Knench/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

IlL (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
IlL (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1,559: Line 1,559:
*Infinitives in ''-ti'' or ''-thi'' (e.g. ''dealati'', ''riềthi'')  
*Infinitives in ''-ti'' or ''-thi'' (e.g. ''dealati'', ''riềthi'')  
*Pro-drop when the subject is not 3rd person
*Pro-drop when the subject is not 3rd person
*3sg, 2pl and 3pl present and future perfective forms in ''-t'', ''-te'' and ''-nt'' (e.g. ''dealảt, dealảte, dealảnt'', sometimes for more archaic effect ''dealaït, dealaïte, dealaïnt''); the 3pl form is always used with a plural subject. The ''-t'' and ''-nt'' affixes were artificially preserved in early liturgical use of the language, possibly out of conscious imitation of Latin; even as early as Bỉble Brỷntowscả they were out of use in daily speech.
*3sg, 2pl and 3pl present and future perfective forms in ''-t'', ''-te'' and ''-nt'' (e.g. ''dealảt, dealảte, dealảnt'', sometimes for more archaic effect ''dealaït, dealaïte, dealaïnt''); the 3pl form is always used with a plural subject.
*''ne'' used without ''als''.
*''ne'' used without ''als''.
*''est'' and ''sunt'' are used for 3sg and 3pl present of ''bỵṫ'' (The modern forms ''les/os'' and ''len/lesun/ỏn/osun'' are from ''gleḋ/ot est'' 'here is' and ''gleḋ/ot sunt''.)
*''est'' and ''sunt'' are used for 3sg and 3pl present of ''bỵṫ'' (The modern forms ''les/os'' and ''len/lesun/ỏn/osun'' are from ''gleḋ/ot est'' 'here is' and ''gleḋ/ot sunt''.)