Talk:Bearlandic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dē Graut Bʉr (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Greatbuddha (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The sample looks nice! I can sort-of piece together the grammar through my knowledge of German, Icelandic, and Danish. [[User:Darthme|Darthme]] ([[User talk:Darthme|talk]]) 16:20, 18 April 2013 (CEST)Darthme | The sample looks nice! I can sort-of piece together the grammar through my knowledge of German, Icelandic, and Danish. [[User:Darthme|Darthme]] ([[User talk:Darthme|talk]]) 16:20, 18 April 2013 (CEST)Darthme | ||
:Thank you! The language is mostly based on Dutch, so with knowledge of Dutch or German, you should be able to understand some of it. --[[User:Dē Graut Bʉr|Dē Graut Bʉr]] ([[User talk:Dē Graut Bʉr|talk]]) 17:23, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | :Thank you! The language is mostly based on Dutch, so with knowledge of Dutch or German, you should be able to understand some of it. --[[User:Dē Graut Bʉr|Dē Graut Bʉr]] ([[User talk:Dē Graut Bʉr|talk]]) 17:23, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
Why is the language put in the "berilonic" language family instead of the Germanic one. I would get it if bearlandic didn't use germanic vocabulary, only grammar, but it uses both. | |||
[[User:Greatbuddha|Greatbuddha]] ([[User talk:Greatbuddha|talk]]) 21:44, 18 January 2014 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 20:44, 18 January 2014
The sample looks nice! I can sort-of piece together the grammar through my knowledge of German, Icelandic, and Danish. Darthme (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2013 (CEST)Darthme
- Thank you! The language is mostly based on Dutch, so with knowledge of Dutch or German, you should be able to understand some of it. --Dē Graut Bʉr (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
Why is the language put in the "berilonic" language family instead of the Germanic one. I would get it if bearlandic didn't use germanic vocabulary, only grammar, but it uses both. Greatbuddha (talk) 21:44, 18 January 2014 (CET)