User:Chrysophylax/Creating an Indo-European Conlang: Difference between revisions

m
Line 47: Line 47:
Proto-Indo-European is commonly accepted to have had the following vowel and consonant inventory
Proto-Indo-European is commonly accepted to have had the following vowel and consonant inventory


{| class="greentable"
|+ '''Proto-Indo-European consonants'''
|-
!rowspan="2" colspan="2"|
!rowspan="2"|[[wiki:labial consonant|Labial]]
!rowspan="2"|[[wiki:coronal consonant|Coronal]]
!colspan="3"|[[wiki:dorsal consonant|Dorsal]]
!rowspan="2"|[[wiki:Laryngeal theory|Laryngeal]]
|-
!<small>palatal</small>
!<small>plain</small>
!<small>labial</small>
|-
!colspan="2"|[[wiki:Nasal stop|Nasal]]
| align=center | *{{PIE|m}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|n}}
|
|
|
|
|-
!rowspan="3"|[[wiki:Plosive consonant|Plosive]] ||<small>
[[wiki:Voiceless consonant|voiceless]]</small>
| align=center | *{{PIE|p}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|t}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|ḱ}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|k}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|kʷ}}
| &nbsp;
|-
!<small>[[wiki:Voiced consonant|voiced]]</small>
| align=center | (*{{PIE|b}})
| align=center | *{{PIE|d}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|ǵ}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|g}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|gʷ}}
| &nbsp;
|-
!<small>[[wiki:aspiration (phonetics)|aspirated]]</small>
| align=center | *{{PIE|bʰ}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|dʰ}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|ǵʰ}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|gʰ}}
| align=center | *{{PIE|gʷʰ}}
| &nbsp;
|-
!colspan="2"|[[wiki:fricative consonant|Fricative]]
|
| align=center | *{{PIE|s}}
|
|
|
| align=center | {{PIE|*h₁, *h₂, *h₃}}
|-
!colspan="2"|[[wiki:liquid consonant|Liquid]]
|
| align=center | {{PIE|*r, *l}}
|
|
|
|
|-
!colspan="2"|[[wiki:Approximant|Approximant]]
|
|
| align=center | *{{PIE|y}} {{IPA|[j]}}
|
| align=center | *{{PIE|w}}
|
|}
You have many options available in the treatment of the vowels and consonants; already in Proto-Indo-European we discern a trend towards either engaging in af/fricativisation or not of the 'palatovelars'. This important isogloss divides Indo-European into two broad swaths: Centum and Satem. Cf. with the reconstructed PIE [[wikt:Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/ḱm̥tóm#Proto-Indo-European|*(d)ḱm̥tóm]].
You have many options available in the treatment of the vowels and consonants; already in Proto-Indo-European we discern a trend towards either engaging in af/fricativisation or not of the 'palatovelars'. This important isogloss divides Indo-European into two broad swaths: Centum and Satem. Cf. with the reconstructed PIE [[wikt:Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/ḱm̥tóm#Proto-Indo-European|*(d)ḱm̥tóm]].