Nankôre: Difference between revisions
| Line 562: | Line 562: | ||
--> | --> | ||
===Auxiliary Verbs === | ====Auxiliary Verbs ==== | ||
Auxiliary verbs encode number, voice and tense. Intransitive pronominal core arguments, if used as independent pronouns, precede the auxiliary. | Auxiliary verbs encode number, voice and tense. Intransitive pronominal core arguments, if used as independent pronouns, precede the auxiliary. | ||
| Line 568: | Line 568: | ||
((More stuff to follow)) | ((More stuff to follow)) | ||
====Animacy-Number Agreement Marking==== | =====Animacy-Number Agreement Marking===== | ||
Transitive verbs mark number on core arguments by ablaut, or by adding a prefix, to the auxiliary. These markers indicate the number of both the higher animate and the lower animate arguments. | Transitive verbs mark number on core arguments by ablaut, or by adding a prefix, to the auxiliary. These markers indicate the number of both the higher animate and the lower animate arguments. | ||
| Line 601: | Line 601: | ||
# Rompóy kurasno tarayro ita-tā'itá'. "The dogs played with the girls." | # Rompóy kurasno tarayro ita-tā'itá'. "The dogs played with the girls." | ||
====Voice and Tense==== | =====Voice and Tense===== | ||
The Nankôre verb is rich in voice and tense distinctions. These distinctions are combined in an auxiliary verb, formed by adding one or more prefixes to the copular verb ''itá'' /ɪ'taʔ/, hence this auxiliary is called the ''itá''-verb. The ''itá''-auxiliary verb is always clause final, the main verb and any other VP particles preceding it. Some voices also encode formality, with the long forms, e.g. ''man'itá', suphitá', tā'itá', hô'itá', and pā'itá' '', used for formal situations, and the short forms ''manta'/nitá', supta', tayta', hoyta''', and ''pitáh'' for informal conversation among friends and family. | The Nankôre verb is rich in voice and tense distinctions. These distinctions are combined in an auxiliary verb, formed by adding one or more prefixes to the copular verb ''itá'' /ɪ'taʔ/, hence this auxiliary is called the ''itá''-verb. The ''itá''-auxiliary verb is always clause final, the main verb and any other VP particles preceding it. Some voices also encode formality, with the long forms, e.g. ''man'itá', suphitá', tā'itá', hô'itá', and pā'itá' '', used for formal situations, and the short forms ''manta'/nitá', supta', tayta', hoyta''', and ''pitáh'' for informal conversation among friends and family. | ||
| Line 668: | Line 668: | ||
--> | --> | ||
==== Finals ==== | ===== Finals ===== | ||
The Irrealis ''-hi'' is suffixed to the copula. It is obligatory for all Future tenses. It also surfaces in imperatives, yes-no questions which are marked with the ''-yo'' marker cliticizing to the first or second word of a sentence, as in ''Chire-yo tā'itá'-hi?'' "Did he die?", and in WH-questions when the event actually happening has not yet been established as having occurred; for example, ''Enket chire tā'itá'?'', "Where did he die?" implies that the person's death is a fact, and it is only the location that is being inquired, versus ''Enket chire tā'itá'-hi?'' implies that not only is the location unknown, but the person's actual death happening still remains to be established. An interesting structure, called the "double interrogative", is a combination of a WH-word followed by a word bearing the ''-yo'' clitic, which also turns the question into yes-no question: ''Enket chire-yo tā'itá'-hi?'', "Did he die, and if so, where?" The ''-hi'' suffix is believed to be cognate with the Minhast Irrealis clitic ''=š''. | The Irrealis ''-hi'' is suffixed to the copula. It is obligatory for all Future tenses. It also surfaces in imperatives, yes-no questions which are marked with the ''-yo'' marker cliticizing to the first or second word of a sentence, as in ''Chire-yo tā'itá'-hi?'' "Did he die?", and in WH-questions when the event actually happening has not yet been established as having occurred; for example, ''Enket chire tā'itá'?'', "Where did he die?" implies that the person's death is a fact, and it is only the location that is being inquired, versus ''Enket chire tā'itá'-hi?'' implies that not only is the location unknown, but the person's actual death happening still remains to be established. An interesting structure, called the "double interrogative", is a combination of a WH-word followed by a word bearing the ''-yo'' clitic, which also turns the question into yes-no question: ''Enket chire-yo tā'itá'-hi?'', "Did he die, and if so, where?" The ''-hi'' suffix is believed to be cognate with the Minhast Irrealis clitic ''=š''. | ||
====Positional and Motion Verbs==== | ====Positional and Motion Verbs==== | ||
| Line 781: | Line 728: | ||
These auxiliaries are often confused for adpositions, or relational nouns, but unlike adpositions and locative nouns, these auxiliaries are full-fledged verbs. If inverse marking is required, the prefix ''tā/tāh'' is still prefixed to the auxiliary verb. Likewise, aspect and modality markers are attached to the auxiliary, a process that occurs only with verbs in the language, never with nouns. Moreover, these auxiliaries can stand alone as independent verbs, such as ''Kosmakis Anut yampe itá'' "Anut walked with Koshmak" (''yampe '' = to be arm-in-arm; c.f. ''yanup'' "elbow"). | These auxiliaries are often confused for adpositions, or relational nouns, but unlike adpositions and locative nouns, these auxiliaries are full-fledged verbs. If inverse marking is required, the prefix ''tā/tāh'' is still prefixed to the auxiliary verb. Likewise, aspect and modality markers are attached to the auxiliary, a process that occurs only with verbs in the language, never with nouns. Moreover, these auxiliaries can stand alone as independent verbs, such as ''Kosmakis Anut yampe itá'' "Anut walked with Koshmak" (''yampe '' = to be arm-in-arm; c.f. ''yanup'' "elbow"). | ||
====Derivation ==== | |||
Nankôre has a set of verbalizing prefixes that when attached to nominal roots, often body parts, create verbs. These prefixes are most likely the remnants of Proto-Nahenic noun incorporation, based on comparisons with Nankôre's distant relatives, Minhast and Nahónda; similar or even identical fossilized affixes have been found in these languages that likewise attach to nominal roots for body parts to derive verbs, e.g. Minhast ''kirim'' (from ''k-erum'', literally "make sound with the mouth) and Nahónda ''teloma'' (from ''t-loma'', note that Minhast /k/ maps to Nahónda /t/); ''kirim'' is the Minhast cognate of Nankôre ''kôre''. | |||
{| class="bluetable lightbluebg" | |||
|+ '''Verbalizing Prefixes''' | |||
|- | |||
! | |||
! Prefix | |||
! Sample Noun | |||
! Example | |||
! Meaning | |||
! Nahenic Cognates | |||
|- | |||
! Sound | |||
| k- | |||
| ore "mouth" | |||
| k-ore | |||
| to speak | |||
| Common Minhast ''k-irim'' "to speak" (NB: Nankôre ''ôre'' = "mouth" is cognate with Minhast ''erum'' = "mouth") | |||
|- | |||
! Striking | |||
| ya- | |||
| shipa "hand" | |||
| ya-shpa | |||
| to punch | |||
| Minhast, Horse Speaker dialect: ''wi-šnu'' "to strike, hit" (Minhast ''išna'' "fist", "knuckles") | |||
|- | |||
! Movement | |||
| ha- | |||
| nake "foot" | |||
| ha-nake | |||
| to scoot along the floor with one's foot; to kick around | |||
| Nahónda: ''ho-sispa'' "to give" ''sisp'' = hand; c.f. Minhast ''sespir'' = hand, Nankôre ''shipa'' = hand | |||
|- | |||
! Stability | |||
| pa- | |||
| are "eye" | |||
| p-are | |||
| to stare | |||
| Common Minhast ''p-uħta'' "to stand up" (from ''yuħta'' = "sole of the foot", cognate with Nankôre ''yohíhita'' = "flat surface") | |||
|- | |||
! Removal | |||
| ro- | |||
| ampe "body" | |||
| ro-yampe | |||
| to remove one's clothes | |||
| Common Minhast ''ruyyamb'' "to take off clothing" (but note that Minhast lost the original ''*yambet'' (body), replacing it with ''tarti'' (body) | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
==Syntax== | ==Syntax== | ||