51
edits
User talk:Chrysophylax: Difference between revisions
→Waahlis and Abuse of [Authority] (previously "Power")
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) (→Visite) |
Herr Dunkel (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 466: | Line 466: | ||
This conversation is degrading. I will let Chrysophylax be the judge, as you intended. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 14:42, 14 January 2013 (CET) | This conversation is degrading. I will let Chrysophylax be the judge, as you intended. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 14:42, 14 January 2013 (CET) | ||
Further arguments for my side: Waahlis' retroactive application of law is not condoned by neither the German Federal Constitution (Artikel 103, Teil 2), nor the Swedish Constitution (Kapitel 2, 10§), while the British legal structure does indeed allow such retroactive application of law but only by express will of the Parliament.<br/>Here it must be noted taht it isn't the individual punished but the act "repaired" to a state condoned by the current law while the previous state is in violation of said law except that it was condoned by the laws that applied at the time of creation of that state.<br/>23:48, 14 January 2013 (CET) [[User_talk:Herr Dunkel|'''<span style="color:black;">Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf</span>''']] | |||
== Demonstration == | == Demonstration == | ||