Verse:Irta/Judeo-Mandarin/Proto-Ăn Yidiș: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 3: Line 3:
Should Hebrew loans have been borrowed at this stage?
Should Hebrew loans have been borrowed at this stage?


Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Ăn Yidiș Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o:/ vs ů /u:/ distinction in cholam. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă
Todo: Reconstruct Proto-Ăn Yidiș Hebrew before and after filtering through Proto-Ăn Yidiș phonology. Before they used TibH but with an o /o(:)/ vs ů /u(:)/ distinction in cholam; TibH /u/ was /ü(:)/. TibH style allophonic vowel length should go through the filter, hence leading to QG o vs QQ ă


either (1) ''amadàn'' and ''Chanücà'' or (2) ''amadan'' and ''Chanüca''
either (1) ''amadàn'' and ''Chanücà'' or (2) ''amadan'' and ''Chanüca''
139,553

edits

Navigation menu