Knench/Ancient: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
The definite article was ''ʔaC-'' (from Biblical Hebrew ''*haC-''). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ''ʔā-''. | The definite article was ''ʔaC-'' (from Biblical Hebrew ''*haC-''). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ''ʔā-''. | ||
The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'' | The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'', and the stress in feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). Other possible feminine endings are ''-t'' or ''-δ''. The feminine plural ending was unstressed ''-oδ'', from Biblical Hebrew ''*-ṓt''. Sometimes ''-a'' is found where Standard Jewish Hebrew has ''-t'', and vice versa.) | ||
The construct state was not entirely predictable but not as "hard" as Tiberian Hebrew. Feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' had a construct state in ''-aδ''. | The construct state was not entirely predictable but not as "hard" as Tiberian Hebrew. Feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' had a construct state in ''-aδ''. | ||
Example: | |||
{| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="text-align:center;" | |||
|+ '''Attributive declension for hard-stem adjectives''' | |||
! number | |||
!colspan=2| singular | |||
!colspan=2| plural | |||
|- | |||
! gender | |||
! m. !! f. !! m. !! f. | |||
|- | |||
! indef. | |||
| ''sus ᴛob'' | |||
| ''súsa ᴛóba'' | |||
| ''susím ᴛobím'' | |||
| ''susóδ ᴛobóδ'' | |||
|- | |||
! def. | |||
| ''an yawm an tė́b'' | |||
| ''an φarī́θ an tė́baθ'' | |||
| ''an yawmė́θ an tėbī́n'' | |||
| ''an φariyė́θ an tėbė́θ'' | |||
|} | |||
===Adjectives=== | ===Adjectives=== | ||