle] | |||
Aryan ''*(∅)-C-ás'' [PIE ''*(∅)-mós''] [forms derived nouns through mobile roots] EX: ''*pʰtʰūymás'' PIE = | |||
===Root=== | ===Root=== | ||
| Line 3,069: | Line 3,141: | ||
====Personal Pronouns [...]==== | ====Personal Pronouns [...]==== | ||
[...] | |||
English, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Persian, Latin, Greek, Sanskrit... | |||
Brugmann; Grundriss [...] ⇒ Schmidt, Stammbildung und Flexion (argues in favor of eǵ as older tham eǵom) ⇒ P. Forchheimer, The category of person in language, Berlin 1953 | |||
⇒ Benveniste, La nature des pronoms > https://www.academia.edu/1478874/Die_komplexe_Morphologie_der_urindogermanischen_Personalpronomina_draft_ | |||
Stop Borrowing! Anatolian/Indo-European Stops, Voice, and Northwest Semitic Loans – With Notes on Ugaritic grdš, ztr, dġṯ and Other Words | |||
[...] | [...] | ||
| Line 3,112: | Line 3,193: | ||
*The first-person singular ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' (PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'') seems to be a descendent of the primordial form ''ˈʕih-ɔː'' "I" , which would regularly yield stress on the first syllable, yet it is observed that in PIE the consonant <''*ǵ''> appears (probably a consequence from the sound change '''*h<sub>1</sub> ⇒ *ǵ / V_V'''), plus the affixation of <''*n''>, a borrowing from Diluvian ''nao'' "this person". | *The first-person singular ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' (PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'') seems to be a descendent of the primordial form ''ˈʕih-ɔː'' "I" , which would regularly yield stress on the first syllable, yet it is observed that in PIE the consonant <''*ǵ''> appears (probably a consequence from the sound change '''*h<sub>1</sub> ⇒ *ǵ / V_V'''), plus the affixation of <''*n''>, a borrowing from Diluvian ''nao'' "this person". | ||
**In PIE, the emphatic''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'' could be interpreted as more archaic than ''*h₁eǵH'', as Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'' and Sanskrit ''अहम्'' suggest. The emphatic particle ''*-om'' (PIE) likely arose due the contaminator <''*m''>. | **In PIE, the emphatic ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵHóm'' could be interpreted as more archaic than ''*h₁eǵH'', as Homeric Greek ''ἐγών'' and Sanskrit ''अहम्'' suggest. The emphatic particle ''*-om'' (PIE) likely arose due the contaminator <''*m''>. | ||
**The nasal in ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' "I" became <''*m''> primarily due two distinct processes; one phonetic and other phonological. It was either subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /oːn/ ⇒ /own/ ⇒ /om/), and/or swapped by the contaminator ''*m'' based on its inflected forms. | **The nasal in ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' "I" became <''*m''> primarily due two distinct processes; one phonetic and other phonological. It was either subsequently labialized by the preceding vowel, shortening the nucleus (i.e. /oːn/ ⇒ /own/ ⇒ /om/), and/or swapped by the contaminator ''*m'' based on its inflected forms. | ||
***This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular (e.g. ''*nh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' "me" ( | ***This sound change affected all other inflections of the first person singular (e.g. ''*nh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' "me" (A) ⇒ ''*mh<sub>0</sub>'' ~ ''*h<sub>0</sub>m'' "me" (?) ⇒ ''*me'' ~ ''*h<sub>1</sub>me'' "me" (PIE)). | ||
*The second-person singular ''*tū́'' (PIE ''*túH'') seems to be a descendent of Diluvian ''taocar'' "the person one refers to", with an unusual vocalic paradigm. If this is correct, a more conservative alternative might have been ''*táu''. | *The second-person singular ''*tū́'' (PIE ''*túH'') seems to be a descendent of Diluvian ''taocar'' "the person one refers to", with an unusual vocalic paradigm. If this is correct, a more conservative alternative might have been ''*táu''. | ||
**In PIE, the pronoun ''*túH'' is extremely conservative, found as ''tu'' in Latin, ''σύ'' in Greek, and ''त्वम्'' in Sanskrit, for example. In PIA, though, Hittite ''zīg'' and Palaic ''ti'' suggest Indo-Anatolian ''*tī́''<ref name=Kloekorst>Alwin Kloekorst (2007); [https://archive.org/details/etymological-dictionary-of-the-hittite-inherited-lexicon/mode/1up ''Etymological Dictionary Of The Hittite Inherited Lexicon'']</ref>; although it could also be pointed out that the Anatolitan counterparts might be mere rearrangements from the non-emphatic PIE 1.SG.NOM. ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵ(ō)'' plus an accusative enclitic of the second-person singular (i.e. ''*te-eǵ'' ⇒ ''*tī́ǵ'' (PA))<ref name=Szemerényi>Oswald Szemerényi (1990); [https://archive.org/details/szemerenyieinfuhrungindievergleichendesprachwissenschaft4thedition1990/mode/2up ''Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft'']</ref><ref name=Petersen>Walter Petersen (1930); [https://www.jstor.org/stable/409118?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ''The Inflection of Indo-European Personal Pronouns'']</ref>, or even the result of the palatalization of apical consonants due phonetic height (i.e. ''*tū'' (PIA) ⇒ ''*tyū'' (?) ⇒ ''*tī'' (PA))<ref name=Melchert>Craig Melchert (1983); [https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/Melchert/2ndsingularpronoun.pdf ''The Second Singular Personal Pronoun in Anatolian'']</ref>. | **In PIE, the pronoun ''*túH'' is extremely conservative, found as ''tu'' in Latin, ''σύ'' in Greek, and ''त्वम्'' in Sanskrit, for example. In PIA, though, Hittite ''zīg'' and Palaic ''ti'' suggest Indo-Anatolian ''*tī́''<ref name=Kloekorst>Alwin Kloekorst (2007); [https://archive.org/details/etymological-dictionary-of-the-hittite-inherited-lexicon/mode/1up ''Etymological Dictionary Of The Hittite Inherited Lexicon'']</ref>; although it could also be pointed out that the Anatolitan counterparts might be mere rearrangements from the non-emphatic PIE 1.SG.NOM. ''*h<sub>1</sub>eǵ(ō)'' plus an accusative enclitic of the second-person singular (i.e. ''*te-eǵ'' ⇒ ''*tī́ǵ'' (PA))<ref name=Szemerényi>Oswald Szemerényi (1990); [https://archive.org/details/szemerenyieinfuhrungindievergleichendesprachwissenschaft4thedition1990/mode/2up ''Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft'']</ref><ref name=Petersen>Walter Petersen (1930); [https://www.jstor.org/stable/409118?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ''The Inflection of Indo-European Personal Pronouns'']</ref>, or even the result of the palatalization of apical consonants due phonetic height (i.e. ''*tū'' (PIA) ⇒ ''*tyū'' (?) ⇒ ''*tī'' (PA))<ref name=Melchert>Craig Melchert (1983); [https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/Melchert/2ndsingularpronoun.pdf ''The Second Singular Personal Pronoun in Anatolian'']</ref>. | ||
*The third-person singulars ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'', ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>'', and ''*aī́ts'' possess a shorter form when complemented by a noun (e.g. ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>0</sub> | *The third-person singulars ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'', ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>'', and ''*aī́ts'' possess a shorter form when complemented by a noun (e.g. ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>0</sub>naī́r h<sub>0</sub>i'' "he, the man"). The reason for this is that in the Codex, pronouns used to be morphologically treated as affixes, and therefore couldn't stand by themselves except when linked to a root (e.g. ''ˈə-e̞ː'' "he/she/it", but not ''**e̞ː''). | ||
**As a result, the clitic counterparts gained a sense as proximal demonstratives in PIE, being evident in forms such as Latin ''is'' "he", ''ea'' "she", and ''id'' "it", whose anaphoric use prohibts them to stand by themselves. | **As a result, the clitic counterparts gained a sense as proximal demonstratives in PIE, being evident in forms such as Latin ''is'' "he", ''ea'' "she", and ''id'' "it", whose anaphoric use prohibts them to stand by themselves. | ||
***e.g. ''*h<sub>0</sub>í'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>í'' "this/he"; ''*íh<sub>0</sub>'' "she" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íh<sub>2</sub>'' "this/she"; ''*íts'' "it" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íd'' "this/it". | ***e.g. ''*h<sub>0</sub>í'' "he" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>í'' "this/he"; ''*íh<sub>0</sub>'' "she" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íh<sub>2</sub>'' "this/she"; ''*íts'' "it" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íd'' "this/it". | ||
*Overall, the dual is formed by erasing sounds of the singular, then reduplicating it (e.g. ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ōi̯ṓn''; ''*tū́'' ⇒ ''*ūi̯ū́''; ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' ⇒ ''*aīaī́''), while the plural is formed by erasing the reduplication of the dual, then adding the serial particle ''*-s-'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓns''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́s''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́s''), and the collective simply does the latter but with the suffix ''*-a'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓna''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́a''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́a''''). Medial ''*i̯'' ~ ''*u̯'' is inserted to avoid diphthongs between reduplicated vowels, and ''*ts'' is applied in other cases when two bordering vowels are similar (except those involving schwas). | *Overall, the dual is formed by erasing sounds of the singular, then reduplicating it (e.g. ''*h<sub>5</sub>ih<sub>1</sub>ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ōi̯ṓn''; ''*tū́'' ⇒ ''*ūi̯ū́''; ''*aī́h<sub>0</sub>i'' ⇒ ''*aīaī́''), while the plural is formed by erasing the reduplication of the dual, then adding the serial particle ''*-s-'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓns''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́s''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́s''), and the collective simply does the latter but with the suffix ''*-a'' (e.g. ''*ōi̯ṓn'' ⇒ ''*ṓna''; ''*ūi̯ū́'' ⇒ ''*ū́a''; ''*aīaī́'' ⇒ ''*aī́a''''). Medial ''*i̯'' ~ ''*u̯'' is inserted to avoid diphthongs between reduplicated vowels, and ''*ts'' is applied in other cases when two bordering vowels are similar (except those involving schwas). | ||
** | **Rather than the nominative of the first and second-person dual/plural in PIE being prehistorical combinations (i.e. ''*u'' 2.SG + ''*e'' 1.SG. + = ''we'' 1.DU./PL.; ''*i'' 3.SG. + ''*u'' 2.SG = ''*yu'' 2.DU./PL.)<ref name=Seebold>Elmar Seebold (1984); [https://annas-archive.org/md5/e8ece7cab77fe9adeae0052312aa3d89 ''Das System der Personalpronomina in den frühgermanischen Sprachen: Sein Aufbau und seine Herkunft'']</ref>, the dual products of the Aryan patterns would eventually substitute the plural forms of the first and second-person in their nominative equivalents (i.e. ''*ṓns'' "we (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ōi̯ṓn'' "we (dual)" (A) ⇒ ''*wéy'' "we (plural)" (PIE); ''*ūs'' "you (plural)" ⇒ ∅, replaced by ''*ūi̯ū́'' "you (dual)" (A) ⇒ ''*yū́'' "you (plural)" (PIE)), while their oblique inflections for example would assume other spots in the ancestor of Indo-European languages (i.e. ''*noh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 1.DU.ACC. (A) ⇒ ''*n̥h<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*nōh<sub>1</sub>'' 1.DU.ACC. (PIE); ''*i̯uh<sub>0</sub>(m)'' 2.DU.ACC. (A) ⇒ ''*uh<sub>1</sub>wé'' ~ ''*wōh<sub>1</sub>'' 2.DU.ACC. (PIE)). | ||
**The particle <''*m''> gains the property of the serial particle <''*s''> when the latter conflates with the particle ''*ts'' (e.g. third-person plural locative ''*itsim'' instead of ''*itsis''). This contamination was likely encouraged due the abundant presence of ''*m'' in the accusative, and produces an alternative explanation to the hypothesis that the oblique of the first-person plural was''*ms-'' before becoming ''*ns-''<ref name=Sihler>Andrew Sihler (1995); [https://archive.org/details/sihler-andrew-new-comparative-grammar-of-greek-and-latin/mode/2up ''New Comparative Grammar Of Greek And Latin'']</ref>. Later in PIE, not only plural forms (e.g. ''*nsai̯(m)'' 1.PL.DAT. ( | **The particle <''*m''> gains the property of the serial particle <''*s''> when the latter conflates with the particle ''*ts'' (e.g. third-person plural locative ''*itsim'' instead of ''*itsis''). This contamination was likely encouraged due the abundant presence of ''*m'' in the accusative, and produces an alternative explanation to the hypothesis that the oblique of the first-person plural was''*ms-'' before becoming ''*ns-''<ref name=Sihler>Andrew Sihler (1995); [https://archive.org/details/sihler-andrew-new-comparative-grammar-of-greek-and-latin/mode/2up ''New Comparative Grammar Of Greek And Latin'']</ref>. Later in PIE, not only plural forms (e.g. ''*nsai̯(m)'' 1.PL.DAT. (A) ⇒ ''*n̥sméy'' 1.PL.DAT. (PIE)) would become contaminated, but also singular ones (e.g. ''*iai̯'' "to him" (A) ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>esmōy'' "to him" (PIE)); including verbal affixes (e.g.''*-nas'' 1.PL.VB. (A) ⇒ ''*-mos'' 1.PL.VB. (PIE)). | ||
====Possessive Pronouns==== | |||
nás, tu̯ás, h0iás/ih0ás/i ... tsu̯á | |||
in Aryan possessive pronouns could be produced through the pure oblique or any inflected form, as long as it received the affix -ás. | |||
nás ~ nai̯ás ~ ni̯aás ~ niás | |||
nás h0naír | |||
compare the translation for "my man" | |||
''*nh0(m)ás h0naī́r'' (A) > ''*h1mós h2nḗr'' (PIE) > ''ἐμός ἀνήρ'' (G) | |||
-as -ah0 -am | -aī -ah0ī -aī | |||
-ias -i | -īas īs | |||
-h0i -ih0 -its | -h0ias -ih0as -itsas | |||
====Reflexive Pronouns==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | |||
! rowspan="2" | | |||
! colspan="4" | REFLEXIVE PRONOUN DECLENSION | |||
|- | |||
! Singular | |||
! Dual | |||
! Plural | |||
! Collective | |||
|- | |||
! Nominative | |||
| *tsū́r ~ *tsáur || *ūi̯ū́r || ū́rs || *ū́ra | |||
|- | |||
! Accusative | |||
| *su̯h<sub>0</sub> || *ruh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rsh<sub>0</sub> || *u̯rah<sub>0</sub> | |||
|- | |||
! Genitive | |||
| *su̯i̯a || *rui̯a || *u̯rsi̯a || *u̯rai̯a | |||
|- | |||
! Locative | |||
| *su̯i || *rui || *u̯rsi || *u̯rai | |||
|- | |||
! Dative | |||
| *su̯ai̯ || *ruai̯ || *u̯rsai̯ || *u̯raai̯ | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
*The reflexive pronoun ''*tsū́r'' derives from an older ''*ū́tsar'' (equivalent to Aryan ''*aítsar'' "this/that one", PIE ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other"), itself a borrowing from Diluvian ''aocar'', whose <''*ū́''> portion is still visible in another borrowing into Aryan (i.e. the second-person singular ''*tū́''). | |||
**In PIE, it was reanalyzed as its accusative form (i.e.''*su̯h<sub>0</sub>'' "themselves" ⇒ ''*swé'' "themselves"), thus degrading the dual, plural, and collective inflections. | |||
====Demonstrative Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | |||
! rowspan="3" | | |||
! colspan="12" | PRONOUN DECLENSION | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="3" | Singular | |||
! colspan="3" | Dual | |||
! colspan="3" | Plural | |||
! colspan="3" | Collective | |||
|- | |||
! Masculine | |||
! Feminine | |||
! Neuter | |||
! Masculine | |||
! Feminine | |||
! Neuter | |||
! Masculine | |||
! Feminine | |||
! Neuter | |||
! Masculine | |||
! Feminine | |||
! Neuter | |||
|- | |||
! Nominative | |||
| *h<sub>0</sub>tsar|| *tsah<sub>0</sub>r || *tsar || *h<sub>0</sub>tātā || *tātāh<sub>0</sub> || *tātā || *h<sub>0</sub>tās || *tāh<sub>0</sub>s || *tās || *h<sub>0</sub>tāa || *tāh<sub>0</sub>a || *tāa | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | |||
! rowspan=" | |||
! colspan=" | |||
|- | |||
! Singular | |||
! Dual | |||
! Plural | |||
! Collective | |||
|- | |||
! Nominative | |||
| * | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Accusative | ! Accusative | ||
| * | | *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>m || *tats || *atam || *atah<sub>0</sub>m || *atats || *tasm || *tah<sub>0</sub>sm || *tas || *tam || *tah<sub>0</sub>am || *taa | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Genitive | ! Genitive | ||
| * | | *tai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *tai̯a || *atai̯a || *atah<sub>0</sub>i̯a || *atai̯a || *tasi̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>si̯a || *tasi̯a || *taai̯a || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯a || *taai̯a | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Locative | ! Locative | ||
| * | | *tai || *tah<sub>0</sub>i || *tai || *atai || *atah<sub>0</sub>i || *atai || *tasi || *tah<sub>0</sub>si || *tasi || *taai || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai || *taai | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Dative | ! Dative | ||
| * | | *taai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *taai̯ || *ataai̯ || *atah<sub>0</sub>ai̯ || *ataai̯ || *tasai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>sai̯ || *tasai̯ || *taaai̯ || *tah<sub>0</sub>aai̯ || *taaai̯ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
''*-tsaras'' (emphatic affix) ⇒ ''*-teros'' (emphatic affix), with the demonstrative sense shown in ''*aítsaras'' "one there" ⇒ ''*h<sub>1</sub>íteros'' "(an)other" | |||
** | |||
tsar > *só "that" | |||
-om (emphatic) | |||
-tar (loc.) | |||
*íta "there/then/thus" | |||
*h1itH "thus" EX: ita | |||
*h1idH "here" EX: ibi | |||
*tor "there" | |||
tso | |||
-r "locative" | |||
ítar > h1itH | |||
tsatar "that > tor | |||
==== | |||
h0tā́a > h1etṓa > tóy | |||
táa > téa > teh2 | |||
h0 may become h1 as <e> or h2 as <a> | |||
*aī́h0i, *aī́h0, *aíts > *h0i, *ih0, *its | |||
*h5ílias, *h5íli > *lis, li | |||
specialized/not | |||
as this segment results in 6 possibilities | |||
ʕih > ~ h5ī ~ aī ~ aih1 ~ h5ih1 ~ ai ~ i | |||
*All demonstratives of the ''*-ias'' paradigm transitioned from animate/inanimate to masculine/feminine/neuter declension. | |||
**Either through the tonic form (e.g. "other" ''*h<sub>5</sub>ílias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íli'' (Aryan) ⇒ ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyos'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyeh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*h<sub>2</sub>élyod'' (PIE)), or the clitic form (e.g. "this" ''*kis'', ''*ki'' (from Aryan ''*h<sub>5</sub>íkias'', ''*h<sub>5</sub>íki'') > ''*ḱís'', ''*ḱíh<sub>2</sub>'', ''*ḱíd'' (PIE)). | |||
====Interrogative Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | [..] | ||
====Indefinite Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | |||
====Relative Pronouns==== | |||
[..] | |||
===Verb=== | |||
[...] | |||
====Aspect==== | |||
The Origin of Aspect in the Indo-European Languages Oswald Szemerényi | |||
====?==== | |||
''*gaínōm'', ''*gígnmi'' "I generate" | |||
''*pūhāṓm'', ''*píbmi'' "I drink" | |||
''*wehdḗyōm'', ''*wḗydmi'' "I see" | |||
*gánas > γόνος "offspring" | |||
* | Initial clusters in the Nominative will give way to /ə/<br> | ||
* | *ptā́r (A)> *patḗr (PIE)<br> | ||
*páh5man > *póh5mn̥ > πῶμα "slid"<br> | |||
[*peh5] "feed, protect" | |||
''*pʰair-'' "bearing" [n/v] (Latin ferō, Greek φέρω < ''*pʰaírōm'', ''*pʰíprmi'') > ''*pʰaíras'' [bare noun], ''*pʰ∅rás'' "bearer" [adjective-noun] (Latin fūr, Greek φώρ "thief"), ''*pʰáras'' [result-noun] (Greek φόρος "tribute") | |||
[ | ''*daim-'' "building" [n/v] (Greek δέμω < ''*daímōm'', ''*dídmmi'') > ''*daímas'' [bare noun], ''*d∅más'' "building" [adjective-noun] (Greek δῶ "house"), ''*dámas'' "house" [result-noun] (Latin domus, Greek δόμος "house") | ||
[ | |||
[ | |||
[ | |||
''*paid-'' "stepping" [n/v] (''*paídōm'', ''*pípdmi'') > ''*paídas'' [bare noun], ''*p∅dás'' "foot" [adjective-noun] (Latin pes, Greek πούς "foot"), ''*pádas'' "step" [result-noun] | |||
''*paid-'' "stepping" [n/v] (''*paídōm'', ''*pípdmi'') > ''*paídas'' [bare noun], ''*p∅dás'' "foot" [adjective-noun] (Latin pes, Greek πούς "foot"), ''*pádas'' "step" [result-noun] | |||
''*kpain-'' "killing" [n/v] (Proto-Indo-European *kʷʰen, Latin de-fendo "I expell from") > ''*kpaínas'' [bare noun], ''*kp∅nás'' "murderer" [adjective-noun], ''*kpánas'' "murder" [result-noun] (Greek φόνος "murder") | ''*kpain-'' "killing" [n/v] (Proto-Indo-European *kʷʰen, Latin de-fendo "I expell from") > ''*kpaínas'' [bare noun], ''*kp∅nás'' "murderer" [adjective-noun], ''*kpánas'' "murder" [result-noun] (Greek φόνος "murder") | ||
| Line 3,561: | Line 3,590: | ||
perfect: I have run [action started and halted, not necessarily completed] | perfect: I have run [action started and halted, not necessarily completed] | ||
perfective: I have run [action started and completed] | perfective: I have run [action started and completed] | ||
*the syntax of a language is marked by its idiosyncratic constructions | *the syntax of a language is marked by its idiosyncratic constructions | ||
il semblerait qu'ils se soient intensifiés | il semblerait qu'ils se soient intensifiés | ||
parece (por hypóthese) que eles se intensificaram | parece (por hypóthese) que eles se intensificaram | ||
movement verbs and cases: cubitum ire *as French and German treat it in the european sprachbund | movement verbs and cases: cubitum ire *as French and German treat it in the european sprachbund | ||
eo domum | eo domum | ||
end goal: accusative | end goal: accusative | ||
*h2iyṓm dámam | *h2iyṓm dámam | ||
[[w:Standard average european||europoid]] | [[w:Standard average european||europoid]] | ||
какой-то сказал | какой-то сказал | ||
Ja vot tut ... | in dem Anfang, hat Gott die Erde und den Himmel geschaffen | ||
Männer, deren Kinder gestorben haben, | |||
==Sample text== | der Schicksal dessen, der gelitten habt | ||
der Schicksal derer, die gelitten haben | |||
==References== | |||
Ja vot tut ... | |||
Bergaige, Abel; Du Rôle de la dérivation dans la déclinaison indo-européenne: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57721099.texteImage# | ==Sample text== | ||
Bergaige, Abel; Essai sur la construction grammaticale considérée dans son développement historique, en sanscrit, en grec, en latin, dans les langues romanes et dans les langues germaniques: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5803410m/f6 | ==References== | ||
> | Einleitung in die Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (Pott) | ||
hermann hirt Indogermanische Grammatik | |||
Franz Bopp | |||
Schleicher | |||
Calvert Watkins | |||
Jochem Schindler | |||
Helmut Rix | |||
Kuryłowicz | |||
Boisacq : É. Boisacq, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Heidelberg, 1916. | |||
Brugmann, Griech. Gram?: Griechische Grammatik, | |||
Chantraine, GH: Grammaire homérique. | |||
Chantraine, Morphologie : Morphologie historique du grec. 1947. 2nd ed. 1961. | |||
Chantraine, Formation ` La formation des noms en grec ancien | |||
CIL : Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. | |||
Collitz-Bechtel, D: Sammlung griechischer Dialektinschriften. 1884— 1915 | |||
Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen: J. Egli, Heteroklisie im Griechischen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fälle von Gelenkheteroklisie. Dissert. Zürich | |||
Ehrlich, Betonung ` Untersuchungen über die Natur der griechischen Betonung. 1912 | |||
Ernout-Meillet, Dictionnaire étym.: Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine | |||
Evidence for Laryngeals : Evidence for Laryngeals — Work papers of a conference in Indo—European linguistics on May 7 and 8, 1959. Edited by Werner Winter. Austin, Texas, 1960 | |||
Frisk, GEW ` Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg 1954 | |||
Kuryłowicz, A pophonie ` L'apophonie en indo-européen. 1956. | |||
Kuryłowicz, Accentuation *: L'accentuation des langues indo—européennes. 2nd ed. 1958. | |||
Leumann-Hofmann :M. Leumann-]. B. Hofmann, Lateinische Grammatik, 5th ed. 1926-8 | |||
Meillet, Zz£roduction 9: Introduction a l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. 8th ed. 1937 | |||
Pokorny : Pokorny, /wdogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. 1948- | |||
Wackernagel (-Debrunner), AzGr. : Altindische Grammatik | |||
Bergaige, Abel; Du Rôle de la dérivation dans la déclinaison indo-européenne: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57721099.texteImage# | |||
Bergaige, Abel; Essai sur la construction grammaticale considérée dans son développement historique, en sanscrit, en grec, en latin, dans les langues romanes et dans les langues germaniques: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5803410m/f6 | |||
> | |||
edits