User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic: Difference between revisions

User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic (view source)

135 bytes added , 29 July 2022

m

no edit summary

138,726

edits

@@ Line 235: / Line 235: @@
 *''bur'' 'to undergo' (from *3abar), used as a passive auxilliary
-The ''independent'' forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. They have become more similar to each other due to analogy. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' requires the ''dependent'' form, listed in a separate table from the independent forms.
+Conservative dialects of Knench maintain a distinction between independent and dependent forms for finite verbs, like Old Irish. The independent forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. They have become more similar to each other due to analogy. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' 'not' or ''mur'' 'if' requires the dependent form, listed in a separate table from the independent forms.
 Even verbs with finite forms are defective verbs, since finite forms are always perfective (except forms of ''juð''). To express the imperfective with these verbs, you still have to use the copula + bə + VN construction. The negator ''lu'' only negates finite verbs.
@@ Line 325: / Line 325: @@
 !rowspan=2| ''buð''
 ! past pfv.
-| ''upowð i''
+| ''powð i''
-| ''upows tr''
+| ''pows tr''
-| ''upows ti''
+| ''pows ti''
-| ''upow u''
+| ''pow u''
-| ''upól oj''
+| ''pól oj''
-| ''upown nu''
+| ''pown nu''
-| ''upowðu tim''
+| ''powðu tim''
-| ''upu'm''
+| ''pu'm''
 |-
 ! future pfv.