2,553
edits
Middle Semitic/Morphophonology: Difference between revisions
m
→Pronouns
No edit summary |
m (→Pronouns) |
||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 2 | ! 2 | ||
| -kâ <sub>m</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܟܐ}}}} -kî <sub>f</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܟܝ}}}} || -kûm {{Sy|{{C|- | | -kâ <sub>m</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܟܐ}}}} -kî <sub>f</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܟܝ}}}} || -kûm {{Sy|{{C|-ܟܡ}}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! 3 | ! 3 | ||
| -hû <sub>m</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܗܘ}}}} -hâ <sub>f</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܗܐ}}}} || -hûm {{Sy|{{C|- | | -hû <sub>m</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܗܘ}}}} -hâ <sub>f</sub> {{Sy|{{C|-ܗܐ}}}} || -hûm {{Sy|{{C|-ܗܡ}}}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:auto;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width:auto;" | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
The pronouns may seem strange for Indo-Europeans, but are utterly normal for Semitic speakers. There are independent forms which can only serve as the subject of a clause. Another set of forms serves two functions: they attach to verbs to mark direct objects, or they attach to nouns to indicate genitival possession. | The pronouns may seem strange for Indo-Europeans, but are utterly normal for Semitic speakers. There are independent forms which can only serve as the subject of a clause. Another set of forms serves two functions: they attach to verbs to mark direct objects, or they attach to nouns to indicate genitival possession. | ||
== Verbs == | == Verbs == | ||