Nankôre

Nankôre
Nankôre
Pronunciation	[/nan.'ko:re/]
Created by	–
Native to	Nanhoshka Kôya
Native speakers	3,232,430 (2014)
Language family	Nahenic Nankoric Nankôre
Official status
Official language in	Koya Island
Language codes
ISO 639-1	nk
ISO 639-2	nnk

Background

Nankôre, from the words nan ("man, human") and kôre ("speech"), is spoken by the Nanhoshka people of Kôya Island. There are two main dialects, the Konishmak, located in the Northeastern Coastal Mountains, and the Sapshira, encompassing the western and southern parts of the country. The dialects differ chiefly in pronunciation and differences in certain lexical items, but are otherwise mutually intelligible.

For a little over a century the origins of the language and its people remain clouded in mystery. Physically, the Nanhoshka people look distinct from the Northwest Pacific Native Americans just 862 kilometers from the eastern shore, but their physical features bear a strikingly close resemblance to the Minhast people of the Republic of Minhay, who live much further away on the other side of the Pacific Ocean close to Japan and Ainushir. Because of these physical resemblances, both anthropologists and linguists started exploring a possible relationship between the two peoples. Recent genetic research uncovered that both the Nanhoshka and Minhast belong to the haplogroup C-M212, indicating a common ancestry. Linguists had a more difficult task in establishing a relationship. Finally Benson et. al. compiled an extensive Swadesh list and internally consistent sound correspondences between the two languages. Most importantly, a set of affixes that were quite conservative were revealed, notably the Causative affix, and a set of fossilized affixes which are prefixed to body parts to derive verbs. In addition, a third language, Nahónda, also previously classified as a language isolate, was discovered to contain common vocabulary and affixes which it shared with both Nankôre and Minhast. Therefore, both Nankôre and Minhast, along with Nahónda, are now recognized as belonging to the same language family, which has been named the Nahenic language family.

Phonology

Orthography

The Nankôre orthography is based on the Allen-Mills system, derived from the Latin alphabet. However, a second system, the American Media system, has started displacing the Allen-Mills system. Although based on the Allen-Mills system, the American Media system uses the grapheme <y>, and the digraphs <ch> and <sh>, to make transcription of the language more accessible to American readers.

Allen-Mills	American Media	IPA
'	(n/a)	ʔ
a,ā, â, á	a,ā,â, á	a, a:
e	e	e
i	i	ɪ, i
o, ô	o, ô	o, o:
u	u	u
c	ch	tʃ
s	sh	s, s̺, ʃ
š	sh	ʃ
h	h	h
k	k	k
r	r	r
m	m	m
n	n	n
p	p	p
t	t	t
y	y	j

Note that the grapeme <s> in the Allen-Mills system is pronounced /ʃ/ or /s̺/ when followed by [i] (e.g. sinkokah /ʃin'kokah/ "orca"), or in coda position (Nanhoska /nan'hoʃka/ "the True People"). A few decades after the Allen-Mills transcription system was developed, a sound shift in the northwestern Hoyampe dialect, whereby /s/ shifted to the voiceless apico-alveolar fricative /s̺/ when followed by /i/ or in coda position. A similar sound shift occurred at around the same time in the northeastern Konishmak dialect (possibly the result of the Hoyampe sound shift), but it was the voiceless palato-alveolar fricative /ʃ/ that appeared. It was this sound shift that spread out through most of the country, although there are some remote regions of the country that have not been affected by either sound shift. As a result in foreign transcriptions <sh> is often used in words where the /s/ >> /ʃ/ has already occurred, e.g. akôsh vs. the original akôs transcription

The grapheme <ô> is used to indicate vowel length for /o/, and <ā> for /ɑ/.

Because the American Media orthography system is the most widely used system, it will be used throughout the rest of this article, unless otherwise noted.

Consonants

Nankôre has a small inventory of consonants, only fourteen in number. Noteworthy is the paucity of voiced consonants which contributes to the limited number of consonants in the Nankôre language. The following table contains the entire consonantal inventory:

	Bilabial	Dental	Alveolar	Apical	Post-alveolar	Palatal	Velar	Glottal
Nasal	m		n
Stop	p	t					k	ʔ
Affricate					͡tʃ
Fricative			s	s̻	ʃ			h
Approximant						j
Flap			r

Vowels

	Front	Near- front	Central	Near- back	Back
Close	i u ɪ e o ɛ a
Near-close
Close-mid
Mid
Open-mid
Near-open
Open

Morphology

Nouns

The Nominal Hierarchy

Nankôre nouns, at first glance, appears very simple. They are not inflected for case, gender, nor do adpositions indicate their directional or positional relationships. Number is distinguished only in pronouns. Nevertheless, the nominal system has a complex hierarchy of animacy, which although unmarked, is a semantic feature of the noun and pronoun. This hierarchy of animacy is used to determine the syntactic roles of the core arguments of a clause, namely that of Agent and Patient. Arguments that are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy are by default considered Agents, whereas lower animacy arguments are considered Patients. If the syntactic roles of two core arguments are reversed, namely a lower animacy argument acts as an Agent on a higher animacy Patient argument, a special construction known as the Inverse Voice, involving the prefix tā(h)-, is added to both the first verb in the verb phrase and the auxiliary verb itá'. Thus, the Inverse Voice is doubly-marked.

Where a given NP falls within the animacy hierarchy must be memorized in order to use the verbal inverse prefix tā(h)- correctly (see section on Verbs for additional details regarding inverse marking).

The Nankôre nominal hierarchy has been traditionally classified along two axes, the first marking the noun class, and the second marking levels of hierarchy within a given class. Animacy along classes decrease as one traverses from Supernatural/Phenomonological onwards towards the Ephemeral. Animacy decreases as one goes down the Level axis. The hierarchy is arranged according to the following table:

Table of Nominal Animacy hierarchy

	Noun Class
Level	Supernatural & Phenomonological	Human	Animals		Weather	Lower Animals	Plants	Geophysical	Material	Ephemeral
			Mammals	Birds
1	Gods, the Earth, the Sun, the Sky/Heavens	Adults >> Children	predator >> prey		Clouds	Reptiles (excluding snakes)	Forests	Rushing rivers	Water	Magic
2	Demons	Older >> Younger	wild >> domesticated		Rain	Snakes	Large Trees	Slow-moving rivers	Food	Actions
3	Human & Animal Spirits	Male >> Female	Pet (usually carnivorous) >> Non-Pet (usually raised for food)		Snow	Amphibians	Small Trees	Streams, brooks, springs	Fabrics, fibers, skins, clothing	Emotions
4	Destructive Forces of Nature	Large >> Small			Wind	Fish	Fruit/Nut Trees	Lakes	Wood	Thoughts
5	Lightning	Strong >> Weak			Breeze	Crustaceans	Bushes/Shrubs	Glaciers	Buildings	Disease
6	Ocean	Quick >> Slow			Water	Insects	Prairie grass	Mountains	Metals	States
7	Thunderstorms	Intelligent >> Unintelligent	Carnivore >> Herbivore >> Carrion Eater		Air	Worms	Leafy plants	Cliffs, jagged outcroppings, tumuli, boulders	Jewels and gemstones	Abstractions
8	Fire	Fertile >> Infertile	Stud >> Gelded	Flight >> Flightless	Muggy weather	Mollusks	Mushrooms/Fungi/Mosses	Flat land or gently rolling landscape	Stones, rocks, pebbles	Death

If two nouns with equal animacy but different number appear as core arguments, the plural noun is assigned a higher animacy status than the singular noun. However, if animacy and number are equal, the most recently introduced noun, providing it was introduced as a core argument, is assigned the higher animacy status.

In situations were two nouns have equal animacy and equal number, the rules for assigning the position each core argument in the hierarchy is as follows:

1. If one of the nouns is just newly introduced info, it is considered less animate because the older noun has been presumably been the center of discourse and at least during part of the previous discourse it was agent. SOV order is usually used, particularly if pragmatics and other contextual cues cannot disambiguate the syntactic roles
2. HOWEVER, if the new noun is topicalized with the clitic ="=hat", it is considered the agent.
3. Another pattern, where a new noun is introduced by an intransitive been as a Patient argument, it is regarded as the less animate argument once the older noun is reintroduced back into the discourse in a transitive construction.
4. If the animacy level of each argument cannot be resolved, then the unmarked SOV word order is used when context can't disambiguate syntactic roles.

The Noun Template

root - derivation - adjective - demonstrative/decessives

Derivational Affixes

-no: Diminutive suffix, e.g. kurash (woman), kurashno (girl)

Adjectival Suffixes

Nankôre lacks a separate word class for adjectives. They may be expressed as attributive verbs, e.g. Aryak neshkak itá, "Aryak is smart", Kanko shoykar itá, "Kanko (an indigenous vegetable) is good" (for your health), or a suffix may be attached to the noun it modifies. These suffixes are called adjectival suffixes. Some of these suffixes are etymologically derived from an attributive verb, e.g. -kerek > karyak itá "to be red". Others appear to be derived from separate roots, c.f. "Aryak-arku", ("clever Aryak") vs "Aryak neshkak itá" ("Aryak is clever"). Theoretically an unlimited number of suffixes may be appended to the noun, but in practice the number of adjectival suffixes seldom exceeds three. The suffixes may appear in any order, so long as the meaning is comprehensible. Nevertheless it appears that scope determines the ordering of the suffixes: suffixes with wider scope tend to appear towards the end e.g. "Kenenkor-pita-shune-une itá" (bed plush-red-soft-very 3S.COP ) "It is a very soft, red and plush bed."

There are seven observed categories of adjectival affixes:

1. Quality
2. Quantity
3. Strength
4. Size
5. Color
6. Tactile
7. Other Attributes

Demonstrative Clitics

Type	Spatial	English Translation	Example
Proximal	=skoro	this one near me; now	nan=iskoro "this man here"; oriyat=hepi "today"
Medio-Proximal	=hori, =ori	that one by you; just awhile ago	nan=hori "that man next to you";
Distal	=nko, =kekori	yonder, that one near him/her/them; yesterday, a few days ago	nan=inko "yonder man""
Invisible	=nanak	that one beyond the horizon, or occluded by a distant object	nan=nanak "that man (e.g. on the other side of the mountain)"

Number

Number is usually determined by context, but plurality can be indicated by either joining a cardinal number, a quantifier, or the plural marker no before the noun. The noun is always linked to these modifiers by the si- connective, as in no si-kurashno "the girls".

Quantifiers

Quantifier	Substantive	Attributive
All	kamun	kamun si=
Most	toman	toman si=
Some	cene	cisi=
Many	etco	etcisi=
Both	hani	hanisi=
Each	nune	nisi=
Few	cato	catci=
Another/Other	hane	hanesi=

Interrogatives

Header text	Header text	Notes
Who	ra'	Possibly cognate with Minhast redad
What	pôh	c.f. Minhast bak
When	tu'a
Where	nahí'	c.f. Minhast nakki. Also, note dialectal variant enket (Sapshira dialect)
Why	penóh
Which	yôri-

As Interrogatives proper, they appear BEFORE the auxiliary itá' and are accompanied by rising intonation, and often preceded by a slight pause after the main VP: Okep nari ayrarke, penóh hô'itá? (Why did Okep spank her child earlier this morning?), Ka tahoné, ra pis'itá? ("Who is making you cry?)

All Interrogatives can also serve as conjunctions, eg Hôri ak kosno tā'itá' penóh Okep nari ayrarke ho (I did not hear/receive the news why Okep spanked (her) nephew early this morning").

Interrogatives can also serves as Conditionals by a si- Topicalization structure: Ra'si karampo neknek tā'itá, siakos tamakkó itá' ("Whoever slaughtered the bear (in this manner) is a danger to us all"). Take note that the embedded clause linked to the Interrogative is linked to its matrix clause by the Connective as well.

Ra' is a high-animacy pronoun and is outranked only by proper nouns, and 1st and 2nd person prounouns. With regards to 3rd person pronouns, the situation is more complicated, where the 3rd person pronoun sometimes outranks ra' , and other times ra' outranks the 3rd person pronoun. This is because the semantics of the verb (see examples with the Verbs of Victimhood" below).

Pôh is much lower in the Animacy Heirarchy, classified just above Sessiles. Yôri- is always prefixed to the noun it modifies and can never appear as an independent word. If necessary, it can be prefixed to pôh and ra' (yôripoh and yôra' ) in order to avoid repeating its host noun, or in cases where the target NP contains more than one noun class or type (e.g. a mix of men and women).

Pronouns

The first group of pronouns are the simple independent pronouns. The animacy of each pronoun is arranged in the following hierarchy:

Pronominal hierarchy
1st >> 2nd >> 3rd

Plurality generally does not affect the animacy level across persons. However, if two 3rd person arguments have the same animacy and one of the arguments is plural, then the plural argument is assigned a higher animacy level.

The following table lists the forms of the simple independent pronouns:

Intransitive Independent Pronouns

	Singular	Plural
1S	ak	akôs, akôsh
2S	kā, ka	kakôs, kakôsh
3S	tā, ta	takôs, takôsh

If used as a core argument, they appear in intransitive clauses only, and just before the clause-final copula itá,e.g. Nitori kā itá! (You are a fool); sometimes the pronoun is cliticized to the main verb, e.g. Nitoriká' itá!, in which case a final long vowel is shortened and is appended with the glottal stop. They may also be used to emphasize a noun, in which case the pronoun precedes the noun linked with the connective si=, as in tā shi=naho (She/Her, the mother).

Transitive Portmanteau Pronouns

Singular				Plural
	1S	2S	3S	1P	2P	3P
1S	--	akak	akat	--	akakos, akakosh	akatos, akatosh
2S	akak	--	kat	akoska, akoshka	--	katakos, katakosh
3S	akat	kat	tat	akosta, akoshta	kakosta, kakoshta	takosta, takoshta
Plural x Plural
1P				--	akoskos, akoshkosh	akostos, akoshtosh
2P				akoskos, akoshkosh	--	kakostos, kakoshtosh
3P				akostos, akoshtosh	kakostos, kakoshtosh	takostos, takoshtosh

As earlier stated, nouns in Nankôre are not inflected, nor are case clitics attached to them to indicate case relations. Transitive verbs take two NPs as core arguments. The case relations of the two arguments are determined by the position of the noun in the animacy hierarchy; the core argument that is higher in the animacy hierarchy is assigned the Agent role, and the other argument is assigned the Patient role. However, an inverse affix tā=/tāh=/ta=/t= is prefixed to the primary verb, as well as a redundant ta- affix that is added to the auxiliary to alter the argument structure and promote the lower-animacy argument to Agent role.

Unlike the Intransitive forms, the portmanteau Transitive forms come before the main verb, not the auxiliary verb, e.g. Akostos karok tā'itá' , "I ate it". Sometimes the portmanteau is cliticized to the main verb, as in Akostos=karok tā'itá' . If the Inverse marker appears simultaneously with the Transitive portmanteau pronoun, the preverbal Inverse marker tā=/tāh=/ta=/t= cliticizes to the portmanteau pronoun. Since the Inverse voice is double-marked, the Inverse form of the auxiliary itấ' also is used, as in the improbable sentence, Takostos karok tahortā'itá'/Takostoskarok tahortā'itá' , from Tā-akostos-karok tahortā'itá' , "He/she/it ate me".

Oblique arguments on the other hand are treated as adjuncts, and are thus bound to their clause with the connective clitic si=. Context alone determines the semantic role of the oblique. Because obliques are considered adjuncts, they may not come between the core arguments and the verb, and therefore must appear either before or after the clause nucleus. To illustrate, the sentence Maska si=ohipna koykare ekán itá (anthill=CONN twig boy twist COP.PST), i.e. "The boy inserted the twig into the anthill", the noun maska (anthill) is the oblique argument and is marked with the clitic si= to join it to the rest of the sentence, e.g. Ohipna koykare ekán itá si=maska.

Verbs

Verbs mark for [blah blah blah blah]

Verb Test Area

Present			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	itá'	itán	sip'itá' (pis'itá')	sip'itán (pis'itán)
		PL	nitá'	nitán	sipnitá' (pisnitá')	sipnitán (pisnitán)
			High Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	tā’itá	tā’itán	taspitá	taspitán
		PL	tānitá	tānitán	tāsipnitá	tāsipnitán
Hodiernal Past
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	hô'itá	hô'itán	hô'ipnitá	hô'ipnitán
		PL	hô'intá	hô'intán	hô'ipnintá	hô'ipnintán
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	ta’hô'itá	ta’hô'itán	tāhópnitá	tāhópnitán
		PL	tāhô'intá	tāhô'intán	tāhópnintá	tāhópnintán
Recent Past
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	nitá	nitán	sipnitá	sipnitán
		PL	nintá	nintán	sipnintá	sipnintán
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	ta’nitá	ta’nitán	tāsipnitá	tāsipnitán
		PL	tānintá	tānintan	tāsipnintá	tāsipnintán
Medio-Distal Past
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	hitá	hitán	hispitá	hisiptán
		PL	hintá	hintán	hisipnitá	hisipnitán
			High Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	tāhitá	tāhitan	tāsiphitá	tāsiphitán
		PL	tāhintá	tāhintan	tāsiphintá	tāsiphintán
Distal Past
			Low Animate Patient
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	pitá	pitán	pisiptá	pisiptan
		PL	pintá	pintán	pisipnitá	pisipnitán
			High Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	ta’pitá	ta’pitán	tapsipta	tapsiptan
		PL	tapintá	tápintan	tapsipnitá	tapsipnitán
Medio-Proximal Future
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	nitáh	nitáhan	nisiptáh	nisiptahan
		PL	nintáh	nintáhan	nisipnitáh	nisipnitáhan
			High Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	ta’nitáh	tantáhan	tāsipnitáh	tāsipnitáhan
		PL	tanintáh	tanintáhan	tāsipnitáh	tāsipnintáhan
Immediate Future
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	hitáh	hitáhan	hisipitáh	hisiptáhan
		PL	hintáh	hintáhan	hispintáh	hisipnitáhan
			High Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	tāhitáh	tāhitáhan	tāhisipitáh	tāhisiptáhan
		PL	tāhintáh	tāhintáhan	tāhispintáh	tāhisipnitáhan
Distal Future
			Low Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	High Animate Agent	SG	pitáh	pitáhan	pisiptáh	pisiptáhan
		PL	pintáh	pintáhan	pisipnitáh	pisipnitáhan
			High Animate Patient
			Indicative		Causative
			SG	PL	SG	PL
	Low Animate Agent	SG	ta’pitáh	taptahán	tapsiptáh	tapsiptáhan
		PL	tāpintáh	tāpintáhan	tapsipnitáh	tapsipnitáhan

The Verb Phrase

The following example demonstrates a complex verb predicate, with the Inverse marker ta= cliticizing to the coverb yam (accompany) in the Imperfect aspect, followed by the main verb yayak (go up a mountain) with the Hearsay Evidential suffix -kor, and finally the copular verb marked with the secondary Inverse clitic tā=.

Rompóy kurasno tayampo yayak hosmakor tā'itá'.
/rom'poɪ ku'raʃno ta'yampo 'yayak hoʃma'kor ta:ʔɪt'aʔ/
Rompóy kurasno ta=yam=po yayak hosma-kor tā'-itá'.
dog girl INV=accompany=IMPF go.up.mountain-EVID.HEAR INV-PST.COP
The dog was going up the mountain with the girl, I heard.

Diagram of the Nankôre Verb Phrase

The verbal elements follow a relatively strict order. The required elements for a VP to be well-formed are the Main Verb and the Copula. Adjuncts are unbound morphemes, and exhibit rather free order; however, they are barred from appearing between the Inverse Marker and any following verb, be it the Coverb or the Main Verb. If a Coverb appears between the Inverse Marker and Main Verb, an adjunct may appear between the Coverb and Main Verb. However, if the Inverse Marker is not followed by a Coverb, then an adjunct may not appear between the Inverse Marker and the Main Verb. Moreover, if Quasi-Noun Incorporation (QNI) takes place, an adjunct may not intervene between the Main Verb and the quasi-incorporated noun (QIN), although bound adverbial affixes may.

Main Verb

The main verb is believed to be descended from a verbal noun. The main verb hosts the Inverse Marker tā-/ta-, applicative, aspect, and evidential/modal markers. If a pronoun is used, it may cliticize to the first element of the verb. However, one or more adjuncts may be inserted between the portmanteau pronoun and the verb, in which case the portmanteau cliticizes to the adjunct following it.

Applicatives

The Applicative affixes betray their origins as motion and positional verbs. However, Applicatives, unlike their locomotive verbal counterparts, also alter the argument structure of a clause by promoting an oblique NP to a derived Patient argument; this promotion of an oblique argument triggers the demotion of the original Patient argument to oblique status. Applicatives are mutually incompatible with the Passive and Antipassive markers that are carried on the auxiliary verb (see section on Auxiliary Verbs below). However, since the Applicatives increase the transitivity of a clause, thereby creating a derived Patient, the Inverse Prefix can be prefixed to the Applicative in the usual manner, namely, to mark lower animacy core arguments as Agents and higher animacy arguments as Patients in transitive clauses. When the Inverse marker cliticizes to an Applicative, morphophonemic may alternations occur.

Because of their origin from motion and positional verbs, these affixes are prefixed to the main verb.

	Applicative Marker	Inverse Marker + Applicative Marker	Meaning
Dative/Allative	san-	tasan-	to, towards
Benefactive	nas-	tanas-	for
Commitative	yam-	tayam-, teym-, tem-	with, along
Instrumental	mak-	tamak-	by means of, using
Ablative	ris-	tarsh-	from
Locative	ne-	tan-	in, within
Vialis	nak-	tanak-, tank-	through
Prolative	rosh-	torsh-	across
Elative	nakri-	takri-	out of
Illative	nak-	tanak-	into
Superessive	or-	tor-	above
Subessive	yor-	chor- (Shapshira dialect: "toyor-")	below
Ablative-Superessive	suk-	tushk-, toshk-	from above
Ablative-Subessive	roy-	toroy-	from below
Perlative	tek-	tatek-	across
Riverine	tem-, ten-	tatem, taten-	along a river
Montaigne	yayk-	teyk-	upwards on a mountain

Aspect

The Perfective Aspect is null-marked, but several non-Perfect Aspects are recognized:

	Aspect Marker	Meaning
Perfect	-Ø
Semelfective	-no	completed in one single motion/act, e.g. hit
Simple Imperfect	-po
Durative/Repetitive	-nahoyra, -noyra	several times
Habitative	-(h)oshma, -shma	often
Factual	-yoshir	(general truth statement, e.g. "The sun rises in the east")
Continuative	-namporo	to continue
Inceptive	-otah	to begin
Cessative	-chiri	to stop
Terminative	-ruykáno	to finish
Incipient	-kara	about to
Approximative	-tontoro	almost, nearly
Frequentative	-nokori, -(o)nkori	often

Modals and Evidentials

The Modal and Evidential suffixes occupy the final position of the main verb's template.

Mode
Factual	-mash
Hearsay	-kor
Visual	-nui
Intentive	-neat

Auxiliary Verbs

Auxiliary verbs encode number, voice and tense. Intransitive pronominal core arguments, if used as independent pronouns, precede the auxiliary.

((More stuff to follow))

Animacy-Number Agreement Marking

Transitive verbs mark number on core arguments by ablaut, or by adding a prefix, to the auxiliary. These markers indicate the number of both the higher animate and the lower animate arguments.

	Higher Animate Singular	Higher Animate Plural
Lower Animate Singular	--	t(i)-
Lower Animate Plural	first /a/ lengthened to /a:/	ita-

Unmarked:

1. Rompóy kurasno rayro ta'itá'. "The girl played with the dog."
2. Rompóy kurasno tarayro ta'itá'. "The dog played with the girls."

Higher Animate Plural x Lower Animate Singular

1. Rompóy kurasno rayro ti-ta'itá'. "The girls played with the dog."
2. Rompóy kurasno tarayro ti-ta'itá'. "The dog played with the girl."

Higher Animate Singular x Lower Animate Plural

1. Rompóy kurasno rayro kor tā'itá'. "The girl played with the dogs."
2. Rompóy kurasno tarayro kor tā'itá'. "The dogs played with the girl."

Higher Animate Plural x Lower Animate Plural

1. Rompóy kurasno rayro ita-tā'itá'. "The girls played with the dogs."
2. Rompóy kurasno tarayro ita-tā'itá'. "The dogs played with the girls."

Voice and Tense

Tense-Aspect	Number
	Singular	Plural
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example
Example	Example	Example

The Nankôre verb is rich in voice and tense distinctions. These distinctions are combined in an auxiliary verb, formed by adding one or more prefixes to the copular verb itá /ɪ'taʔ/, hence this auxiliary is called the itá-verb. The itá-auxiliary verb is always clause final, the main verb and any other VP particles preceding it. Some voices also encode formality, with the long forms, e.g. man'itá', suphitá', tā'itá', hô'itá', and pā'itá' , used for formal situations, and the short forms manta'/nitá', supta', tayta', hoyta', and pitáh for informal conversation among friends and family.

Note that the Present Inverse form tā'itá' is identical in form with that of the Past Direct form. Fortunately, the Inverse Voice is double-marked: the enclitic ta= and its allomorphs tā=/tah=/tāh= cliticizes to the main verb so no ambiguity arises.

HAS = High Animate Singular

HAP = High Animate Plural

LAS = Low Animate Singular

LAP = Low Animate Plural

	Present				Mythological Past				Distal Past				Past				Recent Morning Past				Future
	HAS x LAS	HAS x LAP	HAP x LAS	HAP x LAP	HAS x LAS	HAS x LAP	HAP x LAS	HAP x LAP	HAS x LAS	HAS x LAP	HAP x LAS	HAP x LAP	HAS/LAS	HAS x LAP	HAP x LAS	HAP x LAP	HAS x LAS	HAS x LAP	HAP x LAS	HAP x LAP	HAS x LAS	HAS x LAP	HAP x LAS	HAP x LAP
Direct	itá'	itâ'	titá'	titâ'	man'itá', manta', nitá'	man'itâ', mantâ', nitâ'	timan'itá', timanta', tintá'	timan'itâ', timantâ', tintâ'	suphitá', supta'	suphitâ', suptâ'	tisuphitá', cupta'	tisuphitâ', cuptâ'	tā'itá', tayta'	tā'itâ', taytâ'	titā'itá', titayta'	titā'itâ', titaytâ'	hô'itá', hoyta'	hô'itâ', hoytâ'	tihô'itá', tihoyta'	tihô'itâ', tihoytâ'	pā'itáhi, pitáh	pā'itâhi, pitâh	tipā'itáhi, tiptáh	tipā'itâhi, tiptâh
Inverse	tā'itá', tayta'	x	x	x	taman'itá', tamanta'	x	x	x	tahorish'itá', taroshta'	x	x	x	tahortā'itá', tahorta'	x	x	x	tahorô'itá', taróyta'	x	x	x	tahorpā'itáhi, torpáytah	x	x	x
Simple Causative	shiphitá'	x	x	x	mashpitá'	x	x	x	ishpitá'	x	x	x	tashpitá'	x	x	x	hoshpitá'	x	x	x	pashpitáhi, pashpitah	x	x	x
Double Causative	shipshiphitá'	mashishpitá'	ishishpitá'	tashishpitá'	hoshishpitá'	pashishpitáhi, pashishpitah
Intransitive Active	kitá'	mankitá'	ishkitá'	tākitá', takta'	hôkitá', hokta'	pākitáhi, paktah
Intransitive Stative	itá'	mankitá'	ishkitá'	tākitá', takta'	hôkitá', hokta'	pākitáhi, paktah
Passive	horkitá'	horankitá'	horishkitá'	hortākitá', hortakta	horôkitá', horokta	horpākitáhi, horpaktah
Reflexive	shorkitá'	mashorkitá'	ishorkitá'	tashorkitá'	hoshorkitá'	pashorkitáhi, pashorkitáh
Reciprocal	soshorkitá'	masoshorkitá'	isoshorkitá'	tasoshorkitá'	hososhorkitá'	pasoshorkitáhi, pasoshorkitah
Middle/Inchoative	hankitá'	mankitá'	yankitá'	tankitá'	honkitá'	pankitáhi

Nankôre has five intransitive voices, two basic Intransitive voices, one for Active verbs and another for Stative verbs; a Passive-Direct, a Reflexive, and a Reciprocal. A submorpheme -k- is found in all four intransitive voices, although it is lacking in the Present Tense form of the Intransitive Stative Form. The Active and Stative Intransitive forms are otherwise identical.

The Passive demotes a lower animate core argument, which is then relegated to oblique status or is dropped from the clause. All Intransitive voices are incompatible with the Inverse marker ta=/tā=/tah=/tāh= that cliticizes to the main verb.

Finals

The Irrealis -hi is suffixed to the copula. It is obligatory for all Future tenses. It also surfaces in imperatives, yes-no questions which are marked with the -yo marker cliticizing to the first or second word of a sentence, as in Chire-yo tā'itá'-hi? "Did he die?", and in WH-questions when the event actually happening has not yet been established as having occurred; for example, Enket chire tā'itá'?, "Where did he die?" implies that the person's death is a fact, and it is only the location that is being inquired, versus Enket chire tā'itá'-hi? implies that not only is the location unknown, but the person's actual death happening still remains to be established. An interesting structure, called the "double interrogative", is a combination of a WH-word followed by a word bearing the -yo clitic, which also turns the question into yes-no question: Enket chire-yo tā'itá'-hi?, "Did he die, and if so, where?" The -hi suffix is believed to be cognate with the Minhast Irrealis clitic =š.

Positional and Motion Verbs

The Positional/Motion verbs usually appear at the beginning of the VP.

Table of Applicative Auxiliary Verbs

	Positional/Motion Verb	Sample Sentence	Translation	Comment
Directional	sanha	Anut America sanha-kor kamuk itá.	Anut supposedly flew to America.	-kor = HEARSAY.EVID, attaches to the first verb of a VP.
Benefactive	nasko	Nanhoska karen tā-nasko-ro-kor eyna itá.	It is said the (sacred) tree gave (life) for the people.	Note also the inverse marker tā- -ro- = IMPF.
Commitative	yampe	Anut yampe-kor temen itá	Anut walked beside the river with him.	temen = to perform an activity by a river
Instrumental	makôr	Ehok yurasna makôr-nahoyra-kor neat itá.	The adolescent struck (it) repeatedly with a club.	-nahoyra- = Repetitive neat, ne'at = INTENTIVE
Ablative	risa	Shôni Nan Kamun Koryash risa-kor man itá	First Man emerged from (out of) the snow.	Shôni Nan "First Man" Kamun Koryash "All Snow" (the birthplace of First Man)
Locative	neyhi	Yonka asrok tāh-neyhi-kor akun ho itá.	The fly buzzed inside Yonka('s mouth) this morning.	Note inverse marker -tāh asrok = fly, insect ho = earlier this morning.
Vialis	nahke	Pohak tā-nahke-nui shokor-ken ka itá	I saw the river take you through the cave.	pohak = cave shokor = to flow -ken- = CAUS -nui- = VIS.EVID
Prolative	roshkar	Ak piri roshkar hô'itá'.	I crossed the street earlier this morning	piri = street, road, path
Superessive	oros	Ayôhe arupenrô oros-kor yaunke hô'itá.	The airplane flew over Ayôhe township earlier this morning.	arupenrô = airplane yaunke = to fly
Subessive	yorha	Ekurki saska yorha-ro-kor kahoro itá.	The turtle swam underneath the ice.	ekurki = turtle saska = ice kahoro = to swim
Ablative-Superessive	isuk	(Example)	(Example)
Ablative-Subessive	royna	(Example)	(Example)
Riverine	temen	No si-kurasno temen-kor rohnas itá.	The girls supposedly were playing by the river.
Montaigne	yayak	Kahno chôri yayak chire itá	The boy went up the mountain.

These auxiliaries are often confused for adpositions, or relational nouns, but unlike adpositions and locative nouns, these auxiliaries are full-fledged verbs. If inverse marking is required, the prefix tā/tāh is still prefixed to the auxiliary verb. Likewise, aspect and modality markers are attached to the auxiliary, a process that occurs only with verbs in the language, never with nouns. Moreover, these auxiliaries can stand alone as independent verbs, such as Kosmakis Anut yampe itá "Anut walked with Koshmak" (yampe = to be arm-in-arm; c.f. yanup "elbow").

Derivation

Nankôre has a set of verbalizing prefixes that when attached to nominal roots, often body parts, create verbs. These prefixes are most likely the remnants of Proto-Nahenic noun incorporation, based on comparisons with Nankôre's distant relatives, Minhast and Nahónda; similar or even identical fossilized affixes have been found in these languages that likewise attach to nominal roots for body parts to derive verbs, e.g. Minhast kirim (from k-erum, literally "make sound with the mouth) and Nahónda teloma (from t-loma, note that Minhast /k/ maps to Nahónda /t/); kirim is the Minhast cognate of Nankôre kôre.

Verbalizing Prefixes

	Prefix	Sample Noun	Example	Meaning	Nahenic Cognates
Sound	k-	ore "mouth"	k-ore	to speak	Common Minhast k-irim "to speak" (NB: Nankôre ôre = "mouth" is cognate with Minhast erum = "mouth")
Striking	ya-	shipa "hand"	ya-shpa	to punch	Minhast, Horse Speaker dialect: wi-šnu "to strike, hit" (Minhast išna "fist", "knuckles")
Movement	ha-	nake "foot"	ha-nake	to scoot along the floor with one's foot; to kick around	Nahónda: ho-shishpa "to give" shishp = hand; c.f. Minhast sespir = hand, Nankôre shipa = hand
Stability	pa-	are "eye"	p-are	to stare	Common Minhast p-uħta "to stand up" (from yuħta = "sole of the foot", cognate with Nankôre yohíhita = "flat surface")
Removal	ro-	ampe "body"	ro-yampe	to remove one's clothes	Common Minhast ruyyamb "to take off clothing" (but note that Minhast lost the original *yambet (body), replacing it with tarti (body)

Numbers

The Nankôre number system is dozenal, i.e. base-12. The numbers thirteen through twenty-three are modified compounds consisting of the unit numbers shori (1) through shiktash (11) compounded to shin (12). The number twenty-four hanoshin can be analyzed as han-o-shin, where the affix -o- signifies "multiplied by", so hanoshin literally means "two times twelve". The multiplicative pattern continues until the number 144, which is called nakpa. The number 100 (nenanoshin >> nena ān-o-shin) is literally "four (and) eight times twelve". The ordinals for the numbers 1-7 are the cardinal numbers suffixed by -ak or -ok. Numbers 8-11 are the cardinal numbers suffixed with the ending -u. The ordinal for the number 12 is again suffixed with -ok, and the higher numbers with -nok. If the -nok affix is preceded by a consonant followed by -i-, the -i- may be dropped, provided that this does not form the impermissible consonant cluster -CCC- sequence.

Number	Cardinal	Ordinal
one	šôri	šoriak
two	hani, ôhi	hanyak
three	tusta, tak	tustak
four	nena, kayoka	nenak
five	sišak	catak
six	sirišo	siiršok
seven	kerišo	kiršok
eight	ān	anku
nine	karu	karku
ten	kaše	kasku
eleven	siktas	sistu
twelve	sin	sinok
thirteen	šorsin	šorsinok
fourteen	hansin	hanisnok, hanisnok
fifteen	tusin	tusnok
sixteen	ninsin	ninsinok, nisnok
seventeen	casin	casinok,casnok
eighteen	sirsin	sirsinok, sirisnok
nineteen	kirsin	kirisnok
twenty	ansin	asnok
twenty-one	karusin	karushnok
twenty-two	kasmin	kasminok
twenty-three	siksin	siksinok
twenty-four	hanosin	hanosnok
thirty-six	tustosin	tustosnok
one hundred	nenanosin	nenanosnok
one hundred forty-four	nakpa	nakpanok

Clitics and Particles

Temporal Deictic Clitics

The Temporal Deitic clitics are usually attached to the first word of a sentence, e.g. Anut=antak America san-kamuk tā'itá' , "A year ago, Anut flew to America". In multiclausal sentences, the clause in which they appear have scope over the elements preceding it. At least one, =yorai, cannot appear after the initial clause. These clitics may also be attached to the main verb, and in the process replace the auxiliary tense affixes of the Direct Voice, as in Anut America san-kamuk=inkát itá' "Several years ago Anut flew to America" (note that the Temporal Deictic clitic =inkát has replaced the past tense affix tā- in tā'itá' ). Compare this with the Direct Voice Distal Past form suphitá' , in Anut America san-kamuk suphitá' , "Anut went to America a while back". Also note that the other verb voices do not lose their tense markers, as in Otok erashi ta-karok=inkat ta'itá' (boy crab INV-eat=several.years.ago INV.PST-COP) "The crab ate the boy."

Clitic	Meaning	Header text
=yorai	Once upon a time	Example
=(i)nkát	Several years ago	Example
=sheyhori	A few years ago	Example
=(a)ntak	A year ago	Example
=(e)kak	Several days ago, last week	Example
=nate	The day before yesterday	Example
=kira	Yesterday	Example
=ho	Earlier this morning	Example
=tora	Just awhile ago	Example
=(e)yót	Now	Example
=(e)nash	Soon	Example
=k(e)sor	Tomorrow	Example
=n(i)kos	In the next few days	Example
=n(a)koy	In the indeterminate future	Example

Syntax

Word Order

Nankôre is classified as a SOV language. The auxiliary verbs, such as the copula itá, obligatorily appear in clause-final position. Although the core argument NPs do not take any overt case marking, the animacy hierarchy and inverse system usually provide enough information to identify the Agent from the Patient, so OSV orders are also found in speech and text. Although auxiliary verbs are obligatorily clause-final, the main verb may appear at the beginning of the clause for emphasis, as in Kakno, rihat makshe no itá >> seize.3, falcon.AGT mouse.PT SEM COP, lit. "It seizes it, the falcon the mouse in.one.act it.does", i.e. "The falcon seizes the mouse in one fell swoop." Note that the fronted verb is followed by an audible pause.

As in many SOV languages, modifiers precede their heads, e.g. Shirkosh shi=rohpa, "This fine foreign cloth" (lit. "Foreigner fine.cloth").

The Verb Phrase

The verb phrase may contain up to three independent verb stems or roots. All verb phrases must end with the appropriate form of the auxiliary itá. Itá was originally a copula but later on accreted voice, tense, and the secondary ta- Inverse marker. The main verb precedes the auxiliary and may be separated from it by a de-focused noun or by one or more adjuncts. De-focused nouns appear immediately after the main verb and adjuncts cannot be inserted between the two (see "Quasi-Incorporation" below). Positional or motion verbs appear before the main verb. The primary ta- Inverse marker cliticizes to the first verb of the verb phrase.

Quasi-Incorporation

Nankôre canonical word order is SOV₁V₂, but under certain circumstances, the O-argument may occur between V₁ and V₂, i.e. SV₁OV₂. The O-argument becomes backgrounded, thereby assuming a peripheral role; as a result, the clause is effectively detransitivized. The Inverse marker ta- does not occur in intransitive clauses; it must be omitted for the clause to remain grammatical. This operation is called quasi-incorporation, and occurs cross-linguistically in unrelated languages, e.g. Dutch and Hungarian. A feature of Nankôre quasi-incorporation is that adjuncts, which typically can occur in most positions of a clause, including clause-finally, cannot occur between V₁ and the relocated O-argument.

Quasi-incorporation may eventually evolve into full noun incorporation, as in the case of Nankôre's distant relatives, Minhast and Nahónda. Both exhibit full noun incorporation. Like Nankôre, both languages add the incorporated noun after the verb root, e.g. Minhast Ušnirupmakekaru << ušn-ruppumak-ek-ar-u (hit-face-3S.ABS+1S.ERG-PST.PFCT-TRANS) "I hit him in the face, I face-hit him", Nahónda klomenatsoyetolayo<< kloma-natsoye-Ø-t-ola-yo (speak-wisdom-3S.PT-1S.AGT-PST-AGT) "I gave him counsel, I wisdom-speak to him. Most languages that exhibit noun incorporation attach the incorporated noun before the verb root; placement of the incorporated noun after the root is rare among incorporating languages. The process by which Nankôre performs quasi-incorporation, namely by placing the O-argument between the primary verb and auxiliary verbs, may explain why Minhast and Nahónda place their incorporated nouns after the verb. Proto-Nahenic may have also placed a quasi-incorporated noun after the primary verb but before the auxiliary verb, an order which the descendant languages preserved.

Possession

Possession is indicated by joining the possessor to the possessum with the connective si=/shi=, followed either by the verb ras/rash to indicate inalienable possession e.g. Koykare shi=naho rash, "The boy's mother", or ocité for alienable possession, e.g. Koykare shi=mashka ocité. If the possessor is lower in the animacy heirarcy, the inverse marker ta'/tah is prefixed to the verb, as in the improbable Mashka shi=koykare tah-ocité, "The anthill's boy".

Comparatives and Superlatives

Degrees of comparison are formed by placing the auxiliary verb soyka (to be big, i.e. to be more) or hatka (to be small, i.e. to be less) before a stative verb. Since two arguments are involved, namely the comparer NP and the compared NP, the phrase is structurally equivalent to a transitive clause, requiring an Agent and a Patient, and follows the rules governing the nominal animacy hierarchy. In the sentence Joe Sara soyka inupe tā itá (Joe is stronger than Sarah; lit. "Joe bigs strongs Sara"), soyka precedes the stative verb inupe (to be strong). Joe, being male, is higher in the animacy scale and so is assigned Agent status. If Sara were stronger, the Inverse affix tā-/tāh- surfaces, as in Joe Sara tā-soyka inupe tā itá (Sara is stronger than Joe). Other examples:

1) Joe Sara soyka soyka tā itá (Joe is taller than Sara; lit. "Joe bigs bigs Sara").

2) Joe Sara tā-hatka nahamosh tā itá (Sara is less tan than Joe).

3) Joe Sara hatka hatka tā itá (Joe is smaller than Sara; lit. "Joe small smalls Sara").

4) Natos Suhe soyka makit itá (Natosh [masc.] runs faster than Suhe [fem.]; lit. "Natosh big runs Suhe").

5) Orôyo Paul tā-soyka soyka itá (The volcano is bigger than Paul; note that orôyo is less animate because it is a sessile object, hence the use of the inverse marker tā-).

To express the superlative, the clause must be antipassivized with the auxiliary verb norhe/norhâ e.g. Orôyo norhe soyka soyka itá (This is the largest mountain), or Sikôya orôyo norhe soyka soyka itá (This is the largest mountain in Kôya Island).

(Phrases and terms from FB - To be incorporated later)

1) "tak orâshim kot": 3 Orashim trees hands" (i.e. the number 300). The length of the trunk of an orâshim tree is the length of approximately 100 hand-lenghths, from heel of the hand to tip of the middle finger.

2) "koytan karásh", meaning "lava lizard", a scarlet colored giant salamander with venomous glands scattered across its skin. It lives in certain mountain rivers in Kôya Island

koytan = lava karásh = lizard

3) "Ekáh akôsh atoroh itá, penoh Konkekma Yamâtaroh karhok tā'itá" (We do not know why the Minhast expelled the Japanese refugees)

4) Example of the Perlative Applicative:

"Shirikoy akat teki-temen tā'itá." (I walked across the river/I forded the river).

river 1S+3S PERL.APPL-walk DIR.PST.COP

5) "bear": raiyarke

6) "spider": erte

7) "Minhashtôri nahke-nui pohro ninúrta takôsh itá. Shinráko nató ak nampita." Meaning: "The Minhast came with weapons. Thus did I take out my knife."

Minhasht-tôri nahke-nui pohro ninúrta takôsh itá. Shinráko nató ak namp-itá.

Minhast-to.be.wrong come.through while carry.weapons 3P PAST knife take.out 1S as.a.result-PAST.

8) Nankôre has two words for flesh, one for human, the other for food: "nashpi" = (carnal) flesh "aroyka" = (meat) flesh

9)