Ɯ: Difference between revisions
Line 983: | Line 983: | ||
====Referent anaphora==== | ====Referent anaphora==== | ||
=====Anaphoric reference shift particle===== | =====Anaphoric reference shift particle===== | ||
The anaphoric marker states that the referent of the verb has changed. <!--It can be __ or is different than that of the most closely before person mentioned.--> This is to avoid the ambiguity of sentences like the following: | |||
:''“Tavar hit Perit. He cried”'' | |||
Given a sequence of actions like the one above, performed by actuants (A or S) of the same level of semantically adscribed animaciy, it is necessary to mark wether the sequence of actions (hitting, then crying) belongs to the same referent, or if the referent of the first action is different than that of the latter. To mark that the actuant of the crying, S, is now ''Perit'' (formerly the non-actuant, O, of the hitting), and no longer ''Tavar'' (actuant, A, of the hitting), either the verb itself or the pronoun -most commonly the verb, given the pro-drop feature of the language- is suffixed with one of the following particles: | |||
::{| class="bluetable lightbluebg collapsible collapsed" | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=3 style="background:LightBlue"| '''{-Vn, -an, -on} /C_''' || -Vn > [√a, o] | |||
|- | |||
| -an > [√V<sub>rounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
| -on > [√V<sub>unrounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=3 style="background:LightBlue"| '''{-Vt, -at, -ot} /C_''' || -Vt > [√a, o] | |||
|- | |||
| -at > [√V<sub>rounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
| -ot > [√V<sub>unrounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=3 style="background:LightBlue"| '''{-Vk, -ak, -ok} /C_''' || -Vk > [√a, o] | |||
|- | |||
| -ak > [√V<sub>rounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
| -ok > [√V<sub>unrounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=3 style="background:LightBlue"| '''{-Vs̆, -as̆, -os̆} /C_''' || -Vs̆ > [√a, o] | |||
|- | |||
| -as̆ > [√V<sub>rounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
| -os̆ > [√V<sub>unrounded</sub>C] | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
This would render the aforementioned sentence (''"Tavar hit Perit. He cried"'') into the unambiguously marked: | |||
:{| | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=6| ''‹anTavar sakĕssiteš tenPerit. Lamma xabaxlitešen›'' | |||
|- | |||
| /an.ta.ˈvaɾ || sa.ˈkøs.si.teʃ || ten.pe.ˈɾit || <nowiki>|</nowiki> || ˈlam.ma || xa.ˈbax.li.te.ʃen/ | |||
|- | |||
| {an-Tavar || sa-kĕs-siteš || ten-Perit || <nowiki>|</nowiki> || Ø-lam-ma || xa-bax-liteš-en} | |||
|- | |||
| {an-Tavar || C₂a-kĕs-liteš || tVn-Perit || <nowiki>|</nowiki> || Ø-lam-Ca || C₂a-bax-liteš-Ø-Vn} | |||
|- | |||
| ERG.ANIM.SG-Tavar || PERF-to.hit-3S.ANIM.MASC.NPRES || ABS.ANIM.SG-Perit || <nowiki>|</nowiki> || NOM.ANIM.S-LAM-PRON.S || PERF-to.cry-3S.ANIM.MASC.NPRES.IND-{{sc|shift}} | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=6 | ''“Tavar hit Perit. He cried”'' | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
''Tavar'' did the hitting, ''Perit'' the crying. | |||
=====Use of the obviate===== | =====Use of the obviate===== | ||
The obviative form of the tense-person marker, used to mark agreement of verbs with the less animate actor of a clause with different actors of the same semanticly adscribed degree of animacy, as it sepparates actors, can be used on its own to mark the shift in referent within a single clause, while the anaphoric reference shift particle can also be used over longer discourse segments. | |||
===Animacy, control and volition=== | ===Animacy, control and volition=== |
Revision as of 22:34, 26 February 2016
This article is private. The author requests that you do not make changes to this project without approval. By all means, please help fix spelling, grammar and organisation problems, thank you. |
This article is a construction site. This project is currently undergoing significant construction and/or revamp. By all means, take a look around, thank you. |
Ŭrbŭrŭx U | |
---|---|
"the speech, U" | |
Pronunciation | [/ˈuɾ.bu.ɾux ˈɯ/] |
Created by | Nicolás Straccia |
Setting | Yrḳuti conworlding project |
Ɯ languages
| |
The language known as Ɯ is a conlang being created and developed by Nicolás Straccia as part of the Yrḳuti conworlding project.
Background
[...]
Grammar
In a nutshell:
PHONOLOGY
Vowels
Vowel inventory
Front | Near-front | Central | Near-back | Back | |
Close | |||||
Near‑close | |||||
Close‑mid | |||||
Mid | |||||
Open‑mid | |||||
Near‑open | |||||
Open |
Stem-controlled roundness harmony. Both /a/ and /o/, a back and a front vowel, are neutral. In compounds each element retains it own harmony; affixes will harmonize with the stem with which they are directly in contact.
Consonants
Consonant inventory
Bilabial | Labio-dental | Dental | Alveolar | Post-alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Glottal | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plosive | p b | t d | (ɟ) | k g | ʔ | |||
Nasal | m | n | (ɲ) | (ŋ) | ||||
Trill | r | |||||||
Tap or flap | ɾ | |||||||
Fricative | f v | s | ʃ | x | h | |||
Africate | ʧ | |||||||
Approximant | w | j | ||||||
Lateral app. | l | (ʎ) |
Phonotaxis
Sandhi
[...]
Sandhi over morpheme boundaries |
---|
-VC·CV- |
-n· |
-n·t- → -n·d-, lenition of /t/ → /d/ |
-n·t- → -n·n-, assimilation of /t/ → /n/ |
-n·k- → -n·g-, lenition of /k/ → /g/ |
-n·h- → -n·k-, fortition of /h/ → /k/ |
-n·j- → -n̆-, fusion (palatalization of /n/ → /ɲ/) |
-n·b- → -m·b-, fusion (labialization of /n/ → /m/) |
-n·b- → -m·m-, fusion (labialization of /n/ → /m/), assimilation of /b/ → /m/) |
-n·l- → -n·n-, assimilation of /l/ → /n/ |
-n·r- → -n·n-, assimilation of /ɾ/ → /n/ |
-n·m- → -n·n-, assimilation of /m/ → /n/ |
-n·v- → -p-, fusion to /p/ |
-m· |
-m·b- → -p-, fusion to /p/ |
-m·l- → -m·m-, assimilation of /l/ → /m/ |
-m·v- → -p-, fusion to /p/ (labialization of /v/ → /β/, plosivization of /β/ → /p/) |
-l |
-l·t- → -l·d-, lenition of /t/ → /d/ |
-l·k- → -l·g-, lenition of /k/ → /g/ |
-l·g- → -l·l-, assimilation of /g/ → /l/ |
-l·r- → -l·l-, assimilation of /ɾ/ → /l/ |
-l·m- → -l·l-, assimilation of /m/ → /l/ |
-l·b- → -p·p- [+____] |
-l·j- → -l̆-, fusion (palatalization of /l/ → /ʎ/) |
-l·v- → -l·l-, assimilation of /v/ → /l/ |
-r· |
-r·g- → -rr-, assimilation of /g/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·h- → -rr-, assimilation of /h/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·x- → -rr-, assimilation of /x/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·l- → -rr-, assimilation of /l/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·t- → -s·s- [+____] |
-s· |
-s·l- → -s·s-, assimilation of /l/ → /s/ |
-s·g- → -s·k-, fortition of /g/ → /k/ |
-s̆· |
-s̆·h- → -s̆→s̆-, assimilation of /h/ → /ʃ/ |
-s̆·l- → -s̆·s̆-, assimilation of /l/ → /ʃ/ |
-t· |
-t·b- → -s·s- [+____] |
-t·g- → -t·t-, assimilation of /g/ → /t/ |
-t·l- → -t·t-, assimilation of /l/ → /t/ |
-t·n- → -t·t-, assimilation of /n/ → /t/ |
-x· |
-x·k- → -n·k- [+nasalization] |
Being all instances of -n·k- already lenited by sandhi to -n·g-, all remaining instances of -n·k- after the sandhi has been applied must then spawn from modified instances of -x·k-, thus avoiding ambiguity. |
-VC·CCV- |
-n· |
-n·rk- → -n·ng- → -ngg-, assimilation of /ɾ/ → /n/, fusion of /n/ and /k/ (velatization of /n/ → /ŋ/) |
-n·lt- → -n·t-, elision of /l/ |
-n·ln- → -n·n-, elision of /l/ |
-n·ll- → -n·n-, assimilation of first /l/, elision of second /l/ |
-n·hm- → -m·m-, elision of /l/, assimilation of /n/ |
-n·hr- → -n·kr-, fortition of /h/ → /k/ |
-n·hš- → -n·š-, elision of /h/ |
-n·tm- → -d·d-, lenition of /t/ → /d/, elision of /n/, assimilation of /m/ → /d/ |
-n·tx- → -n·x-, elision of /t/ |
-x· |
-x·hr- → -x·r-, elision of /h/ |
-CV·CV- |
-ta· |
-ta·h- → -ta·g- [+____] |
-ta·r- → -ta·l- [+____] |
-ta·š- → -ta·s- [+____] |
-ta·x- → -ta·g- [+____] |
-ta·t- → -ta·d-, lenition of /t/ → /d/ |
-ta·k- → -ta·g-, lenition of /k/ → /g/ |
-ta·bVC- → -ta·fCV- [+____] |
-CV·CCV- |
-ta· |
-ta·hš- > -ta·š- [+____] |
-ta·tx- > -ta·x- [+____] tVtC > tVC elision of t? haplology? |
-m·v- → -p-, fusion to /p/ (labialization of /v/ → /β/, plosivization of /β/ → /p/) |
-l |
-l·t- → -l·d-, lenition of /t/ → /d/ |
-l·k- → -l·g-, lenition of /k/ → /g/ |
-l·g- → -l·l-, assimilation of /g/ → /l/ |
-l·r- → -l·l-, assimilation of /ɾ/ → /l/ |
-l·m- → -l·l-, assimilation of /m/ → /l/ |
-l·b- → -p·p- [+____] |
-l·j- → -l̆-, fusion (palatalization of /l/ → /ʎ/) |
-l·v- → -l·l-, assimilation of /v/ → /l/ |
-r· |
-r·g- → -rr-, assimilation of /g/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·h- → -rr-, assimilation of /h/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·x- → -rr-, assimilation of /x/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·l- → -rr-, assimilation of /l/ → /ɾ/, fusion of /ɾɾ/ to /r/ |
-r·t- → -s·s- [+____] |
-s· |
-s·l- → -s·s-, assimilation of /l/ → /s/ |
-s·g- → -s·k-, fortition of /g/ → /k/ |
-s̆· |
-s̆·h- → -s̆→s̆-, assimilation of /h/ → /ʃ/ |
-s̆·l- → -s̆·s̆-, assimilation of /l/ → /ʃ/ |
-t· |
-t·b- → -s·s- [+____] |
-t·g- → -t·t-, assimilation of /g/ → /t/ |
-t·l- → -t·t-, assimilation of /l/ → /t/ |
-t·n- → -t·t-, assimilation of /n/ → /t/ |
-x· |
-x·k- → -n·k- [+nasalization] |
Being all instances of -n·k- already lenited by sandhi to -n·g-, all remaining instances of -n·k- after the sandhi has been applied must then spawn from modified instances of -x·k-, thus avoiding ambiguity. |
-VC·CCV- |
-n· |
-n·rk- → -n·ng- → -ngg-, assimilation of /ɾ/ → /n/, fusion of /n/ and /k/ (velatization of /n/ → /ŋ/) |
-n·lt- → -n·t-, elision of /l/ |
-n·ln- → -n·n-, elision of /l/ |
-n·ll- → -n·n-, assimilation of first /l/, elision of second /l/ |
-n·hm- → -m·m-, elision of /l/, assimilation of /n/ |
-n·hr- → -n·kr-, fortition of /h/ → /k/ |
-n·hš- → -n·š-, elision of /h/ |
-n·tm- → -d·d-, lenition of /t/ → /d/, elision of /n/, assimilation of /m/ → /d/ |
-n·tx- → -n·x-, elision of /t/ |
-x· |
-x·hr- → -x·r-, elision of /h/ |
-CV·CV- |
-ta· |
-ta·h- → -ta·g- [+____] |
-ta·r- → -ta·l- [+____] |
-ta·š- → -ta·s- [+____] |
-ta·x- → -ta·g- [+____] |
-ta·t- → -ta·d-, lenition of /t/ → /d/ |
-ta·k- → -ta·g-, lenition of /k/ → /g/ |
-ta·bVC- → -ta·fCV- [+____] |
-CV·CCV- |
-ta· |
-ta·hš- > -ta·š- [+____] |
-ta·tx- > -ta·x- [+____] tVtC > tVC elision of t? haplology? |
Sandhi over word boundaries |
---|
-C_b- → -C_p-, fortition of /b/ → /p/ (devoicing of /b/) |
Composite sandhi: obligatory contour and other phenomena. |
---|
A case of composite sandhi occurs when the application of an external sandhi rule results in either i) the resetting of or ii) the innovation on an internal sandhi rule. |
Examples: |
i) Resetting of an internal sandhi rule: external sandhi triggers obligatory contour, resetting internal sandhi. |
bengilir > penkilir |
1) Internal sandhi: rule -n·k- → -n·g-, lenition of /k/ → /g/ (voicing of /k/) |
bV·en·kil·Vr → bēnkilir* → bēngilir |
2) External sandhi: rule -C b- → -C p-, fortition of /b/ → /p/ (devoicing of /b/) |
(-V bēngilir → -V bēngilir) |
-C bēngilir → -C pēngilir* >> -C pēnkilir |
ii) Innovation on an internal sandhi rule: external sandhi triggers obligatory contour, leniting a cluster formed through assimilation |
bepɯlɯr > pevɯlɯr |
1) Internal sandhi: rule -n·v- → -p-, fusion to /p/ |
bV•en•vɯl•Vr > bepɯlɯr |
2) External sandhi: rule -C b- > -C p-, fortition of /b/ /p/ (devoicing of /b/) |
(-V bepɯlɯr > bepɯlɯr) |
-C bepɯlɯr > pevɯlɯr |
Syllable structure
Both verbal and nominal roots, as well as affixes, have a (C)(C)V(C) syllable structure.
MORPHOLOGY
Nominal morphology
Nominal roots are marked for grammatical case, deixis (relative locativity and lativity), definiteness and number or quantity.
Grammatical gender and animacy
There are two grammatical genders: animate and inanimate. The animate gender has two subdivisions: masculine and feminine. These are all generally listed as masculine, feminine and neuter gender.
(See also ‘Animacy and volition’ below)
Grammatical number and quantifier affixes
There are two systems of grammatical number: i) for nouns, Collective 1, Dual, Singulative, Collective 2; ii) for pronouns, the numbers Singular, Dual, Plural and Indefinite.
(See also “__*number*__” below)
Grammatical number markers for nouns
The determiners account for definiteness as well as for number:
Number | Definiteness | Marker |
---|---|---|
col Collective | Indefinite | -Ø |
Definite | -Vr | |
dual Dual | Indefinite | -Vt |
Definite | -VmVm | |
sg Singulative | Indefinite | -Vm |
Definite | -Vx | |
col2 Collective 2* | Indefinite | -lVt |
Definite | -lVm |
- * The number “Collective 2” reffers to collectives or complete sets of a noun; e.g. ne; trees; nelet, a.forest
Declension particles and affixes
Grammatical case
Animate | Inanimate | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singular | Dual | Plural | 4th | Singular | Dual | Plural | 4th | |
Nominative nom | Ø | |||||||
Ergative erg | an- | vVl- | sVm- | tVm- | ɯl- | xan- | rVm- | tVl- |
Dative dat | bVl- | mVl- | bVl- | mVl- | ||||
Absolutive abs | tVn- | wVn- | VtVn- | sVn- | okVn- | xVn- | VkVn- | šVn- |
Accusative acc | VnV- | lVt- | VnV- | lVt- | ||||
Instrumental inst | or- | Vm- | or- | Vm- | ||||
Partitive* part | bV- | tV- | kV- | tV- | ||||
Genitive** gen | -(o)nnu(r) |
- * The partitive case (part) conveys the telicity of the verb (to.x/to.x.obj vs. to.fully/thoroughly.x/x.obj).
- ** The genitive case (gen) is marked with a conflation of the deictic markers -ho- (FROM) and -nur (APUD) and is thus the same for all nouns.
Deictics
.
A. ESSIVITY | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‹› | // | Case | ||||
I | -vul | -vɯl | in | inessive | ||
-kil | -kil | sup | superessive | |||
-tiš | -tiʃ | sub | subessive | |||
-lur | -lɯɾ | ant | antessive | |||
-vet | -vet | poste | postessive | This case is now rarely used for its original meaning "behind" and is often used to mean "with" or "in exchange for" | ||
-nur | -nɯɾ | apud | apudessive | apudessive, adessive | ||
B. LATIVITY | ||||||
‹› | // | Case | ||||
II | -kur | -kɯɾ | il | ilative | ||
-lir | -liɾ | el | elative | |||
-vox | -vox | perl | perlative | |||
-tum | -tɯm | prol | prolative | prolative, prosecutive, oblative/pertingent (against) | ||
III.a | -te | -te | up.to, until | |||
-sul | -te·vɯl | -sɯl | ||||
-xil | -te·kil | -xil | ||||
-tiš | -te·tiʃ | -(t)tiʃ | ||||
-nur | -te·lɯɾ | -nɯɾ | ||||
-det | -te·vet | -det | ||||
-dur | -te·nɯɾ | -dɯɾ | ||||
III.b | -ho | -ho | from | |||
-ful | -ho·vɯl | -fɯl | inel | inelatve | ||
-kil | -ho·kil | -(h)kil | /k/→/g/ sandhi doesn’t apply, anulated by underlying /h/ | |||
-diš | -ho·tiʃ | -diʃ | ||||
-hlur | -ho·lɯɾ | -hlɯɾ | ||||
-hret | -ho·vet | -hɾet | ||||
-šur | -ho·nɯɾ | -ʃɯɾ |
Nominal declension themes
C-theme | VC-stems |
CVC-stems | |
V-theme | CV-stems |
CCV-stems |
Personal pronouns
Personal pronouns can be dropped. They are marked as follows:
-1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
---|---|---|---|
grammatical.case | lam | deictic.marker | number.marker |
“person" |
Propter names
Proper names are marked for grammatical case in the same way as animate singular common nouns. Regular sandhi over morpheme boundaries is not triggered (for instance, tanTavar instead of **tanDavar, see below).
In the Romanization, the capitalization of the proper name remains in place while prefixes and suffixes remain in minuscle, e.g.:
“Farŭl” {Ø-Farŭl} nom-Farŭl vs. “anFarŭl” {an-Farŭl} erg-Farŭl or
“Perit” {Ø-Perit} nom-Perit vs. “belPerit” {bVl-Perit} dat-Perit or
“Tavar” {Ø-Tavar} nom-Tavar vs. “tanTavar” {tVn-Tavar} abs-Tavar.
Other names, like given names, nicknames and pet names based on common nouns are marked with the proper name marker pnm –gV or –Vg.
The proper name vocative, derived from a reduplicated form of the pnm, fossilized in the forms -gagV and -agVg, with epenthesis of the harmonically neutral vowel a. In this latter form, the first g is subject to sandhi, while the second isn’t. E.g. Tavar → Tavarraga!, Perit → Perittagi!, Farŭl → Farŭllagŭ!.
Verbal morphology
Verbal roots are marked for tense, aspect and subject (animacy, gender, number and person). Mood is marked through postpositions.
Tenses
Tenses are: present, non-present. The equivalent to the future and past tense are conveyed as follows:
Marking | Conveyed tense | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
-2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
perfect | - | √root | obviative | subject.non-present | past |
Ø | subject.present | present | |||
prospective | subject.non-present | future |
Whence:
Marking | |||
---|---|---|---|
Primary aspect (-2) | Tense (2) | ||
Perfect | present | stative | resulting from past action |
non-present | past | ||
Prospective | present | prospective | |
non-present | future | ||
Neutral (Ø marking) | present | present | |
non-present | oblique |
Tense-person marking suffixes
The most animate agent of the clause (see "Animacy, control, volition") agrees with the verb declined with the proximate suffix, the lesser animate with the verb marked with the obviate. This can also be used to mark a change of referent (see "referent anaphora").
Proximate suffixes
Animacy | Gender | Number | Person | Tense | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present | Non-present | ||||
Animate | Masculine | S | 1 | -hɯɾ | -hɾam |
2 | -ɾam | -ɾamat | |||
3 | -lit | -liteʃ | |||
D | -Vl | -Vlɯt | |||
P | 1 | -ʃɯt | -ʃtɯɾ | ||
2 | -ɾok | -ɾkol | |||
3 | -litit | -lteʃ | |||
4 | -bɯl | -batɯɾ | |||
Feminine | S | 1 | -hɯm | -hmɯɾ | |
2 | -xal | -xlat | |||
3 | -lan | -lnaɾ | |||
D | -Vt | -Vtem | |||
P | 1 | -tam | -tmaʃ | ||
2 | -xɯl | -tɯleɾ | |||
3 | -hoʃ | -hʃol | |||
4 | -bok | -bilɯɾ | |||
Inanimate | Neuter | S | 1 | -tex | -txet |
2 | -kol | -klot | |||
3 | -leɾ | -lɾeʃ > -lleʃ | |||
D | -VtVl | -VtVʃ | |||
P | 1 | -tot | -tɯɾ | ||
2 | -hem | -hmel | |||
3 | -kim | -kmiliɾ > -biliɾ | |||
4 | -bim | -bamal |
Obviate suffixes
The obviative particle obv -i-/-ĭ- is placed between the root and the proximal tense marker. It applies to the second and third person.
This in turn shows the form of the tense suffix that is otherwise opaqued by the sandhi:
- prox mẹnnᴉt, obv mẹnᴉlᴉt
- -lit 3s.masc.pres, -ilit 3s.masc.pres.obv.
Verbal aspect markers
.
Aspect | Marker | |
---|---|---|
Perfect | perf | C₂a-/C₂o- |
Prospective | pros | C₂ora-/oC₂osa- |
Continuous | cont | C₂ona- |
Progressive | prog | C₂ara- |
Gnomic | gnom | aC₂C₂a- |
Imperfective | imper | oC₂a- |
Iterative | iter | toC₂a- |
The primary and the secondary aspect markers have historically fused through metaphony and syncope, yielding the following standarized forms:
For animate subjects
Aspect | Marker | ||
---|---|---|---|
Perfect | perf.anim | C₂a- | |
Per. gnomic | perf.gnom.anim | C₂a·aC₂C₂a- | C₂aC₂C₂a- |
Per. imperfective | perf.imperf.anim | C₂a·oC₂a- | C₂aC₂o- |
Per. continuous | perf.cont.anim | C₂a·C₂ona- | C₂ano- |
Per. progressive | perf.prog.anim | C₂a·C₂ara- | aC₂ara- |
Per. iterative | perf.iter.anim | C₂a·toC₂a- | toC₂aC₂a- |
Prospective | pros.anim | C₂ora- | |
Pro. gnomic | pros.gnom.anim | C₂ora·aC₂C₂a- | C₂oC₂C₂ara- |
Pro. imperfective | pros.imperf.anim | C₂ora·oC₂a- | oC₂C₂a- |
Pro. continuous | pros.cont.anim | C₂ora·C₂ona- | C₂oC₂a- |
Pro. progressive | pros.prog.anim | C₂ora·C₂ara- | aC₂oC₂ara- |
Pro. iterative | pros.iter.anim | C₂ora·toC₂a- | noC₂ora- |
For inanimate subjects
Aspect | Marker | ||
---|---|---|---|
Perfect | perf.inan | C₂o- | |
Per. gnomic | perf.gnom.inan | C₂a·aC₂C₂a- | C₂waC₂C₂a- |
Per. imperfective | perf.imperf.inan | C₂a·oC₂a- | oC₂C₂a- |
Per. continuous | perf.cont.inan | C₂a·C₂ona- | C₂ona- |
Per. progressive | perf.prog.inan | C₂a·C₂ara- | oC₂wara- |
Per. iterative | perf.iter.inan | C₂o·toC₂a- | otoC₂C₂a- |
Prospective | pros.inan | oC₂osa- | |
Pro. gnomic | pros.gnom.inan | oC₂osa·aC₂C₂a- | oC₂oC₂wara- |
Pro. imperfective | pros.imperf.inan | oC₂osa·oC₂a- | C₂wasa- |
Pro. continuous | pros.cont.inan | oC₂osa·C₂ona- | oC₂ona- |
Pro. progressive | pros.prog.inan | oC₂osa·C₂ara- | oC₂wasa- |
Pro. iterative | pros.iter.inan | oC₂osa·toC₂a- | toC₂osa- |
Mood marking particles
All mood marking particles are postpositional to the verb they modify. Being there no copula for existencial predication, all mood markers modify verbal phrases directly (see below: negation).
Special cases
i) Counterfactual conditional
The if clause is counterfactual
ii) Deliberative mood
A construction similar to a deliberative mood (delib – sentences of the form “should I do X?”) can be marked by the conflation of the optative mood marker (opt) kŭ either 1) with the interrogative mood marker (int) če; or 2) with the imperative mood marker (imp) kŭ.
delib (int+opt): čekkŭ (< če + kŭ) delib (imp+opt): nakkŭ (< na + kŭ)
iii) Desiderative mood (“wanting to X”)
Participles
The participial verbal forms are formed with the bare root of the verb, marked with the participial marker ppl aC₂(a)- (a modified form of the gnomic aspect marker gnom aC₂C₂a-) and an epenthetic suffix -i/-ĭ that takes over the slot of the person-tense marker. This works as an infinitive participle, and can furtherly be inflected for tense and aspect. The forms of the ppl fused with the verbal tense structural primary verbal aspects, and most used participles are:
Marking | Conveyed tense | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
-3 | -2 | 0 | 2 | ||
1 | ppl aC₂(a)- | perfect C₂a-/C₂o- | √root | subject.non-present | past |
2 | Ø | subject.present | present | ||
3 | prospective C₂ora-/oC₂osa- | subject.non-present | future |
Marked with the forms:
Participle | ppl | Primary aspect marker | Person-tense marker | Participle prefix (-3)·(-2)- | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Past participle | aC₂(a)- | C₂a-/C₂o- | subject.non-present | aC₂C₂(V)- |
2 | Present participle | Ø | subject.present | aC₂(V)- | |
3 | Future participle | C₂ora-/oC₂osa- | subject.non-present | aC₂Vr(V)- |
For example:
‹axxamaxi nēr› /ˈax.xa.ma.xi neːɾ/ {axxa-max-i ne-er} {aC₂C₂(V)-max-i ne-Vr} ppl-to.cut-ppl trees-def.col “the cut trees”
All other combinations of ppl+(aspect marker) are also allowed.
Referent anaphora
Anaphoric reference shift particle
The anaphoric marker states that the referent of the verb has changed. This is to avoid the ambiguity of sentences like the following:
- “Tavar hit Perit. He cried”
Given a sequence of actions like the one above, performed by actuants (A or S) of the same level of semantically adscribed animaciy, it is necessary to mark wether the sequence of actions (hitting, then crying) belongs to the same referent, or if the referent of the first action is different than that of the latter. To mark that the actuant of the crying, S, is now Perit (formerly the non-actuant, O, of the hitting), and no longer Tavar (actuant, A, of the hitting), either the verb itself or the pronoun -most commonly the verb, given the pro-drop feature of the language- is suffixed with one of the following particles:
{-Vn, -an, -on} /C_ -Vn > [√a, o] -an > [√VroundedC] -on > [√VunroundedC] {-Vt, -at, -ot} /C_ -Vt > [√a, o] -at > [√VroundedC] -ot > [√VunroundedC] {-Vk, -ak, -ok} /C_ -Vk > [√a, o] -ak > [√VroundedC] -ok > [√VunroundedC] {-Vs̆, -as̆, -os̆} /C_ -Vs̆ > [√a, o] -as̆ > [√VroundedC] -os̆ > [√VunroundedC]
This would render the aforementioned sentence ("Tavar hit Perit. He cried") into the unambiguously marked:
‹anTavar sakĕssiteš tenPerit. Lamma xabaxlitešen› /an.ta.ˈvaɾ sa.ˈkøs.si.teʃ ten.pe.ˈɾit | ˈlam.ma xa.ˈbax.li.te.ʃen/ {an-Tavar sa-kĕs-siteš ten-Perit | Ø-lam-ma xa-bax-liteš-en} {an-Tavar C₂a-kĕs-liteš tVn-Perit | Ø-lam-Ca C₂a-bax-liteš-Ø-Vn} ERG.ANIM.SG-Tavar PERF-to.hit-3S.ANIM.MASC.NPRES ABS.ANIM.SG-Perit | NOM.ANIM.S-LAM-PRON.S PERF-to.cry-3S.ANIM.MASC.NPRES.IND-shift “Tavar hit Perit. He cried”
Tavar did the hitting, Perit the crying.
Use of the obviate
The obviative form of the tense-person marker, used to mark agreement of verbs with the less animate actor of a clause with different actors of the same semanticly adscribed degree of animacy, as it sepparates actors, can be used on its own to mark the shift in referent within a single clause, while the anaphoric reference shift particle can also be used over longer discourse segments.
Animacy, control and volition
Adjectives and adverbs
Semblative constructions
Participles
Dative and genitive constructions
Derivational morphology
Derivational affixes
Compounding
Genitive compounds
Special compositional functions of verbs
Dative compounds
Nominalization
Nominalization of a verb
Nominalization of a locative adverb
Hypocoristics
Diminutives
Augmentatives
Superlatives
Negation
Use of the negative mood marker NEG xe
Use of the coordinating discourse particle &neg nŭ
Use of the discourse particle/adjective? “without” kĭllŭ
Interrogation
General interrogation
Special interrogation
Discourse particles
Numerals
SYNTAX
Morphosyntactic allignment
i) transitive verbs (A) – (V) – (O)
ii) intransitive verbs (S) – (V)
iii) ditransitive verbs (A) – (V) – (T) – (O)
(S) NOM
(A) ERG
(T) DAT
(O) i) ABS, iii) ACC
Word order
(S)-V-(O/A)-V-(T)-(O)
A/N
Lexicon
Citation forms:
Leipzig-Jakarta list
Some terms which are listed as one entry in the Leipzig-Jakarta list but have more than one distinct term in [] have become as many entries as needed to accommodate the scope of its vocabulary.
Orthography
Samples
Sentences
Example of verb conjugation paradigms
Words:
|
|
|