User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 236: Line 236:
Their forms have become more similar to each other due to analogy.  
Their forms have become more similar to each other due to analogy.  


Some dialects of Knench maintain a distinction between independent and dependent forms for finite verbs, like Old Irish. The independent forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' 'not' or ''mur'' 'if' requires the dependent form, listed in a separate table from the independent forms.
Knench maintains a distinction between independent and dependent forms for finite verbs, like Old Irish. The independent forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' 'not' or ''mur'' 'if' requires the dependent form. Dependent past forms and future forms look similar to independent future forms and past forms, but can be a little different since they may lack ''w-'' or ''u-''.


Even verbs with finite forms are defective verbs, since finite forms are always perfective (except forms of ''juð''). To express the imperfective with these verbs, you still have to use the copula + bə + VN construction. The negator ''lu'' only negates finite verbs.
Even verbs with finite forms are defective verbs, since finite forms are always perfective (except forms of ''juð''). To express the imperfective with these verbs, you still have to use the copula + bə + VN construction. The negator ''lu'' only negates finite verbs.
Line 305: Line 305:
!rowspan=2| ''fluð''  
!rowspan=2| ''fluð''  
! future pfv.
! future pfv.
| ''owð i''
| ''wąht i''
| ''ows tr''
| ''wąht tr''
| ''ows ti''
| ''wąht ti''
| ''ow u''
| ''wąś u''
| ''ól oj''
| ''wąś oj''
| ''own nu''
| ''wąś nu''
| ''owðu tim''
| ''wąht tim''
| ''lu'm''
| ''wąśu'm''
|-
|-
! past pfv.
! past pfv.
| ''wąf i''
| ''wąf i''
| ''uþąf tr''
| ''þąf tr''
| ''uþąf ti''
| ''þąf ti''
| ''jąf u''
| ''jąf u''
| ''uþąf oj''
| ''þąf oj''
| ''unąf nu''
| ''nąf nu''
| ''uþąfu tim''
| ''þąfu tim''
| ''jąflu'm''
| ''jąflu'm''
|-
|-
Line 337: Line 337:
! future pfv.
! future pfv.
| ''weð i''
| ''weð i''
| ''uþes tr''
| ''þes tr''
| ''uþes ti''
| ''þes ti''
| ''jeð u''
| ''jeð u''
| ''uþeð oj''
| ''þeð oj''
| ''uneð nu''
| ''neð nu''
| ''uþeðu tim''
| ''þeðu tim''
| ''jeðu'm''
| ''jeðu'm''
|-
|-
Line 357: Line 357:
|-
|-
! past pfv.
! past pfv.
| ''ulej i''
| ''lej i''
| ''tlej tr''
| ''tlej tr''
| ''tlej ti''
| ''tlej ti''
| ''ulen u''
| ''len u''
| ''tlen oj''
| ''tlen oj''
| ''lej nu''
| ''lej nu''
| ''tlew tim''
| ''tlew tim''
| ''ulew'm''
| ''lew'm''
|-
|-
!rowspan=2| ''kaht''
!rowspan=2| ''kaht''
Line 381: Line 381:
| ''tki tr''
| ''tki tr''
| ''tki ti''
| ''tki ti''
| ''uken u''
| ''ken u''
| ''tken oj''
| ''tken oj''
| ''unki nu''
| ''unki nu''
| ''tki tim''
| ''tki tim''
| ''uku'm''
| ''ku'm''
|-
|-
!rowspan=2| ''ðeht''
!rowspan=2| ''ðeht''
Line 408: Line 408:
| ''unew'm''
| ''unew'm''
|}
|}
 
(Todo: Justify forms)
Most non-pronominal forms come in non-feminine and feminine, and agree in gender only with a singular subject; the feminine is only used with women and female animals. With plural ''nominal'' subjects the non-feminine form is used.


====Regular pa3al verbs====
====Regular pa3al verbs====
Retrieved from "https://linguifex.com/wiki/User:IlL/A_Danified_analytic_Neo-Arabic"