2,334
edits
Carpathian language: Difference between revisions
m
→Vocabulary
m (→Pronouns) |
m (→Vocabulary) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox language | {{Infobox language | ||
| image = File:Carpathian_language.jpg|350px|thumbnail|Map of Carpathian dialect groups:{{legend|#71A040|Western Carpathian}}{{legend|#C097FF|Eastern Carpathian}} | |||
| name = Carpathian | | name = Carpathian | ||
| nativename = Karpātiška/Karpātiska | | nativename = Karpātiška/Karpātiska | ||
| pronunciation = kar.ˈpāː.tiʂ.ka/kɑr.ˈpɑ̄ː.tis.kɑ | | pronunciation = kar.ˈpāː.tiʂ.ka/kɑr.ˈpɑ̄ː.tis.kɑ | ||
| states = Slovakia, Ukraine, Poland | | states = Slovakia, Ukraine, Poland | ||
| speakers = | | speakers = 800.000 | ||
| date = 2018–2001 | | date = 2018–2001 | ||
| familycolor = Indo-European | | familycolor = Indo-European | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
| ethnicity = Carpathians | | ethnicity = Carpathians | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Carpathian''', (Western: ''Karpātiška tāris'' [kar.ˈpāː.tiʂ.ka. ˈtāː.ris]; Eastern: ''Karpātiska tāris'' [kɑr.ˈpɑ̄ː.tis.kɑ. ˈtɑ̄ː.ris]) forms an independent branch of the [[w:Indo-European languages|Indo-European languages]], closely related to [[w:Balto-Slavic languages|Balto-Slavic languages]]. It is spoken in the [[w:Carpathian Mountains|Carpathian]] region of Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine. Carpathian is written in the Latin alphabet, although Cyrillic had also been used during the Soviet period. The total number of Carpathian speakers worldwide is estimated between | '''Carpathian''', (Western: ''Karpātiška tāris'' [kar.ˈpāː.tiʂ.ka. ˈtāː.ris]; Eastern: ''Karpātiska tāris'' [kɑr.ˈpɑ̄ː.tis.kɑ. ˈtɑ̄ː.ris]) forms an independent branch of the [[w:Indo-European languages|Indo-European languages]], closely related to [[w:Balto-Slavic languages|Balto-Slavic languages]]. It is spoken in the [[w:Carpathian Mountains|Carpathian]] region of Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine. Carpathian is written in the Latin alphabet, although Cyrillic had also been used during the Soviet period. The total number of Carpathian speakers worldwide is estimated between 760 and 840 thousand, including the Carpathian-speaking diaspora. | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
''See also: [[Carpathian historical development]]'' | ''See also: [[Carpathian historical development]]'' | ||
[[File:Carpathian_Primer.jpg|thumb|Wiltā Laziniskā’s “Eastern Carpathian Primer” published in Eastern Carpathian in 1924. Prior to that, the Western variety was the only written standard for the Carpathian language.]] | |||
===Classification and origins=== | ===Classification and origins=== | ||
[[File:Carpathian_language.jpg|350px|thumbnail|Map of Carpathian dialect groups: | |||
{{legend|#71A040|Western Carpathian}} | |||
{{legend|#C097FF|Eastern Carpathian}}]] | |||
Carpathian is classified as an independent branch of the Indo-European languages, although it shares many common features with the Balto-Slavic languages. Some linguists tentatively conclude that Carpathian was dialectally close to that subbranch and connect it to the [[w:Paleo-Balkan languages|extinct languages]] of the Balkans, [[w:Dacian language|Dacian]] in particular. It is of interest to linguists for its distinctive phonological conservatism among modern Indo-European languages. Just as the Balto-Slavic languages, Carpathian exhibits [[w:Centum and satem languages|satemization]] (''śum̃ta'' “hundred” from Proto-Indo-European ''*ḱm̥tóm''), although some words developed as in the centum languages, such as ''gansìs'' “goose” from *ǵʰh₂éns (same as Slavic *gǫ̑sь). | Carpathian is classified as an independent branch of the Indo-European languages, although it shares many common features with the Balto-Slavic languages. Some linguists tentatively conclude that Carpathian was dialectally close to that subbranch and connect it to the [[w:Paleo-Balkan languages|extinct languages]] of the Balkans, [[w:Dacian language|Dacian]] in particular. It is of interest to linguists for its distinctive phonological conservatism among modern Indo-European languages. Just as the Balto-Slavic languages, Carpathian exhibits [[w:Centum and satem languages|satemization]] (''śum̃ta'' “hundred” from Proto-Indo-European ''*ḱm̥tóm''), although some words developed as in the centum languages, such as ''gansìs'' “goose” from *ǵʰh₂éns (same as Slavic *gǫ̑sь). | ||
The Carpathian region was a multilingual through its history, Carpathian vocabulary has historically been influenced by Paleo-Balkan, Slavic, Pannonian Avar and Hungarian, the latter two affected the language to a lesser extent. | The Carpathian region was a multilingual through its history, Carpathian vocabulary has historically been influenced by Paleo-Balkan, Slavic, Pannonian Avar and Hungarian, the latter two affected the language to a lesser extent. Contact with German during the Austro-Hungarian period also resulted in a number of loanwords, particularly vocabulary related to trade and industry. There are two standardised modern literary forms, Eastern Carpathian in Ukraine and Poland and Western Carpathian in Slovakia, with which most contemporary dialects are mutually intelligible. Although Carpathians were known to history much earlier, both forms were codified in the 19th century. | ||
===Early contacts=== | ===Early contacts=== | ||
Several linguists throughout the late 20th century noted the presence of so called "Carpathian [[w:Stratum_(linguistics)#Substratum|substratum]]" – an unidentified, likely non-Indo-European language formerly spoken in the Carpathians. Because there are irregularities in Carpathian substrate words, they might have been borrowed from distinct, but closely related languages. In the west, the substrate languages probably had an š-type sibilant which corresponds to an s-type sibilant in the east. The speakers of the Proto-Carpathian language arrived in the region around 2500 BCE and fully assimilated the local [[w:Paleo-European languages|Paleo-European]] population by the middle of 1st millennium BCE. The detailed reconstruction of this language (or languages) is impossible. Some of the borrowed words have cognates in all dialects of Carpathian, and semantically the substrate consists primarily of basic geographic and botanical terminology as well as toponymy, they are better preserved in dialectal vocabulary of the Carpathian Highlands. Some aspects of the Carpathian phonology, such as pleophony and consonant gemination, and grammar (absence of the passive voice, polypersonal agreement of verbs) are associated with the substrate. | Several linguists throughout the late 20th century noted the presence of so called "Carpathian [[w:Stratum_(linguistics)#Substratum|substratum]]" – an unidentified, likely non-Indo-European language formerly spoken in the Carpathians. Because there are irregularities in Carpathian substrate words, they might have been borrowed from distinct, but closely related languages. In the west, the substrate languages probably had an š-type sibilant which corresponds to an s-type sibilant in the east. The speakers of the Proto-Carpathian language arrived in the region around 2500 BCE and fully assimilated the local [[w:Paleo-European languages|Paleo-European]] population by the middle of 1st millennium BCE. The detailed reconstruction of this language (or languages) is impossible. Some of the borrowed words have cognates in all dialects of Carpathian, and semantically the substrate consists primarily of basic geographic and botanical terminology as well as toponymy, they are better preserved in dialectal vocabulary of the Carpathian Highlands. Some aspects of the Carpathian phonology, such as pleophony and consonant gemination, and grammar (absence of the passive voice, polypersonal agreement of verbs) are associated with the substrate. | ||
The hypothesis that Carpathian is the closest living relative to the Paleo-Balkan languages originated in 1944, based on the number of proposed lexical cognates being greater than that of between Dacian and any other Indo-European subfamily. The other more recent proposal is Carpathian being a divergent Baltic language, it found the most support in Lithuania; the proposal also includes the Paleo-Balkan languages as a closely related subbranch. Noting that Dacian-speaking peoples inhabited the Carpathian region till the fifth century CE, providing a substratum of abstract, geographical and biological terms such as ''ramùs'' “peaceful” ( ← Dac. ''*ramus''), ''kòpa/kàpa'' “mountain slope” ( ← Dac. ''*kapas''), ''kérbā'' “swamp” ( ← Dac. *kerba), '' | The hypothesis that Carpathian is the closest living relative to the Paleo-Balkan languages originated in 1944, based on the number of proposed lexical cognates being greater than that of between Dacian and any other Indo-European subfamily. The other more recent proposal is Carpathian being a divergent Baltic language, it found the most support in Lithuania; the proposal also includes the Paleo-Balkan languages as a closely related subbranch. Noting that Dacian-speaking peoples inhabited the Carpathian region till the fifth century CE, providing a substratum of abstract, geographical and biological terms such as ''ramùs'' “peaceful” ( ← Dac. ''*ramus''), ''kòpa/kàpa'' “mountain slope” ( ← Dac. ''*kapas''), ''kérbā'' “swamp” ( ← Dac. *kerba), ''burùkalā'' “cranberry” ( ← Dac. ''*brukla'') or ''tī́ras'' “blank, desolate” ( ← Dac. ''*tiras''). Other linguists have rejected the Dacian origins for many of these words and instead suggest native Carpathian etymologies, however some words, such as ''dìtas'' “bright” cannot be explained otherwise – PIE ''*dih₂tís'' “brightness” would have resulted in ''**dī́tas''. | ||
===Shared features with Balto-Slavic=== | ===Shared features with Balto-Slavic=== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 47: | ||
Some examples of words shared between Carpathian and Balto-Slavic languages: “linden” — Carpathian ''léipā'', Lithuanian ''líepa'', Old Prussian ''līpa'', Common Slavic ''*lìpa''; “hand” — Carpathian ''rañkā'', Lithuanian ''rankà'', Old Prussian ''ranka'', Common Slavic ''*rǭkà''; “head” — Carpathian ''galwā́'', Lithuanian ''galvà'', Old Prussian ''galwa'', Common Slavic ''*golvà''. | Some examples of words shared between Carpathian and Balto-Slavic languages: “linden” — Carpathian ''léipā'', Lithuanian ''líepa'', Old Prussian ''līpa'', Common Slavic ''*lìpa''; “hand” — Carpathian ''rañkā'', Lithuanian ''rankà'', Old Prussian ''ranka'', Common Slavic ''*rǭkà''; “head” — Carpathian ''galwā́'', Lithuanian ''galvà'', Old Prussian ''galwa'', Common Slavic ''*golvà''. | ||
Many scholars instead prefer a dialect continuum model where the late PIE northeastern dialects developed into Balto-Slavic (or even separate Baltic and Slavic), while the southwestern dialect that had migrated into the mountains developed into Carpathian. This may explain many differences between the two branches, particularly in their corresponding verbal morphology and lexicon, as well as certain archaic Carpathian features, not found in Balto-Slavic, such as consonantal reflexes of Proto-Indo-European laryngeals *h₂ and *h₃, found only in the [[w:Anatolian languages|Anatolian]] languages and Armenian (irregularly): Carpathian ''harèlis<sup>W</sup>/harìlis<sup>E</sup>'' “eagle” (from PIE ''*h₃érō''), with some words having doublets in dialects ''hwḗjas/wḗjas'' “air” (PIE''*h₂weh₁-'' “to blow”), '' | Many scholars instead prefer a dialect continuum model where the late PIE northeastern dialects developed into Balto-Slavic (or even separate Baltic and Slavic), while the southwestern dialect that had migrated into the mountains developed into Carpathian. This may explain many differences between the two branches, particularly in their corresponding verbal morphology and lexicon, as well as certain archaic Carpathian features, not found in Balto-Slavic, such as consonantal reflexes of Proto-Indo-European laryngeals *h₂ and *h₃, found only in the [[w:Anatolian languages|Anatolian]] languages and Armenian (irregularly): Carpathian ''harèlis<sup>W</sup>/harìlis<sup>E</sup>'' “eagle” (from PIE ''*h₃érō''), with some words having doublets in dialects ''hwḗjas/wḗjas'' “air” (PIE''*h₂weh₁-'' “to blow”), ''meibáheta'' “is telling me it” (*bʰéh₂ti “to speak”). | ||
==Phonology== | ==Phonology== | ||
| Line 143: | Line 149: | ||
===Pitch accent=== | ===Pitch accent=== | ||
Standard Carpathian and most of the Carpathian dialects, have mobile pitch accent. There are three types of tones: | Standard Carpathian and most of the Carpathian dialects, have mobile pitch accent. There are three types of tones: | ||
*Rising, acute or tone-1 — rising tone if followed by another syllable, or a brief rise followed by a long fall, if followed by a pause: ''dílgas'' [ˈdíl. | *Rising, acute or tone-1 — rising tone if followed by another syllable, or a brief rise followed by a long fall, if followed by a pause: ''dílgas'' [ˈdíl.gɑ́s] “long (masculine)” if followed by another word, or [ˈdíl.gɑ̀s] if followed by a pause; ''rankā́'' [ˈrɑ̂ŋ.kɑ́ː] “hand” if followed by a pause; The syllable preceding stressed syllable receives an [[w:Upstep|upstep]] , when the stressed syllable is followed by pause. | ||
*Level, circumflex or tone-2 — mid tone, steady throughout the syllable: ''tāris'' [ˈtɑ̄ː.rīs] “language” if followed by another word, or [ˈtɑ̄ː.rìs] if followed by a pause. The stressed syllable receives a [[w:Downstep|downstep]], if the preceeding word has rising pitch. | *Level, circumflex or tone-2 — mid tone, steady throughout the syllable: ''tāris'' [ˈtɑ̄ː.rīs] “language” if followed by another word, or [ˈtɑ̄ː.rìs] if followed by a pause. The stressed syllable receives a [[w:Downstep|downstep]], if the preceeding word has rising pitch. | ||
*Falling or tone-3 – short falling or low tone: ''ràgas'' [ˈrɑ̀. | *Falling or tone-3 – short falling or low tone: ''ràgas'' [ˈrɑ̀.gɑ̀s] (Western ''rògas'' [ˈrò.gɑ̀s]) “horn”. The stressed syllable receives a downstep if the preceding word has either tone-1 or tone-2. | ||
Tones 1 and 2 are only possible for long syllables – those containing either a long monophthong, a diphthong, or a short vowel followed by a sonorant in a closed syllable. Short stressed syllables receive tone-3 by default, historically the distinction in pitch neutralised in short syllables to a low tone. Unstressed syllables (both short and long) harmonise with the stressed syllable, they do not receive a distinct tone on their own, but keep the pitch height of the stressed syllable. Historically some unstressed long syllables could receive rising pitch (tone-1), which used to be independent from the stress position, while all other long syllables received tone-2. However, the pitch distinction was later lost on all unaccented syllables, turning into the intonation distinction that spreads through the whole accented word. | Tones 1 and 2 are only possible for long syllables – those containing either a long monophthong, a diphthong, or a short vowel followed by a sonorant in a closed syllable. Short stressed syllables receive tone-3 by default, historically the distinction in pitch neutralised in short syllables to a low tone. Unstressed syllables (both short and long) harmonise with the stressed syllable, they do not receive a distinct tone on their own, but keep the pitch height of the stressed syllable. Historically some unstressed long syllables could receive rising pitch (tone-1), which used to be independent from the stress position, while all other long syllables received tone-2. However, the pitch distinction was later lost on all unaccented syllables, turning into the intonation distinction that spreads through the whole accented word. | ||
==Grammar== | ==Grammar== | ||
[[File:Carpathian_Grammar.png|thumb|Jānas Paišutis’ ''Karpātiškās Gramatika'' (“Carpathian Grammar”) written in Western Carpathian in 1901]] | |||
The first prescriptive printed grammar of the Carpathian language – Grammatica Carpathica was published in 1771 in Vienna, written in Latin. | The first prescriptive printed grammar of the Carpathian language – Grammatica Carpathica was published in 1771 in Vienna, written in Latin. | ||
| Line 191: | Line 198: | ||
In Carpathian, adjectives have two declensions determined by the singular and plural nominative case inflections. Adjectives agree with nouns in number, gender, and case, but adjectives lack vocative and use their nominative forms in those cases. | In Carpathian, adjectives have two declensions determined by the singular and plural nominative case inflections. Adjectives agree with nouns in number, gender, and case, but adjectives lack vocative and use their nominative forms in those cases. | ||
A Carpathian innovation to the inflection of adjectives was the creation of a pronominal inflection by affixing forms of the object pronominal clitics to existing adjective forms. The inflection had a function resembling [[w:Predicate (grammar)|predication]] or [[w:Definiteness|definiteness]]: ''nawas'' “new” — ''nawasis'' “the new one”, “nawasmi” “I am new”. When declining for case, only the adjective changes: ''nawaimi'' “for me being new”. Pronominal forms often indicate something unique, and they are usually used with proper names: ''Kiršanajis mari'' “the Black Sea”, ''Nawājis Zelandijā'' “New Zealand”; as well as in scientific terminology: ''diskas | A Carpathian innovation to the inflection of adjectives was the creation of a pronominal inflection by affixing forms of the object pronominal clitics to existing adjective forms. The inflection had a function resembling [[w:Predicate (grammar)|predication]] or [[w:Definiteness|definiteness]]: ''nawas'' “new” — ''nawasis'' “the new one”, “nawasmi” “I am new”. When declining for case, only the adjective changes: ''nawaimi'' “for me being new”. Pronominal forms often indicate something unique, and they are usually used with proper names: ''Kiršanajis mari'' “the Black Sea”, ''Nawājis Zelandijā'' “New Zealand”; as well as in scientific terminology: ''diskas tvirtasis'' “hard disk”, ''ellis abitisis<sup>W</sup>/allis aukarisis<sup>E</sup>'' “common spruce”. | ||
===Pronouns=== | ===Pronouns=== | ||
Carpathian pronouns has a distinct grammatical category of [[w:Animacy|animacy]]: ''Kan waistai'' “Whom have you seen?” (animate), but ''ki waistai'' “What have you seen?” (inanimate). ''inakan aidaini'' “I have seen something” ''inaki waidaita'' “I have seen something”. | Carpathian pronouns has a distinct grammatical category of [[w:Animacy|animacy]]: ''Kan waistai'' “Whom have you seen?” (animate), but ''ki waistai'' “What have you seen?” (inanimate). ''inakan aidaini'' “I have seen something” ''inaki waidaita'' “I have seen something”. | ||
| Line 201: | Line 209: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=4 | Singular !! colspan=2 | 1st person | ! rowspan=4 | Singular !! colspan=2 | 1st person | ||
| ēžù/ā̃s || mène/màne || meĩ|| mḗn/mā́n || | | ēžù/ā̃s || mène/màne || meĩ|| mḗn/mā́n || mùnajūn || munái | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan=2 | 2nd person | ! colspan=2 | 2nd person | ||
| tū́ || tèwe/tàwe || teĩ || tḗn/tā́n || | | tū́ || tèwe/tàwe || teĩ || tḗn/tā́n || twàjūn || twái | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=2 | 3rd person !! Animate | ! rowspan=2 | 3rd person !! Animate | ||
| jìs || | | jìs || jī̃ || jái || jiñ || jū || jamái | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Inaninate | ! Inaninate | ||
| jì || | | jì || jī̃ || jeĩ || jiñ || jū || jamái | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan=3 | Reflexive pronoun | ! colspan=3 | [[w:Reflexive pronoun|Reflexive pronoun]] | ||
| – || séwe || sebái || sḗn || sàbūn || sabái | | – || séwe || sebái || sḗn || sàbūn || sabái | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 223: | Line 231: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan=2 | 3rd person | ! colspan=2 | 3rd person | ||
| jī́ || | | jī́ || ejáu || eimā̃ || jī́ || eimā̃ || ejáu | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=4 | Plural | ! rowspan=4 | Plural | ||
| Line 233: | Line 241: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=2 | 3rd person !! Animate | ! rowspan=2 | 3rd person !! Animate | ||
| jī́s || jū̃n || | | jī́s || jū̃n || eĩmas || jiñs || eĩmīs || eĩšu | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Inanimate | ! Inanimate | ||
| jī́ || jū̃n || | | jī́ || jū̃n || eĩmas || jī́ || eĩmīs || eĩšu | ||
|} | |} | ||
The personal pronouns are usually used only for emphasis, since the information about the person is already indicated on a verb. The reflexive pronoun ''sēn'' can be used with any person for both reflexive and intensive meaning, although the latter is uncommon and is considered to be Slavic influence, as it is more common to use the third person pronoun instead. Here are the example of reflexive and intensive usage: ''Janas '''sebai''' kunīgān kaupījesa'' “John bought '''himself''' a book” (reflexive); ''Janas '''jis''' kunīgān kaupījesa'' “John '''himself''' bought a book” (intensive). | |||
===Verbs=== | ===Verbs=== | ||
| Line 248: | Line 257: | ||
In terms of grammatical tense, it is more accurate to speak of an aspectual distinction in Carpathian, although its aspects overlap with a more common use of tense in other European languages. The Carpathian aspectual system includes present or [[w:Imperfective aspect|imperfective]], [[w:Aorist|aorist]], [[w:Imperfect|imperfect]], [[w:Perfect (grammar)|perfect]] and [[w:Future tense|future]]. Although still present, the stative is no longer a separate productive category, becoming instead a subclass of inactive verbs. There are three moods: [[w:Realis mood|indicative]], [[w:Optative mood|optative]] and [[w:Subjunctive mood|subjunctive]] with optative often replacing the old [[w:Imperative mood|imperative]] in the standard as well as in most dialects. | In terms of grammatical tense, it is more accurate to speak of an aspectual distinction in Carpathian, although its aspects overlap with a more common use of tense in other European languages. The Carpathian aspectual system includes present or [[w:Imperfective aspect|imperfective]], [[w:Aorist|aorist]], [[w:Imperfect|imperfect]], [[w:Perfect (grammar)|perfect]] and [[w:Future tense|future]]. Although still present, the stative is no longer a separate productive category, becoming instead a subclass of inactive verbs. There are three moods: [[w:Realis mood|indicative]], [[w:Optative mood|optative]] and [[w:Subjunctive mood|subjunctive]] with optative often replacing the old [[w:Imperative mood|imperative]] in the standard as well as in most dialects. | ||
Unlike many European languages, Carpathian lacks [[w:Passive voice|passive]] voice in finite verbs, but it preserves passive participles, reanalysed as inactive or [[w:Stative verb|stative]]. The [[w:Infinitive|infinitive]] is formed by the addition of the suffix ''-tei'', which likely arose as a participle in the dative case. The [[w:Supine|supine]] is formed by the addition of the suffix ''-tun'', which might have the same origin, as the infinitive, but as the accusative case instead. Both forms are unconjugated and usually used with finite verbs to indicate a specific occasion, goal or purpose, which is also true for participles. They can also be used independently as a main element of a subordinate clause. | Unlike many European languages, Carpathian lacks [[w:Passive voice|passive]] voice in finite verbs, but it preserves passive participles, reanalysed as inactive or [[w:Stative verb|stative]]. Passive constructions are usually expressed by inactive verbs: ''kartamun teikirtājata'' “I have written a letter to you” (active); ''kartamas teikirtājasasin'' “the letter has been written to you” (inactive); ''kartamas kirtājatas'' “the letter, which has been written” (passive, non-finite). | ||
The [[w:Infinitive|infinitive]] is formed by the addition of the suffix ''-tei'', which likely arose as a participle in the dative case. The [[w:Supine|supine]] is formed by the addition of the suffix ''-tun'', which might have the same origin, as the infinitive, but as the accusative case instead. Both forms are unconjugated and usually used with finite verbs to indicate a specific occasion, goal or purpose, which is also true for participles. They can also be used independently as a main element of a subordinate clause. | |||
Finite transitive verbs take more than one personal suffix to mark both the subject and the direct object of a clause. Some verbs additionally take the indirect object prefix (also called the recipient). This is called [[w:Polypersonal agreement|polypersonal agreement]], and it is rare among the Indo-European languages. | Finite transitive verbs take more than one personal suffix to mark both the subject and the direct object of a clause. Some verbs additionally take the indirect object prefix (also called the recipient). This is called [[w:Polypersonal agreement|polypersonal agreement]], and it is rare among the Indo-European languages. | ||
==Syntax== | |||
Carpathian has an '''SVO''' (subject–verb–object) or '''SOV''' (subject–object-verb) as the most neutral word orders: Adjunct (temporal, locative, causal) + Subject + Object(s) + Verb + Infinitive + other parts. At the same time Carpathian as a highly [[w:Fusional language|inflected]] language is considered to have the free word order. The [[w:Topic and comment|topic]] is usually placed first in the sentence, with everything else following it with the comment being the final part. Depending on its relevancy, the [[w:Adjunct (grammar)|adjunct]] may be either initial or final in a sentence. The verb usually follows the subject, but the reverse order is common as well, especially in questions or quotes. Adjectives typically follow the noun, if they have a pronominal clitic, but otherwise their placement in the sentence is relatively free, as they may even be disconnected from the noun they modify: ''zelhanis nōtirpunsa ābalun'' “I found a green apple” (literally: “green I found apple”). | |||
'''Prepositions''' is the only part of speech that tends to precede the noun they modify. [[w:Preposition and postposition|Prepositions]] provide additional information about the position of an object or the direction it is moving. Certain prepositions are used with certain cases, some prepositions may be used with more than one case. The list of Carpathian prepositions: | |||
With genitive case: | |||
* '''is''' – out of | |||
* '''han''' – on | |||
* '''da''' – till | |||
* '''at''' – away, from | |||
* '''pa''' – after, past | |||
* '''pire''' – near, at | |||
* '''zō''' – for the sake of | |||
* '''habi''' – around | |||
* '''be''' – without | |||
With instrumental case: | |||
* '''pō''' – under | |||
* '''sun''' – with | |||
* '''ker''' – through, over, via | |||
* '''zō''' – behind | |||
With dative case: | |||
* '''pas''' – on the surface | |||
With accusative case: | |||
* '''in''' – in | |||
* '''pas''' – to, at | |||
* '''per''' – across, by, during | |||
* '''par''' – through, because of | |||
* '''api''' – about | |||
In some cases, prepositions can be used after the noun they modify, in which case they become postpositions: ''Esti penkīs penkiū pas'' “It’s five past five”. In case, when a verb of motion is used with a prefix, the preposition is usually dropped, but not in cases, when the preposition is different from the verb prefix: '''''Zō'''jeimi '''in''' damanmi'' “I walk into my house from behind”, but '''''In'''eimi midamun'' “I enter my house”. [[w:Preposition stranding|Stranding]] can seldom occur in dialects, but it is not allowed in the standard language. | |||
'''Conjunctions''' are used to link together clauses in a sentence. Some common Carpathian [[w:Conjunction (grammar)|conjunctions]] are: | |||
* '''ō/ei''' – and | |||
* '''be/nu''' – but | |||
* '''har''' – or, question starter | |||
* '''jilei/lei''' – if | |||
* '''kai''' – that | |||
* '''dakai''' – until | |||
* '''ali''' – or/but | |||
* '''ba''' – because | |||
* '''parta''' – however | |||
Some conjunctions can follow the clause they modify: ''weidēsa be ne weidēsa '''lei''', ne zinōhū'' “'''Whether''' he saw it or not, I don’t know”. | |||
==Vocabulary== | |||
''Main article: [[Carpathian vocabulary]]'' | |||
''Main article: [[Carpathian/Phrasebook]]'' | |||
Although the Carpathian language is Indo-European, one can identify many words that do not have cognates within the Indo-European language family. Carpathian has borrowed a large portion of its vocabulary from the Balto-Slavic languages, mainly from Slovak, Polish, Ukrainian, as well as some words from Hungarian, a Uralic language, and an extinct Oghuric language, called Avar, that used to be spoken south of the Carpathian Mountains. The percentage of [[w:Paleo-Balkan languages|Paleo-Balkan]] loanwords can be estimated at approximately 5%, which is comparable to Romanian and Hungarian loanwords in Southern Lowlands dialects of Carpathian, but they constitute a specific portion of vocabulary, such as topographical features and plants. The [[w:Pre-Indo-European languages|Pre-Indo-European substrate]] is more well-preserved in Eastern Carpathian, particularly in the Highland dialects. In these borrowings, the voiced plosives are unstable or non-existent, which may indicate that the original languages lacked voicing distinction. The initial "s" before another consonant (often called the [[w:Indo-European s-mobile|s-mobile]]) is often dropped before a plosive, with some exceptions, such as ''stogas<sup>W</sup>/stagas<sup>E</sup>'' “stack” from PIE ''*stógos'' (which is also an example, where [[w:Winter's law|Winter's law]] failed to apply, suggesting that the word may be a loanword). | |||
[[Category:Languages]] | [[Category:Languages]] | ||
[[Category:Carpathian]] | [[Category:Carpathian]] | ||