User:Nicolasstraccia/Mininorsk: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
It is thought as an exercise on creativity within constraints, making something new with a definite framework based on simplicity and conciseness. The goals of ''Mininorsk'' are to have a highly regular grammar based on precise limitations:
It is thought as an exercise on creativity within constraints, making something new with a definite framework based on simplicity and conciseness. The goals of ''Mininorsk'' are to have a highly regular grammar based on precise limitations:
::1) a nordic morphology and word stock (with an eclectical choice of sources – using Old Norse, Proto-norse and North Germanic reflexes); and
::1) a nordic morphology and word stock (with an eclectical choice of sources – using Old Norse, Proto-norse and North Germanic reflexes); and
::2) a pseudo-esperantic grammatical scaffolding (following aspects of Esperanto morphology and syntax),
::2) a pseudo-esperantic grammatical scaffolding (following aspects of Esperanto morphology and syntax).
while aiming to achieve the same kind of ''through-the-looking-glass'' feeling Esperanto has, in particular with regard to its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romance_languages Romance] resonance.
The aesthetic goal is to achieve the same kind of ''through-the-looking-glass'' feeling Esperanto has with regard to its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romance_languages Romance] resonance.
 


Even though it is in principle a stand-alone exercise, ''Mininorsk'' has potential for expansion and might be expanded upon in the future.
Even though it is in principle a stand-alone exercise, ''Mininorsk'' has potential for expansion and might be expanded upon in the future.