Azalic: Difference between revisions

53 bytes added ,  1 September 2019
m
No edit summary
Line 174: Line 174:
*Irrealis (source of the English subjunctive, including ''were''): sigmatic future.
*Irrealis (source of the English subjunctive, including ''were''): sigmatic future.
*Stative (the source of the English past): a tenseless form like the Akkadian stative. Originally a deverbal noun; formed with the o-grade (deriving nouns in PIE) for strongs, -dh from -tús (with random voicing) for weaks, (i)-ə from -ih2 for semistrongs. It was not a true finite verb form so it didn't take ''-se''.
*Stative (the source of the English past): a tenseless form like the Akkadian stative. Originally a deverbal noun; formed with the o-grade (deriving nouns in PIE) for strongs, -dh from -tús (with random voicing) for weaks, (i)-ə from -ih2 for semistrongs. It was not a true finite verb form so it didn't take ''-se''.
**Modal verbs such as ''can, will, shall, may, must, ought'' are stative-present verbs.
**Some modal verbs in English, such as ''can, will, shall, may, must, ought'', come from statives and thus are called stative-present verbs.
*Active participle: -ənt
*Active participle: -ənt
**''-ənt-qhe'' became the present progressive ''-ing'' in English.
**''-ənt-qhe'' became the present progressive ''-ing'' in English.
138,759

edits