Vornian: Difference between revisions

5 bytes removed ,  16 May 2017
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 127: Line 127:


===Verbs===
===Verbs===
The Bhadhagha verbal system is very different from Tíogall, and much closer to [[Äivy]].
The Bhadhagha verbal system is very different from Tíogall, and much closer to [[Äivö]].


For one thing, Bhadhagha analogized the analytic forms of verbs to all persons, and fused the personal pronoun with the verb:
For one thing, Bhadhagha analogized the analytic forms of verbs to all persons, and fused the personal pronoun with the verb:
Line 143: Line 143:
</poem>
</poem>


The past tense is marked by a séimhiú on the verb as in Irish, except that the suffixes are the same as in the present tense. This comes from a construction that translates to "it was the case that ...", which also survives in [Coetel gib]. Even non-lenitable consonants get aspirated in casual Bhadhagha, though in the written language a particle is used when the first consonant isn't lenitable.
The past tense is marked by a séimhiú on the verb as in Irish, except that the suffixes are the same as in the present tense. This comes from a construction that translates to "it was the case that ...", which also survives in Äivö. Even non-lenitable consonants get aspirated in casual Bhadhagha, though in the written language a particle is used when the first consonant isn't lenitable.


The future tense however has a special set of suffixes, derived from the Old Tíogall future tense:
The future tense however has a special set of suffixes, derived from the Old Tíogall future tense:
138,726

edits