Literature talk:Hansu Hansuen: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(IlL moved page Reber Wiebian to Feiden: Renaming)
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[Feiden]]
i'm assuming the tones are like in Feisen
after the second creolization, Very Early Reber will have just 3 tones
falling, rising, low rising
much like the history of mandarin
 
Ø, t, s -> rising
f, v, l -> low rising
n, z, d, b -> falling
(the northern invaders supposedly influenced the language)
 
that means a lot of homophony which means a lot of compounding
yes
 
then the consonants
retros should be preserved (or should they merge with alveolars or uvulars?)
i might merge them with alveolopalatals
so it's a kind of Rebero-Feisic
 
Middle Wieb doesn't have alveolopalatals
they should merge
 
this is just the first stage
with alveolars
 
voiceless nasals merge with aspirated stops, retroflexes with alveolars, perhaps something happens to clicks as well
clicks simply soften!
so ! !h g! -> ɧ h ɧ̬
i prefer voiceless nasals > unaspirated stops
we need more of them
 
wine-whine merger, θ -> ɬ
ð -> ɮ
yes
 
now, the vowels!
the monophthongs shouldn't be much of a problem
the closing diphthongs are more problematic
aiC, auC, ...
 
i:a ja -> ia
> èC, òC
 
yes
aiɐ auɐ oyɐ -> eɐ oɐ øɐ
actually i:a ja je -> ia
u:a wa wo -> ua ...
yes
 
iaa, uaa, and üaa are separate
i don't think i have them anymore
 
ai au oy -> ei ou øy (and e o ø before consonants)
eɐ oɐ øɐ >  ɛː ɔː ɞː
 
no, i'll keep them
this is just the first stage
yes
 
the only click phoneme left is the nasal click
so:
m n ŋ! ŋ ɴ
p t k q ʔ
pʰ tʰ kʰ qʰ
b d g ɢ
f s ɧ ɬ x χ h (ʂ merges with ɧ)
z ɧ̬ ɮ ɣ ʁ
w l
ʐ merges with ɧ̬
yes
 
vowels: ə: merges with ø:
again not sure about the vowels
 
so: ɑ e i o u y æ ø + long
+ ei ou øy iə uə yə ea oa øa
(i have to redo AW > MW vowel changes again)
the voicing pairs aren't homophones yet
 
now there are 32 consonants in Very Early Reber
there should be a merger in the set /ɧ x χ h/
 
to get from that to Early Reber, i'm thinking of these changes:
ŋ ~ ɴ
ɧ~χ
 
yes
x~h?
 
no
satemization?
 
yes!
that works
k q ʔ -> tʃ k q -> ʃ k q
or ɕ k q
ʔ > q: really?
 
yes
to make it more distinct
no thanks, i think i'll keep ʔ - or drop it
 
actually maybe middle wieb has ʡ
i think i want to drop initial ʔ like mandarin
or maybe not, if neck thai and terg both ahve initial ʔ
 
then, a breathy voice epidemic!
p pʰ b f -> p pʰ bʰ f -> b p p f
yes
that doubles the number of tones
to 6
maybe i'll just have tʃ tʃʰ ʃ
or just tʃʰ > ʃ
before the tone split
tS tSh dZ S Z (after satemization)
tS dZ S Z (after merger)
tS tSh S (after tone split)
or maybe not, they can make affricates just fine
tS tSh dZ S Z (after satemization)
tS tSh S (after tone split)
tie languages and terg both have them
Ø, t, s
f, v, l
n, z, d, b
 
yo, those tonal categories aren't valid for middle wiebian!
they're partially allophonic
so it's really tone blaoighnity when the split comes along
 
sounds good
then the 6 should merge into 4

Revision as of 05:12, 22 March 2016

i'm assuming the tones are like in Feisen after the second creolization, Very Early Reber will have just 3 tones falling, rising, low rising much like the history of mandarin

Ø, t, s -> rising f, v, l -> low rising n, z, d, b -> falling (the northern invaders supposedly influenced the language)

that means a lot of homophony which means a lot of compounding yes

then the consonants retros should be preserved (or should they merge with alveolars or uvulars?) i might merge them with alveolopalatals so it's a kind of Rebero-Feisic

Middle Wieb doesn't have alveolopalatals they should merge

this is just the first stage with alveolars

voiceless nasals merge with aspirated stops, retroflexes with alveolars, perhaps something happens to clicks as well clicks simply soften! so ! !h g! -> ɧ h ɧ̬ i prefer voiceless nasals > unaspirated stops we need more of them

wine-whine merger, θ -> ɬ ð -> ɮ yes

now, the vowels! the monophthongs shouldn't be much of a problem the closing diphthongs are more problematic aiC, auC, ...

i:a ja -> ia > èC, òC

yes aiɐ auɐ oyɐ -> eɐ oɐ øɐ actually i:a ja je -> ia u:a wa wo -> ua ... yes

iaa, uaa, and üaa are separate i don't think i have them anymore

ai au oy -> ei ou øy (and e o ø before consonants) eɐ oɐ øɐ > ɛː ɔː ɞː

no, i'll keep them this is just the first stage yes

the only click phoneme left is the nasal click so: m n ŋ! ŋ ɴ p t k q ʔ pʰ tʰ kʰ qʰ b d g ɢ f s ɧ ɬ x χ h (ʂ merges with ɧ) z ɧ̬ ɮ ɣ ʁ w l ʐ merges with ɧ̬ yes

vowels: ə: merges with ø: again not sure about the vowels

so: ɑ e i o u y æ ø + long + ei ou øy iə uə yə ea oa øa (i have to redo AW > MW vowel changes again) the voicing pairs aren't homophones yet

now there are 32 consonants in Very Early Reber there should be a merger in the set /ɧ x χ h/

to get from that to Early Reber, i'm thinking of these changes: ŋ ~ ɴ ɧ~χ

yes x~h?

no satemization?

yes! that works k q ʔ -> tʃ k q -> ʃ k q or ɕ k q ʔ > q: really?

yes to make it more distinct no thanks, i think i'll keep ʔ - or drop it

actually maybe middle wieb has ʡ i think i want to drop initial ʔ like mandarin or maybe not, if neck thai and terg both ahve initial ʔ

then, a breathy voice epidemic! p pʰ b f -> p pʰ bʰ f -> b p p f yes that doubles the number of tones to 6 maybe i'll just have tʃ tʃʰ ʃ or just tʃʰ > ʃ before the tone split tS tSh dZ S Z (after satemization) tS dZ S Z (after merger) tS tSh S (after tone split) or maybe not, they can make affricates just fine tS tSh dZ S Z (after satemization) tS tSh S (after tone split) tie languages and terg both have them Ø, t, s f, v, l n, z, d, b

yo, those tonal categories aren't valid for middle wiebian! they're partially allophonic so it's really tone blaoighnity when the split comes along

sounds good then the 6 should merge into 4