Philosophical language: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Examples of famous philosophical languages of the latter include [[An Essay towards a Real Character|Wilkin's philosophical language]], Dalgarno's [[Lingua Philosophica]] and [[Characteristica universalis|Leibniz' Characteristica universalis]]. Examples taking a more philosophical approach include [[Ro]], [[Toki Pona]] and [[Láadan]].
Examples of famous philosophical languages of the latter include [[An Essay towards a Real Character|Wilkin's philosophical language]], Dalgarno's [[Lingua Philosophica]] and [[Characteristica universalis|Leibniz' Characteristica universalis]]. Examples taking a more philosophical approach include [[Ro]], [[Toki Pona]] and [[Láadan]].


The older philosophical languages follow this taxonomic principle; words are often constructed of one-character morphemes that are stacked together to form a definition of the term itself. An example from [[w:John Wilkins|John Wilkins]]' own [[w:An Essay towards a Real Character|Real Character]]:
The older philosophical languages follow this taxonomic principle; words are often constructed of one-character morphemes that are stacked together to form a definition of the term itself. An example from [[w:John Wilkins|John Wilkins]]' own [[An Essay towards a Real Character|Real Character]]:
:''For instance if (De) signifie Element, then (Deb) must signifie the first difference; which (according to the Tables) is Fire: and (Debα) will denote the first Species, which is Flame. (Det) will be the fifth difference under that Genus, which is, Appearing meteor; (Detα) the first Species, viz. Rainbow; (Deta) the second, viz. Halo.''
:''For instance if (De) signifie Element, then (Deb) must signifie the first difference; which (according to the Tables) is Fire: and (Debα) will denote the first Species, which is Flame. (Det) will be the fifth difference under that Genus, which is, Appearing meteor; (Detα) the first Species, viz. Rainbow; (Deta) the second, viz. Halo.''
This characteristic is reminiscent of real world [[w:polysynthetic languages|polysynthetic languages]], but taken to an extreme in what is termed "oligosynthesis". True oligosynthesis is only theoretical and regarded by some linguists as impractical for productive use by humans.
This characteristic is reminiscent of real world [[w:polysynthetic languages|polysynthetic languages]], but taken to an extreme in what is termed "oligosynthesis". True oligosynthesis is only theoretical and regarded by some linguists as impractical for productive use by humans.
forumadmin, Administrators
2,041

edits