886
edits
Aarlaansc: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox language | {{Infobox language | ||
|name = Aarlaansk | |name = Aarlaansk | ||
|nativename = | |nativename = Aarlaansc | ||
|pronunciation = ['a:ʀla:nsk] | |pronunciation = ['a:ʀla:nsk] | ||
|region = Europe | |region = Europe | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|iso3 = aak | |iso3 = aak | ||
|script = [[w:Latin script|Latin script]] | |script = [[w:Latin script|Latin script]] | ||
|agency = | |agency = Accademie a d-Aarlaansc Leng (Aarlaansk Language Accademy) | ||
}} | }} | ||
=General infos= | =General infos= | ||
''' | '''Aarlaansc''' is a language spoken in ''Hijs Aarlaans'' (= the Aarlaans), a country that, in a different reality, inclues The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, a half of our France and a part of our Switzerland. | ||
The term '' | The term ''Aarlaansc'' means "(the language) of the Aarlaans". The origin of the ethnonym hasn't been completely explained yet: the most probable hypothesis explains that "Aarlaans" is a contraction of "Aarvers laans", that is "plains of the tree", ''aarvers'' is an archaic genitive case of the term ''aarf'', "tree", and ''laans'' is the plural form of the term ''laan'', "plain". The fact that in old documents, the ethnonym ''Aarlane'' is also found and that the word ''laan'' has got an archaic plural form ''lane'', supports this hypothesis. | ||
But why should the Romans have given this place the name of "plains of the tree"? The explanation was found only in 2609 ab U.c. (that is circa 1856 of our era): during an archaeological excavation it was found a table that dates back to 867 ab U.c. (circa 114 of our era), on this table was written the anecdote of the defeat of Germanic Tribes in a Northern territory by the Roman army of Trajan. According to this narration, the emperor had a prophetic dream: the Roman army would have won, only if it had attacked the Germanic tribes far from the forest, in an endless plain. The sign that would have shown the right place would have been a solitary tree, the only one within this immense plain. History teaches us that in the '''Battle of Vloerijgen''' (866 ab U.c., that is 113 d.C.) the future country of ''Aarlaans'' became a part of Roman Empire. | But why should the Romans have given this place the name of "plains of the tree"? The explanation was found only in 2609 ab U.c. (that is circa 1856 of our era): during an archaeological excavation it was found a table that dates back to 867 ab U.c. (circa 114 of our era), on this table was written the anecdote of the defeat of Germanic Tribes in a Northern territory by the Roman army of Trajan. According to this narration, the emperor had a prophetic dream: the Roman army would have won, only if it had attacked the Germanic tribes far from the forest, in an endless plain. The sign that would have shown the right place would have been a solitary tree, the only one within this immense plain. History teaches us that in the '''Battle of Vloerijgen''' (866 ab U.c., that is 113 d.C.) the future country of ''Aarlaans'' became a part of Roman Empire. | ||
Aarlaansc is a ''Romance language'' that descends from Vulgar Latin, even if, in spite of other languages of the same family, in Aarlaansc many common terms derive from Classical Latin. Moreover the Aarlaansc contains many terms of Celtic - specifically of Gaulish - origin and also many terms of Germanic origin: circa 65% of Aarlaansc words comes from Latin, circa 23% comes from Gaulish and circa 12% comes from Germanic. | |||
=Phonology= | =Phonology= | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
==Alphabet== | ==Alphabet== | ||
The | The Aarlaansc alphabet contains 23 letters and 2 digraphs that is considered a distinct letter: | ||
{| {{Table/bluetable}} style="text-align:center; vertical-align:middle" | {| {{Table/bluetable}} style="text-align:center; vertical-align:middle" | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
|[b] | |[b] | ||
| - | | - | ||
|- | |||
|c | |||
|[k] | |||
|it is used in front of 'a', 'o', and 'u' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|d | |d | ||
| Line 80: | Line 84: | ||
|[ɛi̯] | |[ɛi̯] | ||
|when unstressed it is written ''ei'' and it is read as a schwa [ə] | |when unstressed it is written ''ei'' and it is read as a schwa [ə] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|l | |l | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
|short [ɔ] - long [o:] | |short [ɔ] - long [o:] | ||
| - | | - | ||
|- | |||
|qu | |||
|[k] | |||
|it is always written with 'u'; if it is doubled it is written 'cqu' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|p | |p | ||
| Line 129: | Line 133: | ||
|at the end of a word, after a vowel, it is pronounced [u̯] and it forms diphthong, f.ex.: ''yw'', "that", ['iu̯] | |at the end of a word, after a vowel, it is pronounced [u̯] and it forms diphthong, f.ex.: ''yw'', "that", ['iu̯] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |x | ||
|[ | |[ʃ] | ||
| | | - | ||
|- | |- | ||
|z | |z | ||