User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic: Difference between revisions
m (→Orthography) |
m (→Orthography) |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
*/m n ŋ h l w j ɹ~ʋ Ø/ {{angbr|מ נ ׆ ה ל ו י ר א}} | */m n ŋ h l w j ɹ~ʋ Ø/ {{angbr|מ נ ׆ ה ל ו י ר א}} | ||
*/p b f v t⁼ d tʰ θ ð k⁼ g kʰ x/ {{angbr|פ ב פﬞ בﬞ ט ד ת ת◌ﬞ דﬞ ק ג כ כﬞ}} | */p b f v t⁼ d tʰ θ ð k⁼ g kʰ x/ {{angbr|פ ב פﬞ בﬞ ט ד ת ת◌ﬞ דﬞ ק ג כ כﬞ}} | ||
*/s | */s dz ts ʃ/ {{angbr|ס ז צ ש}} | ||
Consonant correspondences (by default): | Consonant correspondences (by default): |
Revision as of 17:03, 13 October 2019
IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Lexicon
IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Swadesh list
This article is a construction site. This project is currently undergoing significant construction and/or revamp. By all means, take a look around, thank you. |
Modern Canaanite | |
---|---|
IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic | |
Pronunciation | [/xnaːnið/] |
Created by | IlL |
Setting | Lõis |
Afro-Asiatic
|
Modern Canaanite (Canaanite: Xnánið /xnɛ:nið/ or sóv Xnán /saɤv xnɛːn/, Togarmite: Xnoniþ) is the sole surviving descendant of Biblical Hebrew, spoken by the Xnánem people in Lõis's Cyprus, Turkey, Armenia and the Levant. The Xnánem appear to be Celtic speakers who adopted a form of Hebrew. Some Lõisian rabbinical Jewish writings identify an early stage of the language with either the Lost Tribes of Israel or the biblical Canaanites. This is not without cause, as the language preserves quite a few Biblical words and phraseology that fell out of use in Mishnaic Hebrew, though unlike Mishnaic and Israeli Hebrew its grammar was completely restructured to use auxiliaries instead of the older Hebrew tenses.
It's inspired grammatically by Welsh, and aesthetically by Cockney English and Khmer.
Numbers: 0-10: afs, ódh (inanimate)/áth (animate), šnay, šluš, arbą, homiš, šeš, šewą, šmun, tešą, ngaxør
11-20: ódh/áth ngaxør, šnay ngaxør, šluš ngaxør, arbą ngaxør, homiš ngaxør, šeš ngaxør, šew ngaxør, hmun ngaxør, tešą ngaxør, ngaxrim
40: stay ngaxrim
60: šluš ngaxrim
...
100: ??
10000: rúø
before: kkorm
History
TODO
- Swadesh list
- bel-, ble- is a common prefix (conflation of ben- and ba3al-)
- biuth or šą še... = when...
- Many adverbs are froma infinitive absolute
- likkori = to die (lit. be called [by God])
- šovuą = week
- midhborø = conference
- נא becomes a focus marker =nø
- question marker a ... [FOCUS]=nø
- Philippi should be weaker: i > e, instead of the TibH i > a (*bint > bett 'daughter'; TibH baṫ)
- Makhin yo ngalekh likkori? = Why did you have to die?
Some sound changes
- non-rhoticity, H-dropping
- ħ > h; *gt, ħt > kht
- dt, tt > st
- -ø (mainly from Biblical Hebrew -ā) becomes silent and lengthens the vowel before it
Phonology
Orthography
Modern Xnánið is written in the Jewish Hebrew square script, in a spelling inspired by Tiberian Hebrew. Thw first works in Modern Xnánið were written by Jews, namely material intended to teach Judaism to Xnánið-speaking Jews.
- /m n ŋ h l w j ɹ~ʋ Ø/ ⟨מ נ ׆ ה ל ו י ר א⟩
- /p b f v t⁼ d tʰ θ ð k⁼ g kʰ x/ ⟨פ ב פﬞ בﬞ ט ד ת ת◌ﬞ דﬞ ק ג כ כﬞ⟩
- /s dz ts ʃ/ ⟨ס ז צ ש⟩
Consonant correspondences (by default):
- Hebrew ד > Xnánið ט/ד
- Hebrew ת > Xnánið ת◌ﬞ/דﬞ
- Hebrew ט > Xnánið ת
Consonants
/m p b f v n t d θ ð ts s z ʃ ŋ k g x h l w j ɹ~ʋ/ ⟨m p b f v n t d th dh ts s/x z š ng k g kh h l w y r⟩
Biblical Hebrew /l/ became /w/ in some places, especially before C.
Mutations
Words can undergo initial lenition, as in Irish and Tiberian Hebrew:
p- b- t- d- k- g- > f- v- th- dh- kh- Ø-
Vowels
Knánith has the largest vowel inventory of any Lõisian Semitic language:
/a e ɪ ɔ ʊ iə aɪ əɪ äɤ iː ɑ̃ː ɛ̃ː ɪɤ̃ ɔ̃ː æː aw ɛw ɪw ɔw ʊw ɑː(ɹ) ɛː(ɹ) eː(ɹ) oʊ~oː(ɹ) ɜː(ɹ) ə(ɹ)/ = ⟨a e i o u á é/ay í ó ú ą ę į ų aw ew iw ow uw ar er ir or ur ø(r)⟩
Prosody
Stress
Stress is always penultimate, except with some verbs where the lV- prefix does not have the stress.
Intonation
Phonotactics
Morphophonology
Morphology
Knánith has lost the verbal inflections and triconsonantal morphology of Biblical Hebrew.
Nouns and adjectives
Nouns inflect for number and definiteness. Adjectives agree with nouns in number.
Knánith has regularized all plurals to -em. It also lost grammatical gender.
Some irregular plurals: benuš, blenuš = human
Canaanite has lost the construct state. The only remnant of the construct state is the -th- interfix used in possessive constructions between two nouns that end and begin with a vowel, respectively: e.g.
- hadhør-mittø 'bedroom'
- ngønove-th-anf 'the grapes of wrath'
- nøšomø-th-ahwø 'spirit of brotherhood'
Degree markers:
- Equative: de- = as X as; equally X; X enough
- Excessive: ro- = too (from Celtic)
- Comparative/Superlative: -ter = more X or most X; comparandum takes broth 'than' (from Biblical Hebrew *birʔōṫī ʔeṫ 'when I see ACC')
Verbs
Almost all verbs use only one form, usually the inherited Biblical infinitive construct, prefixed with l-. Even for imperatives: Lathett lo hi! = 'Give it to her!' Some verbs instead are derived from other nouns derived from the triconsonantal root rather than the infinitive of a particular verb.
Inflected lexical verbs
There are only five inflected lexical verbs (i.e. verbs with inflected past and future forms):
- ląsuth 'to do, to make'
- lovu 'to come'
- lalakht 'to go'
- lakkakht 'to get'
- lathett 'to give'
→ Person | I | thou (m) | thou (f) | he/it | she | we | blotp | they | Non-pronominal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"to do, to make" (past) | si ni, sit i, sit ni | sit to | sit te | so u | sto hi | sin nu | sit tem | su'm | so/sto |
"to do, to make" (future) | ąs i | tąs to | tąs te | yąs u | tąs hi | nąs nu | tąsu tem | yąsu'm | yąs/tąs |
"to come" (future) | vul i | tvul to | tvuli te | vul u | tvul hi | nvul nu | tvulu tem | vulu'm | vul/tvul |
"to come" (past) | bowt i | bowt to | bowt te | bow u | bolø hi | bown nu | bowt tem | bolu'm | bow/bolø |
"to go" (future) | lekh i | tlekh to | tlekh te | lekh u | tlekh hi | lekh nu | tlekhu tem | lekhu'm | lekh/tlekh |
"to go" (past) | lakht i | lakht to | lakht te | lakh u | lakhø hi | lakhnø nu | lakht tem | lakhu'm | lakh/lakhø |
"to get" (future) | kekh i | tkekh to | tkekh te | kekh u | tkekh hi | kekh nu | tkekhu tem | kekhu'm | kekh/tkekh |
"to get" (past) | kakht i | kakht to | kakht te | kakh u | kakhø hi | kakhnø nu | kakht tem | kakhu'm | kakh/kakhø |
"to give" (future) | ten i | ten to | tni te | ten u | ten hi | ten nu | tnu tem | tnu'm | ten |
"to give" (past) | nakht i | nakht to | nakht te | nakh u | nakhø hi | nakhnø nu | nakht tem | nakhu'm | nakh/nakhø |
Non-pronominal forms agree in gender only with a singular subject; the feminine is only used with women and females. With plural subjects the masculine singular form is used.
Regular pa3al verbs
The regular pattern is *liCCuC.
-t verbs
Many of these verbs got the glottally reinforced -tt from -ʔt. The -tt then analogically spread to other verbs.
- lalakht /laˈlaxt/ = to go
- lakkakht /laʔˈkaxt/ = to take
- lasakht /laˈsaxt/ = to go back
- lašaft /laˈʃaft/ = to sit
- lathett /laˈθeʔt/ = to give
- lalast /laˈlast/ = to be born
- lasett /laˈseʔt/ = to carry
- latsett /laˈtseʔt/ = to go out
- lasątt /laˈsãːʔt/ = to travel
- laghątt /laˈɣãːʔt/ = to hit
- ladhątt /laˈðãːʔt/ = to know
- lattątt /laʔˈtãːʔt/ = to plant
Regular nif3al
The regular pattern is *liCoCiC where the first C is not lenited.
Regular pi3el
The regular pattern is *løCaCiC or *løCiCuC where the middle C is not lenited.
Regular hif3il
The regular pattern is *laCCiC, *leCCeC, or *laCCoCø.
Regular hithpa3el
The regular pattern is *lithCaCiC where the middle C is not lenited.
Other verbs
Other verbs come from noun derivation patterns, or from earlier verb + noun collocations.
Any noun can also be verbed by prefixing lø-.
Auxiliaries
Knánith has an auxiliary verb system similar to Colloquial Welsh. In addition, there is a T-V distinction: the 2nd person plural tem is also used as a polite pronoun.
The non-pronominal present auxiliary re (which may cause lenition depending on dialect) may be omitted in subordinate clauses:
- Re Dowedh ngal lišun = David is about to sleep
- Biuth (re) Dowedh ngal lišun = When David is about to sleep
→ Person | I | thou (m) | thou (f) | he/it | she | we | blotp | they | Non-pronominal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present (re, r' is from רְאֵה *rVʔē 'look!') | i, ni | to | te | u | hi | nu | tem | em | re, r' before V |
Present emphatic (inflected forms of עוֹד) | ngud i | ngud to | ngud te | nguden u | nguden hi | ngud nu | ngud tem | ngud em | ngud |
Interrogative (from הַאִם, -nø must be added to the focused word) | am ni, am i | am to | am te | am u | am hi | am nu | am tem | am em | am |
Past (from perfect of עָשָׂה 'to do') | si ni, sit i, sit ni | sit to | sit te | so u | sto hi | sin nu | sit tem | su'm | so/sto |
Future/Subjunctive (from imperfect of עָשָׂה 'to do') | ąs i | tąs to | tąs te | yąs u | tąs hi | nąs nu | tąsu tem | yąsu'm | yąs/tąs |
Passive present (from imperfect of עָבַר 'to pass') | ur ni, ur i | tur to | tri te | yur u | tur hi | nur nu | tru tem | ru'm | yur/tur |
Passive past (from perfect of עָבַר 'to pass') | var ni, var i, vart i | vart to | vart te | var u | vro hi | varn nu | vart tem | vru'm | var/vro |
"May" (from imperfect of לָקַח 'to take') | kekh i | tkekh to | tkekh te | kekh u | tkekh hi | kekh nu | tkekhu tem | kekhu'm | kekh/tkekh/kekhu |
"Do X more" - present (from imperfect of הוֹסִיף 'to add') | usif i | tusif to | tusif te | yusif u | tusif hi | nusif nu | tusif tem | yusifu'm | usift/tusif/yusifu |
"Do X more" - past (from perfect of הוֹסִיף 'to add') | seft i | seft to | seft te | sif u | sifø hi | sef nu | seft tem | sifu'm | sif/sifu |
Cautionary (from imperfect of זָמַם 'to scheme') | zum i | tøzum to | tøzum te | zum u | tøzum hi | nøzum nu | tøzmu tem | zmu'm | zum/tøzum/zmu |
"X well" - present (from imperfect of הֵיטִיב 'to do well') | attev i | tattev to | tattvi te | yattev u | tattev hi | nattev nu | tattev tem | yattevu'm | yattev/tattev/yattevu |
"X well" - past (from perfect of הֵיטִיב 'to do well') | ettevt i | ettevt to | ettevt te | ettev u | ettivø hi | ettev nu | ettevt tem | ettevu'm | ettev |
Cautionary future
The auxiliary for the cautionary future comes from the Biblical Hebrew verb *zāmam 'to scheme'. It's used to:
- warn the listener of a future event or contingency:
- Zum sąraz tha lovu henø kol ngeth. = 'The storm might come here any moment.'
- Zum tafkestaz mul lith kovuą hettev! = 'The map might not be well-defined! [in a hypothetical math lecture, cautioning against a tacit assumption the audience might make]'
- often used in a threatening manner, for example: Lakh to mul yedhą ma zum i ląsuth lakh to! = 'You have no idea what I'm gonna do to you!'
Object pronouns
Object pronouns are not different from subject pronouns, except kho/khe/khem may be found instead of to/te/tem in some dialects.
Prepositions
Prepositions inflect like in Welsh: for pronominal prepositional objects, usually the preposition is inflected and is followed by the independent pronoun.
example of a Knánith inflected preposition: lø "for"; bø 'in, at' is inflected similarly
- 1sg: li, li ni
- 2sg.m: lakh to
- 2sg.f: lakh te
- 3sg.m: lomu hu
- 3sg.f: lomi hi
- 1pl. lonu nu
- 2pl. lakhøm tem
- 3pl. lomu'm
Syntax
Constituent order
The order is tense-subject-verb-object.
- R'išaz bø lékhul tapuhaz.
- The man is eating the apple.
- Re beth-u bø dhe-rul kø liyothøn.
- His house is as big as a whale.
- Sto hi tha ląsuth halkkbetho hi bø rø-múhør.
- She did her homework too late.
The negative particle mul (from mə'umâ lo 'not anything') comes after the subject pronoun and before the verb.
Faulty accusative
Knánith has the faulty accusative particle tha (from Biblical Hebrew ʔeṫ ha-). It is not used for all direct objects, but only for constituents that are separated from their heads. Tha may also be used before the verbal noun when using an auxiliary: Hettev hu tha litfus doghem. = She was good at catching fish.
Noun phrase
The definite article is a clitic:
- Singular: -az (after C) or -zu (after V)
- Plural: -iw
Examples:
- hadhør = a room
- hadhraz = the room
- hadhrem = rooms
- hadhriw = the rooms
- hadhør grú = a big room
- hadhør grulaz = the big room (< hah-hadhər hag-gâdhol haz-ze)
- botem grulem = big houses
- botem gruliw = the big houses
There is no construct state, unlike in Biblical Hebrew. Genitives are expressed with concatenation: šem-mawkaz = the king's name.
To say "this X" or "that X", X-az fu and X-az šom (lit. "the X here" and "the X there") are used. To say "this" and "that", you say ze fu and ze šom (where the ze becomes ilø in the plural).
The abstract demonstrative is zuth.
Verb phrase
Preposition + VN
- re Pam ngal lalakht = Pam is about to go
- re Pam dhøš lalakht = Pam has just went
- re Pam bi lalakht = Pam has not went
Imperatives
- Lalakht! = Go! (number neutral)
- Te'nu lalakht! = Let's go!
Sentence phrase
Complementizer
There is a complementizer mur (from לאמר lēmōr) or zuth (from זאת) depending on dialect. This is different from relative clauses, which use še (from אשר ʔăšer).
Vocabulary
Canaanite has the following vocabulary layers:
- Inherited vocab from Biblical Hebrew
- Cypriot Celtic substrate
- Ancient Greek, Old Togarmite and Aramaic loans
- L-Arabic loans
- Modern loans from other Levantine sprachbund languages and Modern Greek
Many words are formed form earlier construct state combinations, and are sometimes unrecognizable:
- anvinin, anevinin 'brick' from אבני בניין *ʔaḃ(a)nē ḃinyān 'building stones'
- šavgom 'carnage, destruction' from שפך דם *šáṗek̇ dām 'spilling of blood'
- ngém, ngémuth 'source' from עין מים ʕēn máyim 'spring of water'
- løseppin 'to like' from נשא פני lit. 'lift the face of' meaning 'to favor'
- kulaliv 'conscience' from קול הלב lit. 'voice of the heart'
Although it is attested in late Biblical Hebrew (e.g. Song of Songs), the CăCiCâ verbal noun pattern is not as productive as in Mishnaic Hebrew.
- ben-, pl. ble- = agentive
- beth-, pl. bate- = place noun
Example texts
UDHR, Article 1
- Kol blenušiw vru'm lalest kø hofšem; hem šowim ngaw kovdaz ke tsrokkuthiw. Vru'm lifkudh bø vinø ke kulaliv, ke re ngalem lalakht ngem šuthif bø nøšomø-th-ahwø.
- all human/PL-DEF.PL.M PASS.PRES-3PL be_born as free-M.PL; 3PL equal-PL on dignity-DEF.SG and right-DEF.F.PL. PASS.PRES-3PL entrust with understanding and conscience, and PRES on-3PL walk with one_another with spirit-EZAFE-brotherhood.
- All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act toward one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Tower of Babel
- Var bø khol tevilaz tha zuthu sóf lødhabir ke luthøm míliw lešamiš.
- Wini khi su'm bø lasątt me mikadhøm, su'm litakkiw bø mišuraz Šinngor ke lithyašev šom.
- Ke su'm mur: "Bún, butonu ląsuth anevinin ke lattev léfuth em." Ke su anevininiw løšamiš lom em kø avoniw, ke hemør kø mawtt.
- Ke su'm mur: "Bún, butonu levnuth kiriø ke mídøl bomi hi, yąs rušu hu lagią ląluth le šomayem, ke nąs nu ląsuth lø nawš nu duąšem! Oz nąs nu mul lithpazir pli kol tevilaz."
- Wini Eløkkim [Jewish euphemism for אלוהים] so u lovu larest, ki yąs u lávitt bø kíriaz ke mídølaz še yu blenušiw bø livnuth.
- Ke Eløkkim so u lemur: "Šą še su'm hátholø ląsuth zuth kø hódh ngom še bø lødhabir háth sóf, yiye mum mikhšul mul lø madovør še yąsu løzumim ląsuth!
- "Enø, bu tonu lalakht larest ke løvawbiw sóf em, oz yąsu'm mul lávin šuthif."
- Ku Eløkkim so u løfazir em, ke su'm ládul levnuth kíriaz.
- Ke me síbaz fu še kíriaz bø lakkakht šemaz "Boviw" -- šom so Eløkkim løvawbiw sóf kol tevilaz. Me šom so Eløkkim løfazir em pli kol tevilaz.
Schleicher's Fable
Phrasebook
When three forms are given, the forms are respectively for addressing one male informally, one female informally, and multiple people or formal language.
- Šoløm! [ˈʃɔləm] = Hello! / Goodbye!
- Ngadh bø khorv! [ŋað bəˈxoːv] = See you!
- Elwem eví kho/khe/khem! [ˈɛlwɛm ɛˈvəɪ xɔ/xɛ/xɛm] = Welcome! (lit. God has brought you)
- in tre/tri/tru kø thuv = Please
- also plíz [pləɪz] (from English)
- ngeth tuv [ŋɛθ tuv] = have fun