Suwáá/Classical: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 42: Line 42:
==Grammar==
==Grammar==
Classical Sowaár was optimized for poetic meters (like Marathi) – word order was relatively free and affixes used both long and short syllables. Vowel length was relatively free in affixes (obeying some constraints) and fixed in roots. As a corollary tones were also flexible and there were also fewer (phonemic) tonal distinctions in affixes than in roots. [TODO: rules]
Classical Sowaár was optimized for poetic meters (like Marathi) – word order was relatively free and affixes used both long and short syllables. Vowel length was relatively free in affixes (obeying some constraints) and fixed in roots. As a corollary tones were also flexible and there were also fewer (phonemic) tonal distinctions in affixes than in roots. [TODO: rules]
===Nouns===
Like Modern Sowaár, Classical Sowaár had singular, dual and plural numbers.


Number prefixes for nouns existed but were optional.
Number prefixes for nouns existed but were optional.
 
===Verbs===
More fusional and less agglutinative than Modern Sjowaázh?
Verbs had more complex ablaut patterns than in modern Sowaár varieties. Affixes, on the other hand, were less fused.
138,759

edits