Ciètian: Difference between revisions

15 bytes added ,  23 January 2018
m
Line 300: Line 300:
Anvyrese verbs have two tenses (nonpast and past) and two aspects (imperfective and perfective). The imperfective-perfective distinction is characterized by allomorphy inherited from Old Eevo. (The perfective form derives from adding a prefix, which causes the verb to take the conjunct form. cf. Slavic languages.) Pronominal suffixes have been lost and tense is marked by prefixes.
Anvyrese verbs have two tenses (nonpast and past) and two aspects (imperfective and perfective). The imperfective-perfective distinction is characterized by allomorphy inherited from Old Eevo. (The perfective form derives from adding a prefix, which causes the verb to take the conjunct form. cf. Slavic languages.) Pronominal suffixes have been lost and tense is marked by prefixes.


idk, this might be better for Tumacan or perhaps even !Zoom. Here it's too stereotypically Slavic.
idk, this might be better for Tumacan or perhaps even some Zoomic language. Here it's too stereotypically Slavic.


[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
138,759

edits