139,553
edits
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Should Hebrew loans have been borrowed at this stage? | Should Hebrew loans have been borrowed at this stage? | ||
Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Ăn Yidiș Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o:/ vs ů /u:/ distinction in cholam. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă | Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Ăn Yidiș Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o(:)/ vs ů /u(:)/ distinction in cholam; TibH /u/ was /ü(:)/. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă | ||
either (1) ''amadàn'' and ''Chanücà'' or (2) ''amadan'' and ''Chanüca'' | either (1) ''amadàn'' and ''Chanücà'' or (2) ''amadan'' and ''Chanüca'' |
edits