Suwáá/Classical: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 42: Line 42:
==Grammar==
==Grammar==
Classical Sowaár was optimized for poetic meters (like Marathi) – word order was relatively free and affixes used both long and short syllables. Vowel length was relatively free in affixes (obeying some constraints) and fixed in roots. As a corollary tones were also flexible and there were also fewer (phonemic) tonal distinctions in affixes than in roots. [TODO: rules]
Classical Sowaár was optimized for poetic meters (like Marathi) – word order was relatively free and affixes used both long and short syllables. Vowel length was relatively free in affixes (obeying some constraints) and fixed in roots. As a corollary tones were also flexible and there were also fewer (phonemic) tonal distinctions in affixes than in roots. [TODO: rules]
===Nouns===
Like Modern Sowaár, Classical Sowaár had singular, dual and plural numbers.


Number prefixes for nouns existed but were optional.
Number prefixes for nouns existed but were optional.
 
===Verbs===
More fusional and less agglutinative than Modern Sjowaázh?
Verbs had more complex ablaut patterns than in modern Sowaár varieties. Affixes, on the other hand, were less fused.
138,759

edits

Navigation menu