Laceyiam: Difference between revisions

22,863 bytes added ,  21 January 2018
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(78 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{movedon}}
{{Infobox language
|name          = Laceyiam
|nativname      = Chlegdarimė hėnna
|pronunciation = [ɴ̆acɕ͡eˈʝam]; [ˈc͡ɕʰɴ̆ei̯daʝimeː ˈɦeːnna]
|states (state) = Laltīmāhia
|region        = Southern third of the continent of Isungatsuaq, on the planet of Calémere
|ethnicity    = Chlėgdarims (''Chlėgdarimai'')
|speakers      = {{formatnum:1450000000}}
|date          = 4E 133
|setting      = Calémere
|familycolor  = #F3B1F5
|fam1          = Cis-Tahianshima
|fam2          = Chlegdarim
|creator      = [[User:Lili21|Lili21]]
|created      = 2016
|stand1        = Standard Laceyiam (Laltīmāhei hėnna)
|stand2        = Classical Laceyiam (Chløyęe Laceyiam)
|script        = Chlegdarimė jīmaṃlīne
|nation        = Laltīmāhia, Mǎng Tì pọk, Brono
|agency        = Inquisitorial Office of the Language (hėnni havtnamila)
}}
'''Laceyiam, '''or '''Chlegdarimė hėnna '''("language of the Chlegdarims"), or, in its modern standard version, '''Laltīmāhei hėnna''' ("language of Laltīmāhia") is the most spoken language on the planet of Calémere (Lac.: ''Lillańjānna''). It is the official language of ''Laltīmāhia,'' the liturgical language of the ''Yūnialtia,'' and a lingua franca in many areas of the continent of Isungatsuaq (Lac.: ''Kaissmūhai'').
'''Laceyiam, '''or '''Chlegdarimė hėnna '''("language of the Chlegdarims"), or, in its modern standard version, '''Laltīmāhei hėnna''' ("language of Laltīmāhia") is the most spoken language on the planet of Calémere (Lac.: ''Lillańjānna''). It is the official language of ''Laltīmāhia,'' the liturgical language of the ''Yūnialtia,'' and a lingua franca in many areas of the continent of Isungatsuaq (Lac.: ''Kaissmūhai'').
Despite the fact that local vernaculars in most of Laltīmāhia are in fact daughter languages of Laceyiam or Laceyiam-based creoles, Laceyiam is a fully living language as every Chlegdarim is bilingual in it and in the local vernacular, and in fact in the last half century Laceyiam itself has been replacing some vernaculars as internal migrations have become more and more common. About 1,4 billion people on the planet define themselves as native Laceyiam speakers, more than for any other Calémerian language.
Despite the fact that local vernaculars in most of Laltīmāhia are in fact daughter languages of Laceyiam or Laceyiam-based creoles, Laceyiam is a fully living language as every Chlegdarim is bilingual in it and in the local vernacular, and in fact in the last half century Laceyiam itself has been replacing some vernaculars as internal migrations have become more and more common. About 1,4 billion people on the planet define themselves as native Laceyiam speakers, more than for any other Calémerian language.


Terminological note: hereafter I'll use ''Laceyiami ''as an adjective for things related to the language, ''Chlegdarim ''for things related to the Chlegdarim people, ''Laltīmāhei ''for things related to the nation of Laltīmāhia and ''Yūnialtei ''for things related to the Yūnialtia, the religion of the Chlegdarims. (Still, keep in mind these definitions often overlap)
Terminological note: hereafter I'll use ''Laceyiami ''as an adjective for things related to the language, ''Chlegdarim ''for things related to the Chlegdarim people, ''Laltīmāhei ''for things related to the nation of Laltīmāhia and ''Yūnialtei ''for things related to the Yūnialtia, the religion of the Chlegdarims. (Still, keep in mind these definitions often overlap)
'''NOTE''' that Laceyiam is not being worked on anymore, as [[Chlouvānem]] is its new version.


== External history ==
== External history ==
Laceyiam is an a priori language I (''[[User:Lili21|lili21]]'') started creating - in this current version - in January 2016, but actually it is the latest version of the conlang for my main conculture. I started sketching conlangs back when I was 9 or 10 but only started interesting myself into linguistics seven years later - in 2014 - and since then I started doing more "serious" conlangs (the earlier ones were more like relexes of my native language, Italian). Ideally, Laceyiam is the refined version of all of these languages, but except for a few recurring words (like ''maila'' (water) or ''hulyn'' (woman)) it is only comparable to those languages I have been creating since July 2015 - in fact, the nearest previous version, which I began in October 2015, was already called Laceyiam.
Laceyiam is an a priori language I (''[[User:Lili21|lili21]]'') started creating - in this current version - in January 2016, but actually it is the latest version of the conlang for my main conculture. I started sketching conlangs back when I was 9 or 10 but only started interesting myself into linguistics seven years later - in 2014 - and since then I started doing more "serious" conlangs (the earlier ones were more like relexes of my native language, Italian). Ideally, Laceyiam is the refined version of all of these languages, but except for a few recurring words (like ''maila'' (water) or ''hulyn'' (woman)) it is only comparable to those languages I have been creating since July 2015 - in fact, the nearest previous version, which I began in October 2015, was already called Laceyiam.


Anyway, while being a priori, there are definitely many noticeable influences from natlangs. ''Sanskrit, Lithuanian,'' and ''Icelandic'' are the most obvious ones, and also ''Danish, PIE, Old Tupi,'' and ''Japanese'' had a moderate influence. However, I tried to do something that while having much in common with all of these languages, is also strikingly different (the Austronesian morphosyntactic alignment, morphological expression of evidentiality and more broadly the particular emphasis on moods probably being the most noticeable things). Laceyiam is mainly thought for my conworld, but more than any other conlang of mine it is quite on the border between an art- and a heartlang.
Anyway, while being a priori, there are definitely many noticeable influences from natlangs. ''Sanskrit, Lithuanian,'' and ''Icelandic'' are the most obvious ones, and also ''Danish, PIE'' (and, more as a consequence of all of these, also ''Latin'' and ''Ancient Greek''), ''Old Tupi'', and ''Japanese'' all had a moderate influence. However, I tried to do something that while having much in common with all of these languages, is also strikingly different (the Austronesian morphosyntactic alignment, morphological expression of evidentiality and more broadly the particular emphasis on moods probably being the most noticeable things). Moreover, I tried to create a language very different from Italian while keeping many - not so apparent - similarities.
 
Laceyiam is mainly thought for my conworld, but more than any other conlang of mine it is quite on the border between an art- and a heartlang.


== Classification ==
== Classification ==
Line 19: Line 45:
Being a classical language first spoken some millenniums ago, Laceyiam today does not have true “dialects”. As said before, the most informal form of Laceyiam is usually a local vernacular, daughter language of Laceyiam, but in usual terminology they are not truly distinguished: the term ''Chlegdarimė hėnna'', often used to refer to Laceyiam, may be used for any language spoken by Chlegdarims, thereby including the vernaculars. All vernaculars are usually known as '''Chlegdarimė hlūðė hėnnai''' (singular: ''— hlūði hėnna''), literally “local Chlegdarim language(s)”, and people colloquially call their vernacular speech with the name of their village, city, or region, as opposed to the ''Laltīmāhei hėnna'' - the common language of all of Laltīmāhia, that is standard Laceyiam. The diglossia between them often has blurry borders, as two people speaking may keep code-switching depending on the topic, a common example being in schools: teachers and professors teach their lessons in Laceyiam, but they usually speak in vernacular language of any other topic even with the students.
Being a classical language first spoken some millenniums ago, Laceyiam today does not have true “dialects”. As said before, the most informal form of Laceyiam is usually a local vernacular, daughter language of Laceyiam, but in usual terminology they are not truly distinguished: the term ''Chlegdarimė hėnna'', often used to refer to Laceyiam, may be used for any language spoken by Chlegdarims, thereby including the vernaculars. All vernaculars are usually known as '''Chlegdarimė hlūðė hėnnai''' (singular: ''— hlūði hėnna''), literally “local Chlegdarim language(s)”, and people colloquially call their vernacular speech with the name of their village, city, or region, as opposed to the ''Laltīmāhei hėnna'' - the common language of all of Laltīmāhia, that is standard Laceyiam. The diglossia between them often has blurry borders, as two people speaking may keep code-switching depending on the topic, a common example being in schools: teachers and professors teach their lessons in Laceyiam, but they usually speak in vernacular language of any other topic even with the students.


While Laceyiam does not have local dialects, there are speech varieties; Laceyiam terminology just calls them '''ńäytharaṃsai '''(singular: ''ńäytharam''), “pronunciations”, but differences are also lexical and, in some cases, even grammatical; the written form is based on Classical Laceyiam (''Chløyęe Laceyiam''), but no modern pronunciation follows it. Standard Laceyiam - the Laltīmāhei hėnna - is based on a typical Southeastern pronunciation, formally the one of ''Kaylamārśikha'', capital of Laltīmāhia, around year 60 of the Fourth Era; today the pronunciation of Kaylamārśikha has diverged somewhat and the closest “natural” pronunciation to Standard Laceyiam is the one of ''Līlta'', in the South, the third largest city in the country. 
While Laceyiam does not have local dialects, there are speech varieties; Laceyiam terminology just calls them '''ńäytharaṃsai '''(singular: ''ńäytharam''), “pronunciations”, but differences are also lexical and, in some cases, even grammatical; the written form is based on Classical Laceyiam (''Chløyęe Laceyiam''), but no modern pronunciation follows it. Standard Laceyiam - the Laltīmāhei hėnna - is based on a typical Southeastern pronunciation, formally the one of ''Kailamārśikha'', capital of Laltīmāhia, around year 60 of the Fourth Era; today the pronunciation of Kailamārśikha has diverged somewhat and the closest “natural” pronunciation to Standard Laceyiam is the one of ''Līlta'', in the South, the third largest city in the country. 


The main pronunciation differences are the “digraphs” <hv hj hr hl> and the high vowels <nowiki><i ī y ȳ>; these were /ɦv ʑ ɦʀ ɦɴ̆ i iː y yː/ in Classical Laceyiam; to make some examples, Standard Laceyiam has respectively /f ɕ ʁ ʕ̯ ʲi ʲiː i iː/ while the Northern Plains pronunciation (the one with the most speakers) has /kf ʃ ʁ ɴ̆ i iː y yː/. Some other differences include:</nowiki>
The main pronunciation differences are the “digraphs” <hv hj hr hl> and the high vowels <nowiki><i ī y ȳ>; these were /ɦv ʑ ɦʀ ɦɴ̆ i iː y yː/ in Classical Laceyiam; to make some examples, Standard Laceyiam has respectively /f ɕ ʁ ʕ̯ ʲi ʲiː i iː/ while the Northern Plains pronunciation (the one with the most speakers) has /kf ʃ ʁ ɴ̆ i iː y yː/. Some other differences include:</nowiki>
Line 43: Line 69:
The oldest stage we can be sure of is '''Proto-Cis-Tahianshima''', or ''Indayaivnemiði hėnna'', the latest common ancestor of all Cis-Tahianshima languages. It was most probably spoken 4000 to 3600 years ago in some island groups east of Tahianshima (Lac.: ''Tāhiańśīma'', the second-largest island on the planet), in the middle of the Greater Ocean (''Nemiðārṭya''). Note that the term Cis-Tahianshima has a Western Calémerian origin, and it means “on this side” of Tahianshima for Western people (Evandorians); from a Chlegdarim perspective it’s the other side — anyway, Laceyiam and its descendants are the only Cis-Tahianshima languages spoken west of the island. The Laceyiam term for Cis-Tahianshima is ''Yaivnemiði'', meaning “of the whole Nemið ocean”.Note also that no Cis-Tahianshima language is native of the island of Tahianshima itself, even though today the island’s lingua franca is Laceyiam and the local vernacular is a Laceyiam-based creole.
The oldest stage we can be sure of is '''Proto-Cis-Tahianshima''', or ''Indayaivnemiði hėnna'', the latest common ancestor of all Cis-Tahianshima languages. It was most probably spoken 4000 to 3600 years ago in some island groups east of Tahianshima (Lac.: ''Tāhiańśīma'', the second-largest island on the planet), in the middle of the Greater Ocean (''Nemiðārṭya''). Note that the term Cis-Tahianshima has a Western Calémerian origin, and it means “on this side” of Tahianshima for Western people (Evandorians); from a Chlegdarim perspective it’s the other side — anyway, Laceyiam and its descendants are the only Cis-Tahianshima languages spoken west of the island. The Laceyiam term for Cis-Tahianshima is ''Yaivnemiði'', meaning “of the whole Nemið ocean”.Note also that no Cis-Tahianshima language is native of the island of Tahianshima itself, even though today the island’s lingua franca is Laceyiam and the local vernacular is a Laceyiam-based creole.


Through reconstructed vocabulary we can also hypothesize which kind of society the Proto-Cis-Tahianshima people had. They were primitive but due to their insular location were skilled navigators; their atolline and insular habitat is confirmed by the huge number of words relating to it, like ''*tuŋa₁'' (atoll), ''*ħō₁nə'' (lagoon), ''*ta₂fā'' (islet), three terms distinguishing different depths of lagoon water (''*dotepō₁kə, *ve₁mpeg, *ną₂gnos''); they also had the word ''*ja₁ŋwī'' for large boats (probably used for travelling through different islands) and ''*na₂sət'' for smaller ones; ''*ŋotirō₁'' is a wave (and possibly also “solar ray”), ''*kurū₂m'' (guano), and no word at all for “mountain” or “hill”. They had rudimentary weapons like the ''*gʷūm₂poxim'' (harpoon) and the ''*kōɣəndsą₁(s)'' (knife). They lived in villages called ''*ɟō₂n-bʱeg'' with leaders called ''*ɟun-bʱi-spā₁r''. Military leaders were called ''*šimvā₂tə'' (reconstructible from Mid-Oceanic languages and Laceyiam) or ''*spār-dū₂s'' (from the other branches), and also extremely important were ''*šjā₂mejə'', guardians of boats - this latter root even became the verb “to save” in Pakpatic and Taruebic languages and the standard honorific ''yāmei'' in Laceyiam. The primitiveness of their society is stressed by the fact that they didn’t wear any clothes - there is no reconstructible word for any type of clothes, and also some oceanic islanders didn’t use clothes by the time - 200 years ago - they first had contact with Western civilizations. Still there are three reconstructible body ornament words (none of these survived into Laceyiam, though): ''*dū₁stes'' (necklace — only in Mid- and Upper Oceanic), ''*pōnā₁bə'' (branch or stick inserted into an ear), and ''*fode₁g'' (penis sheath). This latter object probably was a status symbol, as Pakpatic and Taruebic languages reflect it as “family leader”.
Through reconstructed vocabulary we can also hypothesize which kind of society the Proto-Cis-Tahianshima people had. They were primitive but due to their insular location were skilled navigators; their atolline and insular habitat is confirmed by the huge number of words relating to it, like ''*tuŋa₁'' (atoll), ''*ħō₁nə'' (lagoon), ''*ta₂fā'' (islet), three terms distinguishing different depths of lagoon water (''*dotepō₁kə, *ve₁mpeg, *na₂gnos''); they also had the word ''*ja₁ŋwī'' for large boats (probably used for travelling through different islands) and ''*na₂sət'' for smaller ones; ''*ŋotirō₁'' is a wave (and possibly also “solar ray”), ''*kurū₂m'' (guano), and no word at all for “mountain” or “hill”. They had rudimentary weapons like the ''*gʷūm₂poxim'' (harpoon) and the ''*ko₁ɣmja₁(s)'' (knife). They lived in villages called ''*ɟō₂n-bʱeg'' with leaders called ''*ɟun-bʱi-spā₁r''. Military leaders were called ''*šimvā₂tə'' (reconstructible from Mid-Oceanic languages and Laceyiam) or ''*spār-dū₂s'' (from the other branches), and also extremely important were ''*šjā₂mejə'', guardians of boats - this latter root even became the verb “to save” in Pakpatic and Taruebic languages and the standard honorific ''yāmei'' in Laceyiam. The primitiveness of their society is stressed by the fact that they didn’t wear any clothes - there is no reconstructible word for any type of clothes, and also some oceanic islanders didn’t use clothes by the time - 200 years ago - they first had contact with Western civilizations. Still there are three reconstructible body ornament words (none of these survived into Laceyiam, though): ''*dū₁stes'' (necklace — only in Mid- and Upper Oceanic), ''*pōnā₁bə'' (branch or stick inserted into an ear), and ''*fode₁g'' (penis sheath). This latter object probably was a status symbol, as Pakpatic and Taruebic languages reflect it as “family leader”.


Proto-Cis-Tahianshima speakers moved mostly eastwards, colonizing (or conquering) most of the islands in the Ocean east of Tahianshima, and northwards up to the island-continent of Écáreton, and these dialects later split into four different branches:
Proto-Cis-Tahianshima speakers moved mostly eastwards, colonizing (or conquering) most of the islands in the Ocean east of Tahianshima, and northwards up to the island-continent of Écáreton, and these dialects later split into four different branches:
Line 56: Line 82:
The Laceyiam split from PCT happened earlier than for all other branches, as all other branches underwent a late-PCT reworking of the pitch accent system, adding another (but in most cases allophonic) tonal distinction and losing the phoneme *ə. This stage is usually known as ''Late Eastern PCT''; PCT as reconstructable from all languages, including Laceyiam, has only a two-tone pitch accent system, written as *V₁ (low-mid tone) and *V₂ (high tone); the lack of a subscript number means that vowel is unstressed. No Cis-Tahianshima language keeps this tone system today, but most of them reflects the different accents with different vowel qualities. Laceyiam is particularly helpful in reconstructing it, not just because it didn’t undergo the Late Eastern PCT pitch accent system reworking, but also because most pitch-accented vowels have different reflexes (except for high vowels). For example, PCT had six [a]-phonemes: *a₁ *a₂ *a *ā₁ *ā₂ *ā. Laceyiam reflects them as such: '''*a₁, *a > a — *a₂ > ai — *ā₁ > au — *ā₂, *ā  > ā'''.
The Laceyiam split from PCT happened earlier than for all other branches, as all other branches underwent a late-PCT reworking of the pitch accent system, adding another (but in most cases allophonic) tonal distinction and losing the phoneme *ə. This stage is usually known as ''Late Eastern PCT''; PCT as reconstructable from all languages, including Laceyiam, has only a two-tone pitch accent system, written as *V₁ (low-mid tone) and *V₂ (high tone); the lack of a subscript number means that vowel is unstressed. No Cis-Tahianshima language keeps this tone system today, but most of them reflects the different accents with different vowel qualities. Laceyiam is particularly helpful in reconstructing it, not just because it didn’t undergo the Late Eastern PCT pitch accent system reworking, but also because most pitch-accented vowels have different reflexes (except for high vowels). For example, PCT had six [a]-phonemes: *a₁ *a₂ *a *ā₁ *ā₂ *ā. Laceyiam reflects them as such: '''*a₁, *a > a — *a₂ > ai — *ā₁ > au — *ā₂, *ā  > ā'''.


Laceyiam, anyway, extensively modified its vowel system through regressive umlaut and assimilation of *j and *w glides, and also the loss of *ə created lots of consonant clusters and consonant-final words, which were all later simplified in some way. Another notable change is the loss of the various [o]-phonemes into another, mostly into /a/. Syncope and the loss of phonemic stress led to different derivations of a same PCT root being often obscured in Laceyiam.
Laceyiam, anyway, extensively modified its vowel system through regressive umlaut and assimilation of *j and *w glides, and also the loss of *ə created lots of consonant clusters and consonant-final words, which were all later simplified in some way. Another notable change is the loss of the various [o]-phonemes into another, mostly into /a/ — even though much later a new /ɔ/ phoneme arose even in PCT-derived roots, from various contraction of earlier segments like *ow, *o₁w, and *ō₂w, as well from a few remaining schwas. Syncope and the loss of phonemic stress led to different derivations of a same PCT root being often obscured in Laceyiam.


As for consonants, Laceyiam is the only Cis-Tahianshima language (excluding its own descendants) that kept the four-way contrast in stops (unvoiced and voiced, plain and aspirate) and four out of five PCT points of articulation: labials, dentals, palatals and velars were kept, but labiovelars merged into different phonemes depending on nearby vowels. However Laceyiam gained a new fifth point of articulation for stops, the ''retroflex'' one, mostly from sequences of a dental consonant plus *r. Laceyiam is also the only language in its family that reflects directly the PCT phoneme *ħ, whose realization is still unclear but was most probably [ħ], [ʜ], or [ʕ]: in the vast majority of cases, PCT *ħ corresponds to Laceyiam <l>, the peculiar nasal (post-)uvular flap /ɴ̆/. This latter phoneme, the most common consonant in Laceyiam, is a reflection of four PCT phonemes: *ħ, *l, *ŋ, and *ŋʷ, as well as other sources like *r word-initially and in dissimilation, or changes like *kr *kʰr > kl. The common cluster /c͡ɕʰɴ̆/ <chl>, as in the word ''Chlegdarim'', arose both from *cr, *cʰr and also from various simplifications after schwa syncope. The three common PCT phonemes *x, *ɣ, and *h were most often deleted but left their trace in the breathy-voiced phonation of the preceding vowel.
As for consonants, Laceyiam is the only Cis-Tahianshima language (excluding its own descendants) that kept the four-way contrast in stops (unvoiced and voiced, plain and aspirate) and four out of five PCT points of articulation: labials, dentals, palatals and velars were kept, but labiovelars merged into different phonemes depending on nearby vowels. However Laceyiam gained a new fifth point of articulation for stops, the ''retroflex'' one, mostly from sequences of a dental consonant plus *r. Laceyiam is also the only language in its family that reflects directly the PCT phoneme *ħ, whose realization is still unclear but was most probably [ħ], [ʜ], or [ʕ]: in the vast majority of cases, PCT *ħ corresponds to Laceyiam {{angbr|l}}, the peculiar nasal (post-)uvular flap /ɴ̆/. This latter phoneme, the most common consonant in Laceyiam, is a reflex of four PCT phonemes: *ħ, *l, *ŋ, and *ŋʷ, as well as other sources like *r word-initially and in dissimilation, or changes like *kr *kʰr > kl. The common cluster /c͡ɕʰɴ̆/ {{angbr|chl}}, as in the word ''Chlegdarim'', arose both from *cr, *cʰr and also from various simplifications after schwa syncope. The three common PCT phonemes *x, *ɣ, and *h were most often deleted but left their trace in the breathy-voiced phonation of the preceding vowel.


=== Prehistoric language contact ===
=== Prehistoric language contact ===
Line 69: Line 95:
PCT also relied a lot on ablaut variations: inflectional ablaut was already somewhat uncommon (but regular) in PCT, but derivational ablaut was extremely common. Laceyiam keeps ablaut much more than all other Cis-Tahianshima languages, but even there in verbs it’s mostly a relic, while ablauting nouns (which also used different endings) were dumped into the fourth declension, and Laceyiam even added some mostly by analogy. Anyway the combination of different evolutions like the *o > a merger, extensive vowel syncope, umlaut that often added even more vowel alternations, the increasing use of the simpler suffixing-only inflections, and, most importantly, the loss of phonemic and movable stress, led to the ''loss of ablaut'' as a productive inflectional and derivational system.  
PCT also relied a lot on ablaut variations: inflectional ablaut was already somewhat uncommon (but regular) in PCT, but derivational ablaut was extremely common. Laceyiam keeps ablaut much more than all other Cis-Tahianshima languages, but even there in verbs it’s mostly a relic, while ablauting nouns (which also used different endings) were dumped into the fourth declension, and Laceyiam even added some mostly by analogy. Anyway the combination of different evolutions like the *o > a merger, extensive vowel syncope, umlaut that often added even more vowel alternations, the increasing use of the simpler suffixing-only inflections, and, most importantly, the loss of phonemic and movable stress, led to the ''loss of ablaut'' as a productive inflectional and derivational system.  


Proto-Mǎng Tì itself had two main influences on Laceyiam grammar. The first is the addition of the abessive and substitutive cases - the most regular ones in Laceyiam - by attaching the PMNg postpositions ''*tyak'' “without” and ''*myaŋ'' “instead of” to the accusative case forms. The second, and by far most important one, is the origin of the exterior and interior verb forms. This feature wasn’t borrowed directly, but made from inherited PCT elements as a kind of “calque” of some PMNg structures, particularly the pairing of static or “uncontrolled” meanings with the reflexive voice. Laceyiam interior endings are in fact derived by the “normal” exterior verb endings with added ''*nəs'', a clitic form of PCT ''*nō₁ns'', a reflexive pronoun.
Proto-Mǎng Tì itself had a notable influence on the grammar of Laceyiam: the origin of the exterior and interior verb forms. This feature wasn’t borrowed directly, but made from inherited PCT elements as a kind of “calque” of some PMNg structures, particularly the pairing of static or “uncontrolled” meanings with the reflexive voice. Laceyiam interior endings are in fact derived by the “normal” exterior verb endings with added ''*nəs'', a clitic form of PCT ''*nō₁ns'', a reflexive pronoun.


=== The arrival on Isungatsuaq ===
=== The arrival on Isungatsuaq ===
Despite probable intermixing and this extensive contact with the Mǎng Tì-s, the Chlegdarims didn’t remain long on or near Tahianshima island and soon moved westwards into the large archipelago in the southern part of the Sea of Tahianshima (''Tāhiańśīmi jāri''); this area (roughly cut in half by the Equator) takes about three quarters of the sea between Tahianshima and the continent of Isungatsuaq (to the extent that, while geologically this archipelago and Tahianshima itself already lie on the Oceanic plate, nowadays they are geographically often considered an extension of Isungatsuaq). The Chlegdarims’ last stop before the continent was most possibly ''Luldakimū'' island on the 4th parallel south, the southwesternmost main island and largest of the archipelago, and also the nearest to the continent. From there, they probably reached the islands on the continental ridge off today’s '''Leitāvaja''' before settling on the '''Sāńjāyaṇa''' '''peninsula''' - the southernmost tip of ''Isungatsuaq'' - and the cay chain south of it.
Despite probable intermixing and this extensive contact with the Mǎng Tì-s, the Chlegdarims didn’t remain long on or near Tahianshima island and soon moved westwards into the large archipelago in the southern part of the Sea of Tahianshima (''Tāhiańśīmi jāri''); this area (roughly cut in half by the Equator) takes about three quarters of the sea between Tahianshima and the continent of Isungatsuaq (to the extent that, while geologically this archipelago and Tahianshima itself already lie on the Oceanic plate, nowadays they are geographically often considered an extension of Isungatsuaq). The Chlegdarims’ last stop before the continent was most possibly ''Luldakimū'' island on the 4th parallel south, the southwesternmost main island and largest of the archipelago, and also the nearest to the continent. From there, they probably reached the islands on the continental ridge off today’s '''Leitāvaja''' before settling on the '''Sāńjāyaṇa''' '''peninsula''' - the southernmost tip of ''Isungatsuaq'' - and the cay chain south of it.


The Chlegdarims quickly spread across southern Leitāvaja, making contact with a new habitat, mostly made of rainforests and swamps (even more than on Tahianshima) and other civilizations: first of all the so-called '''Nanaklāri''' peoples, whose languages have never been directly attested. Their name derives from ''Nanaklāra'', a borough in ''Kaylamārśikha'' (Laltīmāhia's capital city and the largest city on the planet) whose name is a toponym linked to a "Nanaklāri" origin. '''Old Hjøtūchilāmi''' isn't usually set apart from Nanaklāri languages, but unlike "proper Nanaklāri" it is attested in sparse inscriptions and texts both in ''Laceyiam'' and ''Dzams-bltyod''; it was however spoken further west (in present-day ''Hjøtūchilām'') but was another major source language for many loans into Laceyiam, including a huge number of proper personal names. Apropos personal names, the fact almost no common Laceyiam given name is PCT-derived and a good majority is of either Old Hjøtūchilāmi or Nanaklāri origin, most anthropologist think that the Chlegdarims absorbed Nanaklāri and Old Hjøtūchilāmi cultures easily by intermarriage so that ethnic identity “borders” between them became blurred and vanished. The other main influence was '''Ancient Lelīmuyāńi''', the language of ''Lelīmuyāńa'' (a historical distinct region, today in northern and northeastern ''Leitāvaja'' and extreme southern ''Lanturlīṭa'' dioceses), which at the time was the most advanced civilization of the area. Ancient Lelīmuyāńi already had written texts, and in fact the first attestation of the Chlegdarims’ presence is found in an Ancient Lelīmuyāńi text, probably aimed at travelling merchants, which talks about “people of the west” living in the “forested low coastal areas”, which call themselves ''Cuḷeketazhi'' (approximation of ''Chlegdarim'') in the language ''we'' (the Ancient Lelīmuyāńi people) call “''laccaiyam''”. The word '''Laceyiam''' is in fact an Ancient Lelīmuyāńi borrowing, meaning “voice (''iyam'') of the sunset (''lacca'')”, where “sunset” means “west”.
The Chlegdarims quickly spread across southern Leitāvaja, making contact with a new habitat, mostly made of rainforests and swamps (even more than on Tahianshima) and other civilizations: first of all the so-called '''Nanaklāri''' peoples, whose languages have never been directly attested. Their name derives from ''Nanaklāra'', a borough in ''Kailamārśikha'' (Laltīmāhia's capital city and the largest city on the planet) whose name is a toponym linked to a "Nanaklāri" origin. '''Old Yomadhvāyi''' isn't usually set apart from Nanaklāri languages, but unlike "proper Nanaklāri" it is attested in sparse inscriptions and texts both in ''Laceyiam'' and ''Dzams-bltyod''; it was however spoken further west (in present-day ''Yomadhvāya'') but was another major source language for many loans into Laceyiam, including a huge number of proper personal names. Apropos personal names, the fact almost no common Laceyiam given name is PCT-derived and a good majority is of either Old Yomadhvāyi or Nanaklāri origin, most anthropologist think that the Chlegdarims absorbed Nanaklāri and Old Yomadhvāyi cultures easily by intermarriage so that ethnic identity “borders” between them became blurred and vanished. The other main influence was '''Ancient Lelīmuyāńi''', the language of ''Lelīmuyāńa'' (a historical distinct region, today in northern and northeastern ''Leitāvaja'' and extreme southern ''Lanturlīṭa'' dioceses), which at the time was the most advanced civilization of the area. Ancient Lelīmuyāńi already had written texts, and in fact the first attestation of the Chlegdarims’ presence is found in an Ancient Lelīmuyāńi text, probably aimed at travelling merchants, which talks about “people of the west” living in the “forested low coastal areas”, which call themselves ''Cuḷeketazhi'' (approximation of ''Chlegdarim'') in the language ''we'' (the Ancient Lelīmuyāńi people) call “''laccaiyam''”. The word '''Laceyiam''' is in fact an Ancient Lelīmuyāńi borrowing, meaning “voice (''iyam'') of the sunset (''lacca'')”, where “sunset” means “west”.


Despite the prehistory of Laceyiam and its descendance from Proto-Cis-Tahianshima being now certified and accepted scientifically, Laceyiam’s date and place of birth are considered respectively the time of the Chlegdarims’ arrival on Isungatsuaq and southern Leitāvaja. This area is in fact the homeland of Chlegdarim civilization, and it is only here that Chlegdarim culture and traditions shaped themselves - including language. The most obvious and most important trace of this in Laceyiam is the huge number of words that entered the Chlegdarims’ daily life: obviously they had the need to describe the nature they found themselves in, a jungle- and swamp-centric environment, most features of which were completely unknown in their previous, sea-based habitat. In fact, most words for equatorial plants, animals, and geographical features are of either Nanaklāri, Old Hjøtūchilāmi, or Ancient Lelīmuyāńi origin (e.g. ''jaja'' “igarapé”, ''māra'' “mango”, ''kāmbava'' “water lily”, ''ėmīla'' “tiger”, ''kėmbe'' “toucan”, ''naʔikė'' “flooded clearwater forest”, ''heita'' “durian”, ''kalńi'' “sound of a tree branch falling into water”); only few of them have Proto-Mǎng Tì origin (e.g. ''kami'' “rose”, ''dalakām'' “bamboo”, ''humba'' “spice”, ''tiuʔa'' “palm”), and only those most related to coastal areas are inherited from PCT (e.g. ''tėti'' “island”, ''jhāva'' “reef”). Also borrowed are lots of wordsrelated to activities and products (e.g. ''mānska'' “glass”) and, most importantly, cultural (e.g. ''buldhām'', the typical Chlegdarim burial and the relative ceremony; ''talengim'', ritual tattoo) and religious terms, most of which have probable Nanaklāri origins. In fact, the Leitāvaji society of the First Era was extremely multicultural, and Nanaklāri languages in the west and Ancient Lelīmuyāńi in the east (the latter being the only written language) were the lingua francas; Laceyiam became more important and ultimately drove the others to extinction mainly for two reasons: the cultural intermixing mentioned before and also because '''Lėliðaṇīṭa''', the Great Prophet of the '''Yūnialtia''', was a Chlegdarim and her language began to be considered holier; the amount of Nanaklāri instead of Ancient Lelīmuyāńi words in Yūnialtei terminology points to her native village, and the areas of her first teachings, being located west of the ''Kaicedhīma'' mountains.
Despite the prehistory of Laceyiam and its descendance from Proto-Cis-Tahianshima being now certified and accepted scientifically, Laceyiam’s date and place of birth are considered respectively the time of the Chlegdarims’ arrival on Isungatsuaq and southern Leitāvaja. This area is in fact the homeland of Chlegdarim civilization, and it is only here that Chlegdarim culture and traditions shaped themselves - including language. The most obvious and most important trace of this in Laceyiam is the huge number of words that entered the Chlegdarims’ daily life: obviously they had the need to describe the nature they found themselves in, a jungle- and swamp-centric environment, most features of which were completely unknown in their previous, sea-based habitat. In fact, most words for equatorial plants, animals, and geographical features are of either Nanaklāri, Old Yomadhvāyi, or Ancient Lelīmuyāńi origin (e.g. ''jaja'' “igarapé”, ''māra'' “mango”, ''kāmbava'' “water lily”, ''ėmīla'' “tiger”, ''kėmbe'' “toucan”, ''naʔikė'' “flooded clearwater forest”, ''heita'' “durian”, ''kalńi'' “sound of a tree branch falling into water”); only few of them have Proto-Mǎng Tì origin (e.g. ''kami'' “rose”, ''dalakām'' “bamboo”, ''humba'' “spice”, ''tiuʔa'' “palm”), and only those most related to coastal areas are inherited from PCT (e.g. ''tėti'' “island”, ''jhāva'' “reef”). Also borrowed are lots of wordsrelated to activities and products (e.g. ''mānska'' “glass”) and, most importantly, cultural (e.g. ''buldhām'', the typical Chlegdarim burial and the relative ceremony; ''talengim'', ritual tattoo) and religious terms, most of which have probable Nanaklāri origins. In fact, the Leitāvaji society of the First Era was extremely multicultural, and Nanaklāri languages in the west and Ancient Lelīmuyāńi in the east (the latter being the only written language) were the lingua francas; Laceyiam became more important and ultimately drove the others to extinction mainly for two reasons: the cultural intermixing mentioned before and also because '''Lėliðaṇīṭa''', the Great Prophet of the '''Yūnialtia''', was a Chlegdarim and her language began to be considered holier; the amount of Nanaklāri instead of Ancient Lelīmuyāńi words in Yūnialtei terminology points to her native village, and the areas of her first teachings, being located west of the ''Kaicedhīma'' mountains.


Laceyiam up until this point in time is normally defined as '''Pre-classical Laceyiam''': its limit is the late First Era, around the lifetime of ''Lėliðaṇīṭa'', with Nanaklāri and a few Old Hjøtūchilāmi loans being already established, but without substantial Ancient Lelīmuyāńi influence; in the earliest Laceyiam texts (''Archaic Laceyiam'') we can for example already find the root numbers of Nanaklāri origins (''tulūʔa'' “six” and ''jaibha'' “fifteen”) but the number system itself is still hexadecimal (the Classical decimal one was borrowed from Ancient Lelīmuyāńi). Anyway, except for the hexadecimal numeral system, Laceyiam had grammatically already reached its classical and present state.
Laceyiam up until this point in time is normally defined as '''Pre-classical Laceyiam''': its limit is the late First Era, around the lifetime of ''Lėliðaṇīṭa'', with Nanaklāri and a few Old Yomadhvāyi loans being already established, but without substantial Ancient Lelīmuyāńi influence; in the earliest Laceyiam texts (''Archaic Laceyiam'') we can for example already find the root numbers of Nanaklāri origins (''tulūʔa'' “six” and ''jaibha'' “fifteen”) but the number system itself is still hexadecimal (the Classical decimal one was borrowed from Ancient Lelīmuyāńi). Anyway, except for the hexadecimal numeral system, Laceyiam had grammatically already reached its classical and present state.


=== From Classical Laceyiam to the present day ===
=== From Classical Laceyiam to the present day ===
Line 93: Line 119:
==Phonology==
==Phonology==
===Consonants===
===Consonants===
Standard Laceyiam has a slightly above average consonant inventory with, in the most common analysis, 39 phonemes. The consonant analysis followed here does not follow the exact points of articulation, but is the traditional analysis done by native grammarians, grouping consonant phonemes in mostly regular groups. The Laceyiam word for consonant, ''hīmbeyālia'', is a compound of ''hīmba ''"colour" and ''yālia ''"sound".
Standard Laceyiam has a slightly above average consonant inventory with, in the most common analysis, 36 phonemes. The consonant analysis followed here does not follow the exact points of articulation, but is the traditional analysis done by native grammarians, grouping consonant phonemes in mostly regular groups. The Laceyiam word for consonant, ''hīmbeyālia'', is a compound of ''hīmba ''"colour" and ''yālia ''"sound".
{| class="wikitable article-table" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 660px; text-align:center;"
{| class="wikitable article-table" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 660px; text-align:center;"
! style="width: 68px; " |
! style="width: 68px; " |
Line 136: Line 162:
|-
|-
!Non-sibilant fricatives
!Non-sibilant fricatives
| f v
| v
| θ
| θ
|  
|  
|  
|  
|  
|  
ʁ
|-
!Flaps
|
|
|
|
|
|ʕ̯
|-
|-
!Nasal flaps
!Nasal flaps
Line 175: Line 193:
|
|
|}
|}
Some analyses differ slightly from the one above: the laryngeal flap /<span>ʕ̯/ is sometimes included among the non-sibilant fricatives (''susatiak pańjńybessai''), and nasal flaps, approximants and semivowels are all grouped as approximants (''mūgyālieniai''). These analyses focus more on the actual behaviour of consonants in different environments rather than on their actual articulation.</span>
Some analyses differ slightly from the one above: nasal flaps, approximants and semivowels are all grouped as approximants (''mūgyālieniai''). These analyses focus more on the actual behaviour of consonants in different environments rather than on their actual articulation.


Please note that, to avoid cluttering transcriptions, /t̪ t̪ʰ<span>d̪ d̪ʱ ð̞/ will be transcribed simply as /t t</span>ʰ d dʱ ð/.
Please note that, to avoid cluttering transcriptions, /t̪ t̪ʰ<span>d̪ d̪ʱ ð̞/ will be transcribed simply as /t t</span>ʰ d dʱ ð/.
Line 181: Line 199:
Important notes about consonant phonemes:
Important notes about consonant phonemes:
* /N/, written <ṃ>, is realized as an uvular nasal before laryngeal consonants or as a nasalization of the preceding vowel before other consonants (especially /d dʱ/). Note that <ṃ> may also appear representing a different nasal phoneme (usually /m/) in other morphologically conditioned environments. /n/ is realized [ŋ] before velar consonants and is written <n> except for the root ''cāṃkra''-'' ''(to end, to finish, to border).
* /N/, written <ṃ>, is realized as an uvular nasal before laryngeal consonants or as a nasalization of the preceding vowel before other consonants (especially /d dʱ/). Note that <ṃ> may also appear representing a different nasal phoneme (usually /m/) in other morphologically conditioned environments. /n/ is realized [ŋ] before velar consonants and is written <n> except for the root ''cāṃkra''-'' ''(to end, to finish, to border).
* The consonants written <hj hv hr hl> were clusters in Classical Laceyiam, but they are the phonemes /ɕ f ʁ <span>ʕ̯/ in the modern standard (/</span>ɕ/ is written either as <ś> or <hj> depending on the word). Some analyses of Standard Laceyiam do not count them as separate phonemes, but as realizations of the clusters /ɦ<span>ɟ͡ʑ </span>ɦv ɦʀ ɦ<span>ɴ̆/ due to their behaviour in compounding, c.f. ''ni- ''prefix (/nʲi/) plus the root ''hjøðam ''"hand" (/ˈ</span>ɕøðam/ or /ˈɦ<span class="">ɟ͡ʑøðam/, pronounced [ˈ</span>ɕøðam]) > ''nįjøðemė ''"weapon" (/n<span>i̤ˈɟ͡ʑøðemeː/ [n</span><span class="">i̤ˈɟ͡ʑøðemeː], with the usual morphological process where /</span>ɦ/ vanishes, giving breathy-voiced phonation to the preceding vowel, when in coda).
* /θ ð/ only contrast intervocalically, after nasals, and before /ʀ <span>ɴ̆/; otherwise they're in complementary distribution, with /</span>θ/ word-initially and adjacent to voiceless consonants and /ð/ anywhere else.
* /θ ð/ only contrast intervocalically, after nasals, and before /ʀ <span>ɴ̆/; otherwise they're in complementary distribution, with /</span>θ/ word-initially and adjacent to voiceless consonants and /ð/ anywhere else.


Line 230: Line 247:
* There is an additional diphthong /ɔ<span>u̯/ which is not considered phonemic due to it appearing only in ''Chlou'', the (borrowed) name of the 14th largest city of Lalt</span>īmāhia, and derived/compounded words.
* There is an additional diphthong /ɔ<span>u̯/ which is not considered phonemic due to it appearing only in ''Chlou'', the (borrowed) name of the 14th largest city of Lalt</span>īmāhia, and derived/compounded words.


==Grammar==
==Morphology==
Laceyiam grammar is heavily inflected, with many different inflecting categories for nouns, verbs, and pronouns. The other two traditional parts of speech, particles and numerals, are not considered inflected. An analysis of parts of speech following English terms is possible, but for sake of clarity it's better to treat adjectives and adverbs as particular verbs and adpositions and conjunctions as particles.
Laceyiam grammar is heavily inflected, with many different inflecting categories for nouns, verbs, and pronouns. The other two traditional parts of speech, particles and numerals, are not considered inflected. An analysis of parts of speech following English terms is possible, but for sake of clarity it's better to treat adjectives and adverbs as particular verbs and adpositions and conjunctions as particles.


Line 239: Line 256:
* '''Accusative''' (''mėniādemin''): core case used for the patient of a verb in agentive, benefactive, antibenefactive, or locative voice.
* '''Accusative''' (''mėniādemin''): core case used for the patient of a verb in agentive, benefactive, antibenefactive, or locative voice.
* '''Genitive''' (''jėmiādemin''): case used for possessor arguments.
* '''Genitive''' (''jėmiādemin''): case used for possessor arguments.
* '''Instrumental''' (''khabdemin''): case used for instrumental complements (e.g. "by means of X", "using X").
* '''Translative''' (''kūbilṭādemin''): case used for the entrance in a state.
* '''Comitative''' (''mahiegdemin''): case used for complements of company (e.g. "with X", "together with X").
* '''Exessive''' (''tėssbilṭādemin''): case used for the provenience from a state.
* '''Essive''' (''haisādemin''): case used for the permanence in a state.
* '''Dative '''(''mayėṃdemin''): more accurately defined as Dative-Lative case, it is used for indirect objects (e.g. "I give X <u>to Y</u>"; dative use) and for the destination of motion verbs (lative use).
* '''Dative '''(''mayėṃdemin''): more accurately defined as Dative-Lative case, it is used for indirect objects (e.g. "I give X <u>to Y</u>"; dative use) and for the destination of motion verbs (lative use).
* '''Ablative '''(''paraniādemin''): used mostly for movement away from something, but also for various special word- or particle-specific uses.
* '''Ablative '''(''paraniādemin''): used mostly for movement away from something, but also for various special word- or particle-specific uses.
* '''Locative '''(''hlūðademin''): used for locations (in any voice except locative) and punctual time.
* '''Locative '''(''laṇyādemin''): used for locations (in any voice except locative) and punctual time.
* '''Substitutive '''(''pārinėdmin''): used to express "instead of X".
* '''Abessive '''(''śądemin''): used to express the lack of something (e.g. "without X").
Some nouns also have an additional ''vocative'' form, which is however not considered a case by itself, only a special form of the direct.
Some nouns also have an additional ''vocative'' form, which is however not considered a case by itself, only a special form of the direct.


Nominal morphology is fusional, but there are some regular patterns that reflect the mostly agglutinative nature of Proto-Cis-Tahianshima noun morphology. There are nine declensions (''paiktairathādai''), each of them having a particular citation form ending, plus a few irregular nouns. Some declensions include regular sub-patterns for certain nouns in some forms.
Nominal morphology is fusional, but there are some regular patterns that reflect the mostly agglutinative nature of Proto-Cis-Tahianshima noun morphology. There are eight declensions (''paiktairathādai''), each of them having a particular citation form ending, plus a few irregular nouns. Some declensions include regular sub-patterns for certain nouns in some forms.


All nouns also have inherent natural gender, but the Laceyiami gender system does not have morphological marking and is in fact more like a honorific system.
All nouns also have inherent natural gender, but the Laceyiami gender system does not have morphological marking and is in fact more like a honorific system.
Line 275: Line 291:
|ėmīl'''ė'''
|ėmīl'''ė'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|ėmīla'''nam'''
|ėmīl'''arṇam'''
|-
|Exessive
|ėmīl'''ena'''
|ėmīl'''aivāh'''
|-
|Essive
|ėmīl'''u'''
|ėmīl'''u'''
|ėmīl'''ariu'''
|ėmīl'''ariu'''
|-
|Comitative
|ėmīla'''nam'''
|ėmīl'''arṇam'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|ėmīla'''ð'''
|ėmīla'''ð'''
|ėmīl'''arið'''
|ėmīla'''yoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
Line 295: Line 315:
|ėmīl'''ilym'''
|ėmīl'''ilym'''
|-
|-
|Substitutive
|ėmīla'''mian'''
|ėmīl'''arymian'''
|-
|Abessive
|ėmīla'''tiak'''
|ėmīl'''arytiak'''
|}
|}
Note that if the last vowel is long, it stays long everywhere as long as quality is the same (but '''ā''' > '''ai''' nevertheless, as diphthongs do not distinguish length); breathy-voiced phonation is likewise kept (if possible), thus nouns ending in a breathy-voiced vowel have the same form for instrumental and ablative singular.
Note that if the last vowel is long, it stays long everywhere as long as quality is the same (but '''ā''' > '''ai''' nevertheless, as diphthongs do not distinguish length); breathy-voiced phonation is likewise kept (if possible), thus nouns ending in a breathy-voiced vowel have the same form for instrumental and ablative singular.


The first declension has the following sub-patterns:
The first declension has the following sub-patterns:
* Nouns ending in '''-au''' change this into '''-āva''' before any ending beginning with a vowel, so for example ''hīmuyau'' "husband of father's sister" has dir.pl. ''hīmuyāvai, ''erg.sg. ''hīmuyauss, ''acc.sg. ''hīmuyāvau'' ... com.sg. ''hīmuyaunam, ''and so on. ''Chlou'', the only word with /ɔ<span>u̯/, may informally follow this pattern, but the official recommendation is to use compounds such as ''Chlou-marta ''"Chlou city" or ''Chlou-lila ''"Chlou person" in order to decline it or derive forms.</span>
* Nouns ending in '''-au''' change this into '''-āva''' before any ending beginning with a vowel, so for example ''hīmuyau'' "husband of father's sister" has dir.pl. ''hīmuyāvai, ''erg.sg. ''hīmuyauss, ''acc.sg. ''hīmuyāvau'' ... transl.sg. ''hīmuyaunam, ''and so on. ''Chlou'', the only word with /ɔ<span>u̯/, may informally follow this pattern (alternating between ''-ou'' and either ''-ova'' or ''-āva''), but the official recommendation is to use compounds such as ''Chlou ga marta ''"Chlou city" or ''Chlou-lila ''"Chlou person" in order to decline it or derive forms.</span>
* Nouns ending in '''-ia, -iā, -ie, '''or '''-iė '''all have accusative singular in '''-vau''' (e.g. ''nahia ''"mountain" > ''nahiavau'') genitive singular in '''-ei''' (''nahia ''> ''nahei''), ablative singular in '''-vų''' (''nahia ''> ''nahiavų''), locative singular in '''-ye '''(''nahia ''> ''nahiaye''); ergative plural in '''-lss '''(''nahia ''> ''nahialss''), genitive plural in '''-riė''' (''nahia ''> ''nahiariė''), and locative plural in '''-rilym '''(''nahia ''> ''nahiarilym'').
* Nouns ending in '''-ia, -iā, -ie, '''or '''-iė '''all have accusative singular in '''-vau''' (e.g. ''nahia ''"mountain" > ''nahiavau'') genitive singular in '''-ei''' (''nahia ''> ''nahei''), exessive singular in '''-ena''' (''nahia'' > ''nahiena''), ablative singular in '''-vų''' (''nahia ''> ''nahiavų''), locative singular in '''-ye '''(''nahia ''> ''nahiaye''); ergative plural in '''-lss '''(''nahia ''> ''nahialss''), genitive plural in '''-riė''' (''nahia ''> ''nahiariė''), and locative plural in '''-rilym '''(''nahia ''> ''nahiarilym'').
* Nouns ending in '''-ie '''and '''-'''also have substitutive singular in '''-imian '''(e.g. ''hulunamie ''"pregnancy" > ''hulunamimian'') and abessive singular in '''-itiak '''(''hulunamie ''> ''hulunamitiak'').
* Nouns ending in the "tool" suffix '''-īvā''' (but not its synonym '''-inā''') shorten the final vowel when declined, except for the ergative singular (e.g. ''atmādhevā'' (airplane) > dat.sg. ''atmādhevað'', erg.sg. ''atmādhevāss'').
''heilenu ''"wind" is an irregular noun which, for the most part, follows the first declension, alternating between ''heilenu- ''stem and umlauted ''høylen- ''stem, the latter used in singular accusative, genitive, instrumental, locative, substitutive, and abessive, and in every plural form except instrumental, ablative and locative. Non-umlauted forms have /u/ replacing any /a/ in the "normal" first declension pattern, becoming breathy-voiced in ablative plural. Ablative singular is ''heilenų'' with a single, breathy-voiced /<span class="">ṳ</span>/; locative plural is ''heilenuilym'', with the /<span class="">ui̯/ diphthong.</span>
* Nouns in '''-īvā''' and '''-inā''' all have exessive singular in '''-aina''' instead of '''-ena''' (''atmādhevā'' > ''atmādhevaina'').
''heilenu ''"wind" is an irregular noun which, for the most part, follows the first declension, alternating between ''heilenu- ''stem and umlauted ''høylen- ''stem, the latter used in singular accusative, genitive, exessive (shortened to ''høylenna''), essive, and locative, and in every plural form except dative, ablative, and locative. Non-umlauted forms have /u/ replacing any /a/ in the "normal" first declension pattern, becoming breathy-voiced in ablative plural. Ablative singular is ''heilenų'' with a single, breathy-voiced /<span class="">ṳ</span>/; locative plural is ''heilenuilym'', with the /<span class="">ui̯/ diphthong.</span>


==== The second declension (-e, -ė, -y, -ȳ, -u, -ū) ====
==== The second declension (-e, -ė, -y, -ȳ, -u, -ū) ====
Line 333: Line 347:
|kair'''eyi'''
|kair'''eyi'''
|kair'''eyė'''
|kair'''eyė'''
|-
|Instrumental
|kair'''ūmi'''
|kair'''ėriu'''
|-
|-
|Comitative
|Comitative
|kairė'''nam'''
|kairė'''nam'''
|kair'''ėrṇam'''
|kair'''ėrṇam'''
|-
|Exessive
|kairė'''na'''
|kair'''eivāh'''
|-
|Essive
|kair'''ūmi'''
|kair'''ėriu'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|kairė'''ð'''
|kairė'''ð'''
|kair'''ėrið'''
|kairė'''yoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
Line 353: Line 371:
|kairė'''hie'''
|kairė'''hie'''
|kair'''eilym'''
|kair'''eilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|kairė'''mian'''
|kair'''ėrmian'''
|-
|Abessive
|kairė'''tiak'''
|kair'''ėrtiak'''
|}
|}
As in the first declension, all final vowels remain long as long as quality is the same, with the exception of genitive case in both singular and plural. The sub-patterns of the second declension are:
As in the first declension, all final vowels remain long as long as quality is the same, with the exception of genitive case in both singular and plural. The sub-patterns of the second declension are:
* Nouns ending with the '''-līne '''collective derivational suffix have genitive singular '''-līni''' as if they were of the first declension instead of expected *-līneyi.
* Nouns ending with the '''-līne '''collective derivational suffix have genitive singular '''-līni''' as if they were of the first declension instead of expected *-līneyi.
* Nouns ending in '''-y '''and '''-ȳ '''have genitive singular in '''-yvi '''(e.g. ''tammy ''"train" > ''tammyvi''); direct plural in '''-r '''(''tammy > tammyr''), ergative plural in '''-ylss '''(> ''tammylss''), genitive plural in '''-yvė '''(> ''tammyvė''), ablative plural in '''-įnie '''(> ''tammįnie''), and locative plural in '''-īlym '''(> ''tammīlym'').
* Nouns ending in '''-y '''and '''-ȳ '''have genitive singular in '''-yvi '''(e.g. ''tammy ''"train" > ''tammyvi''), exessive singular in '''-yvena''' (> ''tammyvena''); direct plural in '''-r '''(''tammy > tammyr''), ergative plural in '''-ylss '''(> ''tammylss''), genitive plural in '''-yvė '''(> ''tammyvė''), dative plural in '''-yvoh''' (> ''tammyvoh'') ablative plural in '''-įnie '''(> ''tammįnie''), and locative plural in '''-īlym '''(> ''tammīlym'').
* Nouns ending in '''-iū''' (uncommon, but most notably ''jeniū'' "flower") have ablative singular in '''-ųu '''(''jeniū ''> ''jeniųu'') and various extended plural stems: direct in '''-ūyai '''(> ''jeniūyai''), ergative '''-ūyilss '''(> ''jeniūyilss''), accusative '''-ūyiau '''(> ''jeniūyiau''), comitative '''-ūyinam '''(> ''jeniūyinam''), dative '''-ūyið '''(> ''jeniūyið''), and locative in '''-ūlym '''(> ''jeniūlym''). In addition to these, they also keep the long vowel in genitive singular and plural (e.g. > ''jeniūyi, jeniūyė'').
* Nouns ending in '''-iū''' (uncommon, but most notably ''jeniū'' "flower") have dative singular in '''-ūyena''' (''jeniū'' > ''jeniūyena'') ablative singular in '''-ųu '''(> ''jeniųu'') and various extended plural stems: direct in '''-ūyai '''(> ''jeniūyai''), ergative '''-ūyilss '''(> ''jeniūyilss''), accusative '''-ūyiau '''(> ''jeniūyiau''), translative '''-ūyinam '''(> ''jeniūyinam''), and locative in '''-ūlym '''(> ''jeniūlym''). In addition to these, they also keep the long vowel in genitive singular and plural (e.g. > ''jeniūyi, jeniūyė'').


==== The third declension (-i) ====
==== The third declension (-i) ====
The third declension (''chīkende paiktairathāda'') includes nouns ending in '''-i'''; they are however divided in two different sub-declensions depending on whether they take ''i-umlaut ''or not. Nouns taking ''i-umlaut ''have their root vowel in either '''a, ā''', (both ''a1'' or ''a2'' types) '''u''', or '''ū; '''umlaut is present in every form <u>except</u> direct, ergative, comitative and dative singular and ablative and locative plural.
The third declension (''chīkende paiktairathāda'') includes nouns ending in '''-i'''; they are however divided in two different sub-declensions depending on whether they take ''i-umlaut ''or not. Nouns taking ''i-umlaut ''have their root vowel in either '''a, ā''', (both ''a1'' or ''a2'' types) '''u''', or '''ū; '''umlaut is present in every form <u>except</u> direct, ergative, translative, exessive, and dative singular and dative, ablative and locative plural.
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
!tėti (island)
!tėti (island)
Line 407: Line 417:
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''ė'''</span>
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''ė'''</span>
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|tėt'''iu'''
|tėti'''nam'''
|tėt'''iarṇam'''
|
|gindāmi'''nam'''
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''arṇam'''</span>
|-
|Exessive
|tėti'''ena'''
|tėt'''iarvāh'''
|
|gindāmi'''ena'''
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''arvāh'''</span>
|-
|Essive
|tėt'''iu'''
|tėt'''iariu'''
|tėt'''iariu'''
|
|
|gind'''ä'''m'''u'''
|gind'''ä'''m'''u'''
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''ariu'''</span>
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''ariu'''</span>
|-
|Comitative
|tėti'''nam'''
|tėt'''iarṇam'''
|
|gindāmi'''nam'''
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''arṇam'''</span>
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|tėti'''ð'''
|tėti'''ð'''
|tėt'''iarið'''
|tėti'''yoh'''
|
|
|gindāmi'''ð'''
|gindāmi'''ð'''
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''arið'''</span>
|gindāmi'''yoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
Line 441: Line 458:
|gind'''ä'''m'''ie'''
|gind'''ä'''m'''ie'''
|gindām'''ilym'''
|gindām'''ilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|tėt'''iamian'''
|tėt'''iaumian'''
|
|gind'''ä'''m'''amian'''
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''aumian'''</span>
|-
|Abessive
|tėt'''iatiak'''
|tėt'''iautiak'''
|
|gind'''ä'''m'''atiak'''
|<span>gind</span>'''ä'''<span>m'''autiak'''</span>
|}
|}


==== The fourth declension (ablauting nouns) ====
==== The fourth declension (ablauting nouns) ====
The fourth declension (''bäliende paiktairathāda'') is the least regular and the least common of all. It includes nouns which are a relic of the ablauting nouns, already somewhat archaic and unproductive in Proto-Cis-Tahianshima. Some linguists, however, argue that ablauting and non-ablauting nouns originally had a gender distinction on the basis that Laceyiam has some ablauting nouns which are words for animals native to Isungatsuaq - and thus unknown in PCT times - like ''kīva ''(a kind of capybara), ''linda ''(giant river otter), or ''gunta ''(marsh deer). These nouns are often either common words (like ''niyū'' "mother" or ''klut''''' '''"father") or compounds with ''lila''''' '''"person". Some of these also have irregularities (including ''niyū'' and ''lila'', probably the two most common nouns of this declension) or some cases with more possible forms. Nouns with /j/-stems are the most complicated in the whole Laceyiam language due to extensive umlaut on top of ablauting vowels.  
The fourth declension (''tarveṇḍe paiktairathāda'') is the least regular and the least common of all. It includes nouns which are a relic of the ablauting nouns, already somewhat archaic and unproductive in Proto-Cis-Tahianshima. Some linguists, however, argue that ablauting and non-ablauting nouns originally had a gender distinction on the basis that Laceyiam has some ablauting nouns which are words for animals native to Isungatsuaq - and thus unknown in PCT times - like ''kīva ''(a kind of capybara), ''linda ''(giant river otter), or ''gunta ''(marsh deer). These nouns are often either common words (like ''niyū'' "mother" or ''tyt''''' '''"father") or compounds with ''lila''''' '''"person". Some of these also have irregularities (including ''niyū'' and ''lila'', probably the two most common nouns of this declension) or some cases with more possible forms. Nouns with /j/-stems are the most complicated in the whole Laceyiam language due to extensive umlaut on top of ablauting vowels.  


These words generally all have two syllables, where the first one's vowel is the ablauting one and the latter one is an open syllable which ends in ''-a''; /j/-stems are generally trisyllabic, ending in ''-eya''; there are however some polysyllabic words, which either ablaut the first vowel (e.g. ''kimeda'' (a type of panther)) or the penultimate (e.g. ''havtnamila ''(office/ministry of the Inquisition)).
These words generally all have two syllables, where the first one's vowel is the ablauting one and the latter one is an open syllable which ends in ''-a''; /j/-stems are generally trisyllabic, ending in ''-eya''; there are however some polysyllabic words, which either ablaut the first vowel (e.g. ''kimeda'' (a type of panther)) or the penultimate (e.g. ''havtnamila ''(office/ministry of the Inquisition)).
Line 501: Line 504:
The five different stems are used with this distribution:
The five different stems are used with this distribution:
* The '''Singular stem''' is used in every singular form <u>except</u> genitive;
* The '''Singular stem''' is used in every singular form <u>except</u> genitive;
* The '''Short non-tonic stem''' is used in direct, instrumental, and ablative plural;
* The '''Short non-tonic stem''' is used in direct, essive, and ablative plural;
* The '''Short tonic stem''' is used in ergative and dative plural;
* The '''Short tonic stem''' is used in ergative and dative plural;
* The '''Long stem '''is used in the genitive singular and in accusative, comitative, substitutive, and abessive plural;
* The '''Long stem '''is used in the genitive singular and in accusative, translative, and exessive plural;
* The '''Strong stem '''is used in genitive and locative plural.
* The '''Strong stem '''is used in genitive and locative plural.
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
Line 517: Line 520:
|m'''a'''ð'''iė'''
|m'''a'''ð'''iė'''
|
|
|'''klut'''
|'''gunta'''
|kl'''a'''t'''iė'''
|g'''a'''nt'''iė'''
|-
|-
|Ergative
|Ergative
Line 524: Line 527:
|m'''o'''ð'''iss'''
|m'''o'''ð'''iss'''
|
|
|klut'''ass'''
|gunt'''ass'''
|kl'''iu'''t'''iss'''
|g'''iu'''nt'''iss'''
|-
|-
|Accusative
|Accusative
Line 531: Line 534:
|m'''ė'''ð'''au'''
|m'''ė'''ð'''au'''
|
|
|klut'''au'''
|gunt'''au'''
|kl'''ā'''t'''au'''
|g'''ā'''nt'''au'''
|-
|-
|Genitive
|Genitive
Line 538: Line 541:
|m'''au'''ð'''ė'''
|m'''au'''ð'''ė'''
|
|
|kl'''ā'''t'''i'''
|g'''ā'''nt'''i'''
|kl'''au'''t'''ė'''
|g'''au'''nt'''ė'''
|-
|Translative
|muða'''nam'''
|m'''ė'''ð'''nam'''
|
|gunt'''anam'''
|g'''ā'''nt'''nam'''
|-
|Exessive
|muð'''ena'''
|m'''ė'''ð'''ena'''
|
|gunt'''ena'''
|g'''ā'''nt'''ena'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Essive
|muð'''ū'''
|muð'''ū'''
|m'''a'''ð'''ū'''
|m'''a'''ð'''ū'''
|
|
|klut'''ū'''
|gunt'''ū'''
|kl'''a'''t'''ū'''
|g'''a'''nt'''ū'''
|-
|Comitative
|muða'''nam'''
|m'''ė'''ð'''nam'''
|
|klut'''anam'''
|kl'''ā'''t'''nam'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
Line 559: Line 569:
|m'''o'''ð'''ið'''
|m'''o'''ð'''ið'''
|
|
|klut'''að'''
|gunt'''að'''
|kl'''iu'''t'''ið'''
|g'''iu'''nt'''ið'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
Line 566: Line 576:
|m'''a'''ð'''nie'''
|m'''a'''ð'''nie'''
|
|
|klut'''ų'''
|gunt'''ų'''
|kl'''a'''t'''nie'''
|g'''a'''nt'''nie'''
|-
|-
|Locative
|Locative
Line 573: Line 583:
|m'''au'''ð'''ilym'''
|m'''au'''ð'''ilym'''
|
|
|klut'''ie'''
|gunt'''ie'''
|kl'''au'''t'''ilym'''
|g'''au'''nt'''ilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|muða'''mian'''
|m'''ė'''ð'''umian'''
|
|klut'''amian'''
|kl'''ā'''t'''umian'''
|-
|Abessive
|muða'''tiak'''
|m'''ė'''ð'''utiak'''
|
|klut'''atiak'''
|kl'''ā'''t'''utiak'''
|}
|}
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
Line 594: Line 590:
!Singular
!Singular
!Plural
!Plural
!niyū, nih- (mother) (4.4)
!miyū, mih- (mother) (4.4)
!Singular
!Singular
!Plural
!Plural
Line 602: Line 598:
|l'''e'''l'''iė'''
|l'''e'''l'''iė'''
|
|
|'''niyū'''
|'''miyū'''
|'''niyė'''
|'''miyė'''
|-
|-
|Ergative
|Ergative
Line 609: Line 605:
|l'''e'''l'''ss'''
|l'''e'''l'''ss'''
|
|
|n'''įss'''
|m'''įss'''
|n'''ęiss'''
|m'''ęiss'''
|-
|-
|Accusative
|Accusative
Line 616: Line 612:
|'''løyl *'''
|'''løyl *'''
|
|
|nih'''au'''
|mih'''au'''
|n'''ie'''h'''au'''
|m'''ie'''h'''au'''
|-
|-
|Genitive
|Genitive
Line 623: Line 619:
|l'''ai'''l'''ė'''
|l'''ai'''l'''ė'''
|
|
|'''nęi *'''
|'''męi *'''
|n'''ai'''h'''ė'''
|m'''ai'''h'''ė'''
|-
|Translative
|lila'''nam'''
|l'''ei'''l'''inam'''
|
|m'''įnam'''
|m'''ięnam'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Exessive
|lil'''ena'''
|l'''ei'''l'''ena'''
|
|mih'''ena'''
|m'''ie'''h'''ena'''
|-
|Essive
|lil'''ū'''
|lil'''ū'''
|l'''e'''l'''iū'''
|l'''e'''l'''iū'''
|
|
|nih'''ū'''
|mih'''ū'''
|n'''e'''h'''ū'''
|m'''e'''h'''ū'''
|-
|Comitative
|lila'''nam'''
|l'''ei'''l'''inam'''
|
|n'''įnam'''
|n'''ięnam'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
Line 644: Line 647:
|'''läylið *'''
|'''läylið *'''
|
|
|nih'''að'''
|mih'''að'''
|n'''ei'''h'''ið'''
|m'''ei'''h'''ið'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
Line 651: Line 654:
|l'''ei'''l'''ąnie'''
|l'''ei'''l'''ąnie'''
|
|
|nih'''ų'''
|mih'''ų'''
|n'''ęenie'''
|m'''ęenie'''
|-
|-
|Locative
|Locative
Line 658: Line 661:
|l'''ai'''l'''ilym'''
|l'''ai'''l'''ilym'''
|
|
|nih'''ie'''
|mih'''ie'''
|n'''ai'''h'''ilym'''
|m'''ai'''h'''ilym'''
|-
|}As mentioned before, both '''lila''' and '''miyū''' are irregular nouns, but, being both extremely common nouns, both alone and in compounds, the inclusion of their paradigm as being representative of 4.3 and 4.4 nouns is this way justified. They differ from regular nouns in:
|Substitutive
* 4.3 nouns have ablative singular with '''-ų''' and the singular stem, like ''aʔīma ''(a freshwater crustacean of the flooded rainforest in Southern Laltīmāhia) > ''aʔīmų; ''accusative plural with '''ei-au '''(> ''aʔeimau''), and dative plural '''e-ið''' (> ''aʔemið''). The regular ablative singular ''lilų''''' '''and the plural accusative ''leilau'' are however attested as variant forms of the declension of '''lila''' in some literary texts, particularly those composed until the 1st century of the Third Era in modern-day Yomadhvāya diocese.
|lila'''mian'''
* '''lila''' has a peculiar, but predictable, behaviour in ergative singular and plural, that is the lack of any vowel between the '''l '''and the '''ss, '''and '''-iū''' in the essive plural. This happens for every fourth- and seventh-declension noun ending in '''-l''' or '''-la'''.
|'''løylumian *'''
* '''miyū''' has an irregular direct case for both numbers, otherwise it's regular but with the stem '''mih-''' (alternations between '''-h''' and a breathy-voiced vowel are all regular). Genitive '''męi '''is the only other irregular form, by simplification of earlier (attested in the early Classical Age) ''mięi''. A regular 4.4 noun, ''dlīsa''''' '''"rift, breaking point, limit, abrupt end, edge of a cliff" has direct plural ''dleśiė'' and genitive singular ''dlieśi''''' '''(with a regular '''s > ś '''before '''i '''saṃdhi change).
|
|nih'''amian'''
|n'''ie'''h'''umian'''
|-
|Abessive
|lila'''tiak'''
|'''løylutiak *'''
|
|nih'''atiak'''
|n'''ie'''h'''utiak'''
|}As mentioned before, both '''lila''' and '''niyū''' are irregular nouns, but, being both extremely common nouns, both alone and in compounds, the inclusion of their paradigm as being representative of 4.3 and 4.4 nouns is this way justified. They differ from regular nouns in:
* 4.3 nouns have ablative singular with '''-ų''' and the singular stem, like ''aʔīma ''(a freshwater crustacean of the flooded rainforest in Southern Laltīmāhia) > ''aʔīmų; ''accusative plural with '''ei-au '''(> ''aʔeimau''), dative plural '''e-ið''' (> ''aʔemið'') and substitutive and abessive plural with '''ei-umian/ei-utiak '''(> ''aʔeimumian; aʔeimutiak'' - note that these two cases' forms are based on the accusative plural). The regular ablative singular ''lilų''''' '''and the plural accusative ''leilau'' (and substitutive ''leilumian'' and abessive ''leilutiak'') are however attested as variant forms of the declension of '''lila''' in some literary texts, particularly those composed until the 1st century of the Third Era in modern-day Hjøtūchilām diocese.
* '''lila''' has a peculiar, but predictable, behaviour in ergative singular and plural, that is the lack of any vowel between the '''l '''and the '''ss, '''and '''-iū''' in the instrumental plural. This happens for every fourth- and seventh-declension noun ending in '''-l''' or '''-la'''.
* '''niyū''' has an irregular direct case for both numbers, otherwise it's regular but with the stem '''nih-''' (alternations between '''-h''' and a breathy-voiced vowel are all regular). Genitive '''nęi '''is the only other irregular form, by simplification of earlier (attested in the early Classical Age) ''nięi''. A regular 4.4 noun, ''dlīsa''''' '''"rift, breaking point, limit, abrupt end, edge of a cliff" has direct plural ''dleśiė'' and genitive singular ''dlieśi''''' '''(with a regular '''s > ś '''before '''i '''saṃdhi change).


===== /j/-stem nouns =====
===== /j/-stem nouns =====
Line 720: Line 709:
|b'''øy'''n'''ė'''
|b'''øy'''n'''ė'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|ń'''ȳ'''ń'''ū'''
|ń'''a'''ńey'''ū'''
|
|b'''y'''n'''ū'''
|b'''a'''ney'''ū'''
|-
|Comitative
|ń'''ȳ'''ń'''enam'''
|ń'''ȳ'''ń'''enam'''
|ń'''ė'''ń'''einam'''
|ń'''ė'''ń'''einam'''
Line 734: Line 716:
|b'''ø'''n'''enam'''
|b'''ø'''n'''enam'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Exessive
|ńūńeya'''ð'''
|ń'''ȳ'''ń'''ena'''
|ń'''o'''ń'''eið'''
|ń'''ė'''ń'''ena'''
|
|b'''y'''n'''ena'''
|b'''ø'''n'''ena'''
|-
|Essive
|ń'''ȳ'''ń'''ū'''
|ń'''a'''ńey'''ū'''
|
|b'''y'''n'''ū'''
|b'''a'''ney'''ū'''
|-
|Dative
|ńūńeya'''ð'''
|ń'''o'''ń'''eið'''
|
|
|buneya'''ð'''
|buneya'''ð'''
Line 754: Line 750:
|b'''y'''n'''ie'''
|b'''y'''n'''ie'''
|b'''au'''n'''eilym'''
|b'''au'''n'''eilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|ń'''ȳ'''ń'''imian'''
|ń'''ė'''ń'''iumian'''
|
|b'''y'''n'''imian'''
|b'''ā'''n'''iumian'''
|-
|Abessive
|ń'''ȳ'''ń'''itiak'''
|ń'''ė'''ń'''iutiak'''
|
|b'''y'''n'''itiak'''
|b'''ā'''n'''iutiak'''
|}
|}
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
Line 790: Line 772:
|m'''äy'''t'''ė'''
|m'''äy'''t'''ė'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|mitū'''nam'''
|m'''ei'''tū'''nam'''
|-
|Exessive
|mitū'''yena'''
|m'''ei'''tū'''yena'''
|-
|Essive
|mit'''ø'''y'''ū'''
|mit'''ø'''y'''ū'''
|m'''e'''t'''ø'''y'''ū'''
|m'''e'''t'''ø'''y'''ū'''
|-
|Comitative
|mitū'''nam'''
|m'''ei'''tū'''nam'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
Line 809: Line 795:
|mit'''ø'''y'''e'''
|mit'''ø'''y'''e'''
|m'''äy'''t'''ulym'''
|m'''äy'''t'''ulym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|mitū'''mian'''
|m'''ei'''t'''ymian'''
|-
|Abessive
|mitū'''tiak'''
|m'''ei'''t'''ytiak'''
|}
|}
<span>We can thus describe that '''4.1 /j/-stem nouns''' have umlaut in instrumental, comitative, locative, substitutive, and abessive singular, and direct, genitive, and ablative plural; as for '''4.2 /j/-stem nouns''', they have umlaut in genitive, instrumental, comitative, locative, substitutive, and abessive singular, and in direct, genitive, comitative, and ablative plural.</span>
<span>We can thus describe that '''4.1 /j/-stem nouns''' have umlaut in translative, exessive, essive, and locative singular, and direct, genitive, and ablative plural; as for '''4.2 /j/-stem nouns''', they have umlaut in genitive, translative, exessive, essive, and locative singular, and in direct, genitive, translative, exessive, and ablative plural.</span>


==== The fifth declension (one-stem nasals) ====
==== The fifth declension (nasals) ====
The fifth declension (''gembliende paiktairathāda'')'' ''includes all nasal nouns (those ending in '''-n '''or '''-m''') with a single stem, that is, the majority of them - two-stem nasal nouns are those of the sixth declension.
The fifth declension (''gūṇeṇḍe paiktairathāda'')'' ''includes all nasal nouns (those ending in '''-n '''or '''-m'''). The majority of them have a single stem, and follow this pattern:
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
!hjøðam (hand)
!jāyim (girl)
!Singular
!Singular
!Plural
!Plural
|-
|-
|Direct
|Direct
|'''hjøðam'''
|'''jāyim'''
|hjøðam'''ai'''
|jāyim'''ai'''
|-
|-
|Ergative
|Ergative
|hjøða'''ṃss'''
|jāyi'''ṃss'''
|hjøðam'''ulss'''
|jāyim'''ulss'''
|-
|-
|Accusative
|Accusative
|hjøðam'''au'''
|jāyim'''au'''
|hjøða'''ṃrau'''
|jāyi'''ṃrau'''
|-
|-
|Genitive
|Genitive
|hjøðam'''i'''
|jāyim'''i'''
|hjøðam'''ė'''
|jāyim'''ė'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|hjøðam'''u'''
|jāyi'''ṃnam'''
|hjøðam'''ariu'''
|jāyim'''arṇam'''
|-
|-
|Comitative
|Exessive
|hjøða'''ṃnam'''
|jāyim'''ena'''
|hjøðam'''arṇam'''
|jāyim'''aivāh'''
|-
|Essive
|jāyim'''u'''
|jāyim'''ariu'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|hjøðam'''að'''
|jāyim'''að'''
|hjøða'''ṃrið'''
|jāyim'''yoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
|hjøðam'''ų'''
|jāyim'''ų'''
|hjøðam'''ęnie'''
|jāyim'''ęnie'''
|-
|-
|Locative
|Locative
|hjøðam'''ie'''
|jāyim'''ie'''
|hjøðam'''ilym'''
|jāyim'''ilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|hjøðam'''mian'''
|hjøða'''ṃrumian'''
|-
|Abessive
|hjøða'''ntiak'''
|hjøða'''ṃrutiak'''
|}
|}
There are two differences between nouns ending in '''-m''' and those in '''-n: '''the first one is saṃdhi, that is, '''-n''' nouns have '''-nnam''' in comitative singular and '''-ṃmian''' in substitutive singular (e.g. ''mėngerten ''"morning" > ''mėngertennam; mėngerteṃmian''). The other difference is that '''-n''' noun have ergative plural in '''-alss''' (> ''mėngertenalss'')
There are two differences between nouns ending in '''-m''' and those in '''-n: '''the first one is saṃdhi, that is, '''-n''' nouns have '''-nnam''' in the translative singular (e.g. ''mėngerten ''"morning" > ''mėngertennam''). The other difference is that '''-n''' nouns have ergative plural in '''-alss''' (> ''mėngertenalss'')


==== The sixth declension (two-stem nasals) ====
===== Two-stem nasals =====
The sixth declension (''tulūʔende'' ''paiktairathāda''), as mentioned before, includes two-stem nasals: this declension is similar to the fifth one, but these nouns have a '''-s''' between the '''-m''' and the ending in all forms except ergative plural and direct, ergative, comitative, substitutive, and abessive singular.
A common subpattern of the fifth declension is the one including two-stem nouns: these all have a '''-s''' between the '''-m''' and the ending in all forms except ergative plural and direct, ergative, and translative singular.


Most of these nouns are formed with the derivational suffix '''-ram '''('''-lam '''in some nouns due to dissimilation), often referring to "the process of doing X"; the '''-s''' is a relic from the original PCT form in *-roms. Many nouns, though, have been added to this declension only by analogy: some of the most common ones are ''saṃhāram''''' '''"boy", ''bheiram''''' '''"nest", ''koram''''' '''"autumn/fall" and ''yāram'' "land (especially in many toponyms)". 
Most of these nouns are formed with the derivational suffix '''-ram '''('''-lam '''in some nouns due to dissimilation), often referring to "the process of doing X"; the '''-s''' is a relic from the original PCT form in *-roms. Many nouns, though, have been added to this declension only by analogy: some of the most common ones are ''saṃhāram''''' '''"boy", ''bheiram''''' '''"nest", ''koram''''' '''"autumn/fall" and ''yāram'' "land (especially in many toponyms)". 


The noun ''sūgnulum ''"blind", while etymologically a sixth declension one (< PCT ''*tsu₁ɣ-ŋʷoħūm-s'' "without eye(s)"), is often declined as a fifth declension one
The noun ''sūgnulum ''"blind", while etymologically a two-stem one (< PCT ''*tsu₁ɣ-ŋʷoħūm-s'' "without eye(s)"), is often declined with the main paradigm
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
!lillam (life)
!lillam (life)
Line 900: Line 874:
|lilla'''ṃsė'''
|lilla'''ṃsė'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|lilla'''ṃnam'''
|lilla'''ṃsarṇam'''
|-
|Exessive
|lilla'''ṃsena'''
|lilla'''ṃsaivāh'''
|-
|Essive
|lilla'''ṃṣu'''
|lilla'''ṃṣu'''
|lilla'''ṃśayu'''
|lilla'''ṃśayu'''
|-
|Comitative
|lilla'''ṃnam'''
|lilla'''ṃsarṇam'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|lilla'''ṃsað'''
|lilla'''ṃsað'''
|lilla'''ṃṣrið'''
|lilla'''ṃsyoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
Line 919: Line 897:
|lilla'''ṃśie'''
|lilla'''ṃśie'''
|lilla'''ṃśilym'''
|lilla'''ṃśilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|lillam'''mian'''
|lilla'''ṃṣrumian'''
|-
|Abessive
|lilla'''ntiak'''
|lilla'''ṃṣrutiak'''
|}
|}


==== The seventh declension (consonant-stem nouns) ====
==== The sixth declension (consonant-stem nouns) ====
The seventh declension (''hauþtinde paiktairathāda'') is a common one including basically all ''consonant-stem'' nouns, that is, one of those ending in non-nasal consonants except ''-h''. Possible endings are '''-ð, -t, -ṭ '''and '''-r''', and there are also only five nouns (and their compounds) ending in '''-l: '''''līṭhal ''"seafoam", ''khāngertėl ''(a typical Chlegdarim tandoori oven), ''nūrtāl ''"lake", ''ladragyal ''"inn, restaurant", and ''kambāl ''"thousand". This is also one of the two declensions with a distinct vocative singular form, made by adding '''-e''' to the direct singular.
The sixth declension (''tulūʔende paiktairathāda'') is a common one including basically all ''consonant-stem'' nouns, that is, one of those ending in non-nasal consonants except ''-h''. Possible endings are '''-t'''and '''-''', and there are also only five nouns (and their compounds) ending in '''-l: '''''līṭhal ''"seafoam", ''khāngertėl ''(a typical Chlegdarim tandoori oven), ''nūrtāl ''"lake", ''ladragyal ''"inn, restaurant", and ''kambāl ''"thousand" (''khial'' "finger, small branch" also does, but its stem is ''kheld-''). This is also one of the two declensions with a distinct vocative singular form, made by adding '''-e''' to the direct singular.
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
!bhārmat (lion)
!bhārmat (lion)
Line 956: Line 926:
|bhārmat'''ė'''
|bhārmat'''ė'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|bhārmat'''anam'''
|bhārmat'''arṇam'''
|-
|Exessive
|bhārmat'''ena'''
|bhārmat'''aivāh'''
|-
|Essive
|bhārmat'''u'''
|bhārmat'''u'''
|bhārmat'''ariu'''
|bhārmat'''ariu'''
|-
|Comitative
|bhārmat'''anam'''
|bhārmat'''arṇam'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|bhārmat'''ið'''
|bhārmat'''ið'''
|bhārmat'''arið'''
|bhārmat'''yoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
Line 975: Line 949:
|bhārmat'''ie'''
|bhārmat'''ie'''
|bhārmat'''ilym'''
|bhārmat'''ilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|bhārmat'''mian'''
|bhārma'''ṭumian'''
|-
|Abessive
|bhārmat'''tiak'''
|bhārma'''ṭutiak'''
|}
|}
Consonant-stem nouns all follow the same pattern as ''bhārmat,'' but there are some differences between them due to saṃdhi and/or dissimilation:
Note that ''l-stems'' have '''-lss '''instead of *-lass in ergative singular (e.g. ''nūrtāl ''"lake" > ''nūrtālss'') and plural accusative in '''-larau''' (> ''nūrtālarau'').
* As seen with ''bhārmat'', all ''t-stems'' have '''-ṭau, -ṭumian, -ṭutiak '''for plural accusative/substitutive/abessive respectively. All other stems except ''r-stems ''(see below) have '''-Crau, -Crumian, -Crutiak''' (the ''t-stem ''forms are actually contractions).
* ''ð-stems ''have dative singular in '''-við '''instead of *-ðið (e.g. ''hlūð ''"place, seat, location" > ''hlūvið'') and abessive singular in '''-þiak '''due to assimilation (> ''hlūþiak''). Also, in comitative singular the '''-a-''' at the beginning of the ending is optional (> ''hlūðanam ''and ''hlūðnam'' are both acceptable, but the first one is more common).
* ''r-stems ''have two different dissimilations: accusative, substitutive, and abessive plural have '''-rl-''' instead of *-rr- (e.g. ''leiðir ''"significant other, girlfriend, boyfriend" > ''leiðirlau, leiðirlumian, leiðirlutiak''), while instrumental, comitative and dative plural have '''-lar- '''instead of *-rar- (> ''leiðilariu, leiðilarṇam, leiðilarið'').
* ''l-stems'' have '''-lss '''instead of *-lass in ergative singular (e.g. ''nūrtāl ''"lake" > ''nūrtālss'').
There is a subset of seventh declension nouns which do not fit into the above pattern because they have two different stems, one for the direct singular (and vocative) and one (the ''oblique stem'') for all other forms. These nouns are relics of PCT nouns with hysterokinetic stress:
* ''khial ''"finger; small tree branch", oblique stem ''kheld-''
* ''lān ''"shoulder", oblique ''ṇod-''
* ''läyh ''"arm", oblique ''lahʲ- ''(before vowels) / ''lahi- ''(before consonants)
* ''miu ''"leg", oblique ''may- ''(before vowels) / ''ma- ''(before consonants)
* ''naih ''"boat", oblique ''naṣṭ-''
* ''tið ''"neck", oblique ''śv-''
''śvað ''"thread, path, theme, idea, direction" is an irregular noun mostly following the seventh declension. It has a contracted stem ''śvað'' found in singular direct (with vocative ''śvaþe''), accusative, genitive, instrumental, dative (''śvaþið'') and substitutive, and ablative plural. All other forms use an extended stem ''śvatoð'', but abessive singular and genitive plural are synchronically irregular ''śvateþiak, śvateðė ''respectively; substitutive and abessive plural are ''śvatoðarmian ''and ''śvatoðartiak ''respectively, and dative plural is attested both in the regular form ''śvatoðarið'' and the irregular ''śvatoþrið''.


Finally, there are a few nouns ending in '''-k'''; these are all Calémerian toponyms borrowed from Kalurilut, like ''Inūkutlāk'' "Ceria", ''Inūlulīk ''"Nivaren", ''Itanāk ''"Nordúlik", ''Inūkṣvāk ''"Evandor", or ''Ittukavik ''"Gathuráni" - these are all declined following the ''t-stem ''rules (without the special rule for plural accusative/substitutive/abessive). Also, some non-assimilated toponyms for cities, rivers, or other features outside Laltīmāhia may end in '''-k''', but they are usually not declined, instead adpositional constructions like ''[name] ga marta ''"city of [name]" is used, with ''marta ''being the declined word.
===== -nt stems =====
A particularly important variant of the sixth declension is the one of ''-nt stems'' all recognizable by their ending in '''-ānat''' in the citation form. This is first of all a common derivational suffix, meaning "something derived from X" or "generated from X" — with this latter meaning it has come to be the main suffix used for the formation of matronymics, which are a mandatory part of the name of any Chlegdarim.


==== The eighth declension (-h) ====
These nouns have an alternation between an ''-ānat'', an ''-antā'', and a ''-ān'' ending:
The eighth declension (''teitende paiktairathāda'') includes nouns ending in '''-h'''. Word-final ''-h'' is a result of many sound changes, but mostly from PCT *s, so either '''-s''', or /hj/ (the intervocalic reflex of PCT *s) alternate in most forms. Like the seventh declension, eighth-declension nouns have a distinct vocative singular form.
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
!ńältah ((male's) sister)
!kømbānat (berry, fruit)
!Singular
!Singular
!Plural
!Plural
|-
|-
|Direct
|Direct
|'''ńältah'''
|'''kømbānat'''
|ńälta'''hiai'''
|kømb'''antai'''
|-
|-
|(Vocative)
|(Vocative)
|ńälta'''hie !'''
|kømb'''āne !'''
|ńälta'''hiai !'''
|kømb'''antai !'''
|-
|-
|Ergative
|Ergative
|ńälta'''ss'''
|kømb'''antāss'''
|ńälta'''hialss'''
|kømb'''antālss'''
|-
|-
|Accusative
|Accusative
|ńälta'''sau'''
|kømb'''antau'''
|ńälta'''hiarau'''
|kømb'''antārau'''
|-
|-
|Genitive
|Genitive
|ńälta'''hi'''
|kømb'''antāyi'''
|ńälta'''hiė'''
|kømb'''antė'''
|-
|Translative
|kømb'''antānam'''
|kømb'''antārṇam'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Exessive
|ńälta'''hiu'''
|kømb'''antena'''
|ńälta'''ṣriu'''
|kømb'''antaivāh'''
|-
|-
|Comitative
|Essive
|ńälta'''sanam'''
|kømb'''antāvu'''
|ńälta'''hiarṇam'''
|kømb'''antāriu'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|ńälta'''śve'''
|kømb'''antāð'''
|ńälta'''hiarið'''
|kømb'''antāyoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
|ńälta''''''
|kømb'''antų'''
|ńälta'''sęnie'''
|kømb'''antąnie'''
|-
|-
|Locative
|Locative
|ńälta'''hiye'''
|kømb'''antāye'''
|ńälta'''śilym'''
|kømb'''antailym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|ńält'''ąmian'''
|ńälta'''hiarmian'''
|-
|Abessive
|ńält'''ątiak'''
|ńälta'''hiartiak'''
|}
|}
There are some eighth declension nouns which have obsolete forms, declining as if they were seventh declension with a stem ending in '''-k'''; this is visible in ''nanūh'' "salt" which has a relic form ''nanūkanam ''(from the comitative singular) used attributively to mean "salted" when speaking of foods (this is etymological: ''nanūh ''is actually a borrowing from Ancient Lelīmuyāńi ''nanūkko'' and is attested in some early-Classical Age Laceyiam texts as ''nanūk ''- '''-k '''was actually a possible noun ending until approximately the late First Era).
Note that words where the '''ā''' in ''-ānat'' is part of the root do not shorten it — e.g. ''śamibānat'' (poisonous berry of the ''śamibāra'' tree) → dir.pl. ''śamibāntai'', erg.sg. ''śamibāntāss'', erg.pl. ''śamibāntālss'', ...


Note that the noun ''lilėmaiṭah'', the most important concept in the Yūnialtei religion (and, due to this, in the whole Chlegdarim worldview), is an irregular, singular-only noun and declines as eighth-declension in direct, genitive, instrumental and locative cases, and as a first-declension noun (with stem ''lilėmaiṭą-'') elsewhere; it also lacks a vocative form.
===== Bithematic nouns =====
There is a subset of sixth declension nouns which do not fit into the above pattern because they have two different stems, one for the direct singular (and vocative) and one (the ''oblique stem'') for all other forms. These nouns are relics of PCT nouns with hysterokinetic stress:
* ''khial ''"finger; small tree branch", oblique stem ''kheld-''
* ''lān ''"shoulder", oblique ''ṇod-''
* ''loṭa ''"arm", oblique ''luṭ(a)-''
* ''miu ''"leg", oblique ''may- ''(before vowels) / ''ma- ''(before consonants)
* ''naih ''"boat", oblique ''naṣṭ-''
* ''tið ''"neck", oblique ''śv-''
* ''tirva'' "punch", oblique ''ṣruv-''
''śvað ''"thread, path, theme, idea, direction" is an irregular noun mostly following the sixth declension. It has a contracted stem ''śvað'' found in singular direct (with vocative ''śvaþe''), accusative, genitive, exessive, essive, and dative (''śvaþið''), and ablative plural. All other forms use an extended stem ''śvatoð'', but genitive plural is the synchronically irregular ''śvateðė '', and likewise dative plural is the irregular ''śvatuyoh''.


==== The ninth declension (-ai) ====
Finally, there are a few nouns ending in '''-k'''; these are all Calémerian toponyms borrowed from Kalurilut, like ''Inūkutlāk'' "Ceria", ''Inūlulīk ''"Nivaren", ''Itanāk ''"Nordúlik", ''Inūkṣvāk ''"Evandor", or ''Ittukavik ''"Gathuráni" - these are all declined following the ''t-stem ''rules (with plural accusative in '''-krau'''). Also, some non-assimilated toponyms for cities, rivers, or other features outside Laltīmāhia may end in '''-k''', but they are usually not declined, instead adpositional constructions like ''[name] ga marta ''"city of [name]" is used, with (here) ''marta ''being the declined word.
The ninth declension (''kissende paiktairathāda'') includes those nouns ending in '''-ai'''; they come from various sources but only a minority of them is inherited from PCT: most are Nanaklāri or Ancient Lelīmuyāńi borrowings.
 
==== The seventh declension (-h) ====
The seventh declension (''mojende paiktairathāda'') includes nouns ending in '''-h'''. Word-final ''-h'' is a result of many sound changes, but mostly from PCT *s, so either '''-s''', or /hj/ (the intervocalic reflex of PCT *s) alternate in most forms. Like the sixth declension, seventh-declension nouns have a distinct vocative singular form.
{| class="article-table"
{| class="article-table"
!nanai (rainforest, jungle)
!ńältah ((male's) sister)
!Singular
!Singular
!Plural
!Plural
|-
|-
|Direct
|Direct
|'''nanai'''
|'''ńältah'''
|nan'''ayar'''
|ńälta'''hiai'''
|-
|(Vocative)
|ńälta'''hie !'''
|ńälta'''hiai !'''
|-
|-
|Ergative
|Ergative
|nanai'''ss'''
|ńälta'''ss'''
|nan'''ayalss'''
|ńälta'''hialss'''
|-
|-
|Accusative
|Accusative
|nan'''ayau'''
|ńälta'''sau'''
|nanai'''rau'''
|ńälta'''hiarau'''
|-
|-
|Genitive
|Genitive
|nan'''ayi'''
|ńälta'''hi'''
|nan'''ayė'''
|ńälta'''hiė'''
|-
|-
|Instrumental
|Translative
|nan'''ayu'''
|ńälta'''sanam'''
|nan'''aiyu'''
|ńälta'''hiarṇam'''
|-
|-
|Comitative
|Exessive
|nan'''ayanam'''
|ńält'''ahena'''
|nan'''ayarṇam'''
|ńälta'''hiaivāh'''
|-
|Essive
|ńälta'''hiu'''
|ńälta'''ṣriu'''
|-
|-
|Dative
|Dative
|nan'''aið'''
|ńälta'''śve'''
|nanai'''rað'''
|ńält'''ąyoh'''
|-
|-
|Ablative
|Ablative
|nan'''ąu'''
|ńälta''''''
|nan'''ąinie'''
|ńälta'''sęnie'''
|-
|-
|Locative
|Locative
|nan'''ayie'''
|ńälta'''hiye'''
|nanai'''lym'''
|ńälta'''śilym'''
|-
|Substitutive
|nanai'''mian'''
|nan'''ayarmian'''
|-
|Abessive
|nanai'''tiak'''
|nan'''ayartiak'''
|}
|}


===Verbs - Smārjāmai===
Note that the noun ''lilėmaiṭah'', the most important concept in the Yūnialtei religion (and, due to this, in the whole Chlegdarim worldview), is an irregular, singular-only noun and declines as seventh declension in direct, genitive, essive and locative cases, and as a first declension noun (with stem ''lilėmaiṭą-'') elsewhere; it also lacks a vocative form.
The Laceyiami verb (''smārjām ''or ''pantäyra'', pl. ''smārjāmai ''or ''pantäyrai'') is the most inflected part of speech; its most basic forms are fusional, but many more specific formations are more agglutinative due to their origin from old Proto-Cis-Tahianshima particles or participles.


The first and most important division we can find in Laceyiami verbs is the distinction between '''exterior '''(''bhėmabessa'') and '''interior '''(''niėmabessa'') verbs. This may at first seem a voice system, but it must be distinguished from the true voices in Laceyiam conjugation. The difference between them is mostly lexical: native grammarians distinguish exterior verbs as describing "activities or states that involve interactions with outside the self", and interior verbs as affecting principally the self. Exterior verbs are those we could most easily compare to active verbs in English, while interior verbs are a somewhat "catch-all" category including many distinct meanings, most notably middle-voice, reflexive and reciprocal ones but also all adjectival verbs as well as peculiar and somewhat independent meanings for some verbs. As many verbs can be conjugated both as exterior and as interior; they often have differences in meaning - e.g. ''gṇyauke ''means “to give birth” as exterior and “to be born” as interior.
==== The eighth declension (-ai) ====
 
The eighth declension (''teitende paiktairathāda'') includes those nouns ending in '''-ai'''; they come from various sources but only a minority of them is inherited from PCT: most are Nanaklāri or Ancient Lelīmuyāńi borrowings.
Laceyiam verbs also conjugate for five '''voices''', each one putting one of five different core elements as the ''direct-case argument'', usually for means of topicalization or definiteness; they reflect the Austronesian-type morphosyntactical alignment of Laceyiam. The five voices are, for exterior verbs:
{| class="article-table"
* '''patient-trigger '''or ''patientive ''(unmarked);
!nanai (rainforest, jungle)
* '''agent-trigger '''or ''agentive'';
!Singular
* '''benefactive-trigger '''or simply ''benefactive'';
!Plural
* '''antibenefactive-trigger '''or simply ''antibenefactive'';
|-
* '''locative-trigger '''or simply ''locative''.
|Direct
Interior verbs only have four voices, as they do not have an agentive voice; the patientive, unmarked voice, is here called '''common voice'''.
|'''nanai'''
There is also an ''instrumental'' form, but it is independent of voice despite having much in common with them.
|nan'''ayar'''
 
|-
Laceyiami verbs also conjugate for five different '''tense-aspect combinations''', representing two different aspects (perfective and imperfective) and three tenses proper (past, present, future). The imperfective tenses are the '''present''', the '''imperfect''', and the '''future'''; the perfective tenses are the '''past '''and the '''pluperfect'''. Tenses are the “basic unit” verbs conjugate in: all tenses conjugate for six persons (1st-2nd-3rd in singular and plural).
|Ergative
 
|nanai'''ss'''
However, the most complex part of Laceyiami verbs is the '''mood'''. Laceyiam is particularly mood-heavy and its concept of mood is quite broad, conjugating verbs in what are called '''primary moods '''and '''secondary moods'''; a single verb form may have a single primary mood but up to two secondary moods. 
|nan'''ayalss'''
 
|-
The ten primary moods are:
|Accusative
* '''indicative''' - the realis mood;
|nan'''ayau'''
* '''imperative''' - used for giving orders or commands;
|nanai'''rau'''
* '''desiderative''' - used to express a desire or will (e.g. I want to X);
|-
* '''necessitative''' - used to express need or obligation (e.g. I have to X);
|Genitive
* '''potential''' - used to express the ability to do something (e.g. I can [= am able to] X)
|nan'''ayi'''
* '''permissive''' - used to express the permission to do something (e.g. I can [= I’m allowed to] X)
|nan'''ayė'''
* '''optative '''- used to express wishes or hopes;
|-
* '''propositive '''- used to express proposals (e.g. let’s X; why don’t you X);
|Translative
* '''hypothetical '''- used to express things that may happen or might have happened;
|nan'''ayanam'''
* '''subjunctive '''- used to express general advices (jussive use), purpose (supine use), and also syntactically conditioned by some particles.
|nan'''ayarṇam'''
The eight secondary moods are:
|-
* five of them express '''evidentiality''', namely: certainty (also '''energetic mood'''), deduction, dream, specifically invented situation, and hearsay (also '''inferential mood''');
|Exessive
* '''interrogative''', used for questions;
|nan'''ayena'''
* two '''consequential moods''': one expressing ''cause'' (e.g. “because X”), the other ''opposition'' (e.g. “although X”).
|nan'''ayarvāh'''
Laceyiami verbs also have two '''non-finite forms '''(the '''-ke''' form (or simply the '''infinitive''') and the '''-ę '''form) and a small number of '''preverbal modifiers''' that add a particular meaning to the verb (the most common is ''sų-'', used to negate verbs).
|-
|Essive
|nan'''ayu'''
|nan'''aiyu'''
|-
|Dative
|nan'''aið'''
|nanai'''yoh'''
|-
|Ablative
|nan'''ąu'''
|nan'''ąinie'''
|-
|Locative
|nan'''ayie'''
|nanai'''lym'''
|}


Finally, Laceyiam has a large number of ''attributive'' and ''adverbial participles'', with forms for most voices and tenses and a distinction into ''modal adverbs'', ''homofocal gerundives'' and ''heterofocal gerundives''.
===Verbs - Smārjāmai===
The Laceyiami verb (''smārjām ''or ''täyrāṇama'', pl. ''smārjāmai ''or ''täyrāṇamai'') is the most inflected part of speech; its most basic forms are fusional, but many more specific formations are more agglutinative due to their origin from old Proto-Cis-Tahianshima particles or participles.


==== Conjugations ====
The first and most important division we can find in Laceyiami verbs is the distinction between '''exterior '''(''bhėmabessa'') and '''interior '''(''niėmabessa'') verbs. This may at first seem a voice system, but it must be distinguished from the true voices in Laceyiam conjugation. The difference between them is mostly lexical: native grammarians distinguish exterior verbs as describing "activities or states that involve interactions with outside the self", and interior verbs as affecting principally the self. Exterior verbs are those we could most easily compare to active verbs in English, while interior verbs are a somewhat "catch-all" category including many distinct meanings, most notably middle-voice, reflexive and reciprocal ones but also all adjectival verbs as well as peculiar and somewhat independent meanings for some verbs. As many verbs can be conjugated both as exterior and as interior; they often have differences in meaning - e.g. ''gṇyauke ''means “to give birth” as exterior and “to be born” as interior.
Verbs, in Laceyiam, are divided in four conjugations. They are easily distinguished by their infinitive ending, which is the citation form of the verb. The main difference between them is the thematic vowel added to the stem.
 
* The '''first '''conjugation uses /a/ as the thematic vowel and includes infinitives ending in '''-ake''' or '''-aike; '''this latter class is identified as '''1ai '''and has a different behaviour in the past tense. This is probably the most common conjugation, also because that's the one most denominal suffixes use.
Laceyiam verbs also conjugate for five '''voices''', each one putting one of five different core elements as the ''direct-case argument'', usually for means of topicalization or definiteness; they reflect the Austronesian-type morphosyntactical alignment of Laceyiam. The five voices are, for exterior verbs:
* The '''second '''conjugation uses /e/ as the thematic vowel, and its infinitives end in '''-eke'''.
* '''patient-trigger '''or ''patientive ''(unmarked);
* The '''third '''conjugation uses /i/ (Classical /y/) as the thematic vowel, and its infinitives end in '''-yke'''.
* '''agent-trigger '''or ''agentive'';
* The '''fourth '''conjugation has no thematic vowel and as such it includes two categories of verbs: those with consonant-final roots, which have an infinitive ending in a consonant plus '''-ke '''(or, rarely, because of saṃdhi, '''-ge'''), and those with vowel-final roots, whose infinitive end in a vowel plus '''-ke'''. Note that there are some verbs - like ''nake ''"to think" - where a final /a e i/ is part of the root and not a thematic vowel, and may be mistaken at first for verbs belonging to other conjugations. A few fourth conjugation verbs also have allomorphic roots depending on whether the added ending begins with a vowel or with a consonant, like ''gṇyauke ''"to give birth/to be born" (root ''gṇyāv-/gṇyau-'').
* '''benefactive-trigger '''or simply ''benefactive'';
Apart from these four conjugations, there are some completely irregular verbs (e.g. ''haiske ''"to be", ''milke ''"to take") and also six regular sub-patterns in some tenses, three of which are independent from the four regular conjugation patterns (that is, those verbs may be of any of them in the other tenses). They are all relics of independent aspect formations from PCT:
* '''antibenefactive-trigger '''or simply ''antibenefactive'';
* '''-ah verbs''', which add '''-ah '''or ''''''to the root while forming their present tense - most notably ''lilke ''"to live".
* '''locative-trigger '''or simply ''locative''.
* '''-st- verbs''', which add '''-st '''in the present tense - the most common is ''męlyke ''"to give".
Interior verbs only have four voices, as they do not have an agentive voice; the patientive, unmarked voice, is here called '''common voice'''.
* '''-ėyi- verbs''', which add '''-ėyi- '''(stressed) to the root in the present - like ''hūrtake ''"to shake, tremble, vibrate".
There is also an ''instrumental'' form, but it is independent of voice despite having much in common with them.
* '''-au-/-ei- verbs, '''counted as first conjugation (with infinitives in '''-auke'''), have an '''-au-''' stem-ending suffix in the present which becomes '''-ei-''' in the past - they are relics of a regular PCT derivation forming dynamic verbs. Examples are ''meinauke ''"to watch" or ''blinauke ''"to remember".
* '''-āti-/-it- verbs''' are all counted as fourth conjugation (infinitives in '''-ātike''') and have an '''-āti-''' stem-ending suffix in the present which becomes '''-it- '''in the past - like ''yihātike ''"to understand".
* '''-ėra- verbs''' are first conjugation verbs, which are extremely common as '''-ėra- '''is the main verb-forming denominal suffix in Laceyiam. They use slightly different endings from other verbs of the same conjugations - compare for example ''keipavið ''"you go" and ''paiktāṃliėryð'' "you climb a tree".


===== Bulṭāṇama verbs =====
Laceyiami verbs also conjugate for five different '''tense-aspect combinations''', representing two different aspects (perfective and imperfective) and three tenses proper (past, present, future). The imperfective tenses are the '''present''', the '''imperfect''', and the '''future'''; the perfective tenses are the '''past '''and the '''pluperfect'''. Tenses are the “basic unit” verbs conjugate in: all tenses conjugate for six persons (1st-2nd-3rd in singular and plural).
''Bulṭāṇama'' (pl. ''bulṭāṇamai'', meaning "with mutation") is a class of thirty base verbs which have a vowel mutation in their present stem. These are actually the relics of the Proto-Cis-Tahianshima ablaut system, particularly the middle-grade presents and the high-grade presents.<br />
In a Laceyiam perspective, they are divided in ''middle bulṭāṇamai'', where the modified vowel is a monophthong, and ''strong bulṭāṇamai'', where the modified vowel is a diphthong (note that '''i → ei''' verbs count as strong in this classification, but were actually middle-grade in PCT).
The twenty-three middle bulṭāṇamai have these changes:
* '''i → e''': ''liśvake'' (to wipe), ''priśvake'' (to erase, to turn off, to shut down), ''hįlsake'' (to make a sound), ''ṭilbake'' (to carry (multidirectional)), ''limbake'' (to refresh, to quench thirst, to nourish), ''mįldake'' (to hope, to wish (interior only)), ''mįṃke'' (to catch — also an '''-ėyi-''' verb), ''minge'' (to hear — the root is ''mind-''), ''dinge'' (to pour — root ''dig-''), ''skilgake'' (to cross rough terrain), and ''giske'' (to take away, to seize, to capture, to kidnap).
* '''u → i''': ''murjake'' (to keep inside, to contain), ''bulṭake'' (to change, to modify), ''ṣurgake'' (to feel indifference for something you barely know because you haven't thought about it enough (interior only)), ''kurṣṭake'' (to rot, to make rot), ''bųlake'' (to plow), ''nurgake'' (to itch), and ''nurbake'' (to shake).
* '''u → y''': ''pultake'' (to lean), ''kulke'' (to talk, to chat), ''ḍurke'' (to crumble, to collapse), ''kusake'' (to peck), and ''prudhake'' (to tear apart).
The seven strong bulṭāṇamai are:
* '''i → ai''': ''kirake'' (to love), ''lįnake'' (to stay, to remain), and ''bringe'' (to hinder, to obstruct — root ''brind-'').
* '''i → ei''': only ''pirake'' (to swallow).
* '''u → au''': ''gurvyake'' (to sleep), ''bhuvake'' (to care for someone), and ''spunake'' (to poison).


These verbs conjugate regularly except for this vowel change in the present indicative stem only, for example ''leśvar'' (it is wept) and ''liśvat'' (it was wept), or ''kairu'' (I am loved) and ''kiram'' (I was loved) — note the regular saṃdhi change in ''ṣurgake'': ''śirgāmiss'' (pres. 1sg) vs ''ṣurgamin'' (past 1sg).
However, the most complex part of Laceyiami verbs is the '''mood'''. Laceyiam is particularly mood-heavy and its concept of mood is quite broad, conjugating verbs in what are called '''primary moods '''and '''secondary moods'''; a single verb form may have a single primary mood but up to two secondary moods. 


==== Indicative present and imperative ====
The ten primary moods are:
The indicative present and the imperative use, for most verbs, the same stem. In the indicative present, apart from the four regular patterns, '''-ah-, -st-, -ėyi-, '''and '''-ėra- '''verbs are distinguished. The following table is the conjugation for regular verbs in the indicative present, exterior, patient-trigger voice:
* '''indicative''' - the realis mood;
{| class="article-table"
* '''imperative''' - used for giving orders or commands;
!
* '''desiderative''' - used to express a desire or will (e.g. I want to X);
!pūnake (to work)
* '''necessitative''' - used to express need or obligation (e.g. I have to X);
!hväldeke (to choose)
* '''potential''' - used to express the ability to do something (e.g. I can [= am able to] X)
!läðlyke (to help)
* '''permissive''' - used to express the permission to do something (e.g. I can [= I’m allowed to] X)
!ūtiraṃke (to write)
* '''optative '''- used to express wishes or hopes;
!lilke (to live)
* '''propositive '''- used to express proposals (e.g. let’s X; why don’t you X);
!męlyke (to give)
* '''hypothetical '''- used to express things that may happen or might have happened;
!humbėrake (to spice)
* '''subjunctive '''- used to express general advices (jussive use), purpose (supine use), and also syntactically conditioned by some particles.
!hūrtake (to shake)
The eight secondary moods are:
|-
* five of them express '''evidentiality''', namely: certainty (also '''energetic mood'''), deduction, dream, specifically invented situation, and hearsay (also '''inferential mood''');
|1SG
* '''interrogative''', used for questions;
|pūn'''u'''
* two '''consequential moods''': one expressing ''cause'' (e.g. “because X”), the other ''opposition'' (e.g. “although X”).
|hväld'''ėyu'''
Laceyiami verbs also has a '''non-finite form '''(the '''-ke''' form, called '''infinitive''' hereafter) and a small number of '''preverbal modifiers''' that add a particular meaning to the verb (the most common is ''sų-'', used to negate verbs).
|läðl'''ȳ'''
 
|ūtiram'''iu'''
Finally, Laceyiam has a large number of '''attributive''' and '''adverbial participles''', with forms for most voices and tenses and a distinction into '''modal adverbs''', '''homofocal gerundives''' and '''heterofocal gerundives'''.
|lil'''ah'''
 
|męl'''ściu'''
==== Conjugations ====
|humbėr'''iu'''
Verbs, in Laceyiam, are divided in four conjugations. They are easily distinguished by their infinitive ending, which is the citation form of the verb. The main difference between them is the thematic vowel added to the stem.
|hūrt'''ėyiu'''
* The '''first '''conjugation uses /a/ as the thematic vowel and includes infinitives ending in '''-ake''' or '''-aike; '''this latter class is identified as '''1ai '''and has a different behaviour in the past tense. This is probably the most common conjugation, also because that's the one most denominal suffixes use.
|-
* The '''second '''conjugation uses /e/ as the thematic vowel, and its infinitives end in '''-eke'''.
|2SG
* The '''third '''conjugation uses /i/ (Classical /y/) as the thematic vowel, and its infinitives end in '''-yke'''.
|pūn'''avið'''
* The '''fourth '''conjugation has no thematic vowel and as such it includes two categories of verbs: those with consonant-final roots, which have an infinitive ending in a consonant plus '''-ke '''(or, rarely, because of saṃdhi, '''-ge'''), and those with vowel-final roots, whose infinitive end in a vowel plus '''-ke'''. Note that there are some verbs - like ''nake ''"to think" - where a final /a e i/ is part of the root and not a thematic vowel, and may be mistaken at first for verbs belonging to other conjugations. A few fourth conjugation verbs also have allomorphic roots depending on whether the added ending begins with a vowel or with a consonant, like ''gṇyauke ''"to give birth/to be born" (root ''gṇyāv-/gṇyau-'').
|hväld'''evið'''
Apart from these four conjugations, there are some completely irregular verbs (e.g. ''haiske ''"to be", ''milke ''"to take") and also six regular sub-patterns in some tenses, three of which are independent from the four regular conjugation patterns (that is, those verbs may be of any of them in the other tenses). They are all relics of independent aspect formations from PCT:
|läðl'''yvið'''
* '''-ah verbs''', which add '''-ah '''or '''-ą '''to the root while forming their present tense - most notably ''lilke ''"to live".
|ūtiram'''við'''
* '''-st- verbs''', which add '''-st '''in the present tense - the most common is ''męlyke ''"to give".
|lil'''ąvið'''
* '''-ėyi- verbs''', which add '''-ėyi- '''(stressed) to the root in the present - like ''hūrtake ''"to shake, tremble, vibrate".
|męl'''ścið'''
* '''-au-/-ei- verbs, '''counted as first conjugation (with infinitives in '''-auke'''), have an '''-au-''' stem-ending suffix in the present which becomes '''-ei-''' in the past - they are relics of a regular PCT derivation forming dynamic verbs. Examples are ''meinauke ''"to watch" or ''blinauke ''"to remember".
|humbėr''''''
* '''-āti-/-it- verbs''' are all counted as fourth conjugation (infinitives in '''-ātike''') and have an '''-āti-''' stem-ending suffix in the present which becomes '''-it- '''in the past - like ''yihātike ''"to understand".
|hūrt'''ėyið'''
* '''-ėra- verbs''' are first conjugation verbs, which are extremely common as '''-ėra- '''is the main verb-forming denominal suffix in Laceyiam. They use slightly different endings from other verbs of the same conjugations - compare for example ''keipavið ''"you go" and ''paiktāṃliėryð'' "you climb a tree".
|-
 
|3SG
===== Bulṭāṇama verbs =====
|pūn'''ar'''
''Bulṭāṇama'' (pl. ''bulṭāṇamai'', meaning "with mutation") is a class of thirty base verbs which have a vowel mutation in their present stem. These are actually the relics of the Proto-Cis-Tahianshima ablaut system, particularly the middle-grade presents and the high-grade presents.<br />
|hväld'''er'''
In a Laceyiam perspective, they are divided in ''middle bulṭāṇamai'', where the modified vowel is a monophthong, and ''strong bulṭāṇamai'', where the modified vowel is a diphthong (note that '''i → ei''' verbs count as strong in this classification, but were actually middle-grade in PCT).
|läðl'''yr'''
The twenty-three middle bulṭāṇamai have these changes:
|ūtiram'''ar'''
* '''i → e''': ''liśvake'' (to wipe), ''priśvake'' (to erase, to turn off, to shut down), ''hįlsake'' (to make a sound), ''ṭilbake'' (to carry (multidirectional)), ''limbake'' (to refresh, to quench thirst, to nourish), ''mįldake'' (to hope, to wish (interior only)), ''mįṃke'' (to catch — also an '''-ėyi-''' verb), ''minge'' (to hear — the root is ''mind-''), ''dinge'' (to pour — root ''dig-''), ''skilgake'' (to cross rough terrain), and ''giske'' (to take away, to seize, to capture, to kidnap).
|lil'''ah'''
* '''u → i''': ''murjake'' (to keep inside, to contain), ''bulṭake'' (to change, to modify), ''ṣurgake'' (to feel indifference for something you barely know because you haven't thought about it enough (interior only)), ''kurṣṭake'' (to rot, to make rot), ''bųlake'' (to plow), ''nurgake'' (to itch), and ''nurbake'' (to shake).
|męl'''star'''
* '''u → y''': ''pultake'' (to lean), ''kulke'' (to talk, to chat), ''ḍurke'' (to crumble, to collapse), ''kusake'' (to peck), and ''prudhake'' (to tear apart).
|humbėr'''ar'''
The seven strong bulṭāṇamai are:
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyir'''
* '''i → ai''': ''kirake'' (to love), ''lįnake'' (to stay, to remain), and ''bringe'' (to hinder, to obstruct — root ''brind-'').
* '''i → ei''': only ''pirake'' (to swallow).
* '''u → au''': ''gurvyake'' (to sleep), ''bhuvake'' (to care for someone), and ''spunake'' (to poison).
 
These verbs conjugate regularly except for this vowel change in the present indicative stem only, for example ''leśvar'' (it is wept) and ''liśvat'' (it was wept), or ''kairu'' (I am loved) and ''kiram'' (I was loved) — note the regular saṃdhi change in ''ṣurgake'': ''śirgāmiss'' (pres. 1sg) vs ''ṣurgamin'' (past 1sg). Naturally, all derivations that keep the stem unchanged conjugate likewise, e.g. ''māyaṃlįnake'' (to promise) → ''māyaṃlęnar'' (it is promised), ''māyaṃlįnat'' (it was promised).
 
==== Indicative present and imperative ====
The indicative present and the imperative use, for most verbs, the same stem. In the indicative present, apart from the four regular patterns, '''-ah-, -st-, -ėyi-, '''and '''-ėra- '''verbs are distinguished. The following table is the conjugation for regular verbs in the indicative present, exterior, patient-trigger voice:
{| class="article-table"
!
!pūnake (to work)
!hväldeke (to choose)
!läðlyke (to help)
!ūtiraṃke (to write)
!lilke (to live)
!męlyke (to give)
!humbėrake (to spice)
!hūrtake (to shake)
|-
|-
|1PL
|1SG
|pūn'''asām'''
|pūn'''u'''
|hväld'''esām'''
|hväld'''ėyu'''
|läðl'''ysām'''
|läðl'''ȳ'''
|ūtiraṃ'''sām'''
|ūtiram'''iu'''
|lil'''ahām'''
|lil'''ah'''
|męl'''stisām'''
|męl'''ściu'''
|humbėr'''isām'''
|humbėr'''iu'''
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyisām'''
|hūrt'''ėyiu'''
|-
|-
|2PL
|2SG
|pūn'''akām'''
|pūn'''avið'''
|hväld'''ekām'''
|hväld'''evið'''
|läðl'''ykām'''
|läðl'''yvið'''
|ūtiraṃ'''kām'''
|ūtiram'''við'''
|lil'''ąkām'''
|lil'''ąvið'''
|męl'''stām'''
|męl'''ścið'''
|humbėr'''ikām'''
|humbėr''''''
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyikām'''
|hūrt'''ėyið'''
|-
|-
|3PL
|3SG
|pūn'''athās'''
|pūn'''ar'''
|hväld'''ethās'''
|hväld'''er'''
|läðl'''ythās'''
|läðl'''yr'''
|ūtiraṃ'''thās'''
|ūtiram'''ar'''
|lil'''aṣṭhās'''
|lil'''ah'''
|męl'''stathās'''
|męl'''star'''
|humbėra'''thās'''
|humbėr'''ar'''
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyithās'''
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyir'''
|}
The only different pattern applies to the first person singular in the first and fourth conjugation: roots which end in '''-l, -m, -v, -c,''' '''-ch''', or, for fourth conjugation verbs, in a vowel, use '''-iu'''; all others use just '''-u''' (notice both forms in ''pūn-u'' and ''ūtiram-iu''). A particular trait of speakers from some parts of Eastern Laltīmāhia, including rural Nėniyūkat diocese (but not the urban area of Nanūhimarta), is the pronunciation of the first person singular of '''-ėyi- '''verbs as [ˈeːjiju], which is sometimes reflected in writing (c.f. ''hūrtėyiu ''> ''hūrtėyiyu''), especially in novels or comics, in order to stress a rural Eastern origin of certain characters. ''-ėyiyu ''was however sometimes found in early Classical Age texts.
 
The following table is the conjugation of patient-trigger exterior imperatives ('''-st- '''and '''-ėyi- '''verbs are not distinguished here): 
{| class="article-table"
!
!pūnake (to work)
!hväldeke (to choose)
!läðlyke (to help)
!ūtiraṃke (to write)
!lilke (to live)
!humbėrake (to spice)
|-
|-
|1SG
|1PL
|pūn'''āṣa'''
|pūn'''asām'''
|hväld'''āṣa'''
|hväld'''esām'''
|läðl'''āṣa'''
|läðl'''ysām'''
|ūtiram'''āṣa'''
|ūtiraṃ'''sām'''
|lil'''ąuṣa'''
|lil'''ahām'''
|humbėr'''āṣa'''
|męl'''stisām'''
|humbėr'''isām'''
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyisām'''
|-
|-
|2SG
|2PL
|pūn
|pūn'''akām'''
|hväld'''e'''
|hväld'''ekām'''
|läðl'''y'''
|läðl'''ykām'''
|ūtiram
|ūtiraṃ'''kām'''
|lil'''ą'''
|lil'''ąkām'''
|humbėra
|męl'''stām'''
|humbėr'''ikām'''
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyikām'''
|-
|-
|3SG
|3PL
|pūn'''ās'''
|pūn'''iāt'''
|hväld'''ās'''
|hväld'''iāt'''
|läðl'''ās'''
|läðl'''iut'''
|ūtiram'''ās'''
|ūtiram'''iāt'''
|lil'''ąs'''
|lil'''iąt'''
|humbėr'''ās'''
|męl'''ściāt'''
|humbėr'''iāt'''
|<span>hūrt</span>'''ėyiāt'''
|}
The only different pattern applies to the first person singular in the first and fourth conjugation: roots which end in '''-l, -m, -v, -c,''' '''-ch''', or, for fourth conjugation verbs, in a vowel, use '''-iu'''; all others use just '''-u''' (notice both forms in ''pūn-u'' and ''ūtiram-iu''). A particular trait of speakers from some parts of Eastern Laltīmāhia, including rural Nėniyūkat diocese (but not the urban area of Nanūhimarta), is the pronunciation of the first person singular of '''-ėyi- '''verbs as [ˈeːjiju], which is sometimes reflected in writing (c.f. ''hūrtėyiu ''> ''hūrtėyiyu''), especially in novels or comics, in order to stress a rural Eastern origin of certain characters. ''-ėyiyu ''was however sometimes found in early Classical Age texts.
 
The following table is the conjugation of patient-trigger exterior imperatives ('''-st- '''and '''-ėyi- '''verbs are not distinguished here): 
{| class="article-table"
!
!pūnake (to work)
!hväldeke (to choose)
!läðlyke (to help)
!ūtiraṃke (to write)
!lilke (to live)
!humbėrake (to spice)
|-
|-
|1PL
|1SG
|pūn'''araṭhā'''
|pūn'''āṣa'''
|hväld'''eraṭhā'''
|hväld'''āṣa'''
|läðl'''yraṭhā'''
|läðl'''āṣa'''
|ūtiraṃ'''rathā'''
|ūtiram'''āṣa'''
|lil'''ąraṭhā'''
|lil'''ąuṣa'''
|humbėr'''athā'''
|humbėr'''āṣa'''
|-
|-
|2PL
|2SG
|pūn'''ę'''
|pūn
|hväld'''e'''
|läðl'''y'''
|ūtiram
|lil'''ą'''
|humbėra
|-
|3SG
|pūn'''ās'''
|hväld'''ās'''
|läðl'''ās'''
|ūtiram'''ās'''
|lil'''ąs'''
|humbėr'''ās'''
|-
|1PL
|pūn'''araṭhā'''
|hväld'''eraṭhā'''
|läðl'''yraṭhā'''
|ūtiraṃ'''rathā'''
|lil'''ąraṭhā'''
|humbėr'''athā'''
|-
|2PL
|pūn'''ę'''
|hväld'''ę'''
|hväld'''ę'''
|läðl'''ę'''
|läðl'''ę'''
Line 1,370: Line 1,381:
|-
|-
|3PL
|3PL
|khār'''adhį'''
|khār'''iāde'''
|läyv'''edhį'''
|läyv'''yāde'''
|mālk'''ydhį'''
|mālk'''iude'''
|bhāṇḍa'''ndhį'''
|bhāṇḍat'''iāde'''
|lälek'''ądhį'''
|lälek'''iąde'''
|<span>primęl</span>'''stadhį'''
|<span>primęl</span>'''ściāde'''
|huʔ'''ėyidhį'''
|huʔ'''ėyidhį'''
|}
|}
Note that the plural forms of ''bhāṇḍatke ''are morphemically ''bhāṇḍat-śię'', ''bhāṇḍat-kię, bhāṇḍat-dhį'', regularly modified by saṃdhi. As for meanings, ''primęlyke ''(a prefixed derivation from ''męlyke ''"to give"), means "to return" as interior but "to give back" as exterior. '''-ėra- '''verbs are not included to save space, as the only difference from regular first conjugation verbs is the short vowel ('''-amiss '''instead of '''-āmiss'''; compare ''khārāmiss ''"I am new" and ''śeimėramiss ''"I am poor").
Note that the 1st and 2nd person plural forms of ''bhāṇḍatke ''are morphemically ''bhāṇḍat-śię'' and ''bhāṇḍat-kię'', regularly modified by saṃdhi. As for meanings, ''primęlyke ''(a prefixed derivation from ''męlyke ''"to give"), means "to return" as interior but "to give back" as exterior. '''-ėra- '''verbs are not included to save space, as the only difference from regular first conjugation verbs is the short vowel ('''-amiss '''instead of '''-āmiss'''; compare ''khārāmiss ''"I am new" and ''śeimėramiss ''"I am poor").


In colloquial speech, the '''-ąu''' ending may be substituted by the lone thematic vowel in the first three conjugations, so, for example, it's fairly common to hear forms like ''tami khāra ''instead of ''tami khārąu ''for "it is new".
In colloquial speech, the '''-ąu''' ending may be substituted by the lone thematic vowel in the first three conjugations, so, for example, it's fairly common to hear forms like ''tami khāra ''instead of ''tami khārąu ''for "it is new".
Line 1,561: Line 1,572:
|-
|-
|1SG
|1SG
|pūn'''āmisu'''
|pūn'''āla'''
|kaitm'''aumisu'''
|kaitm'''aila'''
|hväld'''ėmisu'''
|hväld'''ėla'''
|läðl'''ymisu'''
|läðl'''yla'''
|ūtiram'''umisu'''
|ūtiram'''ūla'''
|humb'''ėrumisu'''
|humb'''ėral'''
|-
|-
|2SG
|2SG
|pūn'''āmið'''
|pūn'''ālað'''
|kaitm'''aumið'''
|kaitm'''ailað'''
|hväld'''ėmið'''
|hväld'''ėlað'''
|läðl'''ymið'''
|läðl'''ylað'''
|ūtiram'''umið'''
|ūtiram'''ūlað'''
|humb'''ėrumið'''
|humb'''ėrlað'''
|-
|-
|3SG
|3SG
|pūn'''āmįt'''
|pūn'''ālet'''
|kaitm'''aumįt'''
|kaitm'''ailet'''
|hväld'''ėmįt'''
|hväld'''ėlet'''
|läðl'''ymįt'''
|läðl'''ylet'''
|ūtiram'''umįt'''
|ūtiram'''ūlet'''
|humb'''ėrumįt'''
|humb'''ėrlet'''
|-
|-
|1PL
|1PL
|pūn'''äṃsė'''
|pūn'''ālim'''
|kaitm'''äṃsė'''
|kaitm'''ailim'''
|hväld'''äṃsė'''
|hväld'''ėlim'''
|läðl'''ūmīsė'''
|läðl'''ūlim'''
|ūtiram'''umīsė'''
|ūtiram'''ūlim'''
|humb'''ėrumīsė'''
|humb'''ėrlim'''
|-
|-
|2PL
|2PL
|pūn'''änik'''
|pūn'''ālik'''
|kaitm'''änik'''
|kaitm'''ailik'''
|hväld'''änik'''
|hväld'''ėlik'''
|läðl'''ūmik'''
|läðl'''ūlik'''
|ūtiram'''umik'''
|ūtiram'''ūlik'''
|humb'''ėrumik'''
|humb'''ėrlik'''
|-
|-
|3PL
|3PL
|pūn'''ändė'''
|pūn'''āli'''
|kaitm'''ändė'''
|kaitm'''aili'''
|hväld'''ändė'''
|hväld'''ėli'''
|läðl'''ūmīdė'''
|läðl'''ūli'''
|ūtiram'''umīdė'''
|ūtiram'''ūli'''
|humb'''ėrumīdė'''
|humb'''ėrli'''
|}
|}
In all fourth conjugation forms, the '''-u '''is part of the ending, with regular saṃdhi: after any ending root vowel that is not '''-u '''or '''-i''', a '''-v- '''is inserted; '''-i u-''' form '''-iu-''', while '''-u u-''' form '''-ū-'''.
In all fourth conjugation forms, the '''-ū '''is part of the ending, with regular saṃdhi: after any ending root vowel that is not '''-u, -ū, '''or '''-i''', a '''-v- '''is inserted; '''-i ū-''' form '''--''', while '''-u ū-''' and '''-ū ū-''' form '''-ū-'''.


The indicative interior patient-trigger imperfect is as follows:
The indicative interior patient-trigger imperfect is as follows:
Line 1,621: Line 1,632:
|-
|-
|1SG
|1SG
|khār'''āmisen'''
|khār'''ālen'''
|cāṃkr'''aumisen'''
|cāṃkr'''ailen'''
|läyv'''ėmisen'''
|läyv'''ėlen'''
|mālk'''ymisen'''
|mālk'''ylen'''
|bhāṇḍat'''umisen'''
|bhāṇḍat'''ūlen'''
|śeim'''ėrumisen'''
|śeim'''ėrlen'''
|-
|-
|2SG
|2SG
|khār'''āmiðen'''
|khār'''ālðen'''
|cāṃkr'''aumiðen'''
|cāṃkr'''ailðen'''
|läyv'''ėmiðen'''
|läyv'''ėlðen'''
|mālk'''ymiðen'''
|mālk'''ylðen'''
|bhāṇḍat'''umiðen'''
|bhāṇḍat'''ūlðen'''
|śeim'''ėrumiðen'''
|śeim'''ėralðen'''
|-
|-
|3SG
|3SG
|khār'''āmęn'''
|khār'''ālten'''
|cāṃkr'''aumęn'''
|cāṃkr'''ailten'''
|läyv'''ėmęn'''
|läyv'''ėlten'''
|mālk'''ymęn'''
|mālk'''ylten'''
|bhāṇḍat'''umęn'''
|bhāṇḍat'''ūlten'''
|śeim'''ėrumęn'''
|śeim'''ėralten'''
|-
|-
|1PL
|1PL
|khār'''äṃsan'''
|khār'''ālmin'''
|cāṃkr'''äṃsan'''
|cāṃkr'''ailmin'''
|läyv'''äṃsan'''
|läyv'''ėlmin'''
|mālk'''ūmīsan'''
|mālk'''ūlmin'''
|bhāṇḍat'''umīsan'''
|bhāṇḍat'''ūlmin'''
|śeim'''ėrumīsan'''
|śeim'''ėralmin'''
|-
|-
|2PL
|2PL
|khār'''äkan'''
|khār'''ālkin'''
|cāṃkr'''äkan'''
|cāṃkr'''ailkin'''
|läyv'''äkan'''
|läyv'''ėlkin'''
|mālk'''ūmian'''
|mālk'''ūlkin'''
|bhāṇḍat'''umian'''
|bhāṇḍat'''ūlkin'''
|śeim'''ėrumian'''
|śeim'''ėralkin'''
|-
|-
|3PL
|3PL
|khār'''ändan'''
|khār'''ālīn'''
|cāṃkr'''ändan'''
|cāṃkr'''ailīn'''
|läyv'''ändan'''
|läyv'''ėlīn'''
|mālk'''ūmīdan'''
|mālk'''ūlīn'''
|bhāṇḍat'''umīdan'''
|bhāṇḍat'''ūlīn'''
|śeim'''ėrumīdan'''
|śeim'''ėrlīn'''
|}
|}


Line 1,774: Line 1,785:
|khārak'''auṣṭhän'''
|khārak'''auṣṭhän'''
|}
|}
==== Voice ====
Laceyiam has five voices, marked by affixes added, in unprefixed verbs, at the end of the verb. As the patient-trigger voice (common voice in interior verbs) is unmarked, the four voice markers are:
* '''-śe''' for agent-trigger voice (in exterior verbs only);
* '''-käh''' for benefactive-trigger voice;
* '''-tur''' for antibenefactive-trigger voice;
* '''-kūn''' for locative-trigger voice.
Examples of voice marking are ''lehar'' (he/she/it is eaten) — ''leharśe'' (he/she/it eats) — ''leharkäh'' (something is eaten for him/her/it) — ''lehartur'' (something is eaten against him/her/it) — ''leharkūn'' (something is eaten in him/her/it).
In prefixed verbs (including modifiers like ''sų-'' for negation), voice marking is a bit different as the voice marker is inserted between the prefix and the stem, thus forms like ''trāṃlehar'' (he/she/it is repetitively eaten) → ''trāńśelehar'' (he/she/it repetitively eats). Saṃdhi is applied if needed, e.g. ''I put together'' is ''tacehälgdiu'' (morphemically ''tat-śe-hälgdiu'', verb ''tadhälgdike'').
The verb ''naikścīmake'' (to organize), with a dummy fossilized prefix ''nai-'', only uses the voice marker in front outside of patient-trigger voice, thus ''naikścīmiu'' (I am [being] organized) → ''śekścīmiu'' (I organize).


==== The hypothetical mood ====
==== The hypothetical mood ====
Line 1,975: Line 1,998:


The ''consequential mood of cause'' is formed by adding '''-ę + pian(e)-''' to the verb stem. For example ''pūnu → pūnępianu'' (given that I work, ...); ''pupūṃśvið → pupūṃsępiamvið'' (given that you want to work, ...), or ''pūnįlämet → pūnįlämępianet'' (given that, apparently, (s)he worked, ...).
The ''consequential mood of cause'' is formed by adding '''-ę + pian(e)-''' to the verb stem. For example ''pūnu → pūnępianu'' (given that I work, ...); ''pupūṃśvið → pupūṃsępiamvið'' (given that you want to work, ...), or ''pūnįlämet → pūnįlämępianet'' (given that, apparently, (s)he worked, ...).
The ''consequential mood of opposition'' is similarly formed by adding '''-ę + gām(u)-''' to the verb stem. For example ''pūnu → pūnęgāmu'' (even if I work, ...); ''pupūṃśvið → pupūṃsęgāmvið'' (even if you want to work, ...), or ''pūnįlämet → pūnįlämęgāmut'' (even if, apparently, (s)he worked, ...).
The ''consequential mood of opposition'' is similarly formed by adding '''-ę + gām(u)-''' to the verb stem. For example ''pūnu → pūnęgāmu'' (even if I work, ...); ''pupūṃśvið → pupūṃsęgāmvið'' (even if you want to work, ...), or ''pūnįlämet → pūnįlämęgāmut'' (even if, apparently, (s)he worked, ...).


==== The interrogative secondary mood ====
==== The interrogative secondary mood ====
The interrogative mood is formed in a different way compared to the other secondary moods. It adds '''-ę''' to the verb stem, then all personal endings, then (in unprefixed verbs) those marking voice, and finally '''-thā''' at the very end. For example: ''pūnęrthā?'' (does (s)he work?), ''lehęrthāsthā?'' (are they being eaten?), ''lehęrthāśethā?'' (do they eat?).
The interrogative mood is formed in a different way compared to the other secondary moods. It adds '''-ę''' to the verb stem, then all personal endings, then (in unprefixed verbs) those marking voice, and finally '''-thā''' at the very end. For example: ''pūnęrthā?'' (does (s)he work?), ''lehęyātthā?'' (are they being eaten?), ''lehęyācethā?'' (do they eat?).
<br />
Note that '''-við-thā''' in the second person singular present ending contracts to '''-vindhā''', thus forms like ''pūnęvindhā?'' (do you work?).
Note that '''-við-thā''' in the second person singular present ending contracts to '''-vindhā''', thus forms like ''pūnęvindhā?'' (do you work?).


Line 1,989: Line 2,014:
* ''prābake'' (to be disgusted)
* ''prābake'' (to be disgusted)


These verbs all have their cause in '''exessive''' case and the affected being in '''dative''' case, e.g. "I'm sorry for my mistake" is ''dønėrenėndra lulið nāvtąu'', with ''dønėrenė'' (mistake) in exessive case and ''lāli'' (I) in the dative.
These verbs all have their cause in '''exessive''' case and the affected being in '''dative''' case, e.g. "I'm sorry for my mistake" is ''dønėrṇėndra lilįse nāvtąu'', with ''dønėrṇė'' (mistake) in exessive case and ''lili'' (I) in the dative.


==== Irregular verbs ====
==== Irregular verbs ====
Line 2,054: Line 2,079:
|þørð-
|þørð-
|-
|-
|}
|}
 
''milke'', in the present, uses ''milk-'' in the irregular first person ''milkū'' and ''milėk-'' anywhere else. The past of ''yeihake'' can nowadays also be formed regularly, with e.g. ''yeihat'' (it was read) instead of ''tāśehar''.
 
The past forms of ''hvuipake, khabeke, maldiake, peithake, välieke, vīṇyake, yeihake'', and ''þørðe'' use the present endings and not the past ones — similarly, the imperfect of ''śńėgake'' uses the past endings instead of the imperfect ones.
 
==== The verb "to be" (haiske) ====
The verb "to be" in Laceyiam is ''haiske'', and it is highly irregular because of ablaut and suppletion. Most of its forms derive from PCT *gə₂js- or some of its derivations, but the future tense is from *ba₁ɣməp- (to become). This table includes all of its indicative mood forms, plus the imperative: 
{| class="article-table"
!
!Present
!Past
!Imperfect
!Future
!Pluperfect
!Imperative
|-
|1SG
|jū
|høysu
|hesāla
|bąmby
|jaliauśim
|hiśvāṣa
|-
|2SG
|jīð
|hės
|hesālað
|bąmmið
|jaliauśið
|hąi
|-
|3SG
|jar
|hėt
|hesālat
|bąmbir
|jaliauśi
|hās
|-
|1PL
|jńām
|jeiśi
|hesālim
|bąmbiyām
|jaliaukṣi
|hiṣraṭhā
|-
|2PL
|jńāð
|jeiki
|hesālik
|bąmbikām
|jaliauseki
|haisę
|-
|3PL
|jhis
|jeithe
|hesāli
|bąmbithās
|jaliauṣṭhe
|haiṣṭhi
|}
Note that the imperfect and pluperfect are actually regularly formed with the normal terminations and the stems ''hes- ''and ''jalʲ-'' respectively. In spoken Laceyiam, the past forms (''høysu, hės...'') are increasingly often used in place of the imperfect ones (''hesāla, hesālað...'').
 
''haiske ''is usually defined as an exterior-only verb, but actually there is a single interior 3rd person singular form which is used in the existential construction. This form always needs the pronoun ''tami ''and an accusative argument. The forms are '''tami jąu''' (present), '''tami hiṣąu '''(past), '''tami hesālten '''(imperfect), '''tami bąmbstąu '''(future), and '''tami jaliauśian '''(pluperfect). An example construction is ''tami ėmīlau jąu ''"there is a tiger", with ''ėmīla ''"tiger" in the accusative case. Note that neither the verb nor the pronoun vary for number, thus "there are tigers" is ''tami ėmīlarau jąu.''
 
The verb ''tadhaiske'' (to treat someone, to behave with someone) is a compound of ''haiske'', but it can be conjugated in two different ways:
* as a compound verb, with ''tad-'' plus all forms of ''haiske'', thus indicative present ''tańjū, tańjīð, tańjar...'', indicative past ''tadhøysu, tadhės, tadhėt...'' and so on.
* as a regular verb, with root ''tad-hais-'', and thus with indicative present ''tadhaisu, tadhaiśvið, tadhaisur...'', indicative past ''tadhaisum, tadhaisuð, tadhaisut...''. Anyway, even in this case, in other voices the conjugation of ''haiske'' is the one commonly used, like agent-trigger voice, indicative present ''tajejū, tajejīð, tajejar...'' (morphemically ''tad-śe-jū...''), benefactive-trigger ''tatkäjū, tatkäjīð, tatkäjar...'' (''tad-käh-jū...'') and so on.
 
==== Preverbal modifiers ====
 
==== Analytic forms ====
 
==== Adjectives and adverbs ====
 
=== Pronouns - Pārivāyārai ===
Laceyiami pronouns (''pārivāyārai'', sg. ''pārivāyara'') are a closed class divided into two broad categories: '''personal pronouns''' (''tairpārivāyārai'') and '''correlatives''' (''śńėmpārivāyārai'').
Unlike English, Laceyiami pronouns can take attributives arguments, thus phrases like *the young me or *the cleaning he are possible (these examples being respectively ''laṣṭhyęe lili'' and ''baltiėniaśe no'').
 
==== Personal pronouns ====
Laceyiam has fourteen personal pronouns (''tairpārivāyārai''): three persons and two numbers — second person pronouns have two genders each (higher and lower animate), while third person ones have all four genders.
 
Note that the genitive forms of pronouns are also used as possessive adjectives, as Laceyiam does not have a separate form for them.
 
First person pronouns — lili, chlė
{| class="article-table"
!
!lili (I)
!chlė (we)
|-
|Direct
|lili
|chlė
|-
|Ergative
|lilį
|chlāvi
|-
|Accusative
|liliū
|chlųm
|-
|Genitive
|liliā
|chlęn
|-
|Translative
|lilyja
|chluija
|-
|Exessive
|lilo
|chlot
|-
|Essive
|lilām
|chlaim
|-
|Dative
|lilįse
|chlęśā
|-
|Ablative
|lilįmy
|chlęmū
|-
|Locative
|lilamė
|chlanā
|}
 
Second person pronouns — laha, helān ; no, vinān.
{| class="article-table"
!Higher animate
!laha (you (sg))
!helān (you (pl))
|-
|Direct
|laha
|helān
|-
|Ergative
|lahęs
|helāh
|-
|Accusative
|lahū
|helut
|-
|Genitive
|lahoni
|helųn
|-
|Translative
|lahuja
|helāk
|-
|Exessive
|laho
|helot
|-
|Essive
|lahom
|heluim
|-
|Dative
|ląse
|helęśā
|-
|Ablative
|ląmy
|helęmū
|-
|Locative
|lahamė
|helanā
|}
{| class="article-table"
!Lower animate
!no (you (sg))
!vinān (you (pl))
|-
|Direct
|no
|vinān
|-
|Ergative
|vinąs
|vināh
|-
|Accusative
|vinū
|vinut
|-
|Genitive
|vinoni
|vinųn
|-
|Translative
|vinuja
|vināk
|-
|Exessive
|vino
|vinot
|-
|Essive
|vinom
|vinuim
|-
|Dative
|vįse
|vinęśā
|-
|Ablative
|vįmy
|vinęmū
|-
|Locative
|vinamė
|vinanā
|}
 
Third person pronouns — tami, aṣė ; kai, kilė ; pāt, paśān ; dāt, dadān. Note that ''tami'' is also used as a generic dummy pronoun in many cases, like questions or even just emphasis.
{| class="article-table"
!Higher animate
!tami (she (it, he))
!aṣė (they)
|-
|Direct
|tami
|aṣė
|-
|Ergative
|tamį
|eṣāvi
|-
|Accusative
|tum (''tamiū'')
|eṣųm
|-
|Genitive
|täm (''tamiā'')
|eṣęn
|-
|Translative
|tamyja
|eṣuija
|-
|Exessive
|tamo
|eṣot
|-
|Essive
|tām
|eṣaim
|-
|Dative
|tamįse
|ekṣā
|-
|Ablative
|tįmy
|ęṣmū
|-
|Locative
|tamė
|eṣaṇā
|}
{| class="article-table"
!Lower animate
!kai (he (she, it))
!kilė (they)
|-
|Direct
|kai
|kilė
|-
|Ergative
|kaih
|kilāvi
|-
|Accusative
|kaiyū
|kilųm
|-
|Genitive
|kaiyā
|kilęn
|-
|Translative
|kavyja
|kiluija
|-
|Exessive
|kayo
|kilot
|-
|Essive
|kayām
|kilaim
|-
|Dative
|kąise
|kilęśā
|-
|Ablative
|kąimy
|kilęmū
|-
|Locative
|kaimė
|kilanā
|}
 
{| class="article-table"
!Plant animate
!pāt (it (he, she))
!paśān (they)
|-
|Direct
|pāt
|paśān
|-
|Ergative
|paśąs
|paśāh
|-
|Accusative
|paśū
|paśut
|-
|Genitive
|paśoni
|paśųn
|-
|Translative
|paśuja
|paśāk
|-
|Exessive
|paśo
|paśot
|-
|Essive
|paśom
|paśuim
|-
|Dative
|pakṣe
|paśęśā
|-
|Ablative
|paśmy
|paśęmū
|-
|Locative
|paśamė
|paśanā
|}
{| class="article-table"
!Inanimate
!dāt (it (he, she))
!dadān (they)
|-
|Direct
|dāt
|dadān
|-
|Ergative
|dadąs
|dadāh
|-
|Accusative
|dadū
|dadut
|-
|Genitive
|dadoni
|dadųn
|-
|Translative
|daduja
|dadāk
|-
|Exessive
|dado
|dadot
|-
|Essive
|dadom
|daduim
|-
|Dative
|datse
|dadęśā
|-
|Ablative
|dadmy
|dadęmū
|-
|Locative
|dadamė
|dadanā
|}
 
There are also the two additional personal pronouns ''lārit'' (reflexive — forms in ''italic'' in the table are rarely used) and ''dänit'' (both).
{| class="article-table"
!
!lārit (-self)
!dänit (both)
|-
|Direct
|''lārit''
|dänit
|-
|Ergative
|''lārį''
|dänį
|-
|Accusative
|''lāriū''
|däniū
|-
|Genitive
|lāriā
|däniā
|-
|Translative
|lāryja
|dänyja
|-
|Exessive
|lāro
|däno
|-
|Essive
|lārām
|dänām
|-
|Dative
|lārįse
|dänįse
|-
|Ablative
|lārįmy
|dänįmy
|-
|Locative
|lāramė
|dänamė
|}
 
=== Numerals ===
 
=== Particles ===
 
== Syntax ==
 
== Vocabulary ==
=== Word formation, word origins and etymological classification ===
The vocabulary of Laceyiam is continuously growing with the need to coin new words for anything new that gets discovered on Calémere. New words are today mostly formed by compounding - which is a very common way of forming words, especially nouns - by either Laceyiami roots or Ancient Lelīmuyāńi ones (counting as the latter those who have not already been borrowed into Laceyiam). Other active word-formation processes include word derivation through bound morphemes and, although dwarfed in use by the other two processes, acronyms.
 
As there's barely anything left to discover geographically on Calémere, borrowings into Laceyiam are nowadays rare, and they're mostly used in order to describe cultural aspects from other lands, or sports and activities that gain followers in Laltīmāhia - though note that the Chlegdarim society's relative isolation and its own role as a leading cultural nation, at least for the Eastern Bloc of Calémere, makes this a not-so-common concept. Anyway (as also explained throughout the ''History ''section), historically Laceyiam has borrowed many words and roots, that enriched the vocabulary from the original Proto-Cis-Tahianshima stock of words. The general classification of Laceyiami roots classifies them as such:
* Level 0 - words that can be traced all the way back to ''Proto-Cis-Tahianshima'', and as such have full or partial cognates in at least one other Cis-Tahianshima language. PCT was probably spoken as late as 3600 years ago, three full centuries before the start of the First Era (3281 years ago) of the Chlegdarim calendar (which was however adopted from the Ancient Lelīmuyāńi civilization). Level 0 roots amount to about 32-33% of Laceyiami vocabulary.
* Level P (this classification follows the Chlegdarim alphabetical order) - these are pre-classical words from a number of origins: Proto-Mǎng Tì and Old Yomadhvāyi are the only languages that can be identified as sources for at least some words; they also include all other words from the Nanaklāri substrate, and, most probably, other unattested languages from Tāhiańśīma and the Eastern Islands, as well as possible PCT words that can't be reconstructed as such due to lack of cognates in other languages. Timing for these borrowings is from the end of the common PCT era (about 3600 years ago) up to the late First Era (which ended in 1E 1109, that is 2172 years ago). We lack dates for where the Chlegdarims exactly where during most of these period - Ancient Lelīmuyāńi texts which first mention the Chlegdarims in southern Leitāvaja are dated around 1E 850. Level P roots form a substantial part of the Laceyiam vocabulary - some estimates consider them as being as much as 26% of the vocabulary.
* Level PH1 - Classical Age words borrowed from Ancient Lelīmuyāńi, in particular those borrowed from the late First Era until the mid-Second Era (around 4E 600), the commonly accepted date for the extinction of the Ancient Lelīmuyāńi language - around that time, the areas of modern central and southern Leitāvaja, as well as most of Yomadhvāya and parts of the lower Tāllahāria basin, were already developing the first daughter languages of Laceyiam itself. Level PH1 roots amount between 12% and 14% of Laceyiami vocabulary - possibly the highest percentage from a single language except PCT.
* Level PH2 - Classical Age words not from Ancient Lelīmuyāńi: these relate to the earliest expansions of the Chlegdarim realms after the foundation of the Inquisition, all the way through the Tālliyāia jungle. Three source languages are attested: Dzams-bltyod, Ancient Varṣāthi, and Ancient Vgorrādńi (though a few linguists consider words from this last language to belong either to level B or BH). Many other languages of the jungle are not attested directly but left traces in local vernaculars, some of whose words then have found their way into Standard Laceyiam. Level PH2 words date from the late First Era (almost exclusively Dzams-bltyod) or early Second Era until the mid-Second Era, and constitute about 4% of the vocabulary.
* Level B - words from the first major westward expansion, into the rainforest of Southwestern Laltīmāhia and the mountains and deserts north of it. Starting from here, the vast majority of borrowed words are either natural features (plants, geography, animals) or specific to the cultures of conquered places. Level B dates from the first century of the Second Era to around 2E 800-900 (Chlegdarims probably bordered Dabuke populations, north of the deserts, starting from around that date), and it amounts to about 2% or 3% of words.
* Level BH - words borrowed during the second - and the largest - Inquisitorial expansion, the one in the Lāmiejāya-Lāmber plain (simply the ''Plains''). As for level B words, they are mostly culturally specific, but ''Payt'umpaftl'', a language once spoken in the northern part of the plain, was spoken by a somewhat cultured civilization and gave Laceyiam some words about chemistry, alchemy, and mathematics. The Ancient Vgorrādńi borrowings are considered by some linguists to belong to this level, as they were reached later than other level PH2 cultures, and as their civilization was geographically in the Plains - in the uppermost reaches of the ''Lāmber'' river, around the northern border of the Tālliyāia rainforest; however this is a minority view, as the Plains Expansion is considered to have begun only around 2E 450-500 (the founding of the city of ''Cami'' in modern-day ''Hūmiębhāraya, ''for a long time the main Chlegdarim city in the Plains area, even though not geographically in the Plain itself -'' ''is traditionally considered to have taken place in 2E 511), when the Chlegdarims had already met the Ancient Vgorrādńi civilization; level BH includes borrowings until the late Second Era (which finished in 2E 1137). Words from level BH amount to about 8% of the total vocabulary.
* Level M - from the various expansions of the Chlegdarims into the Dabuke lands in the Northwest, the southern areas of the modern-day North (''Hūnakøyda ''and ''Kaiśiluð''), in the ''Mūneilāhe ''endorheic basin, and in Tāhiańśīma, which took place starting from about 2E 1000 until about 3E 300-400 (note that the Dabuke peoples took at least three more centuries to assimilate into the Chlegdarim culture). Level M amounts to about 5% of Laceyiami words, excluding chiefly local words (mainly of Dabuke origin) used by people from Northwestern Laltīmāhia.
* Level V1 - from the expansion into the North (the Ancient Naumilā-Maidikairi civilization) and contacts with the cultural spaces of Brono, Skyrdagor, and the Kalurilut, dating from around 3E 200 until about 3E 700-750. These words constitute about 4% of the vocabulary.
* Level V2 - words taken from explorations and colonizations all around the planet, starting from mid-Third Era until around 3E 850 (the Third Era finished in 3E 902). Many words were taken on the spot, but some were also borrowed through Kalurilut - most notably the names used today for many Western nations, which are descriptive names in the Kalurilut language. For example the Laceyiami word for ''Ceria ''is ''Inūkutlāk'', from Kalurilut ''inuukutalaaq ''"Empire of the West"; in Kalurilut itself these names are obsolete, mostly replaced by phonetic borrowings, like ''iSiir ''in the case of ''Ceria''. Despite their huge geographical spread, level V2 words only amount to about 2% of the total vocabulary.
* Level T - made of borrowings, mostly from Western languages, of the Fourth Era, that is those borrowed at the current time (the current year is 4E 133). They also include words borrowed from the indigenous languages of the Skūlgatnir islands and the so-called Limits of Védren, now-Chlegdarim islands whose colonization only started less than two centuries ago, in 3E 878. Level T amounts to less than 1% of words.
 
=== Influence on other languages ===
Laceyiam has, due to the Chlegdarims' influence on culture, religion, and politics, had a large influence on other languages. The ones that had the most influence are probably ''Kambøʔu'' - a Mid-Oceanic language spoken in the Kambøʔu islands, a chain off the northern end of Tāhiańśīma, which is a diocese of Laltīmāhia - or the dialect of ''Bazá'' spoken in Gūtambāśi diocese as, being both spoken in parts of Laltīmāhia, are in a state of diglossia with Laceyiam itself like other vernaculars of Laltīmāhia do. ''Mǎng Tì'', spoken in Mǎng Tì pọk, an extremely sparsely populated country on the eastern third of Tāhiańśīma, is also influenced by Laceyiam as they are both official languages in the country (actually, despite being de jure independent, <span>Mǎng Tì pọk is sometimes considered in the West as a puppet state of Lalt</span>īmāhia). These are, however, all languages with a limited number of speakers, or minority languages.
 
Among major languages, those that definitely had the largest Laceyiami influence are ''Kalurilut ''and both standardized dialects of ''Brono-Fathanic'' (''Bronic ''and ''Fathanic''), which are the languages of peoples that are of overwhelming Yūnialtei religious majority and thus have close relationships with Laltīmāhia (Brono also shares with Laltīmāhia about 1300 km of border along the 33rd parallel north); many languages of the ''Dabuke'' family and other local languages of Western Isungatsuaq all have been influenced by Laceyiam, though, due to Western colonization, either Cerian or Nordulic is the lingua franca in those areas. Skyrdagor in Northwestern Isungatsuaq also had some Laceyiam influence, though not very extensive; anyway as Skyrdagor countries are politically aligned with the Eastern Bloc they share modern international terminology mostly with Laceyiam (and languages such as Kalurilut and Brono-Fathanic) rather than with Evandorian languages such as Cerian, Nivarese, or Nordulic. Western languages have mostly borrowed from Laceyiam during the contact between those cultures in the (Western) early Modern Age, when Westerners discovered lots of features from the tropical and equatorial areas of Calémere - almost all located inside the Laceyiam-speaking world. Today, however, there is reciprocal cultural knowledge and, consequently, language contact between them, as shown by the ''level T ''of Laceyiami etymology as in the classification above.<br>
International words of Laceyiam origin include ''lunai'' (> e.g. Cerian ''nunái'', Skyrdagor ''nunaj'', Spocian ''ngounàï'') "tea", ''(irūḍa)ṭūyam'' (> Cer. ''túian'', Skyr. ''irudtrujam'', Spoc. ''touin'') "internet", or ''lalāruṇa'' (> Cer. ''nonáruna'', Skyr. ''nanarun'', Spoc. ''ngengaroun'') (a large ground lizard of Southern Isungatsuaq, used as a mount by the Chlegdarims (unlike the larger ''dāhiða'', or ground dragon)).
 
=== Topics ===
==== Family - Leliėmita ====
Laceyiam has a particular kinship terminology system. Starting from the immediate relatives, the Ego's parents - '''maihāyana''', pl. ''maihāyanai'' (literally "having a daughter", but the term is nowadays used even if they don't have daughters) - are the '''miyū''' (mother) and the '''tyt''' (father). The word for "daughter" is '''maiha''' and the one for "son" is '''paljāram'''. Siblings - collectively called '''dėdum''', pl. ''dėdumai'' - have different terms depending on three factors: not just their own gender, but also the one of the person they're being referred to as siblings, and, if they're of the same gender, relative age. Thus, from a female's perspective, her older sister will be a '''buneya''', her younger sister will be a '''ḍalieh''', and her brother will be a '''yaupam''' no matter his age. Similarly, from a male's perspective, his older brother will be a '''prauḍhām'''; his younger brother a '''vāyeṣa''' and his sister a '''ńältah'''.
 
It should be however noted that these terms may have some broader meanings. In the case a female has both a younger and an older sister, she may refer to both of them as "my sisters" using ''liliā ńältahiai''; similarly a male with both a younger and an older brother would use ''liliā yaupamai'' for "my brothers". Also, the terms dependent on relative age may be used for the self if they're the oldest or the youngest in a family, as in a female referring to herself as the ''buneya'', implying she's the oldest among her siblings (or, actually, just among the sisters - there's no way to disambiguate these meanings without further clues), or as the ''ḍalieh'' if she's the youngest one - a male would do the exact same thing referring to himself as either the ''prauḍhām'' or the ''vāyeṣa''.
 
Uncles, aunts, and cousins are where Laceyiam terminology becomes unique. Uncles, so brothers of either parent, are all called '''ølkran'''; the wife of an ''ølkran'' is an '''ølikė''' and their children, no matter their gender, are '''dītvar''' (pl. ''dītvarai''). As for females, an aunt who is the sister of the father is a '''hīmaya'''; her husband will be called '''hīmuyau''', and their children will all be called '''īlaram''' (pl. ''īlaraṃsai''). An aunt who is the mother's sister, however, is a '''hailāti''', her husband is a '''hailātimun''' and their children are called by the Ego with the terms for siblings but prefixed with ''nėma-'' following the same logic used for siblings. From a female's perspective all of her cousins, children of any of her mother's sisters, will thus be collectively called '''nėmadėdum'''; a female ''nėma''-cousin older than her will be her '''nėmabuneya'''; one younger than her a '''nėmaḍalieh''', and any male ''nėma''-cousin a '''nėmayaupam'''; from a male's perspective any male ''nėma''-cousin older than him will be his '''nėmaprauḍhām''', one younger than him a '''nėmavāyeṣa''' and any female ''nėma''-cousin will be his '''nėmańältah'''.
 
== Texts ==
 
=== Camīdhemānat ===
The '''Camīdhemānat''' (''that [which comes] from the great voice'') is the most important epic of Chlegdarim literature, and the longest text ever written in the Laceyiam language. It is a collection of folk mythological tales — most of them probably originally of Nanaklāri peoples, but some of pure Chlegdarim (pre-arrival on Isungatsuaq) origin — collected and written down in Classical Laceyiam during the Second Era.
Even if surely not the "purest" source on how was the multicultural society of pre-Yūnialtei Leitāvaja (as many passages seem to be Inquisitorial comments or edits), there is no other text detailing so many aspects of how the Nanaklāris lived and merged with the Chlegdarims, including the religious pantheon whose importance fell with the Yūnialtia.
 
The language used in the ''Camīdhemānat'' is also peculiar, as it is mostly Classical Laceyiam, but including lots of Nanaklāri terms; as for the themes and histories, they are peculiar for telling of a long gone age where the world was, however, much more technologically advanced: there are references to "metal people" called ''bhūvātam'' (the term entered colloquial Laceyiam two millennia later as the word for "robot, droid") powered by a mysterious and powerful energy (the ''ṭäyńeha'') visible to the naked eye, controlled in a giant metal machine inside a mountain and protected by "energy brains"; some of these "metal people" - the ''jāmāvyaṭa'' - were even built in such a way that they were actually "metal birds" (or aircrafts) fighting in the sky.
 
Almost no place mentioned in the ''Camīdhemānat'' is real, even though all of the histories happen either in the jungle (those later identified as Nanaklāri stories) or on islands (those identified as Chlegdarim stories). The only real place that can be almost surely identified is mount ''Jaṃsstīren'' (the highest mountain of southern Isungatsuaq, almost on the border between Yomadhvāya and Leitāvaja dioceses), as it is the only mountain in the forest which is so tall it has snow on its peak. Obviously, in the text the modern name (which is from the Dzams-bltyod language) is not used, but it is called in many different ways like "white peak/head" (''pāṇḍęe klīṣa''), "sky rock" (''ilėnibausa''), "rock/mountain of the ''ṭäyńeha''" (''ṭäyńehi bausa/nahia'') or with undeciphered Nanaklāri names (''ńämbąndaum, teyappaum, hayāńama'', and ''käläʔikūm''). Some placenames found in the text were however later given to places later discovered by the Chlegdarims — most notably the ''Lāmiejāya'' river, but also ''Paṃdelūna'' island and the land of ''Nėniyūkāt''.
 
The following text is the very beginning of the epic — the first two stanzas provide a background (which is later expanded in order to connect and introduce many tales): a child — symbolically referred to with the very first word of the text as ''dømachumeitėniah'', meaning "who is eager to know" — is with her maternal aunt in the family's ''lalārunkita'' (the stable for ''lalāruṇai'', the giant lizards used as mounts by the Chlegdarims) and "sacredly" asks her about the "soul of existence" (''lelinatmā'', also a recurrent term in the ''Yūnialtia''). Her aunt then starts to tell her about the "long gone days and people".
 
<big>dømachumeitėniah samin nanā<br />
hīmayau tamiā iha chlairamyn<br />
lelinatmā cā mei nisėtrace ।।


''milke'', in the present, uses ''milk-'' in the irregular first person ''milkū'' and ''milėk-'' anywhere else. The past of ''yeihake'' can nowadays also be formed irregularly, with e.g. ''yeihat'' (it was read) instead of ''tāśehar''.
indā lalāruṇeha muirytin<br />
høyśiyet keljā sama hīmayass<br />
gaṇḍhūvyah avyāṣai leliė ta pa ।।
</big>


The past forms of ''hvuipake, khabeke, maldiake, peithake, välieke, vīṇyake, yeihake'', and ''þørðe'' use the present endings and not the past ones — similarly, the imperfect of ''śńėgake'' uses the past endings instead of the imperfect ones.
<small>(Translation:
That child eager to know<br />
To her aunt, sacredly,<br />
asks about the true soul of existence.


==== The verb "to be" (haiske) ====
And in that moment the ''lalāruṇa'' cries<br />
The verb "to be" in Laceyiam is ''haiske'', and it is highly irregular because of ablaut and suppletion. Most of its forms derive from PCT *gə₂js- or some of its derivations, but the future tense is from *ba₁ɣməp- (to become). This table includes all of its indicative mood forms, plus the imperative: 
So the aunt quickly starts to tell<br />
{| class="article-table"
about the long flown times and people.)</small>
!
!Present
!Past
!Imperfect
!Future
!Pluperfect
!Imperative
|-
|1SG
|jū
|høysu
|haitsumisu
|bąmby
|jaliauśim
|hiśvāṣa
|-
|2SG
|jīð
|hės
|haitsumið
|bąmmið
|jaliauśið
|hąi
|-
|3SG
|jar
|hėt
|haitsumįt
|bąmbir
|jaliauśi
|hās
|-
|1PL
|jńām
|jeiśi
|haitsumīsė
|bąmbiyām
|jaliaukṣi
|hiṣraṭhā
|-
|2PL
|jńāð
|jeiki
|haitsumik
|bąmbikām
|jaliauseki
|haisę
|-
|3PL
|jhis
|jeithe
|haitsumīdė
|bąmbithās
|jaliauṣṭhe
|haiṣṭhi
|}
Note that the imperfect and pluperfect are actually regularly formed with the normal terminations and the stems ''haits- ''and ''jalʲ-'' respectively. In spoken Laceyiam, the past forms (''høysu, hės...'') are increasingly often used in place of the imperfect ones (''haitsumisu, haitsumið...'').


''haiske ''is usually defined as an exterior-only verb, but actually there is a single interior 3rd person singular form which is used in the existential construction. This form always needs the pronoun ''tami ''and an accusative argument. The forms are '''tami jąu''' (present), '''tami hiṣąu '''(past), '''tami haitsumęn '''(imperfect), '''tami bąmbstąu '''(future), and '''tami jaliauśian '''(pluperfect). An example construction is ''tami ėmīlau jąu ''"there is a tiger", with ''ėmīla ''"tiger" in the accusative case. Note that neither the verb nor the pronoun vary for number, thus "there are tigers" is ''tami ėmīlarau jąu.''
=== Schleicher's fable (mailė yaṣakui ta) ===


The verb ''tadhaiske'' (to treat someone, to behave with someone) is a compound of ''haiske'', but it can be conjugated in two different ways:
<big>yaṣakui cā : ńulkęe cūllau mäheśeniaśe lass : jūdhęe vīlyamarau prikṣeluktheniah lass ta : kehiaryna ńeirau luktheniaśe lass ta jāvsku udvīs mailėss meitithė ।।<br />
* as a compound verb, with ''tad-'' plus all forms of ''haiske'', thus indicative present ''tańjū, tańjīð, tańjar...'', indicative past ''tadhøysu, tadhės, tadhėt...'' and so on.
"yaṣakurśepālveniah ńeirau meitamanāh [liliā] läka lilįse kṣāṇąu" tīta mailė yaṣakurið śńėgace ।।<br />
* as a regular verb, with root ''tad-hais-'', and thus with indicative present ''tadhaisu, tadhaiśvið, tadhaisur...'', indicative past ''tadhaisum, tadhaisuð, tadhaisut...''. Anyway, even in this case, in other voices the conjugation of ''haiske'' is the one commonly used, like agent-trigger voice, indicative present ''tajejū, tajejīð, tajejar...'' (morphemically ''tad-śe-jū...''), benefactive-trigger ''tatkäjū, tatkäjīð, tatkäjar...'' (''tad-käh-jū...'') and so on.
"mailė niūką : ńeirāss : ga vaiṣāyass iha : lārit nali mailjāvskandra īlāmięe jūlė paiktairanäss tami jihā dähin jāvsku udvīs mailė jar : tum meitamanāh iha läkai chlęśā kṣāṇadhį" tīta yaṣakui śńėgithėśe ।।<br />
tum tėnakaitā hiyanað mailė ṣārvatālgat ।।</big>


[[Category:A priori]]
[[Category:A priori]]
[[Category:Artlangs]]
[[Category:Artlangs]]
[[Category:Conlangs]]
[[Category:Languages]]
8,514

edits