7,723
edits
Vornian: Difference between revisions
→Morphology
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
</poem> | </poem> | ||
The past tense is marked by a séimhiú on the verb as in Irish, except that the suffixes are the same as in the present tense. This comes from a construction that translates to "it was the case that ...", which also survives in [Coetel gib]. | The past tense is marked by a séimhiú on the verb as in Irish, except that the suffixes are the same as in the present tense. This comes from a construction that translates to "it was the case that ...", which also survives in [Coetel gib]. Even non-lenitable consonants get aspirated in casual Bhadhagha, though in the written language a particle is used when the first consonant isn't lenitable. | ||
The future tense however has a special set of suffixes, derived from the Old Tíogall future tense: | The future tense however has a special set of suffixes, derived from the Old Tíogall future tense: | ||