Luthic: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 574: Line 574:
Unstressed a resulted in a slightly raised a [ɐ]. In hiatus, unstressed front vowels become /j/, while unstressed back vowels become /w/. Unlike other Romance languages, the Luthic vowel system was not so affected by [[w:Metaphony|metaphony]], such as /e/ raising to /i/ or /ɛ/ raising to /e/:
Unstressed a resulted in a slightly raised a [ɐ]. In hiatus, unstressed front vowels become /j/, while unstressed back vowels become /w/. Unlike other Romance languages, the Luthic vowel system was not so affected by [[w:Metaphony|metaphony]], such as /e/ raising to /i/ or /ɛ/ raising to /e/:


* Latin ''vī̆ndēmia'' [u̯i(ː)n̪.ˈd̪eː.mi.ä] > Vulgar Latin *[benˈde.mja] > Spanish [bẽn̪ˈd̪i.mja], but the Luthic cognate ''vendemia'' [venˈde.mjɐ]
* Latin ''vī̆ndēmia'' [u̯i(ː)n̪.ˈd̪eː.mi.ä] > Vulgar Latin *[benˈde.mja] > Spanish [bẽn̪ˈd̪i.mja], but the Luthic cognate ''vendemia'' [βenˈde.mjɐ]


In addition to monophthongs, Luthic has diphthongs, which, however, are both phonemically and phonetically simply combinations of the other vowels. None of the diphthongs are, however, considered to have distinct phonemic status since their constituents do not behave differently from how they occur in isolation, unlike the diphthongs in other languages like English and German. Grammatical tradition distinguishes “falling” from “rising” diphthongs, but since rising diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal sound [j] or [w] and one vowel sound, they are not actually diphthongs. The practice of referring to them as “diphthongs” has been criticised by phoneticians like Alareico Villavolfo.
In addition to monophthongs, Luthic has diphthongs, which, however, are both phonemically and phonetically simply combinations of the other vowels. None of the diphthongs are, however, considered to have distinct phonemic status since their constituents do not behave differently from how they occur in isolation, unlike the diphthongs in other languages like English and German. Grammatical tradition distinguishes “falling” from “rising” diphthongs, but since rising diphthongs are composed of one semiconsonantal sound [j] or [w] and one vowel sound, they are not actually diphthongs. The practice of referring to them as “diphthongs” has been criticised by phoneticians like Alareico Villavolfo.
Line 581: Line 581:
Clusters such as -p.t- -k.t- -x.t- are always smoothed to -t.t-.
Clusters such as -p.t- -k.t- -x.t- are always smoothed to -t.t-.


* Latin ''aptus'' [ˈäp.t̪us̠ ~ ˈäp.t̪ʊs̠] > Luthic ''atto'' [ˈat.tu]
* Latin ''aptus'' [ˈäp.t̪us̠ ~ ˈäp.t̪ʊs̠] > Luthic ''attu'' [ˈat.tu]
* Latin ''āctuālis'' [äːk.t̪uˈäː.lʲis̠ ~ äːk.t̪uˈäː.lʲɪs̠] > Luthic ''attuale'' [ɐtˈtwa.le]
* Latin ''āctuālis'' [äːk.t̪uˈäː.lʲis̠ ~ äːk.t̪uˈäː.lʲɪs̠] > Luthic ''attuale'' [ɐtˈtwa.le]
* Gothic ''ahtau'' [ˈax.tɔː] > Luthic ''attau'' [ˈat.tɔ]
* Gothic ''ahtau'' [ˈax.tɔː] > Luthic ''attau'' [ˈat.tɔ]
* Gothic ''nahts'' [naxts] > Luthic ''natto'' [ˈnat.tu]
* Gothic ''nahts'' [naxts] > Luthic ''nattu'' [ˈnat.tu]


This is also valid for other CC clusters with similar [[w:Manner of articulation|manner]] or [[w:Place of articulation|place]].
This is also valid for other CC clusters with similar [[w:Manner of articulation|manner]] or [[w:Place of articulation|place]].


=====Absorption of nasals before fricatives=====
=====Absorption of nasals before fricatives=====
This is the source of such alterations as modern Standard Luthic ''fimfe'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈfĩ.(p͡)fe]]] “five”, ''monþo'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈmõ.(t͡)θu]]] “mouth” versus Gothic [[wikt:𐍆𐌹𐌼𐍆|𐍆𐌹𐌼𐍆]] [[wikt:AP:pron:got|[ˈɸimɸ]]] “''id.''”, [[wikt:𐌼𐌿𐌽𐌸𐍃|𐌼𐌿𐌽𐌸𐍃]] [[wikt:AP:pron:got|[ˈmunθs]]] “''id.''” and German [[wikt:fünf|fünf]] [[wikt:AP:pron:de|[fʏnf]]] “''id.''”, [[wikt:Mund|Mund]] [[wikt:AP:pron:de|[mʊnt]]] “''id.''”.
This is the source of such alterations as modern Standard Luthic ''fimfe'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈɸĩ.ɸe]]] “five”, ''monþu'' [[IPA for Luthic|[ˈmõ.θu]]] “mouth” versus Gothic [[wikt:𐍆𐌹𐌼𐍆|𐍆𐌹𐌼𐍆]] [[wikt:AP:pron:got|[ˈɸimɸ]]] “''id.''”, [[wikt:𐌼𐌿𐌽𐌸𐍃|𐌼𐌿𐌽𐌸𐍃]] [[wikt:AP:pron:got|[ˈmunθs]]] “''id.''” and German [[wikt:fünf|fünf]] [[wikt:AP:pron:de|[fʏnf]]] “''id.''”, [[wikt:Mund|Mund]] [[wikt:AP:pron:de|[mʊnt]]] “''id.''”.


=====Monophthongization=====
=====Monophthongization=====
Line 597: Line 597:
Early evidence of palatalized pronunciations of /tj kj/ appears as early as the 2nd–3rd centuries AD in the form of spelling mistakes interchanging ⟨ti⟩ and ⟨ci⟩ before a following vowel, as in ⟨tribunitiae⟩ for tribuniciae. This is assumed to reflect the fronting of Latin /k/ in this environment to [c ~ t͡sʲ]. Palatalisation of the velar consonants /k/ and /ɡ/ occurred in certain environments, mostly involving front vowels; additional palatalisation is also found in dental consonants /t/, /d/, /l/ and /n/, however, these are often not palatalised in word initial environment.
Early evidence of palatalized pronunciations of /tj kj/ appears as early as the 2nd–3rd centuries AD in the form of spelling mistakes interchanging ⟨ti⟩ and ⟨ci⟩ before a following vowel, as in ⟨tribunitiae⟩ for tribuniciae. This is assumed to reflect the fronting of Latin /k/ in this environment to [c ~ t͡sʲ]. Palatalisation of the velar consonants /k/ and /ɡ/ occurred in certain environments, mostly involving front vowels; additional palatalisation is also found in dental consonants /t/, /d/, /l/ and /n/, however, these are often not palatalised in word initial environment.


* Latin ''amīcus'' [äˈmiː.kus̠ ~ äˈmiː.kʊs̠], ''amīcī'' [äˈmiː.kiː] > Luthic ''amico'' [ɐˈmi.xu], ''amici'' [ɐˈmi.t͡ʃi].
* Latin ''amīcus'' [äˈmiː.kus̠ ~ äˈmiː.kʊs̠], ''amīcī'' [äˈmiː.kiː] > Luthic ''amicu'' [ɐˈmi.xu], ''amici'' [ɐˈmi.t͡ʃi].
* Gothic ''giba'' [ˈɡiβa] > Luthic ''geva'' [ˈd͡ʒe.].
* Gothic ''giba'' [ˈɡiβa] > Luthic ''geva'' [ˈd͡ʒe.βɐ].
* Latin ''ratiō'' [ˈrä.t̪i.oː] > Luthic ''razione'' [ʁɐˈd͡zjo.ne]
* Latin ''ratiō'' [ˈrä.t̪i.oː] > Luthic ''razione'' [rɐˈd͡zjo.ne]
* Latin ''fīlius'' [ˈfiː.li.us̠ ~ ˈfiː.lʲi.ʊs̠] > Luthic ''fiġlo'' [ˈfiʎ.ʎu].
* Latin ''fīlius'' [ˈfiː.li.us̠ ~ ˈfiː.lʲi.ʊs̠] > Luthic ''figlo'' [ˈɸiʎ.ʎu].
* Latin ''līnea'' [ˈliː.ne.ä ~ ˈlʲiː.ne.ä] , ''pugnus'' [ˈpuŋ.nus̠ ~ ˈpʊŋ.nʊs̠], ''ācrimōnia'' [äː.kriˈmoː.ni.ä ~ äː.krɪˈmoː.ni.ä] > Luthic ''liġna'' [ˈliɲ.ɲɐ], ''poġno'' [ˈpoɲ.ɲu], ''acremoġna'' [ɐ.kɾeˈmoɲ.ɲɐ].
* Latin ''līnea'' [ˈliː.ne.ä ~ ˈlʲiː.ne.ä] , ''pugnus'' [ˈpuŋ.nus̠ ~ ˈpʊŋ.nʊs̠], ''ācrimōnia'' [äː.kriˈmoː.ni.ä ~ äː.krɪˈmoː.ni.ä] > Luthic ''ligna'' [ˈliɲ.ɲɐ], ''pognu'' [ˈpoɲ.ɲu], ''acremogna'' [ɐ.kreˈmoɲ.ɲɐ].


Labio-velars remain unpalatalised, except in monosyllabic environment:
Labio-velars remain unpalatalised, except in monosyllabic environment:


* Latin ''quis'' [kʷis̠ ~ kʷɪs̠] > Luthic ''ce'' [t͡ʃe].
* Latin ''quis'' [kʷis̠ ~ kʷɪs̠] > Luthic ''ce'' [t͡ʃe].
* Gothic ''qiman'' [ˈkʷiman] > Luthic ''qemare'' [kʷeˈma.ɾe ~ kᶣeˈma.ɾe].
* Gothic ''qiman'' [ˈkʷiman] > Luthic ''qemare'' [kʷeˈma.re ~ kᶣeˈma.re].


In some cases, palatalisation occurs word initially, mainly if /kn/ is the initial cluster:
In some cases, palatalisation occurs word initially, mainly if /kn/ is the initial cluster:


* Gothic ''knōþs'' [knoːθs] > Luthic ''ġnode'' [ˈɲo.ð̞e].
* Gothic ''knōþs'' [knoːθs] > Luthic ''gnoðe'' [ˈɲo.ðe].
* Gothic ''kunnan'' [ˈkunːan], influenced by Latin ''(co)gnōscere'' [koŋˈnoːs̠.ke.re ~ kɔŋˈnoːs̠.kɛ.rɛ] and later Langobardic ''*knājan'' */ˈknaːjan/ > Luthic ''ġnoscere'' [ɲoʃˈʃe.ɾe]
* Gothic ''kunnan'' [ˈkunːan], influenced by Latin ''(co)gnōscere'' [koŋˈnoːs̠.ke.re ~ kɔŋˈnoːs̠.kɛ.rɛ] and later Langobardic ''*knājan'' */ˈknaːjan/ > Luthic ''gnoscere'' [ɲoʃˈʃe.re]
* Langobardic ''*knohha'' /ˈknoxːa ~ ˈknɔxːa/ > Luthic ''ġnocco'' [ˈɲɔk.ku].
* Langobardic ''*knohha'' /ˈknoxːa ~ ˈknɔxːa/ > Luthic ''gnoccu'' [ˈɲɔk.ku].


It may not happen if intervocalic:
It may not happen if intervocalic:


* Gothic ''kēlikn'' [ˈkeːlikn] > Luthic ''celecna'' [t͡ʃeˈlek.nɐ].
* Gothic ''kēlikn'' [ˈkeːlikn] > Luthic ''celecna'' [t͡ʃeˈlek.nɐ].
* Gothic ''auknan'' [ˈɔːknan] > Luthic ''aucnare'' [ɔkˈna.ɾe].
* Gothic ''auknan'' [ˈɔːknan] > Luthic ''aucnare'' [ɔkˈna.re].


=====Lenition=====
=====Lenition=====
The Gotho-Romance family suffered very few lenitions, but in most cases the stops /p t k/ are lenited to /b d ɡ/ if not in onset position, before or after a sonorant or in intervocalic position as a geminate. A similar process happens with /b/ that is lenited to /v/ in the same conditions. The non-geminate rhotic present in Latin is simplified to /ɾ ʁ/. The unstressed labio-velar /kʷ/ delabialises before hard vowels, as in:
The Gotho-Romance family suffered very few lenitions, but in most cases the stops /p t k/ are lenited to /b d ɡ/ if not in onset position, before or after a sonorant or in intervocalic position as a geminate. A similar process happens with /b/ that is lenited to /β/ in the same conditions. The unstressed labio-velar /kʷ/ delabialises before hard vowels, as in:


* Gothic ''ƕan'' [ʍan] > *[kʷɐn] > Luthic ''can'' [kɐn].
* Gothic ''ƕan'' [ʍan] > *[kʷɐn] > Luthic ''can'' [kɐn].
Line 634: Line 634:


=====Fortition=====
=====Fortition=====
In every case, /j/ and /w/ are fortified to /d͡ʒ/ and /v/, except when triggered by hiatus collapse. The Germanic /ð/ and /xʷ ~ hʷ ~ ʍ/ are also fortified to /d/ and /kʷ/ in every position; which can be further lenited to /d͡z/ and /k ~ t͡ʃ/ in the environments given above. The Germanic /h ~ x/ is fortified to /k/ before a rhotic or a lateral, as in:
In every case, /j/ and /w/ are fortified to /d͡ʒ/ and /β/, except when triggered by hiatus collapse. The Germanic /ð/ and /xʷ ~ hʷ ~ ʍ/ are also fortified to /d/ and /kʷ/ in every position; which can be further lenited to /d͡z/ and /k ~ t͡ʃ/ in the environments given above. The Germanic /h ~ x/ is fortified to /k/ before a rhotic or a lateral, as in:


* Gothic ''hlaifs'' [ˈhlɛːɸs] > Luthic ''claefo'' [ˈklɛ.fu].
* Gothic ''hlaifs'' [ˈhlɛːɸs] > Luthic ''claefu'' [ˈklɛ.ɸu].
* Gothic ''hriggs'' [ˈhriŋɡs ~ ˈhriŋks] > Luthic ''creggo'' [ˈkɾeŋ.ɡu].
* Gothic ''hriggs'' [ˈhriŋɡs ~ ˈhriŋks] > Luthic ''creggu'' [ˈkreŋ.ɡu].


Coda consonants with similar articulations often [[w:Sandhi|sandhi]], triggering a kind of [[w:Syntactic gemination|syntactic gemination]], it also happens with [[w:Oxytone|oxytones]]:
Coda consonants with similar articulations often [[w:Sandhi|sandhi]], triggering a kind of [[w:Syntactic gemination|syntactic gemination]], it also happens with [[w:Oxytone|oxytones]]:


* ''Ed þû, ce taugis?'' [e‿θˈθu | t͡ʃe ˈtɔ.d͡ʒis].
* ''Ed þû, ce taugis?'' [e‿θˈθu | t͡ʃe ˈtɔ.d͡ʒis].
* ''La cittâ stâþ sporca'' [lɐ t͡ʃitˈta‿sˈsta‿sˈspoɾ.kɐ].
* ''La cittâ stâþ sporca'' [lɐ t͡ʃitˈta‿sˈsta‿sˈspor.kɐ].
 
Regarding the absorption of nasals before fricatives, voiceless fricatives are often fortified to affricates after alveolar consonants, such as /n l ɾ/, or general nasals:
 
* ''Il monþo'' [i‿mˈmõ.t͡θu].
* ''L’inferno'' [l‿ĩˈp͡fɛɾ.nu].
* ''La salsa'' [lɐ ˈsal.t͡sɐ].
* ''L’arsenale'' [l‿ɐɾ.t͡seˈna.le].


=====Deletion=====
=====Deletion=====
Line 660: Line 653:
Vowels other than /a/ are often syncopated in unstressed word-internal syllables, especially when in contact with liquid consonants:
Vowels other than /a/ are often syncopated in unstressed word-internal syllables, especially when in contact with liquid consonants:


* Latin ''angulus'' [ˈäŋ.ɡu.ɫ̪us̠ ~ ˈäŋ.ɡʊ.ɫ̪ʊs̠] > Luthic ''agglo'' [ˈaŋ.ɡlu].
* Latin ''angulus'' [ˈäŋ.ɡu.ɫ̪us̠ ~ ˈäŋ.ɡʊ.ɫ̪ʊs̠] > Luthic ''agglu'' [ˈaŋ.ɡlu].
* Latin ''speculum'' [ˈs̠pɛ.ku.ɫ̪ũː ~ ˈs̠pɛ.kʊ.ɫ̪ũː] ~ Luthic ''speclȯ'' [ˈspɛ.klo].
* Latin ''speculum'' [ˈs̠pɛ.ku.ɫ̪ũː ~ ˈs̠pɛ.kʊ.ɫ̪ũː] ~ Luthic ''speclo'' [ˈspɛ.klo].
* Latin ''avunculus'' [äˈu̯uŋ.ku.ɫ̪us̠ ~ äˈu̯ʊŋ.kʊ.ɫ̪ʊs̠] > Luthic ''avogclo'' [ɐˈvoŋ.klu].
* Latin ''avunculus'' [äˈu̯uŋ.ku.ɫ̪us̠ ~ äˈu̯ʊŋ.kʊ.ɫ̪ʊs̠] > Luthic ''avogclu'' [ɐˈβoŋ.klu].


====Phonotactics====
====Phonotactics====