5,464
edits
Nankôre: Difference between revisions
m
→The Nominal Hierarchy
m (→Orthography) |
|||
| Line 232: | Line 232: | ||
Where a given NP falls within the animacy hierarchy must be memorized in order to use the verbal inverse prefix ''tā-/ta-'' correctly (see section on [[Nankôre#Verbs|Verbs]] for additional details regarding inverse marking). | Where a given NP falls within the animacy hierarchy must be memorized in order to use the verbal inverse prefix ''tā-/ta-'' correctly (see section on [[Nankôre#Verbs|Verbs]] for additional details regarding inverse marking). | ||
The Nankôre nominal hierarchy has been traditionally classified along two axes, the first marking the noun class, and the second marking levels of hierarchy within a given class. Animacy along classes decrease as one traverses from Supernatural/Phenomonological onwards towards the Ephemeral. Animacy decreases as one goes down the Level axis. The following table illustrates the animacy relations between the noun hierarchies, although in reality, animacy is more complex than the table would suggest, as discourse and other contextual elements may influence a native speaker's expression of the hierarchy in a given utterance. | The Nankôre nominal hierarchy has been traditionally classified along two axes, the first marking the noun class, and the second marking levels of hierarchy within a given class. Animacy along classes decrease as one traverses from Supernatural/Phenomonological onwards towards the Ephemeral. Animacy decreases as one goes down the Level axis. The following table illustrates the animacy relations between the noun hierarchies, although in reality, '''animacy is more complex than the table would suggest''', as discourse and other contextual elements may influence a native speaker's expression of the hierarchy in a given utterance. | ||