Eta-Talmic: Difference between revisions
m (→Phylogeny) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Proto- | [[Proto-Talmic/Themsarian|Themsárimai: '''Gávthens tálsmimens''']] | ||
The ''' | The '''Talmic''' languages are a relatively isolated subbranch of the [[Gamedan languages|Gamedan]] language family. They are descended from '''Proto-Talmic''' ('''PT''' or '''PTal'''). | ||
==Phylogeny== | ==Phylogeny== | ||
{{clade | {{clade | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|4=Arabic dialect-ish | |4=Arabic dialect-ish | ||
}} | }} | ||
|label2=[[T- | |label2=[[T-Talmic languages]] | ||
|2={{clade | |2={{clade | ||
|1=[[Andarin]] | |1=[[Andarin]] | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Characteristics== | ==Characteristics== | ||
The historical | The historical Talmic languages have all shared the following characteristics to some extent: | ||
*conversion of a former case system into a system of state distinctions (e.g. definiteness, possessedness, predicative/attributive, generic/specific) | *conversion of a former case system into a system of state distinctions (e.g. definiteness, possessedness, predicative/attributive, generic/specific) | ||
*rigidly head-initial word order | *rigidly head-initial word order | ||
**verb-initial clauses; modern | **verb-initial clauses; modern Talmic languages are topic-prominent and thus have V2 independent clauses and verb-initial dependent clauses. | ||
*heavy grammatical use of pronominal suffixes/enclitics on possessed nouns, verbs and prepositions, that index their dependents | *heavy grammatical use of pronominal suffixes/enclitics on possessed nouns, verbs and prepositions, that index their dependents | ||
**some descendants eventually creep toward being polysynthetic, supplanting former finite verbs with possessed infinitives/participles of complex compound verbs, and predicative nouns | **some descendants eventually creep toward being polysynthetic, supplanting former finite verbs with possessed infinitives/participles of complex compound verbs, and predicative nouns | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*grammatical apophony (tonal, vocalic or consonantal) | *grammatical apophony (tonal, vocalic or consonantal) | ||
*word order changes for topicalization and focusing | *word order changes for topicalization and focusing | ||
*More recent | *More recent Talmic languages have honorific systems developed from abstract nouns in the feminine gender. Therefore former feminine pronouns and verbs develop into honorific markers. | ||
Characteristic phylogenetic innovations vis-à-vis Zachydic include: | Characteristic phylogenetic innovations vis-à-vis Zachydic include: | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
*Conflation of non-labialized and labialized dorsal stops, and preservation of the velar-uvular distinction. | *Conflation of non-labialized and labialized dorsal stops, and preservation of the velar-uvular distinction. | ||
**Also common is the transition of the uvular series into the radical series; uvulars are still found in some phonetically conservative languages and dialects, however. | **Also common is the transition of the uvular series into the radical series; uvulars are still found in some phonetically conservative languages and dialects, however. | ||
*The shift of ''*s'' into ''*h'' and subsequent assibilation of affricates occuring after primary rhotacization (/*cʼ, *c/ > /*s/, /*ʒ/ > /*z/ etc.) greatly reduces the consonant inventory; this also contributes to the fricative-rich flavor of | *The shift of ''*s'' into ''*h'' and subsequent assibilation of affricates occuring after primary rhotacization (/*cʼ, *c/ > /*s/, /*ʒ/ > /*z/ etc.) greatly reduces the consonant inventory; this also contributes to the fricative-rich flavor of Talmic. | ||
*Some metathesis occurred too. | *Some metathesis occurred too. | ||
==Proto- | ==Proto-Talmic phonology== | ||
*qʷ ɢʷ qʷ' > q ɢ q' | *qʷ ɢʷ qʷ' > q ɢ q' | ||
*p' t' c' ƛ' k' kʷ' q' qʷ' > f þ s ł x xʷ χ χ | *p' t' c' ƛ' k' kʷ' q' qʷ' > f þ s ł x xʷ χ χ | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
===Consonant inventory=== | ===Consonant inventory=== | ||
====Pyr Chlʰíse model==== | ====Pyr Chlʰíse model==== | ||
The following is the Proto- | The following is the Proto-Talmic consonant system as conjectured by Núrian Talmicist Dazʰír pyr Chlʰíse: he surmised that Proto-Raxo-Talmic ejective series had turned into an aspirated series in PTal, which has spirantized in daughter languages. This reconstruction is now considered obsolete. | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="greentable lightgreenbg" style="width: 700px; text-align:center;" | {| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="greentable lightgreenbg" style="width: 700px; text-align:center;" | ||
! colspan="10"|Proto- | ! colspan="10"|Proto-Talmic reconstructed consonants (pyr Chlʰíse) | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" | | ! colspan="2" | | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
====Guànitzhùtł model==== | ====Guànitzhùtł model==== | ||
Xamùz Guànitzhùtł revised the pyr Chlʰíse model, positing that the ejective-to-spirant shift had occurred earlier (probably ejective plosives ~ ejective affricates > affricates > fricatives); she noted the inconsistency of evidence for aspirated stops at any stage of | Xamùz Guànitzhùtł revised the pyr Chlʰíse model, positing that the ejective-to-spirant shift had occurred earlier (probably ejective plosives ~ ejective affricates > affricates > fricatives); she noted the inconsistency of evidence for aspirated stops at any stage of Talmic languages. | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="greentable lightgreenbg" style="width: 700px; text-align:center;" | {| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="greentable lightgreenbg" style="width: 700px; text-align:center;" | ||
! colspan="10"|Proto- | ! colspan="10"|Proto-Talmic reconstructed consonants (Guànitzhùtł) | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" | | ! colspan="2" | | ||
Line 259: | Line 259: | ||
*āi ēi ōi āu ēu ōu | *āi ēi ōi āu ēu ōu | ||
==Proto- | ==Proto-Talmic morphology== | ||
===Nominal morphology=== | ===Nominal morphology=== | ||
Nouns and adjectives had retained from Proto-Zachydic 6 cases (nominative, accusative, genitive/prepositional, allative, ablative, locative/instrumental), 3 numbers, 2 genders (masculine, feminine), and additionally possessive inflection for nouns. Like its daughter languages as well as Proto-Zachydic, Common | Nouns and adjectives had retained from Proto-Zachydic 6 cases (nominative, accusative, genitive/prepositional, allative, ablative, locative/instrumental), 3 numbers, 2 genders (masculine, feminine), and additionally possessive inflection for nouns. Like its daughter languages as well as Proto-Zachydic, Common Talmic is thought to have been a [[w:differential object marking|differential object marking]] language; only definite or specific direct objects were marked with the accusative case. | ||
[Genitive is partitive > indefinite?] | [Genitive is partitive > indefinite?] | ||
Line 336: | Line 336: | ||
===Pronominal morphology=== | ===Pronominal morphology=== | ||
Proto- | Proto-Talmic free pronouns can be reconstructed with less confidence because all case marking except as clitics and suffixes was eliminated. | ||
====Full personal pronouns==== | ====Full personal pronouns==== | ||
Line 343: | Line 343: | ||
===Verbal morphology=== | ===Verbal morphology=== | ||
====Tense==== | ====Tense==== | ||
The Proto- | The Proto-Talmic verbal system has converted the pre-existing aspect-based perfective/imperfective dichotomy into a time-based one (past/non-past). The irregularity of the past system is probably a result of conflation of many different parent aspect systems. | ||
====Aspect==== | ====Aspect==== | ||
The following aspect suffixes can be reconstructed: | The following aspect suffixes can be reconstructed: | ||
Line 351: | Line 351: | ||
====Mood==== | ====Mood==== | ||
Proto- | Proto-Talmic has kept many moods intact (imperative, desiderative, hortative, optative). The negative imperative used the prohibitive particle along with the hortative form, as in Proto-Zachydic. The moods are frequently collapsed by its progeny (e.g. jussive in Themsaran). | ||
====Thematic suffixes==== | ====Thematic suffixes==== | ||
Proto- | Proto-Talmic saw the development of thematic vowels from derivational suffixes. Thematic vowels are found in many Talmic languages, but modern languages often generalize the ''a''-paradigm to the expense of the others. | ||
*''*-īn'': basic verbs | *''*-īn'': basic verbs | ||
*''*-a-īn'': denominative or transitive verbs | *''*-a-īn'': denominative or transitive verbs | ||
Line 580: | Line 580: | ||
*the memory evidential prefix ''*ʔṇʔ-''. | *the memory evidential prefix ''*ʔṇʔ-''. | ||
==Proto- | ==Proto-Talmic syntax== | ||
Basic word order was most likely SVO, as evinced by the order {{sc|verb-object suffix}} in all daughter languages. | Basic word order was most likely SVO, as evinced by the order {{sc|verb-object suffix}} in all daughter languages. | ||
==Sound changes to Proto- | ==Sound changes to Proto-Talmic== | ||
==Sound changes from Proto- | ==Sound changes from Proto-Talmic==<!-- | ||
{| class="greentable lightgreenbg" | {| class="greentable lightgreenbg" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|+ ''' | |+ '''Talmic consonant correspondences''' | ||
! PTal||[[Themsaran|Thm]]||[[Low Themsaran|LThm]]||[[Tizian|Tiz]]||[[Snaħħian|Sn]]||[[Qelorian|Qel]] | ! PTal||[[Themsaran|Thm]]||[[Low Themsaran|LThm]]||[[Tizian|Tiz]]||[[Snaħħian|Sn]]||[[Qelorian|Qel]] | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 19:52, 30 December 2015
Themsárimai: Gávthens tálsmimens
The Talmic languages are a relatively isolated subbranch of the Gamedan language family. They are descended from Proto-Talmic (PT or PTal).
Phylogeny
Noble Themsarian |
| ||||||||||||
T-Talmic languages |
| ||||||||||||
Characteristics
The historical Talmic languages have all shared the following characteristics to some extent:
- conversion of a former case system into a system of state distinctions (e.g. definiteness, possessedness, predicative/attributive, generic/specific)
- rigidly head-initial word order
- verb-initial clauses; modern Talmic languages are topic-prominent and thus have V2 independent clauses and verb-initial dependent clauses.
- heavy grammatical use of pronominal suffixes/enclitics on possessed nouns, verbs and prepositions, that index their dependents
- some descendants eventually creep toward being polysynthetic, supplanting former finite verbs with possessed infinitives/participles of complex compound verbs, and predicative nouns
- differential indexing of the direct object and the possessor, and occasionally the prepositional object
- grammatical apophony (tonal, vocalic or consonantal)
- word order changes for topicalization and focusing
- More recent Talmic languages have honorific systems developed from abstract nouns in the feminine gender. Therefore former feminine pronouns and verbs develop into honorific markers.
Characteristic phylogenetic innovations vis-à-vis Zachydic include:
- prominence of tense rather than aspect in verbal TAM, unlike in mainland Zachydic languages.
- Rhotacization of /*z/ to /*r/ / V_V and V_#, and secondary rhotacization (often before consonants, the choice of which depends on the language).
- Development of Proto-Zachydic ejective stops into spirants.
- Conflation of non-labialized and labialized dorsal stops, and preservation of the velar-uvular distinction.
- Also common is the transition of the uvular series into the radical series; uvulars are still found in some phonetically conservative languages and dialects, however.
- The shift of *s into *h and subsequent assibilation of affricates occuring after primary rhotacization (/*cʼ, *c/ > /*s/, /*ʒ/ > /*z/ etc.) greatly reduces the consonant inventory; this also contributes to the fricative-rich flavor of Talmic.
- Some metathesis occurred too.
Proto-Talmic phonology
- qʷ ɢʷ qʷ' > q ɢ q'
- p' t' c' ƛ' k' kʷ' q' qʷ' > f þ s ł x xʷ χ χ
- s > h
- c > s
- ƛ > t
- z > r / V_
Consonant inventory
Pyr Chlʰíse model
The following is the Proto-Talmic consonant system as conjectured by Núrian Talmicist Dazʰír pyr Chlʰíse: he surmised that Proto-Raxo-Talmic ejective series had turned into an aspirated series in PTal, which has spirantized in daughter languages. This reconstruction is now considered obsolete.
Proto-Talmic reconstructed consonants (pyr Chlʰíse) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labial | Alveolar | Lateral | Palatal | Velar | Labiovelar | Uvular | Glottal | ||
Nasal | *m | *n | |||||||
Plosive | voiceless | *p | *t | *ƛ | *k | *kʷ | *q | *ʔ | |
voiced | *b | *d | *λ | *g | *gʷ | ||||
aspirated | *pʰ | *tʰ | *ƛʰ | *kʰ | *kʷʰ | *qʰ | |||
Fricative | voiceless | *s | *ł | *h | |||||
voiced | *z | *ḽ | *ʁ | ||||||
Approximant | *l | *j | *w | ||||||
Trill | *r |
Guànitzhùtł model
Xamùz Guànitzhùtł revised the pyr Chlʰíse model, positing that the ejective-to-spirant shift had occurred earlier (probably ejective plosives ~ ejective affricates > affricates > fricatives); she noted the inconsistency of evidence for aspirated stops at any stage of Talmic languages.
Proto-Talmic reconstructed consonants (Guànitzhùtł) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labial | Alveolar | Lateral | Palatal | Velar | Labiovelar | Uvular | Glottal | ||
Nasal | *m | *n | |||||||
Plosive | voiceless | *p | *t | *k | *kʷ | *q | *ʔ | ||
voiced | *b | *d | *g | *gʷ | |||||
Fricative | voiceless | *φ | *s, *θ | *ł | *x | *xʷ | *χ | *h | |
voiced | *z, *ð | *ʁ | |||||||
Approximant | *l | *j | *w | ||||||
Trill | *r |
Vocalic inventory
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
Close | *i *ī | *u *ū | |
Mid | *e *ē | *o *ō | |
Open | *a *ā |
Diphthongs:
- ai ei oi au eu ou
- āi ēi ōi āu ēu ōu
Proto-Talmic morphology
Nominal morphology
Nouns and adjectives had retained from Proto-Zachydic 6 cases (nominative, accusative, genitive/prepositional, allative, ablative, locative/instrumental), 3 numbers, 2 genders (masculine, feminine), and additionally possessive inflection for nouns. Like its daughter languages as well as Proto-Zachydic, Common Talmic is thought to have been a differential object marking language; only definite or specific direct objects were marked with the accusative case.
[Genitive is partitive > indefinite?]
*çúma=ʔ 'air' | *méisar 'segment' | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender → | Masculine | Feminine | ||||||||||
Case ↓ | Singular | Dual | Plural | Singular | Dual | Plural | ||||||
Nominative | *çúma | *çúmōr | *çúmū | *méisar | *méisoir | *méisāne | ||||||
Accusative | *çúmeç | *çúmōç | *çúmūt | *méisaç | *méisoiç | *méisina | ||||||
Genitive/Prepositional | *çúmu | *çúmār | *çúmakʰe | *méiset | *méisair | *méis(in)ir | ||||||
Ablative | *çúmenʔ | *méisanʔ | ||||||||||
Allative | ? | ? | ||||||||||
Instrumental | *çúmīl | *méisai |
The essive case (*-ēri) was marginal, and was only used adverbially (cf. Th. -ēr adverbial suffix).
Some nouns took the "thematic" suffix/clitic *-ʔ with an uncertain meaning, a holdover from the classifier system in Proto-Zachydic.
Pronominal morphology
Proto-Talmic free pronouns can be reconstructed with less confidence because all case marking except as clitics and suffixes was eliminated.
Full personal pronouns
Possessive suffixes
Verbal morphology
Tense
The Proto-Talmic verbal system has converted the pre-existing aspect-based perfective/imperfective dichotomy into a time-based one (past/non-past). The irregularity of the past system is probably a result of conflation of many different parent aspect systems.
Aspect
The following aspect suffixes can be reconstructed:
- prospective *-eh-
- inceptive *-lʁa-
- cessative *-mbe-
Mood
Proto-Talmic has kept many moods intact (imperative, desiderative, hortative, optative). The negative imperative used the prohibitive particle along with the hortative form, as in Proto-Zachydic. The moods are frequently collapsed by its progeny (e.g. jussive in Themsaran).
Thematic suffixes
Proto-Talmic saw the development of thematic vowels from derivational suffixes. Thematic vowels are found in many Talmic languages, but modern languages often generalize the a-paradigm to the expense of the others.
- *-īn: basic verbs
- *-a-īn: denominative or transitive verbs
- *-e-īn: dynamic or reflexive verbs
TAM/subject affix paradigm
Todo: rederive past tense... they don't look like they could (all) be perfective suffixes.
Subject affixes | |||
---|---|---|---|
Present/Non-past | |||
Singular | Dual | Plural | |
1.ex | -īn | -dir | -mī |
1.in | - | -ʁ-sē | -n-sē |
2 | -r | -r-sē | -l-sē |
3.m | -m | -iri- | -ʁih |
3.f | -isi | -tih | |
Simple past | |||
Singular | Dual | Plural | |
1.ex | -nʔe | -sid | -mā |
1.in | - | -ʁʔā, -tar | -nʔā, -taq |
2 | -rʔe | -rʔā | -lʔā |
3.m | -ā(-m) | -ā-iri | -ā-ʁih |
3.f | -ā-isi | -ā-tih | |
Prospective | |||
Singular | Dual | Plural | |
1.ex | -eh-īn | -eh-dir | -eh-mī |
1.in | - | -eh-ʁsē | -eh-nsē |
2 | -eh-r | -eh-rsē | -eh-lsē |
3.m | -eh-m | -eh-iri- | -eh-ʁēj |
3.f | -eh-isi | -eh-tēj | |
Imperative | |||
Singular | Dual | Plural | |
1.in | - | -ʁsi | -nsi |
2 | -h | -rsi | -lsi |
Hortative | |||
Singular | Dual | Plural | |
1.ex | -īn-ti | -dis-ti | -mī-ti |
1.in | - | -ʁs-ti | -ns-ti |
2 | -ti | -rs-ti | -ls-ti |
3.m | -m-ti | -iri-ti | -ʁih-ti |
3.f | -isi-ti | -tih-ti | |
Desiderative | |||
Singular | Dual | Plural | |
1.ex | -īn-ʔi | -dir-ʔi | -mī-ʔi |
1.in | - | -ʁsē-ʔi | -nsē-ʔi |
2 | -r-ʔi | -rsē-ʔi | -lsē-ʔi |
3.m | -m-ʔi | -iri-ʔ | -ʁih-ʔi |
3.f | -isi-ʔi | -tih-ʔi | |
Optative | |||
Singular | Dual | Plural | |
1.ex | -īn-aʔ | -dir-aʔ | -mī-aʔ |
1.in | - | -ʁs-aʔ | -ns-aʔ |
2 | -r-aʔ | -rs-aʔ | -ls-aʔ |
3.m | -m-aʔ | -ir-aʔ | -ʁ-aʔ |
3.f | -is-aʔ | -t-aʔ |
Other verbal affixes
Other reconstructible affixes include:
- *-pe- potential (e.g. Thm. tacvéi 'know (a fact)' < tak-pe-īn 'be able to say')
- *-re- passive
- *-ina- causative, i.e. supply sb with sth to [verb]/a patient of [verb]
- *-ska- causative
- *az-, "towards" directional prefix.
- the memory evidential prefix *ʔṇʔ-.
Proto-Talmic syntax
Basic word order was most likely SVO, as evinced by the order verb-object suffix in all daughter languages.
Sound changes to Proto-Talmic
Sound changes from Proto-Talmic
Vocabulary
- *az- telic
- Thm. ar-/as-
- Núr. ar- superlative, intensive; s- telic
- Thm. ar-/as-