Antarctican

Antarctican is the most widely spoken language on the continent of Antarctica in the far future, at a time when runaway global warming has melted the icecaps and rendered most of the rest of the word uninhabitable. It has been influenced by a variety of modern-day languages, among them English, Spanish, Japanese and many East Asian languages.

It has a complex phonology and morphophonology, especially in the vowel system. There are a lot of features not found in English e.g. a pitch-register system, phonemic vowel length, prestopped nasals, and ejective consonants. However in other ways the phonology is quite simple compared to English, with a very limited range of syllable shapes.

The morphosyntactic alignment is split ergative (as is the syntax), with noun suffixes following an ergative-absolutive system, but person marking on verbs following a nominative-accusative system. Nouns also inflect for alienable and inalienable possession, and they can undergo some quite complex stem changes. There is no real marking of plurality of nouns.

In the verbal morphology, focus and transitivity are clearly marked. Verbs also inflect for person and voice. Tense and aspect are much less important.

The syntax is head-initial, and adjectives are not distinguished from verbs.

Phonology

Vowels

The pronunciation of each phoneme is listed in the tables below, followed by its romanisation in brackets.

There are 11 monophthongs:

**Antarctican monophthongs**
	Front	Central	Back
Close	i /i/	ue /ɨ/	u /u/
Close-mid	e /e/	oe /ɘ/	o /o/
Open-mid	ae /ɛ/	ao /ɜ/	õ /ɔ/
Open	a /a/		ã /ɒ/

And there are 17 diphthongs. 8 of these end in [j], and another 9 end in [w]:

**Diphthongs ending in /j/**
	Front	Central	Back
Close		uey /ɨj/	uy /uj/
Close-mid	ey /ej/	oey /ɘi/	oy /oj/
Open-mid	aey /ɛj/	aoy /ɜj/
Open	ay /aj/

**Diphthongs ending in /w/**
	Front	Central	Back
Close		uew /ɨw/
Close-mid	ew /ew/	oew /ɘu/	ow /ou/
Open-mid	aew /ɛw/	aow /ɜw/	õw /ɔw/
Open	aw /aw/

Vowel length

Vowel length is phonemic, on both monophthongs and diphthongs e.g.

kow /kou/ - something absorbed in something else, absolutive
koow /koːu/ - a frozen object, absolutive

Vowel phonation

Antarctican also has a pitch register system (like Burmese and Vietnamese). Modal, tense or breathy voice can occur on either short or long vowels. Vowels with tense voice (marked with a glottal stop after the syllable e.g. /aʔ/) are pronounced with a high or rising pitch, and vowels with breathy voice (marked with a voiced /h/ after the syllable e.g. /aɦ/) are pronounced with a low or falling pitch. This distinction is phonemic e.g.

kow /kou/ - something absorbed in something else, absolutive
ków /kouʔ/ - bigot, absolutive

Tense voice cannot occur on high vowels /i/, /ɨ/, /u/, nor on diphthongs beginning with these vowels. Breathy voice cannot occur on low vowels /a/, /ɒ/, nor on diphthongs beginning with these vowels.

The vowel õ /ɔ/ cannot take breathy voice, and when it takes tense voice, it is marked with a circumflex accent i.e. ô.

Floating Phonation

Similar to floating tones in Bantu languages (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_tone), the beginnings of words in Antarctican can have floating phonation (unmarked for modal phonation, written with ' before the word for tense phonation, and ` before the word for breathy phonation). As an example, the following words are pronounced identically when not inflected:

ká /kaʔ/ - coconut milk, absolutive

'ká /kaʔ/ - fence, absolutive

However, when they take the prefix wa- (3rd person topicalised possessive), they are different:

waká /wakaʔ/ - his / her coconut milk, absolutive

'wáká /waʔkaʔ/ - his / her fence, absolutive

Words beginning with a glottal stop only ever have modal floating phonation e.g.

ámáelái /ʔaʔmɛʔlaiʔ/ - prey, absolutive

wa-ámáelái /waʔaʔmɛʔlaiʔ/ - his / her prey, absolutive (never wá-ámáelái)

Vowel Mutation

When a process such as the above changes the phonation of a vowel, often its quality changes as well. E.g. the possessive prefix for inclusive "we" is yew- /jeu/, however, when it acquires tense voice, it becomes 'yáew- /jɛuʔ/ e.g.

yewká /jeukaʔ/ - our (including you) coconut milk, absolutive

'yáewká /jɛuʔkaʔ/ - our (including you) fence, absolutive

Also, the quality of a modally voiced vowel sometimes changes if the next vowel also has modal voice (this also depends on whether the intervening consonant is voice or voiceless). In the case of the prefix yew- /jeu/, this changes to yoew- /jɘu/ if the intervening consonant is voiceless (other than a glottal stop) e.g.

tõn /tɔɴ/ - change (as in coins, money), absolutive

yoewtõn /jɘutɔɴ/ - our (including you) change, absolutive

These changes are given in the table below:

Tense voice	Breathy voice	Modal, normal	Modal, before a voiced consonant followed by another modal vowel	Modal, before a voiceless consonant followed by another modal vowel
éy	ùe	i	i	ue
óey	ùey	ii	ii	uue
áe / áae	òe / òoe	e / ee	e / ee	oe / ooe
á / áa	ào / àao	a / aa	a / aa	ae / aae
ów	ù	u	o	u
óew	ùew	uu	ow	uu
áo	ò	õ	ã	õ
áey / áaey	òey / òoey	ey / eey	ey / eey	ey / eey
áy / áay	àoy / àaoy	ay / aay	ay / aay	aey / aaey
óy / óoy	ùy / ùuy	uy / uuy	oy / ooy	uy / uuy
áew / áaew	òew / òoew	ew / eew	ew / eew	ew / eew
áw / áaw	àow / àaow	aw / aaw	aw / aaw	aew / aaew
ów / óow	òw / òow	ow / oow	õw/ õow	ow / oow

Phonation restrictions

However, not every vowel can have every kind of phonation e.g. tense voice cannot occur on high vowels /i/, /ɨ/, /u/, nor on diphthongs beginning with these vowels. Similarly, breathy voice cannot occur on low vowels /a/, /ɒ/, nor on front vowels, nor on diphthongs beginning with these vowels. The permissible combinations of vowel quality and phonation are listed below:

**Monophthong phonation**
	Voice	Front	Central	Back
Close	Modal	i /i/	ue /ɨ/ from /i/	u /u/
Close	Breathy		ùe /ɨɦ/	ù /uɦ/
Close-mid	Modal	e /e/	oe /ɘ/ from /e/	o /o/ from /u/
	Tense	é /eʔ/	óe /ɘʔ/	ó /oʔ/
	Breathy		òe /ɘɦ/	ò /oɦ/
Open-mid	Modal	ae /ɛ/ from /a/		õ /ɔ/
	Tense	áe /ɛʔ/	áo /ɜʔ/	ô /ɔʔ/
	Breathy		ào /ɜɦ/
Open	Modal	a /a/		ã /ɒ/ from /ɔ/
Open	Tense	á /aʔ/

Vowels in green are found everywhere.
Vowels in pink are phonemic at the end of words, where they mark ergative case, and are allophones elsewhere. They occur before another syllable beginning with a voiced consonant followed by a modally voiced vowel. The vowel that they are an allophone of is indicated afterwards.
Vowels in blue are phonemic at the end of words, where they mark comitative case, and are allophones elsewhere. They occur before another syllable beginning with a voiceless consonant followed by a modally voiced vowel. The vowel that they are an allophone of is indicated afterwards.
Vowels in orange are only found in reduplications.

Antarctican uses reduplication in its morphology, however it only partially reduplicates diphthongs, reducing them to monophthongs in the reduplicated syllable e.g.

'kówntátu /kouɴʔtaʔtu/ – acquaintance, absolutive
'kókówntátu /koʔkouɴʔtaʔtu/ – acquaintances (of each other), absolutive

When such diphthongs are truncated, it is always only the first part of it that is preserved e.g. /eiʔ/ and /euʔ/ both shorten to /eiʔ/. /oiʔ/ and /ouʔ/ both shorten to /oʔ/ etc.

There are similar restrictions on diphthongs:

**Diphthong phonation /j/**
	Voice	Front	Central	Back
Close	Modal			uy /ui/
Close	Breathy		ùey /ɨiɦ/	ùy /uiɦ/
Close-mid	Modal	ey /ei/	oey /ɘi/	oy /oi/
	Tense	éy /eiʔ/	óey /ɘiʔ/	óy /oiʔ/
	Breathy		òey /ɘiɦ/
Open-mid	Modal	aey /ɛi/
	Tense	áey /ɛiʔ/
	Breathy		àoy /ɜiɦ/
Open	Modal	ay /ai/
Open	Tense	áy /aiʔ/

Same applies to the remaining diphthongs:

**Diphthong phonation /w/**
	Voice	Front	Central	Back
Close	Modal
Close	Breathy		ùew /ɨuɦ/
Close-mid	Modal	ew /ew/	oew /ɘu/	ow /ou/
	Tense			ów /ouʔ/
	Breathy		òew /ɘuɦ/	òw /ouɦ/
Open-mid	Modal	aew /ɛu/		õw /ɔu/
	Tense	áew /ɛuʔ/		ôw /ɔuʔ/
	Breathy		àow /ɜuɦ/
Open	Modal	aw /au/
Open	Tense	áw /auʔ/

Consonants

The pronunciation of each phoneme is listed in the table below, followed by its romanisation in brackets.

Antarctican consonants
		Bilabial		Alveolar		Palatal	Velar / Uvular	Glottal / Placeless
		plain	palatalised	central	lateral	Palatal	Velar / Uvular	Glottal / Placeless
Nasals	plain	m /m/	my /mʲ/	n /n/		ny /ɲ/	ng /ŋ/	n /ɴ/
Nasals	pre-stopped	pm /pm/	pmy /pmʲ/	tn /tn/		cn /cɲ/	kn /kŋ/
Stops/Affricate	ejective	pq /p'/	pqy /p'ʲ/	tq /t'/	tql /tɬ'/	cqh /c' ~ tɕ'/	kq /k'/
	voiceless	p /p/	py /pʲ/	t /t/	tl /tɬ/	ch /c ~ tɕ/	k /k/	- /ʔ/
	voiced	b /b/	by /bʲ/	d /d/	dl /dɮ/	j /ɟ ~ dʑ/	g /g/
Fricatives/Affricates	ejective			tqs /ts' ~ s'/
	voiceless	f /f/	fy /fʲ/	s /s ~ ts/	hl /ɬ/	sh /ç ~ ɕ/	h /χ ~ x/
	voiced			z /z ~ dz/
Approximant		w /w/	v /ɥ/	l /l ~ ɹ ~ ʎ/		y /j/	r /ʁ ~ ʀ/

Consonants separated with a tilde (~) are not separate phonemes but are either allophones or in free variation e.g. /s ~ ts/ indicates that there is a single phoneme that can either be pronounced [s] or [ts]. The most common pronunciation is always listed first.
The glottal stop is unmarked word initially (since all words must begin with consonants), and is marked by a hyphen elsewhere.
Prestopped nasals e.g. /tn/, /pm/ etc., pattern as voiceless and as nasals (and thus sonorants) in terms of the phonology. They are only found between syllables with modal vowel phonation (or modal voice floating phonation if at the beginning of a word).
The placeless nasal /ɴ/ is only found at the end of syllables. Before a glottal stop or at the end of a phrase, it nasalises the preceding vowel. Otherwise it assimilates to the same place of articulation as the following consonant e.g. it becomes [n] before /d/, [m] before /b/ etc.
Voiced obstruents (stops, fricatives and affricates) are only found in three cases.

Separating two syllables with modal voice (or a modal voice floating phonation if at the start of a word).
After a syllable containing breathy phonation (or a breathy voice floating phonation if at the start of a word) and before a syllable containing modal phonation.
Separating two syllables with breathy voice (or a breathy voice floating phonation if at the start of a word). In this case they are pronounced with breathy voice, like the murmured/voiced aspirated consonants of many Indian languages.

Non-alveolar fricatives are only found separating two syllables with modal voice (or modal voice floating phonation if at the beginning of a word), or separating two syllables with tense voice (or tense voice floating phonation if at the beginning of a word).
Ejectives are only ever found separating two syllables with tense voice (or tense voice floating phonation if at the beginning of a word).
The velar nasals /kŋ/ and /ŋ/ never occur at the beginning of words.
The alveolar stops /t/ and /d/, and the velar fricative /χ/ are never found before /i/ and /ɨ/ (with any phonation), nor before tense voice /eʔ/ and /ɘʔ/, nor before diphthongs starting with these.
The phoneme /l/ is pronounced as a palatal lateral [ʎ] before a high vowel, [ɹ] before a vowel with tense voice (high vowels cannot have tense voice), and [l] elsewhere.

Consonant Harmony

Consonants in Antarctican can be grouped into two sets, soft and hard. Many affixes have two alternate forms, one with a soft consonant and one with a hard. When they attach to a word that begins with a soft consonant, the form of the affix with the soft consonant is used. If the word begins with a hard consonant, the form of the affix with the hard consonant is used. The soft consonants are the palatal consonants, the palatalized labial consonants, and the lateral consonants. All the other consonants are hard.

For example, the antipassive voice is formed by an infix that comes after the first consonant of a word. For words that begin with a hard consonant, the infix is am /am/ (which contains a hard consonant) e.g.

ziitlàoji /ziːtɬɜɦɟi/ - to know (a person), verb-focus
zamiitlàoji /zamiːtɬɜɦɟi/ - to know (a person), verb-focus, antipassive

However, if the word begins with a soft consonant, the infix is emy /emʲ/ e.g.

pyiquu /pʲiʔuː/ - to purify, verb-focus
pyemyiquu /pʲemʲiʔuː/ - to purify, verb-focus, antipassive
hli-õ /ɬiʔɔ/ - to perform, verb-focus
hlemyi-õ /ɬemʲiʔɔ/ - to perform, verb-focus, antipassive (not *(hlemi-õ) /ɬmiʔɔ/)

Phonotactics

Syllable structures are extremely limited, with only shapes being CV and CVɴ.

Distribution and Dialects

Antarctican is spoken across a large continent, by a diversity of cultures. As would be expected, there is significant dialectical variation within the language. The differences are most pronounced in the vocabulary, less in the morphology, and even less in the syntax and phonology.

Most speakers of Antarctican will also be bilingual in a second language that is only spoken in their local region. Typically, Antarctican will be used in more formal situations, and the local language used with family and friends. However, it is very common for regional varieties of Antarctican to borrow words from other local languages.

The Antarctican Sprachbund

As mentioned before, it is much less common for regional varieties of Antarctican to differ in their syntax and phonology. This is because the local languages of Antarctica form a very strong Sprachbund Sprachbund^[*], which have converged to have very similar phonologies and syntactic systems. Some examples of these areal features are:

Phonology

A pitch register system Register^[*].
Consonant voicing only being phonemic under certain specific conditions. In particular, a total lack of phonemic voicing of non-coronal fricatives.
Some kind of fortis / lenis contrast in obstruents, which often interacts with the pitch register system in some way. This contrast may be glottalisation (ejective or implosive), gemination or aspiration.
Two sets of nasal consonants (this can be plain vs. prestopped, or involve a voicing contrast).
A very restricted range of syllable shapes.

Morphology

Ergative-absolutive cas marking on nouns (if any is present at all).
A complete lack of number agreement on verbs, and no comprehensive marking of plurality on nouns (only ever specific categories of nouns).
Tense and aspect are not consistently marked on verbs, if they are marked at all.
A lack of infinitive verb forms. Antarctican languages use a variety of ways to compensate for this.
Transitivity marked on verbs.

Syntax

Syntactic ergativity.
Topic-comment structure to sentences.
Inclusive and exclusive 'we', with no distinction made between exclusive 'we' and 'I'.
Head initial syntax.

Noun Morphology

Nouns inflect for case (via suffixation or changing the final vowel of the word), and possession (via prefixes)

Case

Nouns decline into three cases, Absolutive, Ergative and Comitative. Absolutive case is unmarked while the other two use vowel changes on the final vowel and/or suffixes. Nouns can also take demonstrative and possessive prefixes.

Ergative case

How this case is formed depends on the phonation and frontness of the final vowel in the word.

Modally voiced final vowel

Final vowel is a back vowel

In this case, lower the back vowel e.g.

tõn /tɔɴ/ - change (as in coins, money), absolutive
tãn /tɒɴ/ - change, ergative

doleengun /doleːŋuɴ/ - dragon, absolutive
doleengon /doleːŋoɴ/ - dragon, ergative

If the final vowel is a diphthong that begins with a back vowel, then the start of the diphthong is lowered e.g.

paehown /pɛχouɴ/ - dust, absolutive
paehõwn /pɛχɔuɴ/ - dust, ergative
yuenpiluy - /jɨɴpilui/ - employee, absolutive
yuenpiloy /jɨɴpiloi/ - employee, ergative

Final vowel is not a back vowel

In this case the ergative suffix is –n /ɴ/, or –ga /ga/ if the noun already ended in –n e.g.*zive /ziɥe/ - boat, absolutive

ziven /ziɥeɴ/ - boat, ergative
myaewntayn /mʲɛuɴtaiɴ/ - mountain, absolutive
myaewntayn-ga / mʲɛuɴtaiɴga/ - mountain, ergative

Final vowel has breathy or tense voice

For nouns where the vowel of the last syllable has breathy or tense voice, the situation is more complicated. They all take ergative suffixes of the form C V ɴ, where C is a consonant and V is a vowel. V is almost always /i/, except after /t/ or /d/, when it is /u/. However it is not possible to predict C, as shown by the examples below:

teyláae /teilɛʔː/ - shirt, absolutive
teyláaesin /teilɛʔːsiɴ / - shirt, ergative
péy /peiʔ/ - book, absolutive
péykin /peiʔkiɴ/ - book, ergative
`kùe /kɨɦ/ - goods, absolutive
`kùezin /kɨɦziɴ/ - goods, ergative
`ròe /ʁɘɦ/ - red object, absolutive
`ròedun /ʁɘɦduɴ/ – red object, ergative
'ków /kouʔ/ - cup, absolutive
'kówpin */kouʔpiɴ/ - cup, ergative
péylánkáe /peiʔlaɴʔkɛʔ/ - blanket, absolutive
péylánkáetun /peiʔlaɴʔkɛʔtuɴ/ - blanket, ergative
wùerù /wɨɦʁuɦ/- frog, absolutive
wùerùgin /wɨɦʁuɦgiɴ/ - frog, ergative

While it may seem that the consonant inserted before the –in (or –un) suffix is random, there are some patterns. Firstly, the inserted consonant is always an obstruent (oral stop, affricate or fricative), and never a sonorant (nasal or approximant). Secondly, observe that, when the final vowel of the absolutive stem has tense voice, the inserted consonant is always voiceless, while if the final vowel of the absolutive stem has breathy voice, the inserted consonant is always voiced. These two rules hold across the language.

Also, for readers with knowledge of whatever language Antarctican borrowed the particular noun stem from, note that the “inserted” consonant almost perfectly corresponds with the consonant at the end of the word e.g. the word for “frog”, (wùerù /wɨɦʁuɦ/ in the absolutive case), is in fact descended from the English word “frog”. However, Antarctican does not like final consonants, so the final “g” was lost in the absolutive form. However in the ergative form, there is another vowel following the “g”, so it “reappears”, and the ergative form of the word is wùerùgin /wɨɦʁuɦgiɴ/. A similar story happens with the “t” in the word for “blanket”, which is also derived from English.

Stem changes

However, for some of the nouns with breathy or tense voice on the final vowel of the absolutive stem, there are changes in the stem when they take the ergative suffix. These involve a change in vowel phonation to modal voice, and often a change in vowel quality (as given by the table in the phonology section). e.g.

'tùen /tɨɴɦ/- wound caused by a sting (e.g. a bee or a jellyfish), absolutive

'tin-gin /tiɴgiɴ/ - wound caused by a sting (e.g. a bee or a jellyfish), ergative (not *tùen-gin)

As a rule, if the final vowel undergoes a change, and the second last vowel has the same voicing as the final vowel, then they both change e.g.

ùylòen /ʔuiɦlɘɴɦ/ - island, absolutive

oylendun /ʔoileɴduɴ/ - island, ergative (not *qùilòendun)

tùròoen /tuɦʁɘːɴɦ/ - fashionable items, absolutive

toreendun /toʁeːɴduɴ/ - fashionable items, ergative

If there are even more consecutive syllables with the same voicing on the vowel, then this rule applies to every single one of them e.g.

ámáeláy /ʔaʔmɛʔlaiʔ/ - prey, absolutive

amelaeykin /ʔamelɛikiɴ/ - prey, ergative

There are many, many other nouns that decline according to this pattern. Almost all of the nouns that end in /ɴ/ or contain a long vowel in the final syllable undergo vowel changes in the stem e.g.

'táen /tɛɴʔ/ - weather, absolutive

'toenchin /tɘɴciɴ/ - weather, ergative

kàao /kɜɦː/ - membership card, absolutive

kaadun /kaːduɴ/ - membership card, ergative

However, the converse is not true. For nouns with non-modally voiced final vowels, but that do not end in /ɴ/ or a long vowel, some undergo vowel changes e.g.

ùenào /ʔɨɦnɜɦ/ - eel, absolutive

inajin /ʔinaɟiɴ/ - eel, ergative

While others do not e.g.

`kùe /kɨɦ/ - goods, absolutive

`kùezin /kɨɦziɴ/ - goods, ergative

There are some nouns that have identical absolutive forms, but are distinguished in the ergative e.g.

'ká /kaʔ/ - fence, absolutive

kaechin /kɛciɴ/ - fence, ergative

ká /kaʔ/ - coconut milk, absolutive

kátlin /katɬiɴ/ coconut milk, ergative

Obstruent Voicing

If the absolutive form has a voiceless obstruent (oral stop, affricate or fricative), that separates two syllables with breathy voice (or a breathy voice floating phonation if word initial), when the breathy voiced vowels acquire modal voice in the ergative form, the voiceless obstruent does too, becoming modally voiced e.g.

`pùelùe /pɨɦlɨɦ/ - bridge, absolutive

bilidlin /bilidɮiɴ/ - bridge, ergative

`pàoy /pɜiɦ/ - baby, absolutive

baybyin /baibʲiɴ/ - baby, ergative

`nyùewsùeylòen /ɲɨuɦsɨɦiɦlɘɴɦ/ - New Zealand, absolutive

nyuuziilendun /ɲuːziːleɴduɴ/ - New Zealand, ergative

If the absolutive form of a noun has a voiceless obstruent (oral stop, affricate or fricative), that is preceded by a syllable with a modally voiced vowel, and is followed by a vowel with tense voice, if this tense voiced vowel becomes modally voiced in the ergative form, then the voiceless obstruent before it acquires modal voice too e.g.

yéysitléynyéy /jeiʔsitɬeiʔɲeiʔ/ - mutton, absolutive

yéysidlinyuekin /jeiʔsidɮiɲɨkiɴ/ - mutton, ergative

Here we can see that the /tɬ/ in the absolutive form has changed to /dɮ/ in the ergative form.

For word initial voiceless obstruents followed by tense voiced vowels in the absolutive form, which change to modal voice vowels in the ergative form, sometimes this change also occurs e.g.

támá /taʔmaʔ/- victim of a scam / swindle, absolutive

damaesin /damɛsiɴ/ - victim of a scam / swindle, ergative

Sonorant Devoicing

Another similar pattern occurs in sonorants. If, in the absolutive form, they are preceded by a syllable with a modally voiced vowel (or modal voice floating phonation if word initial), and followed by a breathy or tense voiced vowel that changes in the ergative (to have modal voice), then the sonorant becomes devoiced. /w/ becomes /f/, /l/ becomes /ɬ/, /j/ becomes /ç/, and /ʁ/ becomes /χ/, voiced nasals become prestopped e.g.

yuuwéy /juːweiʔ/ - clothes, absolutive

yuufoekin /juːfɘkiɴ/ - clothes, ergative

aetenàolùn /ʔɛtenɜɦluɴɦ/ - heart, absolutive

aetoetnalonzin /ʔɛtɘtnaloɴziɴ/ - heart, ergative

De-Ejectivisation

There are some Antarctican nouns that have ejectives in the absolutive form. As required by the phonotactics, they have tense voiced vowels both before and after (possibly with /ɴ/ intervening). However, sometimes in the ergative form, the tense voiced vowel after the ejective becomes modally voiced. In this case, the airstream mechanism changes from glottalic egressive (ejective) to pulmonic egressive (normal) e.g.

'kqów /kʼouʔ/ - a small amount, absolutive

'kuhli /\kuɬi/ - a small amount, ergative

ráetqówléykuetu /ʁɛʔtʼoleiʔkɨtu/ - something self-limiting, absolutive

ráetoluekuetu /ʁɛʔtolɨkɨtu/ something self-limiting, ergative

'kéychqéy /keiʔcʼeiʔ/ - a female name, absolutive

'kéychuekin /keiʔcɨkiɴ/ - a female name, ergative

Comitative Case

How this is formed also depends on the frontness and phonation of the final vowel:

Last Vowel of Abs. Form has Modal Voice

Last Vowel of Abs. Form is not a Back Vowel

In this case, take the absolutive form, raise /a/ to /ɛ/ and centralise any other front vowels e.g.

zive /ziɥe/ - boat, absolutive

zivoe /ziɥɘ/ - boat, comitative

myaewntayn /mʲɛuɴtaiɴ/ - mountain, absolutive

myaewntaeyn /mʲɛuɴtɛiɴ/ - mountain, comitative

agirey /ʔagiʁei/ - agreement, absolutive

agiroey /ʔagiʁɘi/ - agreement, comitative

Last Vowel of Abs. Form is a Back Vowel

In this case, take the absolutive form, and suffix /pmu/ e.g.

tõn /tɔɴ/- change (as in coins, money), absolutive

tõnpmu /tɔɴpmu/ - change (as in coins, money), comitative

doleengun /doleːŋuɴ/ - dragon, absolutive

doleengunpmu /doleːŋuɴpmu/ - dragon, comitative

paehown /pɛχouɴ/ - dust, absolutive

paehownpmu /pɛχouɴpmu/ - dust, comitative

yuenpiluy - /jɨɴpiluipmu/ - employee, absolutive

yuenpiluypmu - /jɨɴpiluipmu/ - employee, comitative

Other Cases

If the last vowel of the absolutive form has tense or breathy voice, the comitative is formed differently. Here, it is formed by taking the ergative, deleting any final /ɴ/ or /ga/ that had been inserted as a suffix, and then suffixing /ʔu/ e.g.

'tùen /sitɨɴɦ/ - wound caused by a sting (e.g. a bee or a jellyfish), absolutive

'tin-gin /sɨtiɴgiɴ/ - wound caused by a sting (e.g. a bee or a jellyfish), ergative

'tin-gi-u /sɨtiɴgiʔu/ - wound caused by a sting, comitative

teyláae /teilɛʔː/ - shirt, absolutive

teyláaesin /teilɛʔːsiɴ / - shirt, ergative

teyláaesi-u /teilɛʔːsiʔu/ - shirt, comitative

péy /peiʔ/ - book, absolutive

péykin /peiʔkiɴ/ - book, ergative

péyki-u /peiʔkiʔu/ - book, comitative

`kùe /kɨɦ/ - goods, absolutive

`kùezin /kɨɦziɴ/ - goods, ergative

`kùezi-u /kɨɦziʔu/ - goods, comitative

`ròe /ʁɘɦ/ - red object, absolutive

`ròedun /ʁɘɦduɴ/ – red object, ergative

`ròedu-u /ʁɘɦduʔu/ – red object, comitative

'ków /kouʔ/ - cup, absolutive

'kówpin /kouʔpiɴ/ - cup, ergative

'kówpi-u /kouʔpiʔu/ - cup, comitative

péylánkáe /peiʔlaɴʔkɛʔ/ - blanket, absolutive

péylánkáetun /peiʔlaɴʔkɛʔtuɴ/ - blanket, comitative

péylánkáetu-u /peiʔlaɴʔkɛʔtuʔu/ - blanket, ergative

wùerù /wɨɦʁuɦ/ - frog, absolutive

wùerùgin /wɨɦʁuɦgiʔu/ - frog, ergative

wùerùgiqu /wɨɦʁuɦgiɴ/ - frog, comitative

Pronominal Possession

Where English would use possessive pronouns (“my”, “your”), Antarctican uses possessive prefixes. The base forms of each are listed in the table below:

Prefix	Usage
myi- /mʲi/	1st person singular, 1st person exclusive plural
yew- /jeu/	1st person inclusive plural
ti- /ti/	2nd person
wa- /wa/	3rd person, topicalised
si- /si/	3rd person, non-topicalised

So, in the absolutive case, “my clothes” or “our clothes” (not including you) would be myiyuuwéy /mʲijuːweiʔ/, “your clothes” would be tiyuuwéy /tijuːweiʔ/ etc.

Phonation Spreading

However, if the noun has a floating phonation, this will spread onto the prefix, and often cause a vowel change in it as well (see the table in the phonology section for a list of changes) e.g.

`pùelùe /pɨɦlɨɦ/ - bridge, absolutive

`myùepùelùe /mʲɨɦpɨɦlɨɦ/ - my bridge, absolutive (not *myipùelùe)

tùepùelùe /tɨɦpɨɦlɨɦ/ - your bridge, absolutive (not *tipùelùe)

Loss of Floating Phonation

However, if, in the ergative form, the first vowel changes to no longer have breathy or tense voice (i.e. it now has modal voice), then, if the floating phonation was the same as the what used to be on the vowel, then it is lost too e.g.

`pùelùe /pɨɦlɨɦ/- bridge, absolutive

bilidlin /bilidɮiɴ/ - bridge, ergative

`myùepùelùe /mʲɨɦpɨɦlɨɦ/ - my bridge, absolutive

myibilidlin /mʲibilidɮiɴ/ - my bridge, ergative

There are two exceptions to the above rule. The first is if the word begins with an ejective, in which case the ejectiveness is lost, but the floating phonation remains e.g.

'kqów /kʼouʔ/ - a small amount, absolutive

'kuhli /kuɬi/ - a small amount, ergative

myéykuhli /mʲeiʔkuɬi/ - my small amount, ergative

The second is for words that begin with consonant pronounced with breathy voice (voiced consonant before a breathy voiced vowel) e.g.

`byùe /bʲɨɦ/ - mouth, absolutive

`byijin /bʲiɟiɴ/ - mouth, ergative

myùebyùe /mʲɨɦbʲɨɦ/ - my mouth, absolutive

`myùebyijin /mʲɨɦbʲiɟiɴ/ - my mouth, ergative

Prediction of Floating Phonation

As a rule, whether or not a noun has floating phonation cannot be predicted. The only time when it is possible to do so is for absolutive nouns, if, in the ergative form, the first vowel loses its breathy or tense phonation and becomes modally voiced. In this case, the rules are given below:

Sonorant Initial Stem

If the absolutive stem begins with a sonorant (nasal or approximant), and that sonorant becomes devoiced when the vowel after it acquires modal voice in the ergative form, then there is only ever modal floating phonation before it in both cases e.g.

màao /mɜɦː/ - betel nut, absolutive

pmaagin /pmaːgiɴ/ - betel nut, ergative

myimàao /mʲimɜɦː/ - my betel nut, absolutive

Otherwise, if a word begins with a sonorant, then it always has floating phonation that is the same as that on the first vowel e.g.

'máláeyáa /maʔlɛʔjaʔː/ - manners, absolutive

maleyaaetun /malejɛːtuɴ/ - manners, ergative

'myéymáláeyáa /mʲeiʔmaʔlɛʔjaʔː/ - my manners, absolutive

Stem starts with /s/

If the absolutive stem begins with /s/, it can never have tense floating phonation e.g.

sásaechin /saʔsɛciɴ/ - stab wound, absolutive

myisásaechin /mʲisaʔsaɛciɴ/ - my stab wound, absolutive

In the case of absolutive nouns with breathy voice on the first vowel, if, in the ergative form, the initial /s/ becomes voiced /z/, then the word has breathy floating phonation e.g.

`sàomùe /sɜɦmɨɦ/ - (major) wife, absolutive

zamibyin /zamibʲiɴ/ - (major) wife, ergative

`myùesàomùe /mʲɨɦsɜɦmɨɦ/ - my (major) wife, absolutive (not *myisàomùe)

But if, in the ergative form, the first vowel acquires modal voice but the initial consonant stays as voiceless /s/, then in both the absolutive form and the ergative, there is floating modal phonation e.g.

sàopyùe /sɜɦpʲɨɦ/ - speech (as in words, not a formal speech), absolutive

sabyishin /sabʲiçiɴ/ - speech (as in words, not a formal speech), ergative

myisàopyùe /mʲisɜɦpʲɨɦ/ - my speech (as in words, not a formal speech), absolutive

Other stems

If the absolutive stem begins with another obstruent (oral stop, affricate or fricative) followed by a vowel with tense voice, and that obstruent stays voiceless even when followed by a modally voiced vowel (in the ergative form), then the absolutive form has tense floating phonation e.g.

'táen /tɛɴʔ/ - weather, absolutive

toenchin /tɘɴciɴ/ - weather, ergative

'myéytáen /mʲeiʔtɛɴʔ/ - my weather, absolutive

But if the obstruent becomes voiced, then there is only ever floating modal phonation e.g.

támá /taʔmaʔ/ - victim of a scam / swindle, absolutive

damaesin /damaɛsiɴ/ - victim of a scam / swindle, ergative

myitámá /mʲitaʔmaʔ/ - my victim of a scam / swindle, absolutive

And vice versa, if the absolutive form of a noun begins with a voicless obstruent followed by a breathy voiced vowel, and that vowel becomes voiced in the ergative form, then the absolutive form has floating breathy phonation e.g.

`pùelùe /pɨɦlɨɦ/ - bridge, absolutive

bilidlin /bilidɮiɴ/ - bridge, ergative

`myùepùelùe /mʲɨɦpɨɦlɨɦ/ - my bridge, absolutive

`pàoy /pɜiɦ/- baby, absolutive

baybyin /baibʲiɴ/ - baby, ergative

`myùepàoy /mʲɨɦpɜiɦ/ - my baby, absolutive

And if the obstruent stays voiceless in the ergative form, then there is only ever floating modal phonation e.g.

pàoy /pɜiɦ/ - page, absolutive

paydlin /paidɮiɴ/ - page, ergative

myipàoy /mʲipɜiɦ/ - my page, absolutive

Nasalisation of Velar Initials

For some nouns that begin with /k/ or /g/, often it changes to /ŋ/ when the noun takes a prefix. e.g.

gali /gali/ - hole, absolutive

myingali /mʲiŋali/ - my hole, absolutive

In such a case, if the first vowel has tense or breathy voice, then it also has a floating phonation that is the same e.g.

`kùe /kɨɦ/ - goods, absolutive

`myùengùe /mʲɨɦŋɨɦ/ - my goods, absolutive

'kéyváy /keiʔɥaiʔ/ - tongue, absolutive

'myéyngéyváy /mʲeiʔŋeiʔɥaiʔ/ - my tongue, absolutive

Possession by a Noun

Antarctican distinguishes alienable and inalienable possession. Both are marked with prefixes on the possessed noun. These are wey- for alienable possession and nu- for inalienable possession (the possessor always takes the absolutive case). Note that floating phonation affects these prefixes in the same way as any other:

`kùeràotùu /kɨɦʁɜɦtuɦː/ - bone, absolutive

yini /jini/ - dog, absolutive

`wòeykùeràotùu yini /wɘiɦkɨɦʁɜɦtuɦː jini/ - the dog’s bone, absolutive, alienable (i.e. the one that it eats, buries etc.)

`nùkùeràotùu yini /nuɦkɨɦʁɜɦtuɦː jini/ - the dog’s bone, absolutive, inalienable (i.e. the one that is a part of it)

Where English would compound nouns together, or use one to modify another. Antarctican uses the alienable possessive construction e.g.

aaehaan /ʔɛːχaːɴ/ - food, absolutive

wey-aaehaan yini /weiʔɛːχaːɴ jini/ - dog food, absolutive

Reciprocal Possession

In Antarctican, there is no singular vs. plural marking. However, some nouns that imply a relationship (e.g. friend, brother, enemy, coworker), have special forms to indicate a pair or group of people / things where that relationship is reciprocal e.g. where English would say “They are friends / brothers / enemies / coworkers (of each other)”.

These forms are generally constructed by reduplicating the first syllable of the noun, in the same “slot” where possession would be marked e.g.

biraza /biʁaza/ - brother, absolutive

bibiraza /bibiʁaza/ - brothers (of each other), absolutive

yeruy /jeʁui/ - ally, absolutive

yeyeruy /jejeʁui/ - allies (of each other), absolutive

However, the inserted syllable cannot have a long vowel, a diphthong, or end in /ɴ/. If it would do so then it is truncated e.g.

doolaa /doːlaː/ - coworker, absolutive

dodoolaa /dodoːlaː/ - coworkers (of each other), absolutive

nayba /naiba/ - neighbour, absolutive

nanayba /nanaiba/ - neighbours (of each other), absolutive

'kówntátu /kouɴʔtaʔtu/ – acquaintance, absolutive

'kókówntátu /koʔkouɴʔtaʔtu/– acquaintances (of each other), absolutive

The voicing of the vowel of the reduplication is determined by what floating phonation the noun has e.g.

sátozii /saʔtoziː/ – enemy, absolutive

myisátozii /mʲisaʔtoziː/ – my enemy, absolutive

sasátozii /sasaʔtoziː/ - enemies (of each other), absolutive

`rùy /ʁuiɦ/- rival, absolutive

`myùerùy /mʲɨɦʁuiɦ/ - my rival, absolutive

`rùrùy /ʁuɦʁuiɦ/ - rivals (of each other), absolutive

firendun /fiʁeɴduɴ/ – friend, ergative

myuefirendun /mʲɨfiʁeɴduɴ/ – my friend, ergative

fuefirendun /fɨfiʁeɴduɴ/ – friends (of each other), ergative

A few nouns have irregular reciprocal possessive forms e.g.

wùeròen /wɨɦʀɘɴɦ/ - friend, absolutive

fiwùeròen /fiwɨɦʀɘɴɦ/ - friends (of each other), absolutive

These arise from when the first vowel has breathy or tense voice, but the first consonant is underlyingly a voiced obstruent or a prestopped nasal. These can only occur before modally voiced vowels, and are thus modified before the vowel with breathy or tense voice. But if word has floating modal phonation, then the vowel there will have modal voice and the underlying consonant will surface there.

Verb / Adjective Morphology

There is no distinction between adjectives and verbs in Antarctican. Instead of adjectives like “good”, “bad”, “strong”, “weak”, there are verbs meaning “to be good”, “to be bad” etc.

Verbs inflect for whether they are putting focus on themselves or on nouns in the sentence (done via changing the end of the root). They also take infixes to indicate pronominal objects and voice changes (which is conflated with aspect marking). As well as this, they take prefixes to indicate pronominal subjects (which is conflated with tense marking).

Focus

Verbs have a root form, from which various other base forms are derived. The two most important of these base forms are the verb-focus base and the noun-focus base. Below is a list of verb roots with their corresponding verb-focus and noun-focus bases:

doleegi /doleːgi/ - to drag, intransitive, root

doleeju /doleːɟu/ - to drag, intransitive, verb-focus

`tùlòoezi /tuɦlɘɦːzi/ – to drag, intransitive, noun-focus

`ròedu /ʁɘdu/ - red, root

`ròedla /ʁɘɦdɮa/ - red, verb-focus

`ròedù /ʁɘɦduɦ/ - red, noun-focus

'kiraeypyi /kiʁɛipʲi/ - to become scraped, root

'kiraeypyu /kiʁɛipʲu/ - to become scraped, verb-focus

'kiraypùe /kiʁa;ipɨɦ/ - to become scraped, noun-focus

Verb-Focus Base

This is used to put focus on the verb ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_(linguistics) ) i.e. when the most important "new" information that is being communicated to the listener is the action being done in the verb, rather than the nouns that are doing it or it is being done to. How it is formed from the root is regular, but the rules are somewhat complex and depend on whether the last syllable of the base begins with a soft or hard consonant:

Final Consonant is Soft

If the final consonant (not including any placeless nasal /ɴ/) is soft, infix -iq-/iʔ/ immediately after it e.g.

hlõ /ɬɔ/ - to perform, root

hli-õ /ɬiʔɔ/ - to perform, verb-focus

However, many vowels shift when this happens e.g.

éypyii /ʔeiʔpʲiː/ - to spit out, root

éypyi-eey /ʔeiʔpʲiʔeːi/ - to spit out, verb-focus

inyelee /ʔiɲeleː/ - to pierce, root

inyeli-aa /ʔiɲeliʔaː/ - to pierce, verb-focus

kiveluun /kiɥeluːɴ/ - to die, root

kiveli-ewn /kiɥeliʔeuɴ/ - to die, verb-focus

These vowel shifts are all in a roughly anti-clockwise directions around the vowel space. The shifts are listed below:

i /i/ -> e /e/

ii /iː/ -> ey /ei/

e /e/ -> a /a/

ee /eː/ -> aa /aː/

a /a/ -> u /u/

aa /aː/ -> uu /uː/

u /u/ -> i /i/

uu /uː/ -> ew /eu/

ey /ei/ -> ay /ai/

eey /eːi/ -> aay /aːi/

ay /ai/ -> uy /ui/

aay /aːi/ -> uuy /uːi/

uy /ui/ -> ii /iː/

ew /eu/ -> aw /au/

eew /eːu/ -> aaw /aːu/

aw /au/ -> ow /ou/

aaw /aːu/ -> oow /oːu/

Final Consonant is Hard

If the final consonant (not including any placeless nasal /ɴ/) is hard, change it to be soft e.g.

yuentorõ /jɨɴtoʁɔ/ - to introduce oneself, root

yuentolõ /jɨɴtolɔ/ - to introduce oneself, verb-focus

However, many vowels shift when this happens e.g.

nangarew /naŋaʁeu/ - to flow, root

nangaluu /naŋaluː/ - to flow, verb-focus

'kirami /kiʁami/ - to swell up, root

'kiramyu /kiʁamʲu/ - to swell up, verb-focus

imuepu /ʔimɨpu/ - to sit down, root

imuepya /ʔimɨpʲa/ - to sit down, verb-focus

These vowel changes are often the reverse of what happens if the final vowel of the stem is a soft consonant. The vowel shifts are all roughly clockwise around the vowel space, and are listed below:

i /i/ -> u /u/

u /u/ -> a /a/

uu /uː/ -> aa /aː/

a /a/ -> e /e/

aa /aː/ -> ee /eː/

e /e/ -> i /i/ * For some words only, see below.

ee /eː/ -> ii /iː/

ii /iː/ -> uy /ui/

uy /ui/ -> ay /ai/

uuy /uːi/ -> aay /aːi/

ay /ai/ -> ey /ei/

aay /aːi/ -> eey /eːi/

ey /ei/ -> ii /iː/

eey /eːi/ -> ii /iː/

ow /ou/ -> aw /au/

oow /oːu/ -> aaw /aːu/

aw /au/ -> ew /eu/

aaw /aːu/ -> eew /eːu/

ew /eu/ -> uu /uː/

eew /eːu/ -> uu /uː/

Vowel Phonation Changes

A few verb stems that end in a hard consonant and e /e/ behave differently. If the consonant is an obstruent and the vowel is short, has modal voice and not followed by -n /ɴ/, then the syllable is deleted and voice put onto the preceding syllable(s). This voice is breathy if the deleted obstruent was voiced, and tense if it was voiceless e.g.

nuetoze /nɨtoze/ - to be fed on, root

nitù /nituɦ/ - to be fed on, verb-focus

siboete /sibɘte/ - to all be present, root

sipáe /sipɛʔ/ - to all be present, verb-focus (remember that Antarctican does not like voiced obstruents before vowels with breathy voice).

The breathy voice “spreads” backwards through the word, changing vowel phonation with it, until it hits a voiceless obstruent or prestopped nasal e.g.

madoze /madoze/ - to give birth, intransitive, root

`màotù /mɜɦtuɦ/ - to give birth, intransitive, verb-focus

nyiibe /ɲiːbe/ - to snow, root

`nyùue /ɲɨːɦ/ - to snow, verb-focus

san-gize /saɴgize/ - to bleed, root

sàon-gùe /sɜɦɴgɨɦ/ - to bleed, verb-focus

Tense voice "spreads" backwards in a similar way, except that it passes through voiceless stops and not through voiced stops, fricatives, or prestopped nasals e.g.

daraeke /daʁɛke/ - to cover, root

tárá /taʔʁaʔ/ - to cover, verb-focus

Noun-Focus Base

This is used to put focus on the (non-topicalised) noun(s) in the sentence.

Regular Formation

The default way of forming it is by putting breathy voice on the final vowel of the base, and changing the vowel quality in the same way as normal e.g.

éypyii /ʔeiʔpʲiː/ - to spit out, root

éypyùey /ʔeiʔpʲɨiɦ/ - to spit out, noun-focus

This breathy voice “spreads” to the left until it hits a voiceless obstruent or a prestopped nasal e.g.

gowpeyee /goupejeː/ - to suffer a setback, root

gowpòeyòoe /goupɘɦjɘːɦ/ - to suffer a setback, noun-focus

inyelee /ʔiɲeleː/ - to pierce, root

ùenyòelòoe /ʔɨɦɲɘɦleː/ - to pierce, noun-focus

kiveluun /kiɥeluːɴ/ - to die, root

kùevòelùun /kɨɦɥɘɦluːɴɦ/ - to die, noun-focus

Remember that Antarctican only permits voiced obstruents, prestopped nasals, and fricatives other than /s/, before vowels with modal voice. So if this vowel phonation change would produce such a forbidden sequence, then the consonant changes e.g.

hlõ /ɬɔ/ - to perform, root

lào /lɜɦ/ - to perform, noun-focus

These changes do not affect phonation spreading though, as we can see from:

madoze /madoze/ - to give birth, intransitive, root

`màotùsòe /mɜɦtuɦsɘɦ/ - to give birth, intransitive, noun-focus

nyiibe /ɲiːbe/ - to snow, root

`nyùeypòe /ɲɨipɘɦ/ - to snow, noun-focus

san-gize /saɴgize/ - to bleed, root

sàonkùesòe /sɜɴɦkɨɦsɜɦ/ - to bleed, noun-focus

When a consonant such as a voiceless obstruent or prestopped nasal blocks the phonation spreading, if the vowel preceding it is /ɨ/ or /ɘ/ with modal voice (or a diphthong beginning with one), then fronts to /i/ or /e/ respectively e.g.

yuentorõ /jɨɴtoʁɔ/ - to introduce oneself, root

yintùrào /jiɴtuɦʁɜɦ/ - to introduce oneself, noun-focus

imuepu /ʔimɨpu/ - to sit down, root

imipù /ʔimipuɦ/ - to sit down, noun-focus

nuetoze /nitoze/ - to be fed on, root

nitùsòe /nituɦsɘɦ/ - to be fed on, noun-focus

poensaa /pɘɴsaː/ - to be lost in deep thought, root

pensàao /peɴsɜːɦ/ - to be lost in deep thought, noun-focus

If the vowel is /ɛ/, or a diphthong starting with /ɛ/, before the blocking consonant, then it lowers to /a/ e.g.

'kiraeypi /kiʁɛipi/ - to become scraped, root

'kiraypùe /kiʁaipɨɦ/ - to become scraped, noun-focus

Final Syllable Replacement

In addition to this, some verbs lose their final syllable, which is replaced with –zi e.g.

doleegi /doleːgi/ - to drag, intransitive, root

tùlòoezi /tuɦlɘːɦzi/ – to drag, intransitive, noun-focus (-gùe has been replaced with -zi).

bilidli /bilidɮi/ - to make it across, root

pùelùezi /pɨɦlɨɦzi/ - to make it across, noun-focus

This process happens under well defined conditions. Both of the last two syllables of the verb root must have modal voice. Also the final vowel must be a short /i/ and not followed by a nasal vowel. The consonant immediately before this must be a voiced obstruent. And, in the proto-language, the verb root must have had pitch-accent on any syllable other than the final one.

Restrictive / Non-Restrictive Modifiers

When verbs / adjectives are used as modifiers, the verb-focus form is used when the modifier is non restrictive ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictiveness ), and the noun-focus form is used when the modifier is restrictive e.g. from the work teyláae /teilɛʔː/ - shirt, we can say:

teyláae `ròedla /teilɛːʔ ʁɘɦdɮa/ – a red shirt (non-restrictive)

teyláae `ròedù /teilɛːʔ ʁɘɦduɦ/ – the red shirt (restrictive)

Verbalisation

Antarctican has a very productive process for to convert a noun N into an intransitive verb root meaning “to become N” / “to be N / to do what N does”. How this is done depends on the voicing of the last vowel of the absolutive form of the noun

Last Vowel of Abs. Form has Modal Voice

In this case, the verb root is identical to the absolutive form e.g.

zive /ziɥe/ - boat, absolutive

zive /ziɥe/ - to be a boat, verb root

buraza /buʁaza/ - brother, absolutive

buraza /buʁaza/ - to be a brother, verb root

yuenpiluy - /jɨɴpilui/ - employee, absolutive

yuenpiluy - /jɨɴpilui/ - employee, verb root

Other Cases

However, if the final vowel of the absolutive form has tense or breathy voice, the verb stem is formed from the ergative form of the noun, minus any final –n e.g.

ùylòen /ʔuiɦlɜɴɦ/ - island, absolutive

oylendun /ʔoileɴdun/ - island, ergative

oylendu /ʔoileɴdu/ - to be an island, verb root

péy /peiʔ/ - book, absolutive

péykin /peiʔkiɴ/ - book, ergative

péyki /peiʔki/ - to be a book, verb root

támá /taʔmaʔ/ - victim of a scam / swindle, absolutive

damaesin /damɛsiɴ/ - victim of a scam / swindle, ergative

damaesi /damɛsi/ - to be a victim of a scam / swindle, verb root

màao /mɜɦː/ - betel nut, absolutive

pmaagin /pmaːgiɴ/ - betel nut, ergative

pmaagi /pmaːgi/ - to be a betel nut, verb stem

`pùelùe /pɨɦlɨɦ/ - bridge, absolutive

bilidlin /bilidɮiɴ/ - bridge, ergative

bilidli /bilidɮi/ - to be bridge / to make it across, verb stem

`pàoy /pɜiɦ/ - baby, absolutive

baybyin /baibʲiɴ/ - baby, ergative

baybyi /baibʲi/ - to be a baby, verb stem

pàoy /pɜiɦ/ - page, absolutive

paydlin /paidɮiɴ/ - page, ergative

paydli /paidɮi/ - to be a page, verb stem

Transitivity

Whether a verb is transitive or intransitive Transitivity^[*] is very important in Antarctican syntax. Unlike English, where a verb such as "drag" can either be used transitively (as in the sentence "He was dragging his pants along the ground"), or intransitively (as in the sentence "His pants were dragging along the ground"), Antarctican uses distinct verb roots for each case e.g.

doleeju /doleːɟu/ - to drag, intransitive, verb-focus (as in "his pants were dragging along the ground")

dleeju /dɮeːɟu/ - to drag, transitive, verb-focus (as in "he was dragging his pants along the ground")

`tùlòoezi /tuɦlɘɦːzi/ – to drag, intransitive, noun-focus

`tlòoezi /tɬɘɦːzi/– to drag, transitive, noun-focus

Very commonly, transitive roots are formed from intransitive roots by deletion of the first vowel and the second consonant. And if, out of the first and second consonants, one was soft and the other hard, the first consonant is changed to agree in hardness / softness with the second (deleted) consonant e.g.

doleegi /doleːgi/ - to drag, intransitive, root

dleegi /dɮeːgi/ - to drag, intransitive, root

shinari /çinaʁi/ - to twist, intransitive, root

hari /χaʁi/ - to twist, transitive, root

The transitive roots are then inflected for focus e.g.

shinari /çinaʁi/ - to twist, intransitive, root

shinali /çinali/ - to twist, intransitive, verb-focus

yùenàorùe /jɨɦnɜɦʁɨɦ/ - to twist, intransitive, noun-focus

hari /χaʁi/ - to twist, transitive, root

hali /χali/ - to twist, transitive, verb-focus

ràorùe /ʁɜɦʁɨɦ/ - to twist, transitive, noun-focus

Voice and Object Marking

Grammatical voice is very important in Antarctican. It is conflated with pronominal object marking, both only affecting transitive verbs and usually using infixes that come immediately after the first consonant of the verb base. As with elsewhere in the language, these are not differentiated for number, although there is an inclusive and exclusive “us”.

Infixation

This is the default way of marking pronominal objects and grammatical voice. In each case there are two forms of the infix, one that contains a hard consonant that is used with verbs beginning with hard consonants, and another that contains a soft consonant that is used with verbs beginning with soft consonants. Note that there is no infix to mark 3rd person objects. Instead the antipassive voice is used. The infixes are listed below in pairs, with the hard version coming first and then the soft version.

Infixes for Voice and Object Pronouns
	Hard Form	Soft Form
1PS Exclusive	em	imy
1PS Inclusive	as	ehl
2PS	õs	õhl
who	ar	el
what	ab	eby
Reflexive	er	il
Perfective Antipassive	ut / ów(tq)s (see below)	atl
Imperfective Antipassive	am	emy
Superordinate	át(q)	áet(q)l

These come immediately after the first consonant of the verb base e.g.

damaehlu /damɛɬu/ - to scam / swindle, verb-focus

dõsamaehlu /dɔsamɛɬu/ - to scam / swindle you, verb-focus

damaehlu /damɛɬu/ - to scam, verb-focus

demamaehlu /demɛɬu/ - to scam me / us (not including you), verb-focus

All of the usual rules about phonation spreading apply e.g.

pyùu /pʲuːɦ/ - to purify, noun-focus

pyùemyùu /pʲɨɦmpʲuːɦ/ - to purify me / us (not including you, noun-focus

pyòelùu /pʲɘɦluːɦ/ - to purify who, noun-focus

The infixes with non-back vowels and voiceless consonants also undergo vowel mutation if the following vowel has modal voice. This is the exact same as has been described before for noun and verb prefixes e.g.

damaehlu /damɛɬu/ - to scam / swindle, verb-focus

daesamaehlu /dɛsamɛɬu/ - to scam / swindle us (including you), verb-focus

deramaehlu /deʁamɛɬu/ - to scam / swindle oneself, verb-focus

If the first vowel of the verb base has breathy or tense voice, and the infix inserted would contain /ɬ/ (which can only occur before modal voice vowels), then it becomes /l/ and /tɬ/ respectively. However it still blocks the spread of the voicing e.g.

pyùu /pʲuːɦ/ - to purify, noun-focus

pyolùu /pʲɔluːɦ/ - to purify you, noun-focus

pyelùu /pʲeluːɦ/ - to purify ourselves (including you), noun-focus

The last example this is distinct from pyòelùu /pʲɘɦluːɦ/ - to purify who, noun-focus, which has breathy voice spreading onto the infix.

Note that, for the purposes of the syntax, using any of these infixes turns a transitive verb into an intransitive verb. This means that the subject of such an infixed verb can no longer take ergative case e.g.

yuenpiluy - /jɨɴpilui/ - employee, absolutive
yuenpiloy /jɨɴpiloi/ - employee, ergative
sõwdla - /sɔudɮ/ - soldier, absolutive
damasùe - /damas#616;ɦ/ - to scam / swindle, noun-focus

yuenpiloy	damasùe	sõwdla
jɨɴpiloi	damas#616;ɦ	sɨudɮ

An employee scammed a soldier

Above, we can see that the word for "employee" is in the ergative case, and must come before the verb. However, when the object is a pronoun, the word for "employee" must take the absolutive case e.g.

yuenpiluy	daesamasùe
jɨɴpilui	dɛsamas#616;ɦ
employee-ABS	<1PS.INC.OBJ>scam-NFCS

An employee scammed us (including you)

Antarctican also permits the subjects of intransitive verbs to come after the verb, so the following sentence is also grammatical (and perhaps more common):

daesamasùe	yuenpiluy
dɛsamas#616;ɦ	jɨɴpilui
<1PS.INC.OBJ>scam-NFCS	employee-ABS

An employee scammed us (including you)

Antipassive Voice

Antarctican has extremely productive antipassivisation (Antipassive_voice^[*]). There are two infixes, which depend on whether the verb has perfective or imperfective aspect.

Perfective Antipassive

This is used for when the action described by the verb is not viewed as having any internal structure (Perfective_aspect^[*]). It can be used for past, present or future actions e.g.

duetamasùe	yuenpiluy
dɨtamas#616;ɦ	jɨɴpilui
<PFV.AP>scam-NFCS	employee-ABS

An employee scammed / will scam (someone who does not need to be mentioned here).

However, remember that alveolar stops (e.g. /t/) can never occur before /i/ and /ʎ/ (with any phonation), nor before tense voice /eʔ/ and /ɘʔ/, nor before diphthongs starting with these. If a verb begins with a hard consonant followed by one of these vowels, a different infix is used, normally -óws- e.g.

inyeli-aa /ʔiɲeliʔaː/ - to pierce, verb-focus

ówsinyeli-aa /ʔouʔsiɲeliʔaː/ - to pierce, verb-focus, perfective antipassive

kiveliqewn /kiɥeliʔeuɴ/ - to die, verb-focus

kówsiveli-ewn /kouʔsiɥeliʔeuɴ/ - to die, verb-focus, perfective antipassive

siséychu /siseiʔcu/ - to stab, verb focus

sówsiséychu /souʔsiseiʔcu/ - to stab, verb focus, perfective antipassive

However, if the first vowel of the verb root had tense voice, the ejective -tqs- is used instead e.g.

'kátla /kaʔtɬa/ - to make someone's acquaintance, verb focus

'kówtqsátla /kouʔtsʼaʔtɬa/ - to make someone's acquaintance, verb-focus, perfective antipassive

éypyi-eey /ʔeiʔpʲiʔeːi/ - to spit out, verb-focus

ówtqséypyi-eey /ʔouʔtsʼeiʔpʲiʔeːi/ - to spit out, verb-focus, perfective antipassive

Imperfective Antipassive

This is used for ongoing, habitual and repeated action (Imperfective_aspect^[*]).

damamasùe	yuenpiluy
damamas#616;ɦ	jɨɴpilui
<IMPV.AP>scam-NFCS	employee-ABS

An employee is / was / will be scamming (someone who does not need to be mentioned here).

Superordinate Voice

Like the antipassive, this also reduces a transitive verb's valency (the number of arguments it has, see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valency_(linguistics)) by one, and requires that its subject take the absolutive case. However, it requires some other verb to come afterwards to be subordinate to it e.g.

wonnye /woɴɲe/ - to want (something), verb-focus
wátonnye /waʔtoɴɲe/ - to want (to do something / something to happen), verb-focus

chi-iin /ciʔiːɴ/ - to fear (something), verb-focus
cháetli-iin /cɛtɬiʔiːɴ/ - to fear (that something will happen), verb-focus

So using the nouns below:

yuenpiluy - /jɨɴpilui/ - employee, absolutive
yuenpiloy /jɨɴpiloi/ - employee, ergative
sõwdla - /sɔudɮ/ - soldier, absolutive
sõwdlan - /sɔudɮɴ/ - soldier, ergative
nayba /naiba/ - neighbour, absolutive
nayban /naibaɴ/ - neighbour, ergative
tõn /tɔɴ/ - change (as in coins, money), absolutive
tãn /tɒɴ/ - change, ergative

We can say:

yuenpiloy	wonnye	tõn
jɨɴpiloi	woɴɲe	tɔɴ
employee-ERG	want-VFCS	change-ABS

An employee wants change.

yuenpiluy	'wátonnye	sõwdla	damasùe
jɨɴpilui	waʔtoɴɲe	sɔudɮa	damasɨɦ
employee-ABS	<SPR>want-VFCS	soldier-ABS	scam-NFCS

An employee wants to scam a soldier.

Note that in the second sentence, the case for the word "employee" has changed from ergative to absolutive. And since Antarctican allows nouns in the absolutive case to also come after the verb, the following sentences would also be grammatical, and all mean roughly the same thing:

wátonnye yuenpiloy sowdla damasùe

yuenpiloy wátonnye damasùe sõwdla

wátonnye yuenpiloy damasùe sõwdla

Similarly, using the verb meaning "to fear", we can say:

yuenpiloy	chi-iin	sõwdla
jɨɴpiloi	ciʔiːɴ	sɔudɮa
employee-ERG	fear-VFCS	soldier-ABS

The employee fears the soldier

yuenpiloy	'cháetli-iin	sõwdla	damasùe
jɨɴpiloi	cɛtɬiʔiːɴ	sɔudɮa	damasɨɦ
employee-ERG	<SPR>fear-VFCS	soldier-ABS	scam-NFCS

The employee fears he will scam / has scammed the soldier.

The words in this sentence can be ordered in the same fashion as before.

yuenpiloy	'cháetliqiin	sõwdlan	damasùe
jɨɴpiloi	cɛtɬiʔiːɴ	sɔudɮaɴ	damasɨɦ
employee-ERG	<SPR>fear-VFCS	soldier-ERG	scam-NFCS

The employee fears the soldier will scam / has scammed him.

Here, while the word for "employee" can come after the verb meaning "to fear", the word for "soldier", cannot, since it takes the ergative case (as it is the subject of the transitive verb damasù meaning "to scam").

Vowel Replacement

All Antarctican verbs use infixation to mark 1st person exclusive objects, whom, what (as a direct object), reflexive objects, the imperfective antipassive, and the superordinate voice. However, there is a subset of verbs that use vowel replacement to mark 1st person inclusive objects, 2nd person objects, and the perfective antipassive.

These are verbs where either a) the first vowel is short, modally voiced /i/, the second vowel has breathy voice, and there is no nasal intervening (plain nasals, prestopped nasals, and the placeless nasal /ɴ/ all count) or b) the first vowel is short, modally voiced /ʎ/, which is immediately followed by a voiceless obstruent, without /ɴ/ intervening or c) the first vowel is short, modally voiced /ʎ/, which is immediately followed by an approximant and then a vowel with breathy voice, without /ɴ/ intervening

The vowel replacements depend on whether the verb begins with a hard or soft consonant, but are regular (and have tense voice) and given in the table below:

Vowel Replacements for Voice and Object Pronouns
	Hard Form	Soft Form
1PS Inclusive	á	áe
2PS	áo	áo
Perfective Antipassive	N/A use the -éys- infix instead	ów

For example:

siséychu /siseiʔcu/ - to stab, verb focus

sáséychu /saʔseiʔcu/ - to stab us (including you), verb focus

sáoséychu /sɜʔseiʔcu/ - to stab you, verb focus

Note that the perfective antipassive form is created using the infix -éys- i.e. séysiséychu /seiʔsiseiʔcu/ - to stab, verb focus, perfective antipassive. It is only with verbs starting with soft consonants that vowel replacement is used.

Also note that, for the other persons and voices, infixation is used e.g.

semiséychu /semiseiʔcu/ - to stab me / us (not including you), verb focus

seriséychu /seʁiseiʔcu/ - to stab oneself, verb focus

sariséychu /saʁiseiʔcu/ - to stab who, verb focus

sabiséychu /sabiseiʔcu/ - to stab what, verb focus

samiséychu /samiseiʔcu/ - to stab, verb focus, imperfective antipassive

More examples:

kiràomùe /kiʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite, verb focus

kimyiràomùe /kimʲiʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite me / us (not including you), verb focus

'káràomùe /kaʔʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite us (including you), verb focus

'káoràomùe /kɜʔʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite you, verb focus

keriràomùe /keʁiʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite oneself, verb focus

kariràomùe /kaʁiʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite who, verb focus

kabiràomùe /kabiʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite what, verb focus

'kówràomùe /kouʔʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite, verb focus, perfective antipassive

kamiràomùe /kamiʁɜɦmɨɦ/ - to bite, verb focus, imperfective antipassive

shuetinju /çɨtiɴɟu/ - to count, verb focus

shimyuetinju /çimʲɨtiɴɟu/ - to count me / us (not including you), verb focus

yáetinju /jɛʔtiɴɟu/ - to count us (including you), verb focus

yáotinju /jɜʔtiɴɟu/ - to count you, verb focus

shiluetinju /çilɨtiɴɟu/ - to count oneself, verb focus

sheluetinju /çelɨtiɴɟu/ - to count who, verb focus

shebyuetinju /çebʲɨtiɴɟu/ - to count what, verb focus

yówtinju /jouʔtiɴɟu/ - to count, verb focus, perfective antipassive

shemyuetinju /çemʲɨtiɴɟu/ - to count, verb focus, imperfective antipassive

(The /ç/ is lenited to /j/ when the vowel is replaced, since Antarctican does not like words starting with fricatives other than /s/ if the next vowel has tense voice.

Reciprocal Voice

One other voice that needs to be mentioned here is the reciprocal voice. This carries to meaning of "to do to each other / one another". It is formed by reduplicating the first syllable of the verb base e.g.

wonnye /woɴɲe/ - to want, verb focus

wowonnye /wowoɴɲe/ - to want each other, verb focus

darakòe /daʁakɘɦ/ - to cover, noun-focus

dadarakòe /dadaʁakɘɦ/ - to cover each other, noun-focus

shuetinju /çɨtiɴɟu/ - to count, verb focus

shueshuetinju /çɨçɨtiɴɟu/ - to count each other, verb focus

However, the reduplicated syllable cannot contain a long vowel, a diphthong, or the placeless nasal /ɴ/. If the first syllable of the verb base contains any of these, then it is truncated e.g.

ziitlàoji /ziːtɬɜɦɟi/ - to know (a person), verb-focus

ziziitlàoji /ziziːtɬɜɦɟi/ - to know each other, verb-focus

yinwùumùe /jiɴwuːɦmɨ/ - to turn in, noun-focus

yiyinwùumùe /jijiɴwuːɦmɨ/ - to turn each other in, noun-focus

kaaeykyu /kɛːi&k#690;u/ - to sell, verb-focus

kaekaaeykyu /kɛkɛːikʲu/ - to sell each other, verb-focus

The reduplicated syllable has whatever floating phonation is at the start of the word e.g.

'kátla /kaʔtɬa/ - to make someone's acquaintance, verb focus

'kákátla /kaʔkaʔtɬa/ - to make each other's acquaintance, verb focus

This may not be the same phonation as is on the first syllable of the word e.g.

'kamyu /kamʲu/ - to inflate (someone's ego), verb-focus

'kákamyu /kaʔkamʲu/ - to inflate each other('s ego), verb-focus

'kaypùe /kaipɨɦ/ - to scrape, noun-focus

'kákaypùe /kaʔkaipɨɦ/ - to scrape each other, noun-focus

Any changes to vowel quality that happen because of vowel phonation changes, also happen here e.g.

'puytlù /puitɬuɦ/ - to pick a fight, noun-focus

'póyputlu /poiʔpuitɬuɦ/ - to pick a fight with each other, noun-focus

As well as all the other regular vowel quality changes that happen when a noun takes a prefix e.g.

hali /χali/ - to twist, transitive, verb-focus

haehali /χɛχali/ - to twist, transitive, verb-focus

As with reciprocal possession, a few verbs have irregular forms in the reciprocal voice e.g.

ràorùe /ʁɜɦʁɨɦ/ - to twist, transitive, noun-focus

haràorùe /χaʁɜɦʁɨɦ/ - to twist each other, transitive, noun-focus

Generally, if a noun has an irregular reciprocal possessive form, then any verbs derived from it will also have irregular reciprocal voice forms e.g.

wùeròen /wɨɦʀɘɴɦ/ - friend, absolutive

fiwùeròen /fiwɨɦʀɘɴɦ/ - friends (of each other), absolutive

wòenzi /wɘɴɦ/ - to befriend, noun-focus

fiwòenzi /fiwɘɴɦ/ - to befriend each other, noun-focus

These irregularities happen for the same reason in reciprocal verbs as they do in reciprocal nouns, namely because there is an underlying initial consonant that changes form to something else because it is before a vowel with breathy voice or tense voice (which prohibit some consonants from coming before it). However, if there is modal floating phonation, then the underlying forms can resurface in the reduplication.

Pronominal Subject Prefixes

Instead of using pronouns to indicate subject, Antarctican uses prefixes on verbs. Which prefix is used depends on the tense of the verb (normally unmarked). They do not inflect for number. They are listed in the table below:

	Past	Present	Future
1PS Exclusive	uy	omyi	ow
1PS Inclusive	chi	we	wi
2PS	nyin	ya	yu
3PS	day	de	daw
Who / What	wu	hew	ri

Note that, for habitual actions in the present, the past tense is used. Also the present tense is used for imminent actions in the future (where English might use "about to").

Emphatic Forms

All of the pronomnial affixes have emphatic forms that are generated by lengthening the vowel e.g.

chisàon-gùe /cisɜɦɴgɨɦ/ you bleed, verb-focus

chiisàon-gùe /ciːsɜɦɴgɨɦ/ you (emphatic) bleed, verb-focus

However, the emphatic forms cannot be used with noun-focus forms, so while chisàonkùesòe /cisɜɴɦkɨɦsɜɦ/ - to bleed, noun-focus is grammatical, chiisàonkùesòe /ciːsɜɴɦkɨɦsɜɦ/ would not be.

This lengthening can also be used on infixes marking objects e.g.

pyõhli-uu /pʲɔɬiʔuː/ - purify you, verb focus

pyõohli-uu /pʲɔːɬiʔuː/ - purify you (emphatic), verb focus

If an object would be formed by vowel replacement (instead of an infix), then the emphatic form is created by lengthening the first vowel e.g.

siséychu /siseiʔcu/ - to stab, verb focus

sáoséychu /sɜʔseiʔcu/ - to stab you, verb focus

sáaoséychu /sɜːʔseiʔcu/ - to stab you (emphatic), verb focus

Syntax

Basic Word Order

Antarctican is a syntactically ergative (Ergative absolutive_language^[*]), topic-prominent language (Topic-prominent_language^[*]). The basic word order is (Topic) (Ergative Noun) Verb (Absolutive Noun). So in intransitive sentences the word order is either V-S or S-V (if the subject is topicalised) e.g.

sõwdla	kiveli-ewn
sɔudɮa	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
soldier.ABS	die.VFCS

The soldier died.

kiveli-ewn	sõwdla
kiɥeliʔeuɴ	sɔudɮa
die.VFCS	soldier.ABS

A soldier died.

In transitive sentences, the possible word orders are S-V-O and O-S-V e.g.

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

A soldier is hunting frogs.

If we topicalise the object, the sentence becomes:

wùerù	sõwdlan	amelaykùe
wɨɦʁuɦ	sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ
frog.ABS	soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS

The frogs are being hunted by a soldier.

In SVO sentences, it is also possible to topicalise the subject. This does not create any "visible" effect in the word order, however it does mean that the subject takes the absolutive case e.g.

sõwdla	amelaykùe	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier.ABS	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

The soldier is hunting frogs.

Note that sentence can only have one topic, so if the object of a transitive sentence is topicalised, then the subject cannot be (and must therefore stay in the ergative case). Hence utterances like "wùeru sowdla amelaykùe" are ungrammatical.

Topicalisation and Possession

Antarctican has two 3rd person possessive prefixes that nouns can take, wa- and si-. They are not interchangable. When the possessor is the noun that has been taken up as the topic, wa- is used. If not, si- is used instead. Compare the following two sentences:

sõwdla	amelaeychu	wawùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelɛicu	wawɨɦʁuɦ
soldier.ABS	hunt.NFCS	TPCPOSS-frog.ABS

The soldier is hunting his frogs (i.e. the ones that the soldier owns).

sõwdla	amelaeychu	siwùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelɛicu	siwɨɦʁuɦ
soldier.ABS	hunt.NFCS	3POSS-frog.ABS

The soldier is hunting his / her frogs (that someone else other than the soldier owns).

In both cases above, the soldier has been taken up as the topic, indicated by putting it immediately before a transitive verb (indicating that it is the subject of that verb), while keeping it in the absolutive case. Hence, whenever wa- is used, it indicates something belonging to the topic (i.e. the soldier). However, when si- is used, it indicates something belonging to someone or something other than the topic.

Now look at sentences where the soldier has not been topicalised (indicated by keeping it in the ergative case):

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wawùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wawɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	TPCPOSS-frog.ABS

A soldier is hunting his / her frogs (not belonging to the soldier, but to whoever / whatever has been taken up as a topic previously).

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	siwùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	siwɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	3POSS-frog.ABS

A soldier is hunting his / her frogs (This sentence is ambiguous, but most likely the frogs belong to the soldier, and definitely not to whoever / whatever has been taken up as a topic previously).

Similar differences in meaning apply in OVS sentences (i.e. where the object of a transitive verb has been topicalised) e.g.

sáaeynátqóey	waesõwdlan	amelaeychu
sɛːiʔnaʔtʼɘiʔ	wɛsɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelɛicu
general.ABS	TPCPOSS-soldier-ERG	hunt.VFCS

The general is being hunted by his (own) soldiers.

sáaeynátqóey	suesõwdlan	amelaeychu
sɛːiʔnaʔtʼɘiʔ	sɨsɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelɛicu
general.ABS	3POSS-soldier-ERG	hunt.VFCS

The general is being hunted by his / her soldiers (not his own).

Implicit Topicalisation

Whenever a noun is the object of a transitive verb or the subject of an intransitive verb, it is, by default, taken up as the topic for any verbs following it e.g.

byaenka	damaehlu	sõwdla	wáetow	kaen-guchi	wabiraza
bʲɛɴka	damɛɬu	sɔudɮa	wɛʔtou	kɛɴguci	wabiʁaza
banker.ABS	swindle.VFCS	soldier.ABS	occur during.NFCS	be a prisoner.VFCS	TPCPOSS-brother

The banker swindled the soldier while his brother was in prison (the soldier's brother).

While the phrase "his brother" in English translation is ambiguous (since both the banker and the soldier can be male), in Antarctican is not. It can only mean "the soldier's brother" because, by being the object of a transitive verb, the soldier has been implicitly taken up as the topic for the next utterance, which uses the topic possessive prefix wa-. However, if we replace wa- with si- the non-topicalised possessive prefix, then the meaning changes:

byaenka	damaehlu	sõwdla	wáetow	kaen-guchi	sibiraza
bʲɛɴka	damɛɬu	sɔudɮa	wɛʔtou	kɛɴguci	sibiʁaza
banker.ABS	swindle.VFCS	soldier.ABS	occur during.NFCS	be a prisoner.VFCS	3POSS-brother

The banker swindled the soldier while his brother was in prison.

In this case, it is not the soldier's brother that is in prison (most likely the banker's brother).

Serial Verbs

Antarctican often uses serial verb constructions.

Intransitive Verbs

If a verb is intransitive, it is simple to serialise it by placing another verb after it e.g.

sõwdla	byowchi-i	kiveli-ewn
sɔudɮa	bʲouciʔi	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
soldier.ABS	sick.VFCS	die.VFCS

The soldier got sick and died.

The subject comes either immediately before the first verb (as above), or immediately after it e.g.

byowchi-i	sõwdla	kiveli-ewn
bʲouciʔi	sɔudɮa	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
sick.VFCS	soldier.ABS	die.VFCS

The soldier got sick and died.

Of course, it is perfectly possible to string together three or more verbs e.g.

sõwdla	byowchi-i	sàon-gùe	kiveli-ewn
sɔudɮa	bʲouciʔi	sɜɦɴgɨɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
soldier.ABS	sick.VFCS	bleed.VFCS	die.VFCS

The soldier got sick, bled, and died.

Transitive Verbs

It is also perfectly possible to use transitive verbs in serial verb constructions, subject to the constraint that all of the verbs share the same noun absolutive argument (i.e. object for transitive verbs, subject for intransitive verbs). Take the following sentence:

sõwdlan	kiràomùesòe	wùerù	kiveli-ewn
sɔudɮaɴ	kiʁɜɦmɨɦsɘɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
soldier-ERG	bite.NFCS	frog.ABS	die.VFCS

A soldier bit a frog and it died.

This sentence can only ever mean that it was the frog that died. Topicalising the subject of the transitive verb (by putting it into the absolutive case) makes no difference to the meaning:

sõwdla	kiràomùesòe	wùerù	kiveli-ewn
sɔudɮa	kiʁɜɦmɨɦsɘɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
soldier.ABS	bite.NFCS	frog.ABS	die.VFCS

The soldier bit a frog and it died.

Topicalising the object of the verb by putting it at the front of the sentence makes no difference either:

wùerù	sõwdlan	kiràomùesòe	kiveli-ewn
wɨɦʁuɦ	sɔudɮaɴ	kiʁɜɦmɨɦsɘɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
frog.ABS	soldier-ERG	bite.NFCS	die.VFCS

The frog was bitten by a soldier and (it) died.

Antipassivisation

To say things like "The soldier bit a frog and died" (as in it was the soldier that died), then the verb meaning "to bite" must be converted into an intransitive verb by putting it in the antipassive voice e.g.

sõwdla	'kówràomùe	kiveli-ewn
sɔudɮa	kouʔʁɜɦmɨɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
soldier.ABS	<PFV.AP>bite.VFCS	die.VFCS

The soldier bit it and died.

Patient Re-introduction

If we want to re-introduce the frog into the sentence, it needs to come after both the antipassivised verb and the subject, take the ergative case, and be followed by the oblique marker nyùe e.g.

'kówràomùe	sõwdla	wùerùgin	`nyùe	kiveli-ewn
kouʔʁɜɦmɨɦ	sɔudɮa	wɨɦʁuɦgiɴ	ɲɨɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
<PFV.AP>bite.NFCS	soldier.ABS	frog-ERG	OBL	die.VFCS

A soldier bit a frog and died.

The (now absolutive) argument of the verb can be topicalised by putting it at the front of the sentence e.g.

sõwdla	'kówràomùesòe	wùerùgin	`nyùe	kiveli-ewn
sɔudɮa	kouʔʁɜɦmɨɦsɘɦ	wɨɦʁuɦgiɴ	ɲɨɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
soldier.ABS	<PFV.AP>bite.VFCS	frog-ERG	OBL	die.VFCS

The soldier bit a frog and died.

However, the noun that was re-introduced with `nyùe cannot be topicalised, so the following sentence is ungrammatical:

wùerùgin	`nyùe	sõwdla	'kówràomùesòe	kiveli-ewn
wɨɦʁuɦgiɴ	ɲɨɦ	sɔudɮa	kouʔʁɜɦmɨɦsɘɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
frog-ERG	OBL	soldier.ABS	<PFV.AP>bite.VFCS	die.VFCS

The soldier bit a frog and died. (ungrammatical)

Subject Pronominal Affixes

Pronouns must be marked by prefixes on every single verb that they are the subject of in a serial verb construction e.g.

wuebyowchi-i	wuekiveli-ewn
wɨbʲouciʔi	wɨkiɥeliʔeuɴ
1PS.INC.SUBJ.FUT-sick.VFCS	1PS.INC.SUBJ.FUT-die.VFCS

We (including you) will get sick and die.

With transitive verbs, there is no need for antipassivisation if the subject is a pronoun e.g.

wuekiràomùe	wùerù	wuekiveli-ewn
wɨkiʁɜɦmɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	wɨkiɥeliʔeuɴ
1PS.INC.SUBJ.FUT- bite.VFCS	frog.ABS	1PS.INC.SUBJ.FUT-die.VFCS

We (including you) will bite a frog and die.

Leaving the pronominal prefix off a verb in a serial verb construction means that that pronoun is no longer the subject of that verb. This changes the meaning entirely e.g.

wuekiràomùe	wùerù	kiveli-ewn
wɨkiʁɜɦmɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
1PS.INC.SUBJ.FUT- bite.VFCS	frog.ABS	1PS.INC.SUBJ.FUT-die.VFCS

We (including you) will bite a frog and it will die.

Note that, if a transitive verb takes a subject pronominal affix, then it can never take antipassive voice.

Relative Clauses

These follow the noun they modify. There are no relative pronouns or relativising particles. However, the accessibility hierarchy is very important in Antarctican (Relative_clause#Accessibility_hierarchy^[*]). Only absolutive arguments (objects of transitive verbs and subjects of intransitive verbs) can be relativised. So the following two phrases are grammatical:

wùerù	kiveli-ewn
wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ
frog.ABS	die.VFCS

The frog, which died.

wùerù	sõwdlan	amelaykùe
wɨɦʁuɦ	sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ
frog.ABS	soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS

The frogs the soldier hunted.

However, to say "the soldier that hunted frogs", the verb must be put into the antipassive voice e.g.

sõwdla	utamelaykùe	wùerù	`nyùe
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔutamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	ɲɨɦ
soldier.ABS	<PFV.AP>hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS	OBL

The soldier that hunted frogs.

Once a transitive verb takes the antipassive voice, the oblique argument (i.e. what used to be its object) can be freely left out e.g.

sõwdla	utamelaykùe
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔutamelaikɨɦ
soldier.ABS	<PFV.AP>hunt.NFCS

The soldier that hunted.

Negation

Negation in Antarctican is achieved by using one of two particles, nõ /nɔ/ (known as general negation) and nay /nai/ (known as specific negation).

The Particle nõ /nɔ/ (General Negation)

The normal way to negate a sentence is to put this immediately before the verb e.g.

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

Soldiers are hunting frogs.

sõwdlan	nõ	amelaykùe	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	nɔ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	NEG.GEN	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

Soldiers aren't hunting frogs.

Either the noun-focus form of the verb (as above), or the verb-focus form can be used e.g.

sõwdlan	nõ	amelaeychu	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	nɔ	ʔamelɛicu	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	NEG.GEN	hunt.VFCS	frog.ABS

Soldiers aren't hunting frogs.

The default position for the particle is immediately before the verb, however it can be moved to in front of a noun as well. Doing so puts emphasis on negating that noun e.g.

nõ	sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù
nɔ	sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
NEG.GEN	soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

Soldiers aren't hunting frogs (but someone else is).

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	nõ	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	nɔ	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	NEG.GEN	frog.ABS

Soldiers aren't hunting frogs (but they are hunting something else).

Note that in both of the above cases, the noun-focus form is used. Using the verb focus form "amelaykùe" here would be ungrammatical.

Also note that, if a noun is topicalised, then the particle cannot occur before it. So the following sentence is ungrammatical:

nõ	sõwdla	amelaykùe	wùerù
nɔ	sɔudɮa	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
NEG.GEN	soldier.ABS	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

The Particle nay /nai/ (Specific Negation)

This is always placed after a verb, which must be in the verb-focus form. It is used for negation with emphasis on the verb e.g.

sõwdla	amelaeychu	nay	wùerù
sɔudɮa	ʔamelɛicu	nai	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier.ABS	hunt.VFCS	NEG.SPFC	frog.ABS

Soldiers aren't hunting frogs (but they are doing something else to them).

It is also used for negating a verb in a relative clause e.g.

wùerù	kiveli-ewn	`ròedla
wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ	ʁɘɦdɮa
frog.ABS	die.VFCS	red.VFCS

The frog, which died, was red.

wùerù	kiveli-ewn	nay	`ròedla
wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ	nai	ʁɘɦdɮa
frog.ABS	die.VFCS	NEG.SPFC	red.VFCS

The frog, which didn't die, was red.

And since Antarctican makes no distinction between adjectives and verbs, and hence no distinction between an attributive adjective (one describing a noun), and a verb in a relative clause, this particle is also used to negate adjectives when they are describing nouns e.g.

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù	`ròedla
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	ʁɘɦdɮa
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS	red.VFCS

Soldiers are hunting red frogs.

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù	`ròedla	nay
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	ʁɘɦdɮa	nai
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS	red.VFCS	NEG.SPFC

Soldiers aren't hunting red frogs (maybe they're hunting another colour).

Polar Questions

A Yes/No question is formed by using either the particle du /du/, or /ka/ /ka/. These are known as the general and specific interrogatives respectively, and the usage of them very closely parallels the /no/ and /nai/ negative particles.

The Particle du (General Interrogative)

The normal way to ask a polar question is to put this immediately before the verb e.g.

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

Soldiers are hunting frogs.

sõwdlan	du	amelaykùe	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	du	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	INT.GEN	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

Are soldiers hunting frogs?

Either the noun-focus form of the verb (as above), or the verb-focus form can be used e.g.

sõwdlan	du	amelaeychu	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	du	ʔamelɛicu	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	INT.GEN	hunt.VFCS	frog.ABS

Are soldiers hunting frogs?

The default position for the particle is immediately before the verb, however it can be moved to in front of a noun as well. Doing so puts emphasis on questioning that noun;s involvement in the event being described, rather than whether or not the event actually happened e.g.

du	sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù
du	sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
INT.GEN	soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

Are soldiers hunting frogs (or is it someone else)?

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	du	wùerù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	du	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	INT.GEN	frog.ABS

Are soldiers hunting frogs (or something else)?

Note that in both of the above cases, the noun-focus form is used. Using the verb focus form "amelaykùe" here would be ungrammatical.

Also note that, if a noun is topicalised, then the particle cannot occur before it. So the following sentence is ungrammatical:

du	sõwdla	amelaykùe	wùerù
du	sɔudɮa	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ
INT.GEN	soldier.ABS	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS

The Particle ka (Specific Interrogative)

This is always placed after a verb, which must be in the verb-focus form. It is used when the noun's involvement in the event is not in question, rather the question is about what the action was e.g.

sõwdla	amelaeychu	ka	wùerù
sɔudɮa	ʔamelɛicu	ka	wɨɦʁuɦ
soldier.ABS	hunt.VFCS	INT.SPFC	frog.ABS

Are soldiers hunting frogs (or doing something else to them)?

It is also used for questioning a verb in a relative clause e.g.

wùerù	kiveli-ewn	`ròedla
wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ	ʁɘɦdɮa
frog.ABS	die.VFCS	red.VFCS

The frog, which died, was red.

wùerù	kiveli-ewn	ka	`ròedla
wɨɦʁuɦ	kiɥeliʔeuɴ	ka	ʁɘɦdɮa
frog.ABS	die.VFCS	INT.SPFC	red.VFCS

Was it the frog that died that was red?

And since Antarctican makes no distinction between adjectives and verbs, and hence no distinction between an attributive adjective (one describing a noun), and a verb in a relative clause, this particle is also used to question adjectives when they are describing nouns e.g.

sõwdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù	`ròedla
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	ʁɘɦdɮa
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS	red.VFCS

Soldiers are hunting red frogs.

sowdlan	amelaykùe	wùerù	`ròedla	ka
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔamelaikɨɦ	wɨɦʁuɦ	ʁɘɦdɮa	ka
soldier-ERG	hunt.NFCS	frog.ABS	red.VFCS	INT.SPFC

Are soldiers hunting red frogs (or another colour)?

Ditransitives

Antarctican differs from English in that it has secundative alignment (Secundative_language^[*]). Take, for example, the following sentence:

sõwdlan	àoy	yini
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔɜiɦ	jini
soldier-ERG	give.NFCS	dog.ABS

A soldier is giving (something to) a dog.

This can only ever mean that the soldier is giving something to a dog, never that the soldier is giving the dog to someone.

A similar situation is found when an object pronominal infix (which makes a verb intransitive for the purposes of case marking on and positioning of the subject) is used on the verb e.g.

asàoy	sõwdla
ʔasɜiɦ	sɔudɮ
<1PS.INC.OBJ>give.NFCS	soldier.ABS

A soldier is giving (something to) us (including you).

If we want to introduce the Theme (whatever is being given), the default construction places it in the ergative case, followed by `wù /wuɦ/ and after the recipient e.g.

sõwdlan	àoy	yini	aaehaan-ga	`wù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔɜiɦ	jini	ʔɛːχaːɴga	wuɦ
soldier-ERG	give.NFCS	dog.ABS	food-ERG	THEME

A soldier is giving food to a dog.

asàoy	sõwdla	aaehaan-ga	`wù
ʔasɜiɦ	sɔudɮ	ʔɛːχaːɴga	wuɦ
<1PS.INC.OBJ>give.NFCS	soldier.ABS	food-ERG	THEME

A soldier is giving us food.

If we want to remove the Recipient from the sentence, then the verb must take the antipassive voice e.g.

àomàoy	sõwdla	aaehaan-ga	`wù
ʔɜmɜiɦ	sɔudɮ	ʔɛːχaːɴga	wuɦ
<IMPV.AP>give.NFCS	soldier.ABS	food-ERG	THEME

A soldier is giving food.

Pronominal Themes

If the Theme is a pronoun, then instead of `wu taking a noun before it, it is prefixed with the same prefixes that mark subject on verbs (with breathy voice spread onto them) e.g.

sõwdlan	àoy	yini	`wòewù
sɔudɮaɴ	ʔɜiɦ	jini	wɘɦwuɦ
soldier-ERG	give.NFCS	dog.ABS	<1PS.INCL.PRES>THEME

A soldier is giving us (including you) to a dog.

If the Recipient is omitted, then the verb takes the antipassive voice as before e.g.

àomàoy	sõwdla	`wòewù
ʔɜmɜiɦ	sɔudɮa	wɘɦwuɦ;
<IMPV.AP>give.NFCS	soldier.ABS	<1PS.INCL.PRES>THEME

A soldier is giving us (to something / someone).

Like the prefixes on verbs, these prefixes inflect for tense e.g.

àomàoy	sõwdla	chùewù
ʔɜmɜiɦ	sɔudɮa	cɨɦwuɦ;
<IMPV.AP>give.NFCS	soldier.ABS	<1PS.INCL.PAST>THEME

A soldier was giving us (to something / someone).

àomàoy	sõwdla	`wùewù
ʔɜmɜiɦ	sɔudɮa	wɨɦwuɦ;
<IMPV.AP>give.NFCS	soldier.ABS	<1PS.INCL.FUT>THEME

A soldier will be giving us (to something / someone).