Template:Nomination/fork1: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<big>Welcome everyone, to a new language featuring on Linguifex!</big>
<big>Welcome everyone, to a new language featuring on Linguifex!</big>


We thank {{{lastauthor|}}} and {{{lastlang|}}} language for being a great and inviting conlang for our front page!
We thank {{{lastauthor|}}} and the {{{lastlang|}}} language for being a great and inviting conlang for our front page!


Voting for a new featured conlang will be open for {{{duration|}}} days. Votes will be accepted '''until {{{deadline|}}}'''.
Votes will be accepted '''until {{{deadline|}}}'''.
 
=====Method=====
As a result of the low amount of traffic and our close-knit hoogalymooly, we have created a more streamlined process of voting.
 
Of course, like before, there are some rules that must be heeded:
*A user may not nominate more than one conlang during the same nomination period.
*The language ought to have the featured banner translated or be in a stage where it can be done by anyone, please display this in your conlang's article. The language author may provide a translation at a later date on discretion of the administratores.
*Winners may be re-nominated once 5 months have passed.
 
=====Nomination rules=====
*A user may not nominate more than one conlang during the same nomination period.
*The language must have the featured banner translated or be in a stage where it can be done by anyone, please display this in your conlang's article.
*When you nominate a conlang, please state its purpose in the description, if known.
*Winning conlangs may be re-nominated once 3 months have passed.


==Procedure==
There are some rules that must be heeded:
*A user may not vote for more than one conlang during the same nomination period.
*The language ought to have the featured banner translated or be in a stage where it can be done by anyone. The language author may provide a translation at a later date on discretion of the administratores.
*Winners may be re-nominated once six (6) months have passed.
*No self voting. These will be discarded.
*No self voting. These will be discarded.
*Unregistered users may, naturally, not vote.
*Unregistered users may, naturally, not vote.
Line 26: Line 17:


When voting for a featured language, you may only vote once. It is appropriate but not required to write a short motivational phrase when casting your vote. You may change or remove your vote before the voting ends.
When voting for a featured language, you may only vote once. It is appropriate but not required to write a short motivational phrase when casting your vote. You may change or remove your vote before the voting ends.
 
===Banner===
======Banner======
"This language was once featured.
"This language was once featured.
Thanks to its level of quality, plausibility and usage capabilities, it has been voted as featured."
Thanks to its level of quality, plausibility and usage capabilities, it has been voted as featured."
=====Criteria=====
===Criteria===
You may vote for whatever reason, however we encourage you to keep the following criteria in mind:
You may vote for whatever reason, however we encourage you to keep the following criteria in mind beyond aesthetics:
*'''Intention''' - How well the language serves its intention, if any.
*'''Intention''' - How well the language serves its intention, if any.
*'''Naturalism''' - Depends on intention, a language may be found very naturalistic or not.
*'''Naturalism''' - Depends on intention, a language may be found very naturalistic or not.
Line 37: Line 27:
*'''Usability''' - Is the language usable, functional or difficult to use? How are the texts glossed? How many texts/words are there?  
*'''Usability''' - Is the language usable, functional or difficult to use? How are the texts glossed? How many texts/words are there?  
*'''Completeness''' - ''"Perfection is many small details done well"'' - [[w:Marco Pierre White|Marco Pierre White]] - Does the language seem complete to you? Is it lacking in any aspect?
*'''Completeness''' - ''"Perfection is many small details done well"'' - [[w:Marco Pierre White|Marco Pierre White]] - Does the language seem complete to you? Is it lacking in any aspect?
====Candidates====
{| {{style|center}}
!Nominee
!Author
!Translation banner
|-
!
!
| text-align="center"| ''{{{top1|}}}''<br/>''{{{bottom1|}}} ''
|-
!
!
| text-align="center"| ''{{{top2|}}}''<br/>''{{{bottom2|}}} ''
|-
!
!
| text-align="center"| ''{{{top3|}}}''<br/>''{{{bottom3|}}} ''
|-
!
!
| text-align="center"| ''{{{top4|}}}''<br/>''{{{bottom4|}}} ''
|}
138,726

edits