Tarkandamonian: Difference between revisions

m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 175: Line 175:
<!--    Nouns -->
<!--    Nouns -->
=== Nouns ===
=== Nouns ===
<!--
Noun types:
Poereim /'pojim/ "Open" nouns - roots ending in a vowel
Gandrom "Closed" nouns
Strong-N Nouns: roots with final -n in all conjugations
Weak-N Nouns: roots where -n surfaces in some conjugations
-->
==== Gender ====
==== Gender ====
Modern Tarkandamonian does not distinguish gender, although a masculine-feminine distinction existed up until the 15th century.  Masculine nouns were marked with the suffix -e-, whilst feminine nouns were marked with the suffix -i.  Traces of the old gender system in  Modern Tarkandamonian survive as irregularities in the number system, particularly in words indicating body parts and a few high-frequency or culturally significant words, where the original ''-I'' feminine marker surfaces (c.f. ''karan -> karandokon'' /'kangon/ “hammers”, vs. ''baralt -> baraldokin'' /'baʒgin/ “ears”).
Modern Tarkandamonian does not distinguish gender, although a masculine-feminine distinction existed up until the 15th century.  Masculine nouns were marked with the suffix -e-, whilst feminine nouns were marked with the suffix -i.  Traces of the old gender system in  Modern Tarkandamonian survive as irregularities in the number system, particularly in words indicating body parts and a few high-frequency or culturally significant words, where the original ''-I'' feminine marker surfaces (c.f. ''karan -> karandokon'' /'kangon/ “hammers”, vs. ''baralt -> baraldokin'' /'baʒgin/ “ears”).
Line 181: Line 192:


==== Case ====
==== Case ====
Tarkandamonian has only two formal cases, a direct case and a construct case.  The direct case represents both the subject and the object, differentiated by word order.  The construct case marks the dependent noun argument in possessive phrases.
Tarkandamonian has only two formal cases, a direct case and a construct case.  The direct case represents both the subject and the object, differentiated by word order.  The construct case marks the dependent noun argument in possessive phrases, and serve as the dependents of prepositions.


{| class="bluetable"
{| class="bluetable"
Line 195: Line 206:
| -dokon
| -dokon
|
|
*bori - bori-dokon /'boʒgon/
*bori - bori<u>dokon</u> /'boʒgon/
*zugum /'d͡ʒɛm/ - zegum-dokon /'d͡ʒɛnkon/
*zugum /'d͡ʒɛm/ - zegum<u>dokon</u> /'d͡ʒɛnkon/
*ravarn /ɾa'van/ - ravarn-dokon /ɾa'vankon/
*ravarn /ɾa'van/ - ravarn<u>dokon</u> /ɾa'vankon/
|  
|  
*temple - temples
*temple - temples
Line 207: Line 218:
| -don
| -don
|  
|  
*bori-na /boɾn/ - bori-don /'boʒon/
*bori<u>na</u> /boɾn/ - bori<u>don</u> /'boʒon/
*zuge-na /d͡ʒɛn/ - zuge-don /'d͡ʒɛndon/
*zuge<u>na</u> /d͡ʒɛn/ - zuge<u>don</u> /'d͡ʒɛndon/
*ravarn-a /ɾa'vana/ - ravarn-don /ɾa'vandon/
*ravarn<u>a</u> /ɾa'vana/ - ravarn<u>don</u> /ɾa'vandon/
|
|
* of/belonging to the temple - of/belonging to the temples
* of/belonging to the temple - of/belonging to the temples
5,464

edits