Minhast: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 2,574: / Line 2,574: @@
 The structure that predominates throughout the rest of the country involves a nominalization of the clause containing
-For non-coreferent arguments as the O-argument, the other dialects nominalize the non-focus clause (the clause containing the secondary core argument of the entire discourse unit<sup>7</sup>) while the focus clause is marked with the Resultative ''-dur-/-dūr-'' suffix.  The verb of the focus clause must also be transitivized by the Comitative Applicative ''-kan-''.  This allows the O-argument of the nominalized clause to be coreferrent with the derived O-argument of the focus clause, thus maintaining the S/O pivot:
+For non-coreferent arguments as the O-argument, the other dialects nominalize the focus clause (the clause containing the secondary core argument of the entire discourse unit<sup>7</sup>) while the non-focus clause is marked with the Resultative ''-dur-/-dūr-'' suffix.  The verb of the non-focus clause must also be transitivized by the Comitative Applicative ''-kan-''.  This allows the O-argument of the nominalized clause to be coreferrent with the derived O-argument of the non-focus clause, thus maintaining the S/O pivot:
 {{Gloss