Vadi: Difference between revisions

Line 945:

|-

! Text ID

! Schumann

! style="width:45%"| Schumann

! Iyyaħmi

|-

! KS.2015.08.10-S1.02.03.04.a1

! rowspan="2" |KS.2015.08.10-S1.02.03.04.a1

|

{{Gloss

|phrase = Ulájina hai tábila ~~nikku osar~~, ~~petta~~ úla tane

|phrase = Ulájina hai tábila niku usar, peta úla tane

| IPA = /u:'lad͡ʒina haɪ 'ta:bɪla ~~nɪk~~:~~u osar pet:a~~ 'ula tane/

| IPA = /u:'lad͡ʒina haɪ 'ta:bɪla 'ni:ku usar 'peta 'ula tane/

| morphemes = úlaji-na hai tábila ~~nikku osar petta~~ úla tane

| morphemes = úlaji-na hai tábila niku usar peta úla tane

| gloss = 2S.NOM-1S.ACC-GEN PST land.PL seize try, thief 2S EMP

| translation = You tried to seize my lands, you are a thief indeed!

Line 959:

|

{{Gloss

|phrase = Ulájnye tábila ~~nikku osar~~, petta ulátane

|phrase = Ulájnye tábila nikku osar, petta ulátane

| IPA = /u:'lad͡ʒɲɛ 'ta:bɪla nɪk:u osaɾ pet:a u'la:tane/

| morphemes = úla-ji-na-hai tábila nikku osar petta úla-tane

| gloss = 2S.NOM-1S.ACC-GEN-PST land.PL seize try, thief 2S-EMP

| translation = You tried to seize my lands, you are a thief indeed!

}}

|-

~~! Row #2:~~

| s-

| v-

| Iyyaħmi's analysis shows several differences, as indicated by the underlined portions, from that of Schumann's.

Iyyaħmi's ''nye'' derives from his observation that the apparent ''Širkattarnaft'' text, ''u-la-di-yi-na'' freqently alternates with ''u-la-di-yi-ni-ya'' in earlier documents, with Sorvin preferring the former and Éro preferring the latter. Later texts of both authors start showing a higher frequency of ''u-la-dyi in-ye''. The Traditionalists have analyzed ''in-ye'' as a particle ''inye'' that serves as a durative marker, which is what is found in the Aħħum texts. Either interpretation so far cannot be determined precisely. The Aħħum texts are rather fragmentary, and analyzing ''in-ye'' in the context it appears in cannot definitively rule out a durative reading.

|-

|}

@@ Line 945: / Line 945: @@
 |-
 ! Text ID
-! Schumann
+! style="width:45%"| Schumann
 ! Iyyaħmi
 |-
-! KS.2015.08.10-S1.02.03.04.a1
+! rowspan="2" |KS.2015.08.10-S1.02.03.04.a1
 |
 {{Gloss
-|phrase = Ulájina hai tábila nikku osar, petta úla tane
+|phrase = Ulájina hai tábila niku usar, peta úla tane
-| IPA = /u:'lad͡ʒina haɪ 'ta:bɪla nɪk:u osar pet:a 'ula tane/
+| IPA = /u:'lad͡ʒina haɪ 'ta:bɪla 'ni:ku usar 'peta 'ula tane/
-| morphemes = úlaji-na hai tábila nikku osar petta úla tane
+| morphemes = úlaji-na hai tábila niku usar peta úla tane
 | gloss = 2S.NOM-1S.ACC-GEN PST land.PL seize try, thief 2S EMP
 | translation = You tried to seize my lands, you are a thief indeed!
@@ Line 959: / Line 959: @@
 |
 {{Gloss
-|phrase = Uláj<u>nye</u> tábila nikku osar, petta ul<u>átane</u>
+|phrase = Uláj<u>nye</u> tábila ni<u>k</u>ku <u>o</u>sar, petta ul<u>átane</u>
 | IPA = /u:'lad͡ʒɲɛ 'ta:bɪla nɪk:u osaɾ pet:a u'la:tane/
 | morphemes = úla-ji-na-hai tábila nikku osar petta úla-tane
 | gloss = 2S.NOM-1S.ACC-GEN-PST land.PL seize try, thief 2S-EMP
 | translation = You tried to seize my lands, you are a thief indeed!
 }}
 |-
-! Row #2:
 | s-
-| v-
+| Iyyaħmi's analysis shows several differences, as indicated by the underlined portions, from that of Schumann's.
+Iyyaħmi's ''<u>nye</u>'' derives from his observation that the apparent ''Širkattarnaft'' text, ''u-la-di-yi-na'' freqently alternates with ''u-la-di-yi-ni-ya'' in earlier documents, with Sorvin preferring the former and Éro preferring the latter. Later texts of both authors start showing a higher frequency of ''u-la-dyi in-ye''.  The Traditionalists have analyzed ''in-ye'' as a particle ''inye'' that serves as a durative marker, which is what is found in the Aħħum texts.  Either interpretation so far cannot be determined precisely.  The Aħħum texts are rather fragmentary, and analyzing ''in-ye'' in the context it appears in cannot definitively rule out a durative reading.
 |-
 |}